Rarity is a lagging indicator. The initial NFT market valued static traits, but this model fails as collections age and utility becomes the primary price driver.
The Future of NFT Valuation: A Shift from Rarity to Relevance
A technical deconstruction of why static rarity metrics have failed and how dynamic, on-chain signals of utility, social capital, and protocol integration are creating a new valuation framework for non-fungible assets.
Introduction
NFT valuation is evolving from static rarity scores to dynamic relevance driven by on-chain utility and social context.
Relevance is a live signal. An NFT's value now derives from its on-chain activity, governance power, and social capital within ecosystems like Farcaster or Friend.tech.
Protocols are the new curators. Platforms like Airstack and Karma3 Labs index social graphs and transaction histories to score contextual relevance, not just metadata.
Evidence: The floor price correlation for top PFP projects with their native token's governance utility exceeds 0.7, while rarity score correlation has fallen below 0.3.
The Rarity Trap
Rarity metrics are a flawed proxy for value, creating fragile markets that collapse when speculative demand evaporates.
Rarity is a weak signal. It measures scarcity, not utility or cultural significance. Projects like Pudgy Penguins succeeded by building IP and community relevance, not by optimizing trait distributions.
The market is repricing. On-chain data from Blur and OpenSea shows floor price compression for high-rarity assets, while collections with strong ecosystems maintain premiums. This is a fundamental repricing.
Valuation shifts to relevance. Future value accrues to NFTs with verifiable utility, like gaming assets in Parallel or membership passes for real-world benefits. The standard is ERC-6551, enabling NFTs to own assets and interact.
Evidence: The correlation between rarity score and price has collapsed. Analysis from Nansen shows the top 10% of 'rare' Bored Apes by trait count underperform the collection's floor.
The Three Pillars of Relevance-Based Valuation
NFT value is shifting from immutable rarity scores to dynamic, context-aware utility, powered by on-chain data and programmable logic.
The Problem: Rarity is a One-Time Snapshot
Static rarity models like Trait Sniper or Rarity.tools capture only mint-time metadata, ignoring all post-mint activity. This fails to value an NFT's evolving on-chain history, social clout, or financial utility.
- Static Scoring: A dormant PFP is valued the same as one used daily as a DAO voting key.
- Missed Context: No weight given to being part of a famous collection, used as collateral, or featured in a major event.
- Market Inefficiency: Creates arbitrage opportunities between under- and over-valued assets based on stale data.
The Solution: On-Chain Activity & Financialization
Relevance engines like Context and Karma index live on-chain data to score NFTs based on usage, not just metadata. This turns NFTs into verifiable, dynamic reputation and utility tokens.
- Utility Scoring: Tracks usage in DeFi (e.g., NFTfi loans), governance (e.g., Compound delegates), and gaming (e.g., Parallel cards).
- Social Graph Analysis: Values NFTs based on holder's network and transaction history with entities like Farcaster or Lens.
- Real-Time Revaluation: Enables new financial primitives like under-collateralized lending and reputation-based airdrops.
The Protocol: Programmable Relevance Oracles
Infrastructure like Rarible Protocol and Reservoir allows any app to build with dynamic NFT data. The endgame is a standard API for querying an NFT's contextual relevance across different verticals.
- Composable Metrics: Developers can query for "top 10 most politically influential Nouns" or "most liquid BAYC for a flash loan."
- Cross-Chain Context: Aggregates data from Ethereum, Solana, and Polygon to create a unified relevance graph.
- New Market Models: Powers intent-based NFT marketplaces that match buyers with contextually relevant assets, not just the cheapest listing.
