Staking is a liability. Traditional staking locks capital, creating dead weight on balance sheets and capping protocol utility. This model is obsolete.
history-of-money-and-the-crypto-thesis
Blog
The Future of Yield: Programmable Staking as a Core Business Model
An analysis of how native, auto-compounding yield strategies are being embedded directly into protocol tokens, transforming them from speculative vehicles into productive capital assets and redefining on-chain business models.
introduction
THE SHIFT
Introduction
Programmable staking transforms passive assets into active, composable capital, creating a new core business model for protocols.
Programmable staking unlocks capital efficiency. Protocols like EigenLayer and Babylon enable restaking, allowing staked assets to secure additional services like rollups or data oracles. This creates a native yield layer.
The business model inverts. Instead of paying for security, protocols earn revenue by renting out their stakers' economic security. This turns staking from a cost center into a profit center.
Evidence: EigenLayer has over $15B in Total Value Restaked, demonstrating massive demand for this capital rehypothecation primitive.
thesis-statement
THE BUSINESS MODEL SHIFT
The Core Thesis: From Rent-Seeking to Value Creation
Programmable staking transforms idle capital into a composable, yield-generating input for on-chain services.
Staking is a business model. It moves from a passive, rent-seeking activity to an active, programmable input for DeFi and dApps. Protocols like EigenLayer and Babylon are the operating systems for this shift.
Yield becomes a product feature. Applications no longer compete on APY alone. They compete by integrating restaked assets as a core utility, enabling services like fast withdrawals or enhanced security.
Capital efficiency defines winners. The protocol that unlocks the most productive utility from staked capital wins. This is the value creation engine, moving beyond simple token emissions.
Evidence: EigenLayer has attracted over $15B in TVL by letting assets like stETH secure new Actively Validated Services (AVS), creating a new market for cryptoeconomic security.
historical-context
THE BUSINESS MODEL
The Evolution of On-Chain Yield: A Timeline of Inefficiency
Programmable staking transforms yield from a passive asset into an active, composable input for on-chain business logic.
Yield is a primitive. The history of on-chain yield is a chronicle of wasted utility. From static DeFi farming to rigid liquid staking tokens (LSTs), yield remained a siloed output, not a programmable input for applications.
Programmable staking changes this. Protocols like EigenLayer and Babylon abstract staking yield into a verifiable resource. This creates a capital efficiency market where staked assets secure both the base layer and novel services like restaking or Bitcoin timestamping.
The core business model shifts. Applications no longer compete for TVL alone; they compete to be the most productive consumer of staked capital. A lending market like Aave could use restaked ETH as collateral with custom slashing conditions, creating new risk/return vectors.
Evidence: EigenLayer has over $15B in TVL, demonstrating demand for yield utility. Protocols like Swell Network and Renzo are building LRTs (Liquid Restaking Tokens), the next evolution of yield-bearing assets designed for DeFi composability.
key-trends
THE FUTURE OF YIELD
Key Trends Driving Programmable Staking
Programmable staking is evolving from a passive yield mechanism into a core business model for protocols, enabling new financial primitives and revenue streams.
01
The Problem: Idle Capital Inefficiency
Staked assets are traditionally locked and unproductive beyond base-layer security. This represents a $100B+ opportunity cost in DeFi.\n- Solution: Programmatic delegation to on-chain strategies like EigenLayer AVSs or Lido's Staked ETH.\n- Key Benefit: Unlocks double or triple-digit basis points in additional yield on staked principal.\n- Key Benefit: Turns a cost center (security) into a profit center for stakers and protocols.
$100B+
Opportunity Cost
2-5%
Added Yield
02
The Solution: Liquid Staking as a Financial Primitive
Liquid Staking Tokens (LSTs) like stETH are becoming the foundational collateral layer for DeFi 2.0.\n- Key Benefit: Enables composability for lending (Aave, Compound), leveraged staking, and perps.\n- Key Benefit: Protocols like EigenLayer and Babylon are extending this to Bitcoin and other assets, creating a unified cryptoeconomic security layer.\n- Trend: The race is on to build the most capital-efficient and integrated LST, moving beyond simple token wrappers.
