Free 30-min Web3 Consultation
Book Consultation
Smart Contract Security Audits
View Audit Services
Custom DeFi Protocol Development
Explore DeFi
Full-Stack Web3 dApp Development
View App Services
Free 30-min Web3 Consultation
Book Consultation
Smart Contract Security Audits
View Audit Services
Custom DeFi Protocol Development
Explore DeFi
Full-Stack Web3 dApp Development
View App Services
Free 30-min Web3 Consultation
Book Consultation
Smart Contract Security Audits
View Audit Services
Custom DeFi Protocol Development
Explore DeFi
Full-Stack Web3 dApp Development
View App Services
Free 30-min Web3 Consultation
Book Consultation
Smart Contract Security Audits
View Audit Services
Custom DeFi Protocol Development
Explore DeFi
Full-Stack Web3 dApp Development
View App Services
mev-the-hidden-tax-of-crypto
Blog

Why Searchers Are Becoming the New Market Makers

An analysis of how MEV searchers, through arbitrage and liquidations, have usurped the price discovery and liquidity functions of traditional market makers, creating a new, extractive financial primitive.

introduction
THE POWER SHIFT

Introduction

The rise of generalized intent solvers is transforming searchers from passive data miners into the primary liquidity providers and risk-takers of the on-chain economy.

Searchers are the new market makers. Traditional market making relies on passive, pre-committed liquidity. Modern searchers, using solvers like those in UniswapX and CowSwap, actively source and route liquidity across venues, creating dynamic, execution-time markets.

This shift flips the liquidity model. Instead of LPs providing static capital, searchers' algorithms provide dynamic capital commitment, optimizing for cross-domain arbitrage and MEV extraction. This creates more efficient price discovery than traditional AMM pools.

The evidence is in solver economics. On CowSwap, a specialized intent-based DEX, competing solvers now handle over 70% of trade volume, generating profits by finding superior execution paths that centralized exchanges and simple AMMs cannot match.

thesis-statement
THE MECHANISM

The Core Argument: Liquidity as a Byproduct of Extraction

Searchers are not just order-takers; their profit-driven MEV extraction is the primary engine for on-chain liquidity.

Liquidity is a side effect. Traditional market makers provide liquidity for a spread. Searchers provide liquidity to capture value from price discrepancies, failed arbitrage, or cross-domain opportunities. Their activity is a byproduct of profit-seeking, not a service.

Searchers outcompete passive LPs. In Automated Market Makers (AMMs) like Uniswap V3, a searcher's JIT (Just-in-Time) liquidity attack provides deeper liquidity for a single block to capture LP fees, then vanishes. This dynamic liquidity is more capital-efficient than static LP positions.

The infrastructure proves the shift. Protocols like Flashbots' SUAVE and bloXroute's mev-commit are building blocks for a searcher-centric liquidity layer. These systems formalize the auction for block space where liquidity provision is the winning bid.

Evidence: On Ethereum, over 90% of MEV is arbitrage, which directly correlates to correcting prices across pools like Curve and Balancer. This constant, automated correction is the liquidity.

market-context
THE POWER VACUUM

Market Context: The Vacuum and the Vultures

The collapse of centralized market makers created a structural liquidity gap that decentralized searchers are exploiting with superior technology.

Centralized market maker collapse created a vacuum. The implosion of firms like Alameda and 3AC removed billions in on-chain liquidity, fragmenting markets and widening spreads. This structural gap persists because traditional market makers are capital-inefficient on public mempools.

Searchers are the new liquidity providers. They operate as specialized, atomic agents using MEV bots and private RPCs like Flashbots to source and execute complex cross-domain arbitrage. Unlike traditional MMs, they provide liquidity as a byproduct of profit-seeking, not as a primary service.

The edge is execution, not capital. A searcher with a $50k wallet and a sophisticated JIT (Just-in-Time) liquidity strategy consistently outcompetes a $50M fund using slow, batched orders. This flips the traditional market-making paradigm where size was the primary moat.

Evidence: Onchain activity shows searcher-driven protocols like UniswapX and CowSwap now dominate large, cross-chain swap volume. Their fill rates and price improvement metrics exceed those of legacy RFQ systems, proving the model's superiority in a fragmented multi-chain world.

THE NEW LIQUIDITY HIERARCHY

The Searcher vs. Traditional MM: A Functional Breakdown

A functional comparison of automated searcher strategies versus traditional market making firms, highlighting the technological and economic paradigm shift in on-chain liquidity.