Rarity vs. Relevance: A Comparative Framework
A data-driven comparison of the traditional rarity-based model versus the emerging relevance-based model for NFT valuation, including key metrics and required infrastructure.
| Core Metric | Rarity-Based Model (PFP Era) | Relevance-Based Model (Onchain Era) | Hybrid Model (Transition) |
|---|---|---|---|
Primary Value Driver | Scarcity & Aesthetic | Utility & Onchain Activity | Scarcity + Verified Utility |
Valuation Method | Subjective Appraisal | Objective Onchain Data | Appraisal + Data Feeds |
Key Data Source | Static Metadata (IPFS) | Dynamic Onchain State | IPFS + Onchain Indexers (The Graph) |
Liquidity Source | Speculative Trading | Protocol Revenue Share | Royalties + Staking Rewards |
Avg. Holding Period (Days) |
| < 30 | 30-90 |
Dependency on Creator | High (Hype Cycles) | Low (Protocol Autonomy) | Medium (Initial Bootstrap) |
Infrastructure Required | Marketplaces (OpenSea) | Smart Accounts, Indexers, Oracles | Hybrid Platforms (Blur) |
Exemplar Projects | CryptoPunks, Bored Apes | Friend.tech Keys, Pudgy Toys | DeGods, y00ts |
The Mechanics of On-Chain Relevance
Relevance is a dynamic, composable signal derived from on-chain activity, not a static trait.
Relevance is a protocol-level primitive that quantifies an NFT's current utility and network effects. This shifts valuation from static rarity scores to a real-time measure of an asset's role in DeFi, gaming, or social ecosystems, similar to how Uniswap LP positions accrue value from fee generation.
Composability drives relevance scores. An NFT's relevance increases when it is used as collateral in Aave, fractionalized via Tessera, or integrated into a Decentraland experience. This creates a positive feedback loop where utility begets more utility, a dynamic absent from rarity-based models.
The data layer is critical. Protocols like Karma3 Labs' OpenRank and CyberConnect are building the graph frameworks to compute these signals. They analyze transaction graphs to surface which assets are central to active economic networks, moving beyond simple trait counts.
Evidence: The 80/20 rule applies. In active collections, 20% of NFTs generate 80% of secondary trading volume and protocol interactions, a direct proxy for relevance. This concentration is the market pricing utility.
Objection: Isn't This Just 'Utility' All Over Again?
Relevance is a measurable, composable, and on-chain evolution of the failed 'utility' narrative.
Relevance is a measurable signal. Past utility was a marketing promise. Relevance is an on-chain behavioral graph derived from provable interactions with protocols like Uniswap, Aave, and Farcaster. It is a data output, not a speculative input.
Utility was static; relevance is dynamic. A 'discord role' utility decays. Relevance is a live score that updates with each transaction, governance vote, or content post, creating a persistent, non-transferable reputation layer.
The market already values relevance. Projects like Karma3 Labs' OpenRank and CyberConnect's Social Graph are building the infrastructure to quantify this. Their traction with VCs and protocols proves the demand for verifiable on-chain identity over hollow features.
Evidence: The failure rate of 'utility NFT' projects in 2022-23 exceeded 90%. In contrast, wallets with high Ethereum Attestation Service (EAS) scores or Gitcoin Passport stamps now receive preferential access in airdrops and governance.
Protocols Building the Relevance Stack
The next wave of NFT infrastructure moves beyond static metadata to create real-time, context-aware valuation models.
Contextual Rarity is the New Floor Price
Static rarity scores are obsolete. The Kernel protocol creates dynamic rarity by analyzing on-chain and social graph data, making an NFT's value a function of its holder's activity and network.
- Dynamic Scoring: Value adjusts based on holder's transaction history and social capital.
- Anti-Wash Trading: Filters out inorganic volume to surface genuine collector demand.
- Portfolio Context: A Punk held by a whale is scored differently than one in a dormant wallet.
The On-Chain Reputation Oracle
NFTs need a verifiable history of utility. Galxe and Rabbithole are building the primitive that ties NFTs to provable on-chain accomplishments, creating a reputation layer for wallets.
- Credential Staking: NFTs can be minted or upgraded by completing specific on-chain tasks.
- Soulbound Traits: Non-transferable metadata attributes that signal expertise or membership.
- Sybil Resistance: Leverages proof-of-personhood protocols like Worldcoin to anchor reputation.
DeFi Integration as a Liquidity Engine
Illiquidity kills utility. Protocols like NFTFi and BendDAO are evolving from simple lending to creating composable financial legs for NFTs, where yield and utility are directly embedded.
- Rental Markets: ReNFT enables usage-rights leasing, separating ownership from utility.
- Fractionalized Governance: Slicing a Blue-Chip NFT into fungible tokens that confer voting power in associated DAOs.
