Stablecoins are the settlement asset. Native crypto assets like ETH are too volatile for daily transactions and corporate treasuries. The monetary base for global digital commerce requires a stable unit of account, which fiat-pegged tokens uniquely provide.
Why the Monetary Base of the Internet Will Be 80% Stablecoins
A first-principles analysis arguing that native crypto assets (BTC, ETH) will function as volatile reserve collateral, while dollar-denominated stablecoins become the dominant medium of exchange and unit of account for global digital commerce.
Introduction: The Obvious Endgame Everyone Ignores
The internet's native currency layer will be dominated by stablecoins because they solve the fundamental volatility problem for commerce and finance.
Regulatory capture is inevitable. Governments will tolerate and eventually regulate dollar-denominated digital tokens before accepting a volatile sovereign alternative. This creates a moat for incumbents like USDC (Circle) and USDT (Tether).
The infrastructure is already built. Every major DeFi protocol (Aave, Uniswap), Layer 2 (Arbitrum, Base), and cross-chain bridge (LayerZero, Wormhole) uses stablecoins as its primary liquidity pair. Network effects are irreversible.
Evidence: Stablecoins already process more annual transaction volume than Visa. The combined market cap of USDC and USDT exceeds $150B, dwarfing the transactional use of any other on-chain asset.
Core Thesis: The Inevitable Bifurcation
The internet's monetary base will be 80% stablecoins because native crypto volatility is incompatible with global commerce and programmable finance.
Stablecoins are the settlement asset. Native crypto assets like ETH or SOL are too volatile for daily transactions and institutional balance sheets. Tether (USDT) and Circle (USDC) dominate on-chain liquidity because they provide a predictable unit of account, enabling everything from Uniswap DEX trades to Aave lending markets.
Programmable money requires stability. Smart contracts cannot execute complex financial logic—like Compound's interest rate models or MakerDAO's collateral auctions—with a base currency whose value swings 10% daily. Stablecoins are the primitive for DeFi's composable money legos.
Regulatory capture is inevitable. Governments will tolerate and eventually regulate dollar-pegged digital assets long before they accept volatile cryptocurrencies as legal tender. This creates a two-tier monetary system: volatile crypto for speculation, and regulated stablecoins for everything else.
Evidence: Stablecoins already represent over 70% of all transaction value settled on public blockchains, with daily volumes exceeding $50B. The Ethereum and Solana ecosystems are structurally dependent on USDC and USDT for liquidity.
Three Data-Backed Trends Proving the Thesis
The composition of the internet's monetary base is shifting from volatile crypto assets to stable, programmable stablecoins. Here's the data.
The Problem: Volatility Kills Utility
No one builds a business on a currency that can swing 20% in a day. This is why DeFi TVL collapsed with bear markets, and why real-world commerce on-chain was impossible.
- $1.5T+ in crypto market cap wiped out in 2022 bear market.
- Merchant adoption near zero due to settlement risk.
- Layer 1s and Layer 2s become speculative vehicles, not utility platforms.
The Solution: Programmable Dollar Rails
Stablecoins like USDC, USDT, and DAI create a predictable unit of account. This unlocks real yield, cross-border payments, and on-chain commerce.
- $160B+ in stablecoin supply, dominating on-chain transaction volume.
- Uniswap and Aave liquidity pools are >80% stablecoin-denominated.
- Enables Circle's CCTP and layerzero for seamless cross-chain value transfer.
The Trend: Sovereign & Corporate Adoption
Nations and public companies are bypassing legacy FX systems. This isn't speculation; it's treasury management and operational efficiency.
- PayPal USD (PYUSD) bringing 430M+ users on-chain.
- Countries like Singapore and Hong Kong piloting CBDC/stablecoin frameworks.
- USDC becoming the de facto settlement layer for Visa and Stripe.
The Stablecoin Takeover: By the Numbers
Quantitative breakdown of why fiat-backed stablecoins will dominate the internet's monetary base, compared to traditional digital money and volatile crypto assets.
| Key Metric | Fiat-Backed Stablecoins (USDC, USDT) | Traditional Digital Money (Bank Deposits, Venmo) | Volatile Crypto Assets (BTC, ETH) |
|---|---|---|---|
Settlement Finality | < 15 seconds | 2-3 business days | ~10 minutes |
Programmability / Composability | |||
Global 24/7 Accessibility | |||
Annual Volatility | < 1% | 0% (nominal) |
|
On-Chain Daily Transfer Volume (30d Avg) | $50-80B | N/A (off-chain) | $10-20B |
Primary Use Case | Global Settlement & DeFi Collateral | Domestic Retail Payments | Speculative Asset / Store of Value |
Audit Transparency (Reserves) | Real-time Attestations | Quarterly Reports | N/A (algorithmic or native) |
Transaction Cost for $1M Transfer | $5-15 | $25-50 (wire fee) | $5-50 (network dependent) |
First Principles: Why Stability Wins the Transaction Layer
Stablecoins will dominate the monetary base of the internet because they provide the predictable unit of account required for global commerce and composable finance.
