Sequencing is a commodity. The core function of ordering transactions has no inherent moat. Projects like Espresso Systems and Astria are building neutral, shared sequencing networks that any rollup can plug into, decoupling this function from the execution layer.
Why Shared Sequencers Will Redefine L2 Revenue Pools
Shared sequencers like Espresso will commoditize transaction ordering, stripping L2s of a key revenue stream. This forces a fundamental shift: Arbitrum, Optimism, and Base must now compete on superior execution engines and developer services, not sequencer rents.
The Coming Commoditization of the L2 Stack
Shared sequencers will unbundle execution from sequencing, transforming L2 revenue models from transaction fees to value-added services.
Revenue pools will fragment. Today, an L2 like Arbitrum or Optimism captures all sequencing and execution fees. With shared sequencers, the sequencing fee becomes a low-margin, competitive market, while L2s must monetize superior execution, faster finality, or custom pre-confirmations.
The real value is execution. The defensible business becomes the virtual machine (VM) and its performance. An L2's revenue shifts to gas fee arbitrage (charging users more than the base sequencing cost) and value-added services like private mempools or integrated intent-based solvers.
Evidence: Espresso's testnet processes orders for multiple rollups, proving the technical model. Arbitrum BOLD research explicitly explores separating its sequencer, signaling the inevitable architectural unbundling.
The Inevitable Unbundling: Three Market Forces
The monolithic L2 stack is fracturing under market pressure, creating a new battleground for value capture.
The MEV Revenue Leak
Rollups currently outsource sequencing to their base layer (e.g., Ethereum), forfeiting billions in MEV and fee revenue to validators. A shared sequencer network like Espresso Systems or Astria captures this value for the rollup ecosystem.
- Recaptures 80-90% of sequencer revenue from L1
- Creates a new, distributable profit pool for rollups and stakers
- Enables cross-rollup MEV sharing and fair ordering
The Latency Arbitrage
Native rollup sequencing suffers from high latency, blocking instant user experiences and real-time DeFi. Shared sequencers like Radius (encrypted mempool) or Fairblock offer sub-second finality by decoupling execution from consensus.
- Reduces finality from ~12s to ~500ms
- Enables true cross-rollup atomic composability
- Unlocks high-frequency trading and gaming on L2s
The Decentralization Mandate
Centralized sequencers are a single point of failure and censorship, a regulatory and security liability. Shared sequencer networks implement decentralized validator sets (DVT) and proof-of-stake slashing, making L2s credibly neutral.
- Eliminates single-operator risk and regulatory attack surface
- Aligns with Ethereum's core ethos of credibly neutral infrastructure
- Future-proofs against regulatory action targeting centralized sequencers
Anatomy of an L2 Revenue Stream (And Its Impending Demise)
Current L2 revenue is a temporary artifact of centralized sequencing, which shared sequencers will dismantle.
Sequencer MEV and fees constitute the primary revenue for L2s like Arbitrum and Optimism. This revenue is not a protocol fee but a rent extracted from controlling transaction ordering and execution.
Shared sequencers like Espresso and Astria will commoditize this function. L2s will compete on execution, not on who gets to order the block, collapsing this revenue stream.
The future L2 is a VM, not a sequencer. Revenue will shift to value-added services like specialized preconfirmations, similar to how UniswapX outsources routing to Fillers.
Evidence: Over 90% of Arbitrum's $125M annualized revenue in Q1 2024 came from sequencer profits, a model directly targeted by shared sequencing.
L2 Revenue Model: Before vs. After Shared Sequencers
Comparison of L2 revenue sources and control under isolated vs. shared sequencing models, highlighting the shift from a monolithic to a modular value chain.
| Revenue Component | Isolated Sequencer (Before) | Shared Sequencer (After) | Implication |
|---|---|---|---|
Sequencing Revenue (MEV + Base Fees) | 100% captured by L2 | ~30-50% captured by L2 | Direct revenue dilution for L2 |
Cross-Chain MEV Capture | Limited to own domain | Multi-chain atomic arbitrage via shared mempool | New, larger revenue source |
Fee Market Control | Full control over priority gas auction | Ceded to shared sequencer network (e.g., Espresso, Astria) | Loss of pricing power and UX control |
Settlement & DA Revenue | Retained by L2 (if using own chain) | Remains with L2 | Stable, non-competitive revenue stream |
Protocol's Cut of Shared Sequencer Profit | N/A | 5-20% via governance staking or fee-sharing | New, variable income stream |
Time-to-Finality for Users | ~12 sec (Optimism) to ~5 min (Arbitrum) | < 1 sec for pre-confirmations | UX improvement drives adoption |
Capital Efficiency for Bridges | Low; 7-day challenge period for some | High; trustless bridging with instant proofs | Increases cross-chain volume & fee potential |
Required Staking for Security | Native token or ETH (high cost) | Delegated to shared sequencer set (lower cost) | Reduces overhead, shifts security cost |
The Architects of the New Order
Decentralized sequencing is not just about censorship resistance; it's a fundamental re-architecting of the L2 value chain, creating new markets for block space and MEV.
