Speculative JPEGs are liabilities. Their value derives entirely from greater-fool demand, which evaporates during capital flight. Projects like Bored Ape Yacht Club rely on perpetual hype cycles, a model that fails when liquidity contracts.
nft-market-cycles-art-utility-and-culture
Blog
Why Utility-Driven NFTs Are the Only Assets That Survive Bear Markets
An analysis of NFT market cycles demonstrating that assets with embedded utility—access, rights, or yield—create persistent demand and price stability, while speculative art collections face inevitable decay.
introduction
THE SPECULATIVE PURGE
Introduction: The Great NFT Washout
Bear markets systematically destroy NFT collections lacking intrinsic utility, leaving only assets with verifiable on-chain function.
Utility provides a price floor. An NFT representing a perpetual license, a governance share in Uniswap v3, or access to a Render Network GPU has calculable value. This intrinsic utility creates a non-zero valuation independent of market sentiment.
On-chain revenue is the metric. The survivors generate verifiable cash flow. Look at ENS domains facilitating transactions or Art Blocks curators earning royalties from secondary sales. Their smart contracts are revenue-generating assets.
Evidence: During the 2022-2023 downturn, the floor price of purely speculative PFP collections collapsed by 90%+. In contrast, functional NFTs within ecosystems like Aavegotchi (DeFi staking) or Parallel (gaming assets) demonstrated significantly higher resilience and user retention.
key-trends
UTILITY IS THE ANTI-FUD
The Three Pillars of Persistent Demand
Speculative JPEGs die in bear markets. Only assets with embedded utility generate persistent demand, creating price floors and sustainable ecosystems.
01
The Problem: Speculation is a One-Way Street
PFP projects like Bored Apes rely on hype cycles. When sentiment turns, the floor price collapses because the asset has no utility beyond signaling status.
- Bear Market Reality: -90%+ floor price drawdowns are common.
- Zero Intrinsic Demand: No reason to buy except for hoped-for appreciation.
- Vicious Cycle: Price drop → community abandons project → utility never gets built.
-90%+
Floor Drawdown
0
Intrinsic Yield
02
The Solution: Protocol-Governed Access Rights
NFTs as keys to on-chain services create non-speculative demand. Think Uniswap v3 LP positions or Blur's bid pool shares.
- Recurring Revenue Capture: Fees from the underlying protocol accrue to the NFT holder.
- Demand Inelasticity: Users need the NFT to access yield or functionality, buying regardless of market sentiment.
- Valuation Model: Price correlates with cash flow, not Twitter hype.
Fee-Bearing
Revenue Model
Inelastic
Demand Driver
03
The Solution: Collateral & Financial Primitives
When an NFT generates yield or represents a real-world asset, it becomes bankable. Projects like Arcade.xyz and NFTfi enable this.
- Debt Markets: Utility NFTs can be collateralized for loans, creating a liquidity sink.
- Risk Assessment: Lenders can underwrite based on predictable cash flows, not volatile art appraisal.
- Capital Efficiency: Turns a static asset into productive capital, akin to Convex's vlCVX model.
Loan-to-Value
New Metric
Productive
Capital State
04
The Solution: Composable On-Chain Identity
An NFT representing verifiable credentials or reputation becomes a persistent Web3 resume. See Ethereum Attestation Service (EAS) or Gitcoin Passport.
- Sybil Resistance: Proven contribution history is valuable for airdrops, governance, and access.
- Portable Reputation: The asset gains value across multiple protocols (e.g., a MakerDAO credit score).
- Network Effects: The more it's used, the more valuable the attestations become—a true data moat.