Core FunctionTraditional Market Maker (e.g., Jump, Wintermute)Searcher (e.g., Flashbots, JIT AMM Bots)Hybrid Entity (e.g., Prop Firm with MEV Arm)

Primary Revenue Source

Bid-Ask Spread & Rebates

Arbitrage, Liquidations, JIT Liquidity

Spread + MEV Extraction

Capital Efficiency (ROI)

10-30% APY on deployed capital

100-1000%+ APY on gas-capital-at-risk

30-200% APY blended

Latency Sensitivity

< 10ms (exchange APIs)

< 100ms (mempool/block space)

< 10ms (exchange + mempool)

Key Infrastructure

C++/Java Exchange Gateways, Risk Engines

Rust/Go MEV Clients (e.g., Flashbots, bloXroute), Private RPCs

Both Exchange & MEV Infrastructure

On-Chain Footprint

Persistent Limit Orders (e.g., Uniswap v3 LP)

Ephemeral, Transaction-based (Single-Block Lifecycle)

Mixed: Persistent LP + Ephemeral JIT

Regulatory Surface

High (Broker-Dealer, MiFID II)

Low (Software Operator)

Medium (Broker-Dealer + Software Op)

Protocol Dependency

Centralized Exchange Order Books, DEX Pools

Mempool, Block Builders (e.g., Builder0x69), SUAVE

CEX, DEX, Block Builders

Risk Profile

Inventory Risk, Adverse Selection

Gas Auction Risk, Failed Bundle Execution

Blended: Inventory + Execution Risk

deep-dive
THE NEW ORDER

Deep Dive: The Mechanics of Extractive Liquidity

Searchers are replacing traditional market makers by algorithmically extracting value from fragmented liquidity across DeFi.

Searchers are the new MMs. Traditional market making relies on passive capital provision. Searchers use active, algorithm-driven strategies to identify and capture inefficiencies across venues like Uniswap, Curve, and Balancer, making liquidity a byproduct of profit-seeking.

The MEV supply chain enables extraction. Searchers operate within the MEV-Boost relay-builder ecosystem, using tools like Flashbots SUAVE to bundle and prioritize transactions. This infrastructure turns block space into a commodity they arbitrage.

Extractive liquidity is more capital efficient. A traditional MM must lock capital in pools. A searcher's capital is transient, deployed only for the milliseconds needed to execute a profitable cross-DEX arbitrage or liquidate a loan on Aave.

Evidence: On-chain data shows over 60% of large DEX swaps now involve searcher-driven routing through aggregators like 1inch or CowSwap, which internalize this extractive logic to find the best price.

protocol-spotlight
THE NEW LIQUIDITY FRONTIER

Protocol Spotlight: Architecting for the Searcher Age

The MEV supply chain is evolving from a public nuisance into a formalized, competitive market, with searchers emerging as the primary liquidity architects.

01

The Problem: Blind Auctions and Inefficient Order Flow

Traditional block builders run sealed-bid auctions, creating a black box. Searchers have no visibility into execution quality, leading to wasted bids and suboptimal price discovery for users.

  • Result: ~$100M+ in MEV is extracted monthly, but a significant portion is lost to inefficiency.
  • Opportunity: Unlocking this value requires transparent, competitive markets for block space.
$100M+
Monthly MEV
~15%
Inefficiency Tax
02

The Solution: Open Searcher Markets (e.g., SUAVE)

Protocols like Flashbots' SUAVE decentralize the block-building process by creating a dedicated mempool and auction house for searchers.

  • Key Benefit: Searchers bid in open, real-time auctions for transaction ordering, driving execution quality up and costs down.
  • Key Benefit: Enables complex, cross-domain MEV strategies, turning searchers into hyper-efficient cross-chain market makers.
~500ms
Auction Latency
Multi-Chain
Scope
03

The New Primitive: Intents and Express Relays

Searchers are the execution layer for intent-based architectures like UniswapX and CowSwap. Users submit outcome-based intents, and searchers compete to fulfill them optimally.

  • Key Benefit: Users get better prices without managing complexity. Searchers capture value via sophisticated routing (e.g., Across, LayerZero).
  • Key Benefit: Creates a $10B+ design space for application-specific searcher networks.
$10B+
TVL in Intents
20-30%
Better Execution
04

Jito: Validators as Searcher Infrastructure

Jito's Solana client bundles searcher transactions with priority fees, creating a liquid market for block space. Validators profit from MEV sharing, aligning incentives.

  • Key Benefit: ~95% of Solana validators use Jito, proving the economic model works.
  • Key Benefit: Provides searchers with predictable, low-latency execution environment, essential for high-frequency arbitrage.
95%
Validator Adoption
-40%
User Fees
05

The Risk: Centralization and Cartels

Efficient searcher markets concentrate power. The most sophisticated actors with the fastest infrastructure and largest capital can dominate, recreating the walled gardens of traditional finance.

  • Result: Top 5 searcher firms capture over 60% of Ethereum MEV.
  • Mitigation: Requires protocol-level design like distributed block building and commit-reveal schemes.
60%+
Market Share
Critical
Protocol Risk
06

The Endgame: Searchers as L1/L2 Differentiators

Blockchain performance will be judged by its searcher ecosystem. Chains that offer superior tooling (EigenLayer, Espresso), fast finality, and fair access will attract the capital and liquidity that define a chain's economy.

