Impact metrics are isolated. Protocols like Aave and Compound generate rich on-chain data on capital efficiency and user behavior, but this intelligence is locked within their own subgraphs and dashboards.
public-goods-funding-and-quadratic-voting
Blog
Why Impact Metrics Must Escape Their Data Silos
Public goods funding is crippled by fragmented impact data. This analysis argues for standardized, composable schemas to unlock cross-protocol utility and smarter capital allocation.
introduction
THE SILO PROBLEM
Introduction
Current impact metrics are trapped in isolated data vaults, rendering them useless for cross-protocol analysis and composable capital allocation.
Silos prevent composable capital. A VC cannot programmatically allocate funds based on a unified view of protocol health, forcing reliance on fragmented, manual reports from platforms like Dune Analytics and Flipside Crypto.
Data fragmentation creates systemic risk. Without a shared standard for measuring real economic impact, the ecosystem allocates billions based on flawed, siloed vanity metrics like Total Value Locked (TVL).
Evidence: The DeFi Llama TVL dashboard aggregates over 200 protocols but provides zero insight into capital velocity or user retention, the true drivers of sustainable growth.
key-insights
THE DATA FRAGMENTATION TRAP
Executive Summary
Current impact metrics are trapped in isolated silos, preventing composable analysis and crippling capital allocation.
01
The Oracle Problem for Impact
Impact data is sourced from non-auditable, centralized databases, creating a trust bottleneck. This mirrors DeFi's pre-oracle dilemma where off-chain data was a single point of failure.
- Trust Assumption: Reliance on a single entity's data integrity.
- Composability Gap: Silos prevent metrics from being programmatically verified or combined.
~100%
Off-Chain Reliance
0
On-Chain Proofs
02
The Capital Inefficiency Vortex
Without verifiable, on-chain metrics, impact capital faces massive due diligence overhead and cannot be deployed algorithmically. This creates a ~$1T+ annual funding gap for SDG-aligned projects.
- Due Diligence Cost: Manual verification consumes >30% of grant capital.
- Liquidity Lock-up: Capital is trapped in slow, opaque grant cycles instead of fluid, performance-based streams.
$1T+
Funding Gap
>30%
Overhead Cost
03
The Solution: Impact State Chains
Dedicated, verifiable data layers (like Celestia for data availability or EigenLayer for restaking security) must host impact attestations. This creates a canonical source of truth that DeFi, ReFi, and grant platforms can trustlessly query.
- Verifiable Footprint: Every ton of CO2 sequestered or gallon of clean water provided has an on-chain proof.
- Composable Capital: Enables automated, conditional funding via smart contracts (e.g., stream funds if >1000 trees are verified).
100%
On-Chain Verifiability
10x
Capital Velocity
thesis-statement
THE DATA SILO TRAP
The Core Thesis
Current impact metrics are trapped in isolated systems, preventing the composable analysis required for meaningful valuation.
Impact metrics are isolated. Protocols like Gitcoin Grants and Optimism's RetroPGF operate as closed data systems. Their contribution graphs, voter sentiment, and funding outcomes are not portable or queryable across ecosystems.
Silos create valuation noise. A developer's impact in Aave's governance is invisible to a Compound grants committee. This fragmentation makes it impossible to build a holistic reputation graph, forcing capital allocators to rely on incomplete signals.
Composability is the unlock. The value of an Ethereum address is its permissionless composability across Uniswap, Aave, and ENS. Impact data must achieve the same interoperability standard to be useful, moving from isolated databases to a shared data layer.
Evidence: Gitcoin Passport attempts to solve this by aggregating identity signals, but it remains a centralized aggregator, not a primitive for on-chain, verifiable impact graphs that protocols can permissionlessly query and build upon.
case-study
WHY IMPACT METRICS MUST ESCAPE THEIR DATA SILOS
The Silo Problem in Practice
Fragmented, non-comparable impact data prevents capital from flowing to the most effective projects, creating a market failure.
01
The Oracle Problem for Impact
Just as DeFi needs price oracles like Chainlink for financial truth, impact needs verified on-chain attestations. Without a shared source of truth, each protocol's impact claims are unverifiable and non-comparable.
- Key Benefit 1: Enables cross-protocol composability for impact-based DeFi (e.g., green bonds, carbon-backed loans).
- Key Benefit 2: Prevents double-counting and greenwashing via cryptographic verification.
0
Shared Sources
100%
Manual Verification
02
The Liquidity Fragmentation Trap
Impact tokens (e.g., carbon credits, RWA yield) are trapped in isolated pools, mirroring early DeFi's pre-Uniswap era. This creates ~50%+ price discrepancies and illiquid markets.
- Key Benefit 1: Aggregated liquidity enables efficient price discovery and deeper markets.
- Key Benefit 2: Reduces slippage for large-scale impact asset purchases by institutions.
$1B+
Fragmented TVL
50%+
Price Spread
03
The UniswapX for Impact
Current impact markets require manual OTC deals. An intent-based settlement layer, akin to UniswapX or CowSwap, could match buyers and sellers of impact off-chain and settle on-chain, minimizing MEV and maximizing fill rates.