Sybil-Resistant
Core Property
Composable
Value Accrual
DATA MATRIX
Bear Market Performance: Utility vs. Speculation
Comparative analysis of NFT asset classes based on their performance drivers and resilience during the 2022-2023 bear market.
| Core Metric / Feature | Utility-Driven NFTs (e.g., ENS, POAP, Art Blocks) | PFP Speculation (e.g., BAYC, CryptoPunks, 2021-22 projects) | Financialized NFTs (e.g., NFTfi, BendDAO collateral) |
|---|---|---|---|
Primary Price Driver | Underlying product/service usage | Perceived cultural status & hype cycles | Collateralization & loan-to-value ratios |
Floor Price Drawdown (2022 Peak to 2023 Trough) | -35% to -60% | -85% to -95% | -70% to -90% (plus liquidation cascades) |
Daily Active Wallets (YoY Change, 2022-23) | +15% to +40% | -75% to -90% | -50% to -70% |
Secondary Sales Volume Retention vs. Peak | 25% - 45% | < 5% | 10% - 20% |
Revenue Model | Protocol fees, renewal fees (ENS), creator royalties | One-time primary sale, decaying royalties | Interest from loans, liquidation penalties |
Bear Market Survival Mechanism | Recurring demand from integrated utility | Community cohesion & roadmap promises | Over-collateralization & liquidation thresholds |
Correlation to ETH Price | Low (0.2 - 0.4) | Very High (0.8 - 0.95) | High (0.6 - 0.8) |
Example of Market Failure | None. Utility persists. | Otherside metaverse land (-97%), numerous 'dead' projects | BendDAO's near-insolvency crisis, Aug 2022 |
deep-dive
THE VALUE ANCHOR
Architecting for Persistence: The Utility Stack
Speculative NFTs collapse; assets with embedded utility and cash flow survive by anchoring value to persistent on-chain activity.
Utility anchors price to cash flow. An NFT's price decouples from hype when its value is a function of verifiable, on-chain revenue. This transforms the asset from a collectible into a financial instrument with a discounted cash flow model.
Persistence requires composable utility. A static 'membership pass' fails. The asset must be a composable primitive within a larger DeFi or gaming stack, like a Bored Ape used as collateral in BendDAO or a Parallel Trading Card staked for game rewards.
The stack is the moat. Survival depends on the depth of the integrated utility stack—protocols like ERC-6551 for token-bound accounts and LayerZero for cross-chain state enable persistent utility that outlives any single application's hype cycle.
Evidence: During the 2022-23 bear market, DeGods with staking rewards and y00ts with migration mechanics retained a higher floor price multiple versus purely speculative PFP collections, demonstrating the premium for embedded utility.
case-study
UTILITY VS. SPECULATION
Case Studies in Resilience
Bear markets incinerate JPEGs with no cash flow, leaving only assets that provide functional utility or direct protocol access.
01
The Problem: PFP Projects Die When Hype Fades
Speculative NFTs collapse when secondary trading volume evaporates. Projects like Bored Ape Yacht Club saw floor prices drop >90% from peaks, as their primary utility was social signaling.
- No recurring revenue: Creators earn only on initial mint and royalties.
- Zero protocol integration: The asset is a dead-end, not a key to a system.
- High correlation to ETH: Purely a beta play on crypto sentiment.
>90%
Drawdown
~0%
Yield
02
The Solution: DeFi Governance NFTs (e.g., veTokens)
Assets like Curve's veCRV or Balancer's veBAL grant direct economic benefits: fee revenue, voting power, and boosted yields.
- Cash-flow generating: Holders earn a share of ~$50M+ in annual protocol fees.
- Protocol-aligned: Value is tied to the underlying DEX's usage and TVL.
- Vote-locking mechanics: Creates natural supply scarcity and long-term holders.
$50M+
Annual Fees
4yrs
Max Lock
03
The Problem: Gaming NFTs Are Illiquid Sinks
In-game assets like Axie Infinity land or characters become worthless if the game's player base or tokenomics fails.
- Closed ecosystem: Value is trapped and non-composable.
- Developer risk: Centralized studios can alter rules or abandon projects.
- High inflation: Unlimited minting to new players dilutes existing holders.
-99%
AXS from ATH
>1M
Daily Users Lost
04
The Solution: NFT-Fi Collateralization (e.g., BendDAO, NFTX)
Platforms that allow blue-chip NFTs to be used as collateral for loans create a floor price and utility layer.
- Liquidity from stasis: Idle assets can generate yield or secure debt.
- Price discovery: Peer-to-peer lending markets establish fundamental value.
- Composability: Borrowed stablecoins can be redeployed in other DeFi strategies.
