L2s are commoditizing execution. The race for the cheapest transaction is a race to zero, with OP Stack, ZK Stack, and Polygon CDK creating a sea of near-identical rollups.
The Future of L2s: Monetizing State Access and Indexing
Transaction fees are a volatile, zero-sum game. The next L2 war will be won by protocols that build sustainable moats through premium data services—selling efficient, reliable read access to indexed chain state.
Introduction
The next phase of L2 competition moves from cheap execution to monetizing data access and state verification.
Sustainable revenue requires new primitives. Protocols like EigenLayer and AltLayer demonstrate that restaking and shared security are the first step, but the endgame is selling verified state.
The real value is the state root. A proven, real-time state is the ultimate oracle, enabling trust-minimized indexing and data feeds that outcompete Chainlink or The Graph for on-chain applications.
Evidence: Arbitrum's BOLD consensus and Espresso Systems' shared sequencer focus on state finality, not just transaction ordering, to create a sellable data product.
The Fee Fallacy
L2 revenue models will shift from simple transaction fees to monetizing state access and data indexing.
Sequencer fees are a commodity. Every L2 offers cheap execution, making this revenue stream a race to the bottom. The real value is not in processing transactions but in providing permissionless access to the state they produce.
The new revenue stack is data. Protocols like The Graph and Covalent already monetize indexing. L2s will embed this capability natively, charging for real-time state queries and historical data access via services like EigenLayer AVS operators.
Indexing is the new RPC. The demand for structured, queryable blockchain data outpaces raw transaction volume. L2s that expose a standardized indexing marketplace, akin to Espresso's shared sequencer for data, will capture developer mindshare and sustainable fees.
Evidence: Arbitrum processes ~1M daily transactions but its ecosystem generates billions of data points. Monetizing this via a native data layer, not just gas, is the inevitable pivot.
The Data Demand Explosion
As L2s scale, their most valuable asset is no longer just cheap execution, but the real-time, verifiable state data they generate. The next battleground is indexing and access.
The Problem: Indexers as a Bottleneck
Traditional RPC endpoints serve generic data, creating a latency bottleneck for applications needing real-time state (e.g., DeFi frontends, on-chain games). This forces teams to build and maintain their own indexers, a $500k+ annual engineering cost.
- ~500ms latency for complex state queries via standard RPC
- Centralized choke point for data access and availability
- Missed revenue from premium, low-latency data feeds
The Solution: Specialized State Networks
Protocols like The Graph (Substreams) and Risc Zero (zkVM) enable verifiable, streaming state proofs. L2s can expose these as a paid API, turning their chain into a data marketplace.
- Monetize access to real-time state transitions and historical data
- Enable verifiable indexing with cryptographic proofs, reducing trust assumptions
- Unlock new app categories requiring provable, low-latency state (e.g., hyper-casual on-chain games)
The Model: Pay-Per-State-Query
Move beyond simple gas fee revenue. L2s can implement a micro-payment layer for state queries, similar to how Google Cloud BigQuery or AWS Timestream operate. This creates a direct, scalable revenue stream from data consumers.
- Recurring SaaS-like revenue from dApps and analytics platforms
- Dynamic pricing based on query complexity and data freshness
- Aligns incentives between L2 validators and data consumers
The Competitor: AltLayer & Restaked Rollups
Restaking platforms like EigenLayer and rollup-as-a-service providers like AltLayer are building shared sequencing layers with native data availability. They threaten to commoditize the L2 stack, making proprietary state access a key differentiator.
- Shared sequencers abstract away block building, focusing competition on data services
- AVS ecosystems can offer specialized state attestation services
- L2s must compete on data richness and access speed, not just TPS
The Implementation: zk-Proofs for State Validity
Using zk-SNARKs or zk-STARKs, L2s can provide succinct proofs that a specific state transition (e.g., a user's portfolio balance) is correct relative to a proven chain state. This is the killer feature for institutional adoption.