30M+
ETH Staked
~90%
DeFi Collateral Usage
03
The Shift: From Validators to Service Operators
The endgame is not running validators, but selling cryptoeconomic security as a service.\n- Key Benefit: Projects can bootstrap security by restaking from established pools (EigenLayer, Karak), avoiding the $1B+ cost of a native token launch.\n- Key Benefit: Creates a two-sided marketplace for stakers (yield seekers) and AVS/rollup developers (security buyers).\n- Entity Play: This trend validates the restaking thesis and platforms like EigenLayer, Symbiotic, and Karak that orchestrate it.
$1B+
Cost Avoided
50+
Active AVSs
04
The Enabler: Intent-Based Staking & Settlement
Users shouldn't manage validator nodes or slashing risk. The future is stating a yield intent and having a solver network (like UniswapX or CowSwap) optimize the path.\n- Key Benefit: Abstracts complexity—users get optimal yield across LSTs, restaking, and DeFi in one transaction.\n- Key Benefit: Enables cross-chain staking strategies via intents and bridges like LayerZero and Across.\n- Trend: This turns staking into a commoditized backend service, where user experience and yield aggregation are the differentiators.
1-Click
Execution
~20%
Yield Boost
05
The Risk: Systemic Fragility & Centralization
Programmable staking creates deep interconnections and hidden leverage. A failure in a major LST or restaking platform could cascade.\n- Problem: Liquidity fragmentation across dozens of LSTs weakens DeFi's collateral base.\n- Problem: Slashing risk aggregation in restaking pools creates new, poorly understood systemic risks.\n- Imperative: The winning platforms will be those that optimize for security and resilience, not just yield, attracting institutional capital.
High
Correlation Risk
Critical
Audit Need
06
The Business Model: Protocol-Owned Liquidity & Fees
The real value accrual shifts from token emissions to capturing fees from a staking economy.\n- Key Benefit: Protocols can build protocol-owned staking vaults, capturing a spread on yield generated (see Frax Finance's sFRAX model).\n- Key Benefit: Fee stacking becomes possible—earning fees from staking, restaking, and AVS services simultaneously.\n- Trend: This creates sustainable, yield-bearing treasuries that fund development without dilution, moving beyond mercenary capital.
5-20%
Fee Capture
Sustainable
Treasury Yield
deep-dive
THE BUSINESS MODEL
The Mechanics: How Protocols Engineer Native Yield
Protocols are transforming staking from a passive security mechanism into an active, programmable revenue engine.
Programmable staking separates yield from security. Protocols like EigenLayer and Babylon abstract the consensus layer, allowing staked assets to be restaked for additional services like data availability or Bitcoin security. This creates a native yield flywheel where the protocol's core utility generates its own revenue stream.
Yield is now a composable financial primitive. A protocol's staking yield becomes a programmable input for DeFi, similar to how Uniswap treats liquidity. Projects like EigenLayer AVSs and Stake.link build services that consume this yield, turning stakers into a capital-as-a-service layer for the broader ecosystem.
The business model shifts from fees to treasury accrual. Instead of just taking protocol fees, the protocol itself earns yield on its native token treasury or a portion of user-staked assets. Lido's stETH and Rocket Pool's rETH demonstrate how yield-bearing derivatives become the primary product, with the protocol capturing value through the spread.
Evidence: EigenLayer has over $15B in restaked ETH, creating a new market for Actively Validated Services (AVSs) that pay for security, fundamentally altering the cryptoeconomic stack.