The Problem: The Solo Sequencer Monopoly
Today, each rollup runs its own sequencer, a centralized profit center that captures 100% of transaction ordering rights and fees. This creates a single point of failure and stifles competition for block building, leading to inefficient fee markets and maximal extractable value (MEV) leakage.
- Captured Revenue: Billions in sequencer fees and MEV are locked within individual L2 silos.
- Fragmented Liquidity: Cross-rollup arbitrage is slow and expensive, creating persistent price inefficiencies.
- Security Debt: Users trade decentralization for speed, relying on a single operator's liveness.
The Solution: A Liquid Market for Block Space
A shared sequencer network like Astria or Espresso turns sequencing into a commodity. Rollups outsource ordering to a decentralized network of validators, creating a competitive marketplace where block producers bid for the right to sequence transactions across multiple chains.
- Revenue Redistribution: Fees and MEV are distributed to a permissionless set of stakers, not a single entity.
- Cross-Rollup Synergy: Atomic bundling of transactions across Arbitrum, Optimism, and zkSync unlocks new DeFi primitives and crushes latency arbitrage.
- Guaranteed Liveness: Decentralized sequencing provides ~1s finality with Byzantine fault tolerance, eliminating downtime risk.
The New Business Model: MEV-as-a-Service
Shared sequencers don't just order transactions; they optimize them. By exposing the sequencing layer, they enable professional block builders (e.g., Flashbots SUAVE, Jito Labs) to compete on cross-chain bundle efficiency, turning MEV from a hidden tax into a transparent, auctioned resource.
- Efficiency Gains: Sophisticated bundling can reduce user costs by -20% to -50% by internalizing arbitrage.
- Revenue Sharing: A portion of optimized MEV flows back to the rollup's treasury or token holders via fee switches.
- Intent Integration: Native support for UniswapX-style intents, where solvers compete on cross-rollup execution.
The Endgame: Sovereign Rollup Interop
The final evolution is a shared sequencer acting as a secure messaging layer, enabling trust-minimized cross-rollup communication without a third-party bridge. This mirrors Celestia's data availability logic but for state transitions, creating a cohesive "L2 superhighway."
- Atomic Composability: A single transaction can trigger actions on multiple sovereign chains with all-or-nothing execution.
- Bridge Disruption: Reduces reliance on external bridges like LayerZero or Axelar for core interoperability.
- Protocol-Owned Liquidity: Rollups can bootstrap liquidity by sequencing their own native DEX trades across the network.
The Bull Case for Status Quo (And Why It's Wrong)
The current L2 economic model is a closed-loop system that funnels all revenue to a single sequencer, but this creates a massive, untapped opportunity.
Sequencer revenue is monopolized. Today, Arbitrum and Optimism capture 100% of transaction fees and MEV from their respective chains. This creates a predictable, high-margin business but centralizes value extraction.
Shared sequencers unbundle this monopoly. Projects like Espresso Systems and Astria decouple execution from sequencing, creating a competitive marketplace for block production. This commoditizes the sequencing layer.
Revenue pools will fragment and grow. Just as UniswapX and Across Protocol unbundled bridging, shared sequencing will spawn new revenue streams for validators, proposers, and decentralized sequencer networks.
Evidence: The combined sequencer revenue for top L2s exceeds $1B annually. A shared sequencer market will expand this pool by enabling cross-rollup MEV and attracting new L2s that cannot afford to build their own sequencer.
The New Battlefield: Where L2 Wars Will Actually Be Fought
MEV and transaction ordering are the new moats. Shared sequencers will unbundle execution from settlement, creating winner-take-most markets for block space.
The MEV Cartel Problem
Isolated L2 sequencers create fragmented, inefficient MEV markets. This leaves billions in value extraction on the table and degrades user experience with front-running and poor price execution.
- Inefficiency: Billions in cross-domain MEV remain unextractable.
- User Harm: Localized sequencing enables toxic MEV like front-running.
- Fragmented Liquidity: Each L2's MEV pool is a puddle, not an ocean.
Espresso & Shared Sequencing
A shared sequencer network acts as a decentralized mempool and proposer for multiple L2s. It aggregates and orders transactions across rollups before finalization, unlocking cross-chain MEV and providing credible neutrality.
- Cross-Domain MEV: Enables atomic arbitrage across Optimism, Arbitrum, zkSync.
- Fast Finality: Provides ~500ms pre-confirmations via cryptographic commits.
- Decentralization: Replaces a single-operator sequencer with a permissionless set.
Revenue Redistribution: From L2s to Sequencers
Shared sequencers flip the L2 business model. Revenue shifts from pure gas fees to a bid-for-order auction model, similar to Ethereum block building. L2s become execution clients competing on VM performance.
