Free 30-min Web3 Consultation
Book Consultation
Smart Contract Security Audits
View Audit Services
Custom DeFi Protocol Development
Explore DeFi
Full-Stack Web3 dApp Development
View App Services
Free 30-min Web3 Consultation
Book Consultation
Smart Contract Security Audits
View Audit Services
Custom DeFi Protocol Development
Explore DeFi
Full-Stack Web3 dApp Development
View App Services
Free 30-min Web3 Consultation
Book Consultation
Smart Contract Security Audits
View Audit Services
Custom DeFi Protocol Development
Explore DeFi
Full-Stack Web3 dApp Development
View App Services
Free 30-min Web3 Consultation
Book Consultation
Smart Contract Security Audits
View Audit Services
Custom DeFi Protocol Development
Explore DeFi
Full-Stack Web3 dApp Development
View App Services
liquid-staking-and-the-restaking-revolution
Blog

Why Privacy-Preserving Oracles Are a Must for Enterprise AVS Adoption

The trillion-dollar enterprise market is locked out of restaking. To unlock it, AVSs need oracles that can handle private data using MPC and ZKPs. This is the technical barrier and the solution.

introduction
THE ENTERPRISE DATA GAP

The $10 Trillion Blind Spot in Restaking

Restaking's enterprise adoption is blocked by the public exposure of sensitive operational data on-chain.

Public data exposure kills adoption. Every Actively Validated Service (AVS) must post its operational state to Ethereum for slashing, revealing proprietary logic and client data to competitors.

Privacy-preserving oracles are the mandatory bridge. Protocols like Aztec and FHE-based systems must feed verified, encrypted data to AVS logic, enabling confidential computation without exposing raw inputs.

The alternative is regulatory oblivion. Without this, financial institutions and corporations will never use AVS networks for core operations, capping the market at DeFi-native applications.

Evidence: JPMorgan's Onyx processes $1B daily in private; its equivalent AVS would expose every transaction publicly without this layer.

key-insights
THE ENTERPRISE GATEWAY

Executive Summary: The Privacy Oracle Thesis

Current oracle designs leak sensitive data, creating an insurmountable barrier for regulated institutions. Privacy-preserving oracles are the critical infrastructure needed to unlock institutional capital and complex financial logic onchain.

01

The Data Leak: Why Chainlink Fails Institutions

Public oracles like Chainlink broadcast proprietary data (e.g., internal risk scores, execution prices) to the entire network. This exposes competitive strategies and violates data sovereignty mandates (e.g., GDPR, MiCA).

  • Reveals Alpha: Front-running and predatory MEV become trivial.
  • Regulatory Non-Compliance: Impossible for banks and hedge funds to adopt.
  • Limited Use Cases: Blocks private auctions, confidential RWA pricing, and internal settlements.
100%
Data Exposure
$0
Institutional TVL
02

The Solution: Zero-Knowledge Oracles (e.g., =nil;, Herodotus)

These oracles use zk-SNARKs or zk-STARKs to prove data correctness without revealing the underlying data. A verifier only sees a cryptographic proof, enabling confidential on-chain computation.

  • Data Sovereignty: Institutions retain full control and privacy.
  • Regulatory Compliant: Enables audits without exposure.
  • New Primitive: Unlocks private DeFi pools, confidential credit scoring, and dark pool settlements.
~2s
Proof Gen
ZK-Proof
Output
03

The TEE Bridge: A Pragmatic Hybrid (e.g., Supra, Switchboard)

Uses Trusted Execution Environments (TEEs) like Intel SGX to process data in an encrypted, isolated hardware enclave. Provides strong confidentiality with lower computational overhead than full ZK proofs.

  • Performance Practical: Enables sub-second latency for high-frequency data.
  • Hybrid Security: Combines TEE integrity with on-chain verification.
  • Enterprise-Ready: Familiar hardware-based security model for CTOs.
<500ms
Latency
TEE+PoS
Security
04

The AVS Catalyst: EigenLayer's Missing Piece

Actively Validated Services (AVSs) on EigenLayer need private data feeds to build complex, institutional-grade applications. A privacy oracle AVS becomes a foundational middleware layer.