- Yield-Bearing NFTs: Native integration with protocols like Aave or Compound to generate yield on the underlying collateral.
AI Curation and Personalized Discovery
The discovery bottleneck stifles niche collections. AI agents, trained on transaction graphs and content trends, will act as personalized curators, driving value to relevant NFTs before they trend.
- Predictive Scoring: Models forecast cultural or financial relevance based on nascent on-chain signals.
- Agent-Based Bidding: Autonomous wallets (DeAgents) bid on NFTs that fit a user's curated profile.
- Cross-Platform Identity: Unifies a holder's footprint across Farcaster, Twitter, and wallet activity to infer taste.
The End of the JPEG
NFT valuation is shifting from static rarity scores to dynamic utility derived from on-chain activity and governance.
Rarity is a dead metric. The ERC-721 standard created digital scarcity, but static traits are a poor proxy for value. Projects like Art Blocks and Pudgy Penguins demonstrate that long-term value accrues to collections with active communities and continuous development, not just a rare hat.
Value accrues to utility. The next generation of NFTs, like ERC-6551 token-bound accounts, are programmable wallets. This transforms a Bored Ape from art into an on-chain identity that accumulates assets, earns yield via Aave, and votes in DAOs, making its transaction history the new rarity.
Relevance is algorithmically determined. Protocols like Airstack and Karma3 Labs are building social graphs and reputation systems that score NFTs based on holder activity, governance participation, and cross-protocol interactions. An NFT's value becomes a function of its network centrality.
Evidence: The floor price correlation for top PFP projects with active DAO treasuries and IP licensing is 3x stronger than for projects with high rarity scores but no utility, according to Nansen's 2024 NFT report.
TL;DR for Builders and Investors
NFT value is migrating from static rarity scores to dynamic utility based on on-chain activity and real-world integration.
The Problem: Rarity is a One-Time Speculation
Static traits create a one-time valuation event, leading to volatile, sentiment-driven floors. Projects like Bored Ape Yacht Club rely on perpetual hype cycles, not sustainable utility.
- Low Retention: ~90% of NFT collections lose >90% of value post-mint.
- No Compound Value: Assets are passive; they don't accrue new value from network growth.
The Solution: Programmable Utility Layers
Embed dynamic properties that tie an NFT's value to its usage. Think ERC-6551 token-bound accounts or Aavegotchi's staked aTokens.
- Revenue Rights: NFTs can own wallets, earn fees from Uniswap pools or Superfluid streams.
- Access Stacking: Utility compounds via integrations with gaming (Parallel), DeFi (Pudgy Penguins' physical toys), and social graphs.
The Metric: Lifetime Value (LTV) Over Floor Price
Shift valuation models from spot price to projected cash flows. Protocols like Tensor for NFTs or Goldfinch for RWA analytics will track this.
- Cash Flow Analysis: Value = Σ (Future Fee Revenue / Discount Rate).
- On-Chain Reputation: An NFT's transaction history (e.g., via Rarible Protocol) becomes a verifiable credit score for collateralization.
The Infrastructure: Dynamic Data Oracles
Static metadata is dead. Valuation requires real-time oracles for off-chain states (e.g., game leaderboards, physical asset condition).
- Chainlink Functions or Pyth feeds can attest to real-world performance.
- Storage Critical: Arweave for permanent metadata, IPFS for mutable data with Lit Protocol access control.
The New Primitive: Composable Identity
An NFT becomes a user's persistent, composable on-chain resume. Projects like CyberConnect or Lens Protocol hint at this, but asset-level identity is next.
- Portable Reputation: A gaming NFT's achievements unlock DeFi credit on Aave.
- Anti-Sybil: Relevance is harder to farm than rarity, creating moats for legitimate assets.
The Investment Thesis: Relevance-Weighted Indexes
Passive capital will flow to indices tracking NFTs by utility, not price. Similar to Index Coop's methodology but for dynamic assets.
- Automated Curation: Indexes auto-rebalance based on on-chain activity metrics (e.g., fee generation, governance participation).
- Liquidity Layer: Creates a new market for derivatives and ETFs on platforms like NFTFi.
Get In Touch
today.
Our experts will offer a free quote and a 30min call to discuss your project.