70%
Avg. LTV
$200M+
Peak TVL
05
The Problem: Membership NFTs Lack Stickiness
One-time access passes or gated content memberships fail to retain holders after initial consumption.
- Non-renewable: No reason to hold the NFT after the event or content is consumed.
- Low switching cost: Communities can migrate to new platforms easily.
- No secondary market: The asset has zero value post-redemption.
1x
Use Case
~0
Post-Use Value
06
The Solution: Soulbound Reputation & Access (e.g., Ethereum POAPs, Gitcoin Passport)
Non-transferable NFTs that accumulate as a verifiable record of on-chain activity, unlocking tiered rewards and governance.
- Anti-sybil: SBTs prove unique human participation, not capital.
- Accrued value: Reputation score increases with each proven action.
- Programmable access: Grants eligibility for airdrops, governance, and real-world events.
10M+
POAPs Minted
Soulbound
Non-Transferable
counter-argument
THE SURVIVORSHIP BIAS
Counterpoint: Isn't All Utility Just Marketing?
Speculative NFTs collapse; assets with embedded rights and cash flows retain value.
Utility is a cash flow. Marketing creates demand; utility creates recurring revenue. A Pudgy Penguin is a brand; a Bored Ape is a Yuga Labs governance token and airdrop vehicle. The latter's price action in 2022-2023 demonstrated embedded optionality that pure PFPs lacked.
Protocols formalize utility. Standards like ERC-6551 (token-bound accounts) transform NFTs into wallets that own assets and interact with DeFi. This creates verifiable on-chain utility, moving beyond promises to programmable property rights. Compare this to the empty roadmap of a 2021 generative art project.
Evidence: During the 2022-2023 bear market, the floor price of Proof Collective (PROOF) membership NFTs, which granted access to high-value art drops, significantly outperformed comparable art blocks sets with no ongoing utility. The market priced the future yield.
risk-analysis
WHY SPECULATIVE ASSETS FAIL
The Bear Case: Risks to the Utility Model
When liquidity evaporates, assets without inherent utility face terminal value collapse.
01
The Speculative Death Spiral
Purely financial NFTs rely on the Greater Fool Theory. In a bear market, the last fool exits, collapsing the floor price and killing all downstream utility (e.g., fractionalization, lending collateral).
- Liquidity vanishes first, rendering assets illiquid and worthless.
- Collateralized loans get liquidated, creating cascading sell pressure.
- Projects like Bored Ape Yacht Club face existential risk when their primary utility is status signaling.
-95%
Floor Price Drop
~0
Active Bids
02
The Infrastructure Cost Trap
Protocols subsidizing utility (e.g., staking rewards, airdrops) with token emissions face unsustainable inflation when token price falls.
- Real yield must cover real costs (servers, developers, security).
- Projects like StepN demonstrated that when tokenomics fail, the utility (movement tracking) becomes irrelevant.
- Survival requires a fee-based revenue model independent of native token speculation.
-99%
Token Value
$0 Rev
If Subsidies Stop
03
The Composability Fragility
Utility built on other speculative protocols (e.g., NFTfi, JPEG'd) inherits their systemic risk. A collapse in the underlying DeFi legos destroys the utility stack.
- Dependency risk is multiplicative, not additive.
- True utility must be vertically integrated or rely on battle-tested, fee-generating infrastructure like Uniswap or Ethereum itself.
- Bear markets expose which utilities are real and which are just leveraged speculation.
>80%
TVL Evaporation
High
Correlation Risk
04
The Solution: Hard-Coded Utility
Assets survive by encoding non-discretionary utility directly into the token's smart contract or underlying protocol logic.
- Access Rights: Tokens that gate essential services (e.g., Arweave data storage, Helium network coverage).
- Work Tokens: Directly govern and capture fees from a productive protocol (e.g., Maker's MKR, early Curve CRV model).
- Consumption Assets: Required to pay for a service with inelastic demand; value is derived from burn rate, not hope.
10x+
Higher Stickiness
Fee-Based
Revenue Model
future-outlook
THE SURVIVAL FILTER
The Next Cycle: Utility as the Default
Speculative NFTs collapse; assets with embedded utility and cash flow become the new base layer for digital ownership.