Stablecoins are unit accounts. Every financial system requires a stable unit for pricing, accounting, and settlement. Native crypto volatility makes it a poor base layer for commerce, creating a vacuum that fiat-pegged stablecoins fill.
Volatility destroys composability. Smart contracts and DeFi protocols like Aave and Compound require predictable collateral values. A volatile base asset introduces systemic liquidation risk and breaks the money lego model.
The data is conclusive. Over 70% of on-chain transaction value on Ethereum and Solana involves USDC or USDT. Payment rails like Circle's CCTP and intent-based systems like UniswapX default to stable settlement.
Counter-Argument: What About Hyperbitcoinization?
Bitcoin's monetary primacy is a maximalist fantasy; stablecoins are the pragmatic monetary base for global commerce.
Bitcoin is a settlement asset, not a transactional currency. Its volatility and finality latency make it unusable for daily payments or DeFi collateral. Stablecoins like USDC and USDT provide the price stability and instant settlement that real economies require.
Network effects favor composability. The entire DeFi stack—from Uniswap to Aave to Compound—is built on stablecoin liquidity. Replacing this with volatile BTC would collapse capital efficiency and introduce systemic risk, a regression no rational protocol will adopt.
The data is conclusive. Over 70% of on-chain transaction value involves stablecoins, not BTC or ETH. Tether's market cap often surpasses the GDP of entire nations, demonstrating its entrenched role as the de facto unit of account for crypto-native finance.
The Bear Case: What Could Derail the 80% Target?
The path to an 80% stablecoin monetary base is paved with systemic risks that could collapse the thesis.
The Regulatory Guillotine
A coordinated global crackdown, like the U.S. banning algorithmic or non-bank-issued stablecoins, could instantly vaporize $150B+ in liquidity. This creates a regulatory moat for compliant players like Circle (USDC) but kills permissionless innovation.
- Black Swan Risk: A major stablecoin depeg triggers a cascading liquidation event across DeFi.
- Fragmentation: A balkanized landscape of CBDCs and licensed stablecoins fractures global liquidity.
Centralized Point of Failure
The entire stack relies on off-chain attestations and banking rails. A single legal seizure of Tether's (USDT) reserves or a Circle banking partner collapse would cause a catastrophic loss of trust.
- Counterparty Risk: The USDC depeg of March 2023 proved systemic fragility.
- Censorship Vector: Central issuers can freeze addresses, undermining the credibly neutral base layer.
Technical Obsolescence & Fragmentation
The multi-chain future is a liquidity nightmare. Stablecoins fragment across 50+ L1/L2s, creating isolated pools and $B+ in bridge risk. A superior native asset (e.g., a hyper-scaled Bitcoin layer) could outcompete stablecoins as the unit of account.
- Bridge Risk: Exploits on LayerZero, Wormhole, or Axelar can trap billions.
- UX Friction: Users won't tolerate managing 10 different USDC variants.
The Sovereign Digital Currency Endgame
Major economies launch wholesale CBDCs and mandate their use for large-scale settlement. This crowds out private stablecoins for institutional use, relegating them to niche, retail, and grey-market applications.
- Network Effects: If the Digital Euro or Digital Yuan integrates seamlessly with TradFi, why use USDC?
- Legal Tender Status: CBDCs have a structural advantage private entities cannot match.
The DeFi Collateral Death Spiral
Stablecoins are the primary collateral in DeFi (e.g., MakerDAO, Aave). A severe market downturn triggers mass redemptions, forcing liquidations of the underlying collateral (e.g., ETH, LSTs), which crashes their price and further destabilizes the stablecoin's peg.
- Reflexivity Risk: The UST/LUNA collapse is the blueprint.
- Concentration: DAI's backing is now ~60%+ centralized stablecoins, creating a single point of failure.