- Enables trust-minimized data oracles without relying on multisigs
- Allows for state queries to be verified off-chain, reducing on-chain load
- Creates a new asset class: verifiable state attestations
The Endgame: L2s as Data Co-Processors
The future L2 is not just a blockchain; it's a verifiable compute and state co-processor for the broader internet. Apps will pull specific, proven state slices on-demand, paying for precision and speed.
- L2 revenue shifts from gas subsidies to API fees
- Vertical integration with data consumers (e.g., games, prediction markets)
- The chain with the richest, most accessible state wins
L2 Revenue Model Comparison
Comparative analysis of emerging revenue streams for Layer 2s, focusing on monetizing state access, data services, and protocol-owned liquidity.
| Revenue Stream | Arbitrum (Status Quo) | zkSync (Emerging Model) | Starknet (Full-Stack Vision) |
|---|---|---|---|
Sequencer Fee Margin | ~80% of L1 gas cost | ~85% of L1 gas cost | ~90% of L1 gas cost |
State Access Fees (RPC) | |||
Proposer/Prover MEV Capture | Partial (via sequencer) | Theoretical (future) | Active (SHARP prover network) |
Protocol-Owned Liquidity (e.g., STRK) | Native token (ZK) for gas | Native token (STRK) for gas & staking | |
Data Indexing/Query Fees | Third-party (The Graph) | Planned (ZK Stack) | Native (Starknet SQL) |
Cross-Chain Messaging Tax | None (third-party bridges) | Potential (native bridge) | Yes (StarkGate fee share) |
Developer Subscription (e.g., APIs) | Planned (ZK Portal) | Yes (Starknet API services) | |
Annualized Revenue Run Rate (Est.) | $120-150M | $40-60M | $20-30M |
Architecting the State Marketplace
Layer 2s will evolve from transaction processors into platforms that monetize access to their canonical state and execution history.
State is the new asset. The canonical state of an L2—its account balances, smart contract code, and historical execution traces—is a unique, high-fidelity data asset. Protocols like EigenLayer and Espresso Systems are building the rails to turn this state into a tradable commodity, enabling restaking and shared sequencing.
Indexing becomes a core primitive. Fast, reliable access to historical and real-time state is a bottleneck for applications. L2s will expose paid APIs, creating a market where services like The Graph or Covalent compete to serve the lowest-latency queries, moving indexing from a public good to a revenue stream.
Execution and data markets converge. The separation between execution layers (Arbitrum, Optimism) and data availability layers (Celestia, EigenDA) blurs. An L2's business model shifts from sequencer MEV and gas fees to selling verifiable state proofs and execution attestations to rollups, bridges, and oracles.
Evidence: Arbitrum processes over 1 million transactions daily, generating a state delta that applications and analysts pay to access. The demand for specialized RPC endpoints from providers like Alchemy and QuickNode proves the latent market for premium state access.
First Movers & Enablers
The next L2 battleground shifts from cheap execution to profitable data services, turning on-chain state into a monetizable asset.
The Problem: L2s Are Data Silos
Rollups publish cheap data blobs to L1 but create fragmented, inaccessible state. This forces dApps to run their own nodes, a $50k+/year operational burden, and cripples cross-chain UX with ~10s latency for state proofs.
The Solution: RPC-as-a-Service (RaaS)
Infra players like Alchemy and QuickNode abstract node operations, but the frontier is indexing-specific RPCs. Think The Graph for L2s, where protocols pay for sub-second access to indexed, queryable state, creating a $100M+ service market.
The Enabler: Verifiable State Proofs
Projects like Brevis and Herodotus enable trust-minimized state access across chains. L2s can monetize this by becoming the canonical source of verifiable proofs for their domain, charging fees for cross-chain attestations used by UniswapX and Across.
The First Mover: EigenLayer AVS for State
Restaking turns L2 sequencers into Actively Validated Services (AVS). They can offer guaranteed state availability and fast finality as a service, backed by $15B+ in restaked ETH slashing risk. This creates a cryptoeconomic moat for early adopters.