Speculative JPEGs are dead assets. They lack intrinsic value drivers beyond sentiment, making them the first to liquidate during capital flight. The 2022-2023 bear market proved this, erasing over 95% of PFP collection value.
Survival requires embedded utility. An NFT must be a key to a service, a revenue share contract, or a productive asset. Projects like Redacted Cartel's BTRFLY (governance with fee accrual) and Tensor's TNSR (NFT marketplace fee capture) demonstrate this shift.
The standard is now cash flow. The market demands on-chain royalties and verifiable yield. Protocols like Ethereum Name Service (ENS) succeed because domains are utilities that generate recurring protocol fees for holders.
Evidence: During the bear market, the floor price of utility-less PFPs like Bored Ape Yacht Club fell over 90%. In contrast, yield-generating NFTfi positions and gaming assets with active economies retained measurable value.
takeaways
UTILITY IS THE NEW SPEC
TL;DR for Builders and Investors
Speculative JPEGs die in bear markets. Here's what survives and thrives.
01
The Problem: Speculative Jpegs Are Pure Beta
PFP collections like Bored Apes are high-beta assets with no intrinsic cash flow. Their value collapses when liquidity flees the ecosystem. Bear markets see floor prices drop 90%+ as demand evaporates.
- Zero recurring utility post-mint.
- Value tied entirely to community sentiment, which is fickle.
- No protocol revenue share to holders.
-90%+
Floor Price Drop
0%
Revenue Share
02
The Solution: NFTs as Access & Equity
Utility NFTs function as membership keys or delegated rights that generate real yield or access. Think Blur's Blend points for lending, Tensorians for TNSR airdrops, or DeGods staking for SOL.
- Recurring yield via fees, staking, or points.
- Protocol alignment where holders benefit from ecosystem growth.
- Bear-market resilience from cash-flow utility, not just hype.
10x+
Holder Retention
Yield-Bearing
Asset Class
03
The Blueprint: Build Financial Legos
The most durable models treat NFTs as financial primitives. See NFTfi for collateralized lending, Pudgy Penguins with physical toys & royalties, or y00ts migration generating arbitrage.
- Composability with DeFi (lending, fractionalization).
- Real-world asset (RWA) bridges for physical utility.
- Clear, sustainable economic model that doesn't rely on the next buyer.
$1B+
NFTfi Volume
DeFi x NFT
Composability
04
The Metric: Protocol Revenue > Secondary Royalties
Forget 5% creator royalties. Survivors bake utility into the protocol layer. An NFT that grants a share of a DEX's swap fees (like a veNFT) or access to a high-APY vault has inherent value.
- Protocol-owned liquidity models (e.g., Olympus Pro bonds).
- Fee-sharing mechanisms that are automatic and transparent.
- Value accrual is continuous, not a one-time mint event.
Fees > Royalties
Revenue Priority
Continuous
Value Accrual
05
The Warning: 'Utility' Is Overused & Often Fake
Many projects bolt on shallow utility (discords, 'future airdrops') that doesn't survive a bear. Real utility is permissionless, verifiable, and economically meaningful. Scrutinize projects claiming utility without on-chain mechanics.
- Avoid vague roadmaps and promised meta-verses.
- Demand smart contract-level utility proofs.
- Prioritize projects with sustainable unit economics.
>80%
Projects Fail
On-Chain Proof
Verification
06
The Survivor's Edge: Liquidity Through Utility
In a bear market, liquidity is king. Utility NFTs maintain liquidity because they are actively used, not just held. A ticket NFT for a concert, a license for a software SDK, or a collateralized loan position has functional demand.
- Utility creates organic, non-speculative demand.
- Active use cases defend against total illiquidity.
- The asset's purpose outlasts market cycles.
Organic Demand
Liquidity Driver
Cycle-Agnostic
Use Case
ENQUIRY
Get In Touch
today.
Our experts will offer a free quote and a 30min call to discuss your project.
NDA Protected
Confidentiality24h Response
Time to ValueDirectly to Engineering Team
No Sales Fluff10+
Protocols Shipped
$20M+
TVL Overall