Platforms are winning today because they control distribution and user experience. Spotify and Apple Music have the users, the payment rails, and the legal frameworks, creating a walled garden that is difficult for artists to circumvent.
The Future of Artist Royalties: A Fight Between Platforms and Protocols
An analysis of the economic battle between centralized NFT marketplace incentives and decentralized, on-chain royalty standards. This is a fight for control of the creator economy's financial plumbing.
Introduction
The future of artist royalties is a technical war between centralized platforms and decentralized protocols.
Protocols are building the escape hatch. Decentralized standards like EIP-2981 for NFT royalties and platforms like Sound.xyz and Catalog embed royalty logic directly into the asset, enabling perpetual, on-chain payments independent of any single service.
The fight is over the settlement layer. Platforms treat royalties as a database entry they can modify. Protocols treat them as immutable smart contract logic. The winner determines whether artists own their financial relationship with fans.
Evidence: In 2023, OpenSea controversially made creator royalties optional, while Sound.xyz and Zora maintained full enforcement, demonstrating the protocol-native advantage of credibly neutral code over mutable platform policy.
Executive Summary
The $40B+ music streaming market is a microcosm of a broader war: centralized platforms capturing value versus decentralized protocols enabling direct artist-to-fan economics.
The Platform Playbook: Rent-Seeking by Design
Legacy streaming services like Spotify and Apple Music operate on a pooled royalty model, which dilutes per-stream payouts to ~$0.003. Their core innovation is user aggregation, not fair value distribution.\n- Key Flaw: Artists are suppliers in a take-it-or-leave-it marketplace.\n- Key Metric: Top 0.1% of artists capture ~90% of streaming revenue.
The Protocol Counter-Attack: Code as Law
Smart contract platforms like Ethereum and Solana enable immutable, on-chain royalty enforcement. Protocols such as Sound.xyz and Catalog bake royalties directly into the NFT's transfer logic.\n- Key Benefit: Royalties become a programmable, unbreakable feature of the asset.\n- Key Constraint: Requires marketplaces to respect the protocol, leading to ecosystem fragmentation.
The Hybrid Horizon: Layer 2s and Social Graphs
The endgame isn't pure decentralization, but sovereign value layers. Base and Farcaster demonstrate how scalable L2s plus social graphs can create platform-like experiences with protocol-grade economics.\n- Key Innovation: Composability allows royalties to flow through Uniswap pools, Superfluid streams, and community vaults.\n- Key Metric: Farcaster frames enable direct artist monetization with < 1 cent transaction fees.
The Core Conflict: Rent-Seeking vs. Rail-Building
The future of artist royalties is a battle between platforms that extract value and protocols that program it.
Platforms are rent-seekers. Spotify and Apple Music operate as centralized aggregators, taking a ~30% cut to provide distribution. Their business model is value capture, not value creation for artists. Royalties become a cost center to be minimized.
Protocols are rail-builders. Standards like EIP-2981 for NFT royalties and platforms like Sound.xyz encode royalties into the asset itself. The economic model shifts to value distribution, where fees are transparent and programmable on-chain.
The conflict is infrastructural. Platforms own the user interface and gatekeep access. Protocols own the settlement layer and the rules. The winner determines if royalties are a feature or a fundamental property of digital art.
Evidence: On-chain music platforms like Catalog and Zora demonstrate 100% of primary sales and enforceable secondary royalties go to creators, a model impossible on Web2 rails. This proves the protocol-based model is viable.
The Royalty Enforcement Spectrum: A Data-Driven View
A comparison of the technical and economic mechanisms for enforcing creator royalties across NFT marketplaces and protocols.
| Enforcement Mechanism | On-Chain Enforcement (e.g., EIP-2981, Manifold) | Off-Chain Enforcement (e.g., OpenSea, Blur) | Hybrid / Social Enforcement (e.g., Zora, SuperRare) |
|---|---|---|---|
Core Enforcement Layer | Smart Contract | Platform Policy | Protocol + Social Graph |
Royalty Payment Guarantee | |||
Royalty Bypass Possible? | |||
Typical Royalty Default | Enforced at contract level | Optional (0-10%) | Flexible, creator-set |
Primary Market Fee | 0-2.5% | 0-2.5% | 0% (Zora) |
Secondary Market Royalty | Creator-defined (e.g., 5-10%) | 0-10% (buyer-determined) | Creator-defined, socially enforced |
Key Dependency | Protocol adoption (EIP-2981) | Centralized marketplace dominance | Community & creator reputation |
Example of Bypass Vector | Forking contract, custom marketplace | Marketplace policy change | OTC trades, alternative liquidity pools |
The Protocol Playbook: How On-Chain Standards Fight Back
On-chain standards are the technical weapons that enforce creator rights against platform non-compliance.
Royalty enforcement is a protocol-level problem. Platforms like OpenSea and Blur treat royalties as a policy choice, but protocols like EIP-2981 encode them as a smart contract standard. This creates a technical enforcement layer that bypasses platform discretion, making royalties a mandatory on-chain transaction.
The fight is about settlement location. Marketplaces that settle trades off-chain, like Blur, can ignore on-chain standards. This forces a protocol arms race where new standards like EIP-2981 with on-chain enforcement (e.g., Manifold's Royalty Registry) compete against off-chain order books.