  • Monetizes Restaking: Creates a new fee-generating service for operators.
  • Unlocks New AVSs: Enables private MEV auctions, confidential AI inference, and compliant RWA platforms.
  • Network Effects: Becomes the default data privacy layer for the restaking economy.
$10B+
AVS TAM
Core Infra
Layer
05

The Business Model: Data as a Confidential Service

Shift from selling public data feeds to providing verifiable computation on private inputs. Charge premiums for confidentiality, compliance, and custom logic.

  • Premium Pricing: Institutions pay 10-100x for privacy guarantees.
  • Recurring Revenue: Subscription model for dedicated TEE clusters or ZK proof services.
  • Enterprise Contracts: Direct B2B agreements with TradFi entities.
10-100x
Fee Premium
SaaS
Model
06

The Endgame: Private Smart Contracts

Privacy oracles are the gateway to fully private state. They enable the final piece: smart contracts that can process secret inputs and produce encrypted outputs, akin to Aztec but for general-purpose computation.

  • Complete Stack: Combines with FHE or ZK-VMs (e.g., zkSync, Polygon Miden).
  • Ultimate Use Case: Fully private derivatives, institutional DAOs, and confidential governance.
  • Regulatory Clarity: Provides a clear audit trail without public disclosure.
FHE/ZK-VM
Stack
Total Privacy
Goal
thesis-statement
THE ENTERPRISE BARRIER

The Core Argument: Privacy is a Prerequisite, Not a Feature

Enterprise adoption of Actively Validated Services (AVS) is blocked by the public data exposure inherent to current oracle designs.

Public data feeds are non-starters for regulated enterprises. A DeFi lending AVS using Chainlink cannot process a private credit agreement, as every transaction detail is visible on-chain to competitors and regulators.

Privacy enables new AVS use cases. A supply chain AVS using Pyth Network data can verify IoT sensor inputs without exposing proprietary logistics data, creating a competitive moat for the enterprise operator.

The current model leaks alpha. An AVS for institutional trading strategies exposes its entire logic and execution path on a public mempool, allowing front-running by MEV bots on Flashbots or bloXroute.

Evidence: Zero major financial institutions run core risk logic on public oracles today. The total value secured (TVS) in private, off-chain enterprise systems dwarfs all public DeFi by orders of magnitude.

market-context
THE ENTERPRISE BARRIER

The Current State: Public Data, Private Problems

Public blockchain data exposure creates an insurmountable adoption barrier for regulated enterprises and sophisticated DeFi applications.

Public mempools are a liability. Every enterprise transaction, from a treasury rebalance to an OTC trade, is broadcast to the world, enabling front-running and strategic intelligence gathering by competitors and MEV bots.

Current privacy solutions are incomplete. Protocols like Aztec or Zcash encrypt on-chain state but remain dependent on public oracles like Chainlink, which broadcast price queries and reveal intent before execution.

The oracle is the leak. A privacy-preserving oracle is the mandatory final piece, fetching and delivering data via confidential compute (e.g., TEEs, ZKPs) without exposing the query's content or context to the public network.

Evidence: Without this, institutional adoption of Actively Validated Services (AVS) for tasks like cross-chain settlement or algorithmic trading will remain negligible, as seen in the minimal enterprise use of public DeFi on Ethereum or Solana.

ENTERPRISE AVS REQUIREMENTS

The Oracle Privacy Spectrum: From Transparent to Opaque

Comparing oracle data delivery models based on their ability to protect sensitive enterprise data and prevent front-running.