- New Revenue Pool: MEV auction + priority fees become primary income.
- L2 Commoditization: Execution layers compete on speed and cost, not sequencing rights.
- Protocol Sourcing: Platforms like Astria and Radius abstract sequencing entirely.
The Interoperability Mandate
Atomic composability across rollups is the killer app. Shared sequencers are the prerequisite, enabling cross-rollup transactions that settle simultaneously, unlocking new DeFi primitives.
- Atomic Swaps: Seamless asset movement between Arbitrum and Base.
- Unified Liquidity: DEX pools can span multiple L2s without bridges.
- Developer Abstraction: Build apps that treat multiple L2s as a single chain.
The Execution Layer Era: Predictions for 2024-2025
Shared sequencers will fragment and commoditize L2 revenue, forcing a strategic pivot from transaction ordering to execution services.
Sequencer revenue will commoditize. The current model where each rollup operates its own sequencer is inefficient. Shared sequencer networks like Espresso and Astria create a competitive market for block building, driving down MEV and ordering fees to a marginal cost. This erodes a primary L2 profit center.
Execution becomes the profit engine. With ordering abstracted, L2s must compete on superior execution. This means optimized VMs (EVM, SVM, Move), faster proving (RISC Zero, SP1), and specialized data availability (EigenDA, Celestia). Revenue shifts from simple sequencing to complex computational arbitrage.
Modular stacks enable vertical integration. Projects like Fuel and Eclipse demonstrate that the winning L2 bundles the best execution layer with the cheapest DA and a neutral sequencer. The value accrues to the execution client, not the sequencing middleware.
Evidence: The mempool is the new battleground. Shared sequencer proposals from Optimism and Arbitrum confirm the trend. Their future revenue depends on attracting developers to their superior, fee-competitive execution environments, not on controlling transaction flow.
TL;DR for Protocol Architects
Shared sequencers are not just a scaling tool; they are a fundamental re-architecting of L2 value capture, moving revenue from isolated chains to a competitive, protocol-level market.
The MEV Problem: Your Chain is a Leaky Bucket
Rollup sequencers currently capture 100% of base fees but leak the most valuable component—MEV—to downstream block builders on L1. This is a massive, untapped revenue stream flowing to Ethereum validators and Flashbots.\n- Lost Revenue: Billions in MEV extracted annually from L2s.\n- Fragmented Liquidity: Each rollup's small, isolated block space is unattractive to sophisticated searchers.
The Solution: A Unified Liquidity Pool for Blockspace
A shared sequencer like Espresso Systems or Astria aggregates block space from multiple rollups (e.g., Arbitrum, Optimism, zkSync), creating a single, deep market for transaction ordering.\n- Attract Top Bidders: Unified blockspace attracts high-frequency traders and sophisticated MEV searchers, driving up auction revenue.\n- Protocol Revenue Share: Revenue from cross-rollup MEV and priority fees is shared back to the constituent L2s and their token holders.
The New Business Model: From Gas Fee to Market Maker
L2 economics shift from simple gas fee passthrough to becoming a liquidity provider for blockspace. The shared sequencer protocol becomes a critical financial intermediary.\n- Yield-Bearing Staking: Native sequencer tokens (e.g., ESPRESSO, ASTR) are staked to participate in revenue sharing, creating a sustainable flywheel.\n- Competitive Differentiation: Rollups compete on execution and app ecosystem, while outsourcing the commoditized sequencing layer for better economics.
The Interop Play: Cross-Chain Slippage as a New MEV Class
Shared sequencing enables atomic cross-rollup arbitrage and composite intents that are impossible with asynchronous bridges. This unlocks a new, high-value MEV category.\n- Atomic Arbitrage: Instant arb between Uniswap on Arbitrum and Curve on Base within a single block.\n- Intent Bundling: Solvers (like those in CowSwap or UniswapX) can fulfill complex, multi-chain user intents, paying premiums for atomic execution.
The Centralization Trade-Off: Decentralization as a Service
A credible neutral shared sequencer must decentralize its operator set to avoid becoming a single point of failure/censorship. This is a sellable service.\n- Sequencer Set Auctions: Permissionless validation via EigenLayer AVS or Cosmos-style consumer chains.\n- L2 Sovereignty: Rollups retain force inclusion rights to L1, preserving the ability to exit a malicious sequencer—the ultimate decentralization backstop.
The Endgame: Vertical Integration vs. Commoditization
The market will bifurcate. App-chains (dYdX, Lyra) may vertically integrate their own sequencer for maximum control. General-purpose L2s will outsource to the shared sequencer with the deepest liquidity and best economics.\n- Winners: Shared sequencers that achieve dominant liquidity and credible neutrality (akin to LayerZero's positioning for messaging).\n- Losers: Isolated L2s that fail to capture MEV, making their native tokens purely governance tokens with weak fee accrual.
Get In Touch
today.
Our experts will offer a free quote and a 30min call to discuss your project.