- Key Benefit 1: Reduces transaction costs by ~30% via batch settlement and optimized routing.
- Key Benefit 2: Protects participants from front-running on volatile, opaque impact assets.
30%
Cost Reduction
~500ms
Intent Matching
04
The LayerZero for Credentials
Impact credentials (e.g., verifiable education, work history) are locked in walled gardens like Arbitrum or Polygon. A universal messaging layer, similar to LayerZero or Axelar, is needed for cross-chain attestation.
- Key Benefit 1: Enables portable identity and reputation across any chain or application.
- Key Benefit 2: Unlocks new use cases like cross-chain sybil resistance and composable social graphs.
10+
Isolated Chains
7 Days
Manual Bridge Time
IMPACT METRICS
The Cost of Fragmentation
Comparing the data isolation and interoperability of leading DeFi and blockchain analytics platforms.
| Metric / Capability | Chainalysis | Nansen | Dune Analytics | Chainscore |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Native Multi-Chain Data Ingestion | ||||
Cross-Chain Wallet Profiling | Manual stitching | EVM-only clusters | Query-based assembly | Unified identity graph |
Protocol Fee Revenue Attribution | On-chain tx only | EVM app-specific | Custom SQL required | Automatic, cross-L1/L2 |
Real-Time MEV Detection Latency |
| 4-6 hours | User-defined | < 2 seconds |
Institutional Risk Score Coverage | 30+ chains (siloed) | 10 EVM chains | Single-chain per dashboard | 50+ chains (unified) |
API Cost per 1M Calls (Est.) | $15,000 | $8,000 | $0 (query compute) | $5,000 |
Supports Intent-Based Flow Analysis |
deep-dive
THE DATA
The Path to Composable Impact
Impact metrics trapped in proprietary databases create a fragmented, unverifiable ecosystem that prevents capital from flowing efficiently to the most effective projects.
Impact metrics are isolated. Today's ESG and carbon credit data lives in centralized databases like Verra's registry or corporate ESG reports. This creates data silos that prevent cross-protocol verification and composability, mirroring the pre-DeFi state of isolated financial ledgers.
Composability unlocks capital efficiency. Just as Uniswap's composable liquidity pools created a flywheel for DeFi, standardized on-chain impact data will allow protocols like KlimaDAO and Toucan to build automated, trust-minimized markets for environmental assets. The liquidity network effect is the primary unlock.
The standard is the protocol. The winning framework will be the one that becomes the universal settlement layer for impact claims, similar to how ERC-20 became the standard for tokens. Projects must prioritize machine-readable attestations over PDF reports.
Evidence: The fragmented voluntary carbon market processes ~$2B annually. A composable, on-chain system capturing even 10% of this would immediately become the largest transparent impact finance primitive, dwarfing the initial TVL of most DeFi bluechips.
FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS
FAQ: The Builder's Perspective
Common questions about why impact metrics must escape their data silos.
Impact metrics are quantifiable data points that measure a protocol's real-world utility and adoption, like daily active wallets or total value secured. They matter because they move beyond speculative price data to show genuine usage, which is critical for informed governance, developer allocation, and sustainable valuation. Silos prevent a holistic view of ecosystem health.
takeaways
ACTIONABLE INSIGHTS
TL;DR: What This Means for Builders
Isolated impact data is a liability. Here's how to operationalize it.
01
The Problem: Silos Kill Composable Value
Your protocol's impact data is trapped in a private database. This prevents DeFi legos from building on your social proof and limits your protocol-owned liquidity. Without composability, you're leaving value on the table.
- Missed Integrations: No on-chain attestations means no trustless integration with Aave Grants or Compound Gauges.
- Inefficient Incentives: You can't auto-allocate rewards based on verifiable, cross-chain impact.
0%
Composability
~$50M+
POTENTIAL TVL LEAK
02
The Solution: On-Chain Attestation Graphs
Publish verifiable impact claims as EAS attestations or Hypercerts. This creates a portable, trust-minimized reputation layer that any smart contract can query.
- Unlock New Primitives: Enable retroactive funding models like Optimism's RPGF and developer DAO grants.
- Automate Trust: Let protocols like Across or LayerZero prioritize messages from verified, high-impact senders.
100%
Portable
<1s
Verification
03
The Execution: Build for the Aggregator
Design your metrics to be consumed by impact oracles like UMA or Chainlink. Your goal isn't to be the source of truth, but the most reliable source of data.
- Standardize Schemas: Adopt Impact Framework or Celo's cLabs metrics for interoperability.
- Monetize Data: Earn fees when your verified data is used in on-chain KYC or green bond smart contracts.
10x
Utility
New Revenue
Stream
ENQUIRY
Get In Touch
today.
Our experts will offer a free quote and a 30min call to discuss your project.
NDA Protected
Confidentiality24h Response
Time to ValueDirectly to Engineering Team
No Sales Fluff10+
Protocols Shipped
$20M+
TVL Overall