Privacy Feature / MetricTransparent Oracle (e.g., Chainlink)Hybrid / Threshold Oracle (e.g., API3, RedStone)Fully Private Oracle (e.g., DECO, FairBloc)

On-Chain Data Visibility

Fully public

Partially obfuscated

Fully encrypted

Front-Running Resistance

Data Provenance Verifiability

Enterprise Data Source Compatibility

Public APIs only

Private APIs via dAPIs

Any authenticated web source

Latency Overhead

< 1 sec

2-5 sec

5-15 sec

Trust Assumption

N-of-M Committee

M-of-N Signers + TEEs

Zero-Knowledge Proofs / TEEs

Integration Complexity for AVS

Low

Medium

High

Use Case Fit

Public DeFi pricing

Private FX rates, institutional data

KYC checks, credit scores, proprietary feeds

deep-dive
THE TRUST MACHINE

Architectural Deep Dive: MPC vs. ZKPs for Oracle Privacy

Enterprise adoption of AVSes requires oracles that hide sensitive data, making MPC and ZKPs the only viable privacy architectures.

Enterprise data is a liability. Public oracle networks like Chainlink expose price feeds and proprietary data, creating unacceptable risk for institutions. Privacy-preserving oracles are a prerequisite for AVS adoption in regulated sectors like private credit or derivatives.

MPC secures data in transit. Multi-Party Computation splits data among nodes, computing results without revealing inputs. This architecture is ideal for real-time feeds where latency is critical, as used by Chainlink DECO for TLS-based attestations.

ZKPs verify data after the fact. Zero-Knowledge Proofs generate cryptographic proofs that data is valid without revealing the data itself. This model suits batch verification and complex logic, as demonstrated by Axiom for on-chain history proofs.

MPC fails on public verifiability. The computation result is trusted but not independently verifiable, creating a black box. ZKPs provide public verifiability, allowing anyone to audit the proof, but require more computational overhead for proof generation.

The future is a hybrid architecture. MPC networks will handle low-latency data ingestion, while ZKPs will generate succinct proofs for final state verification on-chain. Projects like Brevis and Herodotus are pioneering this zk-verifiable compute layer for oracles.

protocol-spotlight
PRIVACY-PRESERVING ORACLES

Protocol Spotlight: Who's Building the Pipes?

Enterprise AVS adoption is gated by the inability to use sensitive, proprietary data on-chain without exposing it to competitors and front-runners.

01

The Problem: Data Leakage Kills Competitive Edge

Traditional oracles like Chainlink expose raw data on-chain. For an AVS managing a $100M+ derivatives book or proprietary trading signals, this is non-negotiable. Public data feeds create immediate MEV and arbitrage opportunities for rivals.

  • Front-running risk on every price update.
  • Loss of proprietary alpha and business logic.
  • Regulatory exposure for handling sensitive financial data.
100%
Data Exposure
$0
Alpha Retained
02

The Solution: Zero-Knowledge Proofs for Data Integrity

Protocols like zkOracle and Herodotus are pioneering the use of ZK proofs to attest to off-chain data's validity without revealing the data itself. The AVS receives a cryptographic proof, not the raw input.

  • Prove data authenticity (e.g., price > $X) with a ~2KB zk-SNARK.
  • Maintain complete data privacy for the underlying source.
  • Enable complex logic (TWAPs, volatility) computed off-chain, proven on-chain.
~2KB
Proof Size
0
Data Revealed
03

The Architecture: Decentralized TLS & Trusted Execution

Projects like Supra and API3 combine decentralized node networks with advanced privacy techniques. This moves trust from a single API provider to a cryptographically verified system.

  • Decentralized TLS to attest to HTTPS API responses.
  • TEEs (Trusted Execution Environments) for confidential computation on raw data.
  • Multi-chain attestations to serve AVSs on Ethereum, Solana, and EigenLayer simultaneously.
100+
Node Operators
<1s
Attestation Latency
04

The Business Case: Unlocking Regulated Asset Markets

Privacy is a prerequisite for bringing tokenized RWAs, private credit, and institutional FX on-chain. A privacy-preserving oracle is the gateway for TradFi entities.

  • Prove creditworthiness without exposing client KYC/balance sheets.
  • Settle OTC derivatives with confidential strike prices.
  • Audit compliance (e.g., sanctions lists) via private set membership proofs.
$10T+
RWA Market
Mandatory
For Compliance
05

The Benchmark: Cost of Privacy vs. Cost of Leakage

ZK proofs and TEEs add computational overhead. The trade-off is not free, but the cost of data leakage is existential. The calculus shifts for high-value applications.