  • Key Benefit: A vibrant searcher market is a 10x multiplier for DeFi TVL and user experience.
  • Key Benefit: Turns latency and composability into measurable competitive advantages.
10x
TVL Multiplier
<1s
Finality Target
counter-argument
THE CENTRALIZATION TRAP

Counter-Argument: Is This Sustainable?

The economic logic driving searcher dominance creates systemic risks that mirror the problems of traditional finance.

Economic centralization is inevitable. The capital requirements and technical sophistication for high-frequency MEV extraction create a winner-takes-most market. This concentrates power in a few firms like Jump Crypto or Wintermute, replicating the broker-dealer oligopoly from TradFi.

Protocols become price-takers. When a handful of searchers control the majority of block space on chains like Solana or Arbitrum, they dictate transaction ordering economics. This undermines the credible neutrality that decentralized networks promise to end-users.

The regulatory attack surface expands. A centralized searcher layer presents a clear target for agencies like the SEC, which can argue these entities act as unregistered exchange facilitators. This legal risk jeopardizes the entire MEV supply chain, from builders to validators.

Evidence: Flashbots' dominance on Ethereum post-Merge, where a single builder often produces over 90% of blocks, demonstrates this centralization pressure. The ecosystem's response, like SUAVE or MEV-Share, is an admission that the current model is not sustainable.

future-outlook
THE NEW LIQUIDITY LAYER

Future Outlook: The Professionalization of Extraction

Searchers are evolving from opportunistic bots into institutional-grade liquidity providers, fundamentally reshaping market structure.

Searchers are the new market makers. They provide the latency-sensitive, cross-domain liquidity that traditional MMs cannot. This shift moves the liquidity function from order books to the execution layer itself.

The business model is institutionalizing. Dedicated firms like Biconomy and PropellerHeads now run multi-chain searcher operations, investing in infrastructure that dwarfs simple MEV bots. This creates a professionalized extractive layer.

Intents formalize this role. Standards like UniswapX and CowSwap abstract execution to searchers, turning them into paid service providers. This is the commercialization of the mempool.

Evidence: Flashbots' SUAVE aims to be a decentralized block builder marketplace, explicitly creating a venue for searcher competition. This institutionalizes the role further.

takeaways
THE NEW LIQUIDITY FRONTIER

Key Takeaways for Builders and Investors

The rise of searchers and intent-based architectures is unbundling the traditional market maker role, creating new infrastructure needs and investment opportunities.

01

The Problem: DEX Liquidity is Fragmented and Inefficient

On-chain liquidity is siloed across hundreds of chains and pools, creating massive arbitrage opportunities. Traditional market makers struggle with capital efficiency and cross-chain execution.

  • Result: Billions in MEV extracted annually from simple DEX arbitrage.
  • Opportunity: A new class of infrastructure to unify and route liquidity is required.
$1B+
Annual Arb MEV
100+
Active Chains
02

The Solution: Searchers as Just-in-Time Liquidity

Searchers, powered by sophisticated algorithms, act as dynamic, on-demand market makers. They fulfill user intents by sourcing liquidity across the entire ecosystem in real-time.

  • Key Entities: This is the engine behind UniswapX, CowSwap, and Across.
  • Builder Play: Create searcher SDKs, RPC endpoints with fast mempool access, and cross-chain messaging infra like LayerZero.
~500ms
Execution Window
10-100x
More Pools Scanned
03

The Investment Thesis: Infrastructure for the Searcher Economy

The value accrual shifts from holding LP tokens to providing critical services to searchers. This creates a new stack.

  • Layer 1: Fast, deterministic blockchains with native MEV management (e.g., Solana, Sei).
  • Middleware: Specialized RPCs (Bloxroute), block builders (Flashbots), and intent solvers.
  • Invest in primitives that reduce latency and increase searcher profitability.
$10B+
New Stack TVL
-90%
Slippage Potential
04

The Risk: Centralization and Regulatory Overhang

Searcher dominance could lead to new centralization points. The most efficient block builders and RPC providers could form oligopolies, recreating the problems of traditional finance.

  • Watch For: Builder cartels and exclusive order flow agreements.
  • Mitigation: Invest in decentralized builder networks, SUAVE-like protocols, and transparent MEV auctions.
>60%
Builder Market Share
High
Regulatory Scrutiny
ENQUIRY

Get In Touch
today.

Our experts will offer a free quote and a 30min call to discuss your project.

NDA Protected
24h Response
Directly to Engineering Team
10+
Protocols Shipped
$20M+
TVL Overall
NDA Protected Directly to Engineering Team
Searchers Are the New Market Makers in Crypto | ChainScore Blog