The Metric: Revenue per GB of State
Future L2 valuation will track Revenue/GB not just TVL. By selling indexed access, verifiable proofs, and guaranteed availability, L2s transform from cost centers (paying for L1 blobs) to profit centers. Expect 10-100x multiplier on data revenue vs. pure sequencer fees.
The Endgame: L2 as a State Co-processor
The ultimate abstraction: L2s aren't just execution layers but general-purpose state co-processors for L1. Every L1 smart contract can rent L2 state for complex computations (e.g., AI inference, game logic), paid via micro-transactions. This mirrors AWS Lambda for blockchain.
The Commoditization Counter-Punch
L2s will pivot from competing on cheap execution to monetizing exclusive access to their state and data.
Execution is a commodity. The core EVM opcode processing will become a low-margin utility, as seen with the convergence of L2 gas fees and the proliferation of OP Stack and ZK Stack forks.
The real moat is state. A rollup's unique application state and transaction history are proprietary assets. Protocols like The Graph index public chains, but L2s control direct, low-latency access to their own data.
Monetization shifts to data access. Future revenue comes from premium RPC endpoints, real-time event streams for traders, and custom indexing APIs, not from base fee margins. This is the AWS for blockchain state.
Evidence: Arbitrum's BOLD consensus and zkSync's Boojum prover are infrastructure investments that secure proprietary state, enabling services that generic RPC providers like Alchemy cannot replicate.
Strategic Imperatives for L2 Teams
As L2s commoditize, the next frontier is building sustainable revenue models by controlling and selling access to the most valuable asset: real-time state data.
The Problem: RPCs as a Cost Center
Public RPC endpoints are a massive, unmonetized cost sink for L2 teams, with traffic from free-tier users and indexers like The Graph and Covalent consuming resources.\n- Cost: Teams spend millions on infra for public goods.\n- Inefficiency: No QoS tiers or usage-based billing.\n- Missed Revenue: No capture of value from high-frequency data consumers.
The Solution: Premium State Access APIs
Monetize real-time state and historical data through tiered API services, directly competing with centralized providers like Alchemy and Infura.\n- Tiered Access: Free public tier, paid tiers for low-latency, high-throughput queries.\n- Direct Monetization: Charge for archival data, event streams, and sub-second finality reads.\n- Strategic Control: Own the primary data pipeline for your ecosystem's apps.
The Problem: Fragmented Indexing Layer
Apps rely on external indexers (The Graph, Goldsky) to query complex state, creating a fragmented, slow data layer outside the L2's control.\n- Speed Lag: Indexing adds ~2-10 second latency to on-chain data.\n- Revenue Leakage: Indexing fees flow to third parties, not the L2.\n- Sovereignty: Critical app logic depends on external, potentially unreliable services.
The Solution: Native, Verifiable Indexing
Bake a high-performance, verifiable indexing engine directly into the node client, offering sub-second data queries as a native L2 service.\n- Native Speed: Serve complex queries directly from sequenced data with <500ms latency.\n- Verifiable Proofs: Provide ZK or fraud proofs for query results, enabling trust-minimized data feeds.\n- Revenue Capture: Charge a premium for fast, provable data, capturing value from DeFi and gaming apps.
The Problem: MEV as the Only Revenue
Sequencer MEV/priority fees are volatile and politically toxic, creating an unsustainable and reputationally risky primary revenue model.\n- Volatility: Revenue swings with market conditions and MEV activity.\n- Community Distrust: Seen as a tax on users, leading to backlash.\n- Single Point of Failure: Over-reliance on one income stream.
The Solution: Diversify with Data SaaS
Build a predictable, high-margin Software-as-a-Service business by selling structured data feeds and analytics to institutions, protocols, and traders.\n- Predictable ARR: Recurring subscriptions for real-time treasury dashboards, risk analytics, and compliance feeds.\n- High Margin: Software margins (70%+) vs. volatile transaction-based revenue.\n- Strategic Moats: Proprietary data insights become a defensible competitive advantage.
Get In Touch
today.
Our experts will offer a free quote and a 30min call to discuss your project.