Evidence: After OpenSea made royalties optional, projects using EIP-2981 and Manifold's registry maintained ~95% royalty collection, while non-compliant collections saw rates plummet below 20%. The standard defines the payment, but the registry enforces it.
The Bear Case: Why Protocols Could Still Lose
On-chain royalties are a moral victory, but the economic and technical battle is far from over. Here's why centralized platforms still hold the cards.
The Liquidity Problem
Royalty protocols like Manifold or EIP-2981 are opt-in standards, not enforceable laws. Marketplaces like Blur and OpenSea have already demonstrated they will bypass them to win on price. Without a critical mass of liquidity locked to royalty-respecting venues, artists have no leverage.
- Market Share: Royalty-optional marketplaces often command >60% of NFT volume.
- Network Effect: Liquidity begets liquidity; once a dominant marketplace flips the switch, others follow to compete.
The UX Friction Problem
Protocol-level solutions like 0xSplits or Royalty Registry add complexity for both creators and collectors. Minting becomes a multi-step process of configuring splits and verifying on-chain enforcement. Platform-level solutions (e.g., a checkbox in a dashboard) will always win on simplicity.
- User Drop-off: Each additional step in minting can reduce completion by ~20%.
- Aggregation Bias: Wallets and aggregators prioritize total price, not royalty compliance, burying compliant listings.
The Legal & Regulatory Moat
Established platforms like Spotify or Apple Music have spent billions on licensing deals and legal frameworks. A pure-protocol approach has no entity to sue, negotiate with, or regulate. For major labels and IP holders, this is a bug, not a feature. They will partner with centralized gatekeepers who offer legal certainty.
- Deal Size: Major label advances are in the hundreds of millions, dwarfing crypto-native funding.
- Compliance Cost: KYC/AML, tax reporting, and copyright takedowns are existential requirements, not protocol features.
The Bundling Advantage
Platforms win by bundling services: discovery, promotion, fiat on-ramps, and community tools. A royalty protocol is just one feature. An artist choosing a platform is choosing an ecosystem. Protocols like Sound.xyz show the hybrid model may be the real winner, using the chain for provenance but the platform for the experience.
- Sticky Ecosystem: Platform lock-in via integrated tools creates >70% user retention.
- Feature Gap: Isolated royalty protocols cannot match the R&D spend of a $10B+ tech company.
The Inevitable Endgame: Protocol-Enforced Rails
Royalty enforcement shifts from platform policy to immutable protocol logic, making non-compliance a technical impossibility.
Royalty logic moves on-chain. Platforms like Spotify or OpenSea enforce royalties through their Terms of Service, a policy layer vulnerable to market pressure. The endgame embeds royalty splits into the smart contract itself, using standards like EIP-2981 or ERC-7641 to define immutable payment flows.
Protocols become the settlement layer. This creates a two-tiered system: a marketplace front-end for discovery and a protocol backend for execution. A platform can choose any front-end, but the underlying NFT or token contract dictates the royalty recipient, removing platform discretion.
Evidence: Manifold's Royalty Registry and 0xSplits demonstrate this architecture. They act as canonical on-chain directories, allowing creators to register their royalty parameters, which compliant marketplaces like Blur or Zora must query and respect during settlement.
TL;DR for Builders and Investors
Artist royalties are the new battleground where centralized platforms and decentralized protocols clash over control, value capture, and creator sovereignty.
The Problem: Platform Enclosure
Marketplaces like OpenSea and Blur have made royalties optional to win market share, destroying a $1.9B+ revenue stream for creators. Their business model is to capture users and liquidity, not enforce creator rights.
- Value Extraction: Platforms treat royalties as a cost center to be minimized.
- Race to the Bottom: Competition on fees leads to a 0% royalty standard.
- Centralized Control: Enforcement is a policy decision, easily reversed.
The Solution: Protocol-Enforced Rights
On-chain mechanisms like EIP-2981 and Manifold's Royalty Registry hardcode royalties into the NFT smart contract itself, making them immutable and platform-agnostic.
- Code is Law: Royalties are a smart contract function, not a ToS clause.
- Creator Sovereignty: Artists set terms that persist across all marketplaces.
- Interoperable Standard: A universal spec for the entire Ethereum Virtual Machine (EVM) ecosystem.
The New Business Model: Royalty-Fi
Protocols like Sound.xyz and Zora are building new economic layers where royalties are the primary feature, not an afterthought. This enables novel financial primitives.
- Revenue Streaming: Tools like Superfluid enable real-time, perpetual royalty splits.
- Secondary Market LPing: Platforms can share fee revenue with creators, aligning incentives.
- DeFi Integration: Royalty streams as collateral for loans via NFTfi or Arcade.
The Endgame: Modular Royalty Stack
The future is a composable stack separating minting, marketplace, and royalty enforcement, led by projects like Manifold (minting), Reservoir (liquidity), and 0xSplits (distribution).
- Specialization: Best-in-class protocols for each layer.
- Composability: Artists mix-and-match tools without vendor lock-in.
- Liquidity Aggregation: Protocols like Reservoir aggregate orders across all marketplaces, making enforcement universal.
Get In Touch
today.
Our experts will offer a free quote and a 30min call to discuss your project.