CORE BUSINESS MODEL EVOLUTION
The Yield Spectrum: Comparing Staking Models
Comparison of traditional staking against emerging programmable staking models, highlighting the shift from a passive yield source to an active, composable financial primitive.
| Feature / Metric | Traditional Native Staking | Liquid Staking Tokens (LSTs) | Programmable Staking (Restaking & AVS) |
|---|---|---|---|
Primary Yield Source | Protocol Inflation & Fees | Underlying Staking Yield | Staking Yield + AVS Service Fees |
Capital Efficiency | |||
Yield Composability | DeFi Lending & Borrowing | Full Stack (DeFi, Oracles, Rollups) | |
Protocol Control Over Capital | Slashing Only | None | Programmatic Reallocation via AVSs |
Time to Liquidity (Unbonding) | 7-28 days | Instant via LST | Varies by AVS (EigenLayer) |
Additional Protocol Risk | Network Slashing | LST Depeg, Smart Contract | Correlated Slashing, AVS Failure |
Exemplar Protocols | Ethereum, Cosmos | Lido (stETH), Rocket Pool (rETH) | EigenLayer, Babylon, Symbiotic |
protocol-spotlight
PROGRAMMABLE STAKING
Protocol Spotlight: Who's Building This Future?
The next wave of DeFi protocols are turning passive staking into an active, composable financial primitive.
01
EigenLayer: The Restaking Primitive
EigenLayer transforms idle ETH staking yield into a reusable security budget for new protocols. It solves the "cold start" problem for networks like EigenDA and AltLayer.
- Key Benefit: Enables $15B+ in pooled security for Actively Validated Services (AVSs).
- Key Benefit: Unlocks dual yield: base ETH staking + AVS rewards.
$15B+
TVL
40+
AVSs
02
The Problem: Idle Capital in Liquid Staking Tokens
Liquid Staking Tokens (LSTs) like stETH and rETH are parked in wallets and AMMs, generating yield but not contributing to ecosystem security or utility.
- Key Benefit: Programmable staking redirects this $30B+ capital base to secure new applications.
- Key Benefit: Turns a passive asset into an active, yield-optimizing agent.
$30B+
LST Market
2x+
Yield Potential
03
The Solution: Automated Yield Strategies via Restaking
Protocols like Kelp DAO and Renzo abstract restaking complexity into automated, yield-optimizing vaults. They manage AVS selection and slashing risk.
- Key Benefit: One-click exposure to a diversified basket of AVS rewards.
- Key Benefit: Professional risk management for retail capital.
Auto-Compound
Strategy
-90%
User Ops
04
Babylon: Bitcoin Secures Proof-of-Stake
Babylon extends programmable staking's thesis to Bitcoin, allowing BTC to be timestamped and slashed to secure PoS chains. This taps into $1T+ of dormant capital.
- Key Benefit: Brings Bitcoin's robust security to the modular stack.
- Key Benefit: Unlocks yield for Bitcoin holders without leaving the Bitcoin ecosystem.
$1T+
Addressable Asset
Native BTC
Security
05
The Problem: Fragmented Security & Silos
Each new blockchain or rollup must bootstrap its own validator set, leading to capital inefficiency and weaker security for smaller chains.
- Key Benefit: Shared security pools like EigenLayer create stronger, more cost-effective networks.
- Key Benefit: Reduces the security overhead for L2s and app-chains by >50%.
>50%
Cost Reduced
Pooled
Security
06
The Solution: Staking as a Service (SaaS) for dApps
Platforms like AltLayer and Espresso Systems offer rollups and dApps a plug-and-play security layer via restaking. Developers rent security instead of building it.
- Key Benefit: ~5-minute setup for a securely validated rollup.
- Key Benefit: Business model shifts from token emissions to revenue-sharing with restakers.
~5 min
Setup Time
Revenue Share
Model
risk-analysis
PROGRAMMABLE STAKING
The Bear Case: Risks & Centralization Vectors
The shift from passive delegation to active, logic-driven yield strategies introduces new systemic risks and centralization pressures.
01
The Smart Contract Risk Multiplier
Programmable staking vaults are complex, upgradeable smart contracts. A single bug can lead to irreversible slashing or fund lock-up, as seen in early DeFi exploits. This risk is compounded by the $10B+ TVL target for these protocols.
- Single Point of Failure: Logic errors affect all pooled capital.
- Governance Attack Surface: Upgrade mechanisms are prime targets for capture.
- Oracle Dependency: Yield automation often relies on external data feeds (e.g., Chainlink).
$10B+
TVL at Risk
1 Bug
Total Loss Vector
02
The MEV