  • ZK proof generation: adds ~500ms-2s and ~$0.05-$0.20 in compute costs.
  • Data leakage cost: can be 100% of margin on a proprietary trade.
  • Network design: Batching proofs across many AVSs amortizes costs significantly.
+$0.10
Avg. Cost/Update
-100%
Leakage Risk
06

The Future: FHE and Cross-Chain Privacy States

The endgame is Fully Homomorphic Encryption (FHE) oracles, enabling computation on encrypted data. Coupled with cross-chain messaging like LayerZero and Axelar, this creates private global state for AVSs.

  • FHE Oracles: Compute directly on encrypted price feeds.
  • Cross-Chain Privacy: Maintain confidential state across Ethereum L2s, Solana, and Cosmos.
  • Intent-Based Integration: Private oracles as a core primitive for systems like UniswapX and CowSwap.
FHE
Endgame Tech
Omnichain
State Scope
risk-analysis
ENTERPRISE AVS ADOPTION

Risk Analysis: What Could Go Wrong?

Without privacy-preserving oracles, enterprise adoption of Actively Validated Services (AVS) is a non-starter due to critical data exposure and regulatory risks.

01

The MEV Front-Running Nightmare

Public on-chain data feeds allow sophisticated bots to front-run enterprise transactions, extracting value and destroying execution quality. This is a direct tax on operations.

  • Pre-trade transparency reveals intent for swaps, liquidations, or large orders.
  • Estimated extractable value for a single large trade can exceed $1M+.
  • Standard oracles like Chainlink broadcast data, creating a public signal.
$1M+
Potential Extractable Value
100%
Signal Exposure
02

The Compliance & Data Sovereignty Wall

GDPR, MiCA, and internal data policies prohibit exposing sensitive business logic. Public oracles force a choice between using crypto rails and violating compliance.

  • Transaction data becomes immutable public record, conflicting with "right to be forgotten".
  • Supply chain or B2B payment data reveals proprietary relationships.
  • Enterprises will not adopt if it means regulatory fines or IP leakage.
GDPR/MiCA
Regulatory Violation
0
Data Obfuscation
03

The Oracle as a Single Point of Failure

Even encrypted data flows through a centralized oracle node create a trusted third-party risk, negating the decentralization benefits of the underlying AVS.

  • Node operator sees all raw, sensitive data before encryption.
  • Creates a honeypot for regulators or hackers to subpoena/attack.
  • Solutions like DECO or zk-proof based oracles (e.g., zkOracle) are required to keep data private from the oracle itself.
1
Trusted Third Party
High
Subpoena Risk
04

The Strategic Intelligence Leak

Aggregated on-chain activity reveals a company's financial strategy, market moves, and partnership timelines to competitors, providing a permanent intelligence advantage.

  • Treasury management patterns expose cash flow and risk appetite.
  • New contract deployments signal product launches weeks in advance.
  • Competitors can run chain analysis to reverse-engineer entire business units.
100%
Strategy Exposure
Permanent
On-Chain Record
05

The Liquidity Fragmentation Trap

To avoid exposure, enterprises will fragment liquidity across private chains or off-chain systems, defeating the purpose of a unified, composable ecosystem and reducing capital efficiency.

  • Leads to siloed liquidity pools and worse pricing.
  • Breaks cross-AVS composability (e.g., using EigenLayer restaking with a private money market).
  • Recreates the inefficient, walled-garden model of TradFi.
-50%+
Capital Efficiency
Siloed
Liquidity
06

The Solution: Zero-Knowledge Proof Oracles

Only oracles that deliver verifiable state (via zk-proofs) without seeing the underlying data solve the trust triangle. This enables confidential smart contracts.

  • zkOracle schemes (e.g., =nil; Foundation) prove data authenticity cryptographically.
  • Data remains encrypted end-to-end, even from the oracle node operator.
  • Enables confidential DeFi and compliant enterprise AVS modules on EigenLayer.
zk-Proof
Verification
0
Data Exposure
future-outlook
THE PRIVACY IMPERATIVE

Future Outlook: The Enterprise AVS Stack Emerges

Enterprise adoption of Actively Validated Services (AVSs) is contingent on oracles that guarantee data confidentiality and execution integrity.

Public data feeds fail enterprises. Corporations cannot broadcast sensitive operational data like supply chain logistics or financial derivatives to a public mempool. This creates a critical gap in the enterprise AVS stack that generic oracles like Chainlink cannot fill.

Privacy-preserving oracles are the middleware. Protocols like zkOracle and Aztec's private state demonstrate that zero-knowledge proofs can verify data authenticity without revealing the data itself. This enables AVSs to process confidential inputs.

The stack requires verifiable off-chain compute. An enterprise AVS like EigenLayer's EigenDA for data availability must pair with a TEE-based oracle or a ZK coprocessor (e.g., Risc Zero) to prove correct computation on private inputs. The oracle is the trust bottleneck.

Evidence: JPMorgan's Onyx uses a permissioned blockchain for repo trading, a use case impossible without confidential price feeds and settlement data. Public AVS adoption will follow the same pattern.

takeaways
ENTERPRISE ADOPTION GATE

TL;DR: The Privacy Oracle Mandate

Public data feeds break enterprise confidentiality, creating the primary roadblock for AVS adoption on EigenLayer and beyond.

01

The On-Chain Leak: Why Public Oracles Fail Enterprises

Public oracle queries (e.g., Chainlink, Pyth) expose sensitive business logic. A DeFi AVS checking a private price feed reveals its trading strategy. A supply chain AVS verifying a shipment leaks partner data. This transparency is a non-starter for regulated entities.

  • Exposes Alpha: Competitors can front-run strategies.
  • Breaches Contracts: Reveals confidential commercial terms.
  • Blocks Compliance: Violates data sovereignty laws (GDPR, HIPAA).
100%
Data Exposure
0
Enterprise AVSs Using Public Feeds
02

The Zero-Knowledge Bridge: Oracles as a TEE/zkVM Service

Privacy oracles like Brevis, HyperOracle, or Lagrange compute proofs off-chain in secure enclaves (TEEs) or zkVMs. They deliver only verifiable attestations, not raw data. An AVS can prove a transaction meets criteria without revealing the inputs.

  • Confidential Compute: Data processed in Intel SGX or RISC Zero.
  • Verifiable Output: On-chain proof of correct execution.
  • Composability: Private attestations work with any AVS logic.
~500ms
Proof Gen Time
TEE/zkVM
Trust Assumption
03

The Business Logic Enabler: From Generic Feeds to Private Workflows

Privacy oracles unlock AVSs for credit scoring, KYC/AML checks, and institutional cross-border settlement. A bank can run a risk model on private client data and post a capital-efficient attestation to EigenLayer. This moves beyond simple price feeds to complex, proprietary business logic.

  • Enables New AVSs: Private RWA verification, compliant DeFi.
  • Lowers Barrier: Enterprises can use existing data silos.
  • Monetizes Data: Sell insights, not raw information.
$10B+
RWA Market Access
1000x
More Use Cases
04

The Cost of Ignorance: MEV & Competitive Disadvantage

Without privacy, enterprise AVS operators face extractable value and strategic decay. Validators can exploit visible intent. The long-term cost of leaked information dwarfs any short-term savings from using public infrastructure.

  • MEV Extraction: Validators front-run corporate treasury moves.
  • Strategy Decay: Competitive edge evaporates in weeks.
  • Regulatory Fines: Potential penalties for data mishandling.
-50%
Strategy Efficacy
$M+
Potential Fines
ENQUIRY

Get In Touch
today.

Our experts will offer a free quote and a 30min call to discuss your project.

NDA Protected
24h Response
Directly to Engineering Team
10+
Protocols Shipped
$20M+
TVL Overall
NDA Protected Directly to Engineering Team