Hyperinflation of the Dollar Itself
The foundational premise—that the USD is a stable unit of account—fails. If the U.S. experiences a loss of monetary credibility, all dollar-pegged stablecoins inherit that volatility. This makes them useless as a base layer, shifting demand to Bitcoin or commodity-backed alternatives.
- Base Layer Failure: You cannot build a stable house on a crumbling foundation.
- Paradigm Shift: The internet's money becomes a hard asset, not a fiat derivative.
The Next 24 Months: Regulation, Yield, and Composability
Stablecoins will become the dominant on-chain monetary base, driven by regulatory clarity, superior yield mechanics, and native composability.
Regulatory clarity drives institutional adoption. The EU's MiCA and US legislative proposals create a framework for compliant, audited stablecoin issuance. This legal certainty unlocks trillions in institutional capital, shifting the monetary base from volatile native assets to regulated digital dollars.
On-chain yield outcompetes traditional finance. Protocols like Aave and Compound offer programmable, real-time yield on stablecoins, a feature impossible with bank deposits. This yield becomes the primary incentive for capital to migrate on-chain, creating a self-reinforcing liquidity flywheel.
Native composability is the killer app. Stablecoins on Ethereum, Solana, and Arbitrum are the default settlement layer for DeFi. This allows seamless integration with Uniswap for swaps, MakerDAO for credit, and Circle's CCTP for cross-chain transfers, creating network effects that fiat rails cannot replicate.
Evidence: The data confirms the trend. Stablecoin supply exceeds $160B, representing over 10% of crypto's total market cap. On-chain stablecoin transfer volume consistently surpasses Visa's quarterly payment volume, proving they are already the dominant settlement medium for digital commerce.
TL;DR for Builders and Investors
The internet's monetary base will be stablecoins because they are the only asset that solves for settlement finality, programmability, and global access simultaneously.
The Problem: Fiat Rails Are a Bottleneck
Traditional finance is slow, expensive, and geographically fragmented. Cross-border payments take 2-5 days and cost 3-7%. This kills global micro-transactions and real-time settlement for dApps.
- Key Benefit 1: Stablecoins enable ~5 second global settlement.
- Key Benefit 2: They reduce transaction costs to <$0.01 for programmable value transfer.
The Solution: Programmable Money as a Primitive
Stablecoins aren't just digital dollars; they are the foundational liquidity layer for DeFi, NFTs, and on-chain economies. Protocols like Aave, Uniswap, and Compound require a stable unit of account.
- Key Benefit 1: Enables $100B+ in DeFi yield markets and lending.
- Key Benefit 2: Creates composable financial legos for novel applications like flash loans and real-world asset (RWA) tokenization.
The Catalyst: Regulatory Clarity & Institutional Onboarding
The approval of spot Bitcoin ETFs and frameworks like MiCA in Europe signal a path for compliant, institutional-grade stablecoins. Entities like BlackRock entering with BUIDL prove the demand.
- Key Benefit 1: Opens the door for trillions in institutional treasury management.
- Key Benefit 2: Drives demand for compliant infrastructure from Circle (USDC) and emerging players, creating a winner-take-most market.
The Architecture: Multi-Chain & Cross-Chain Dominance
Stablecoins are the primary asset bridged between chains. Over 60% of cross-chain volume is stablecoin transfers via protocols like LayerZero, Wormhole, and Circle's CCTP. They are the universal liquidity carrier.
- Key Benefit 1: Becomes the base pair for every DEX (e.g., USDC/ETH on Uniswap).
- Key Benefit 2: Enables intent-based systems like UniswapX and CowSwap to abstract liquidity sourcing across all chains.
The Metric: Velocity Over Hoarding
Money's value is in its use, not its storage. Stablecoins have a velocity orders of magnitude higher than base-layer assets like BTC or ETH. They are the working capital of the on-chain economy.
- Key Benefit 1: High velocity supports fee revenue for L1s/L2s (e.g., Ethereum, Solana, Base).
- Key Benefit 2: Creates a sustainable economic flywheel independent of speculative crypto cycles.
The Endgame: 80% of On-Chain Value
As the internet's economy migrates on-chain, the majority of transactional value must be in a stable unit of account. Gold is for saving, dollars are for spending. The internet will mirror this: BTC/ETH as reserve assets, stablecoins as the transactional base.
- Key Benefit 1: Predictable $10T+ addressable market as global trade digitizes.
- Key Benefit 2: Winners will be the issuers and infra providers that capture this utility layer, not just the store-of-value layer.
Get In Touch
today.
Our experts will offer a free quote and a 30min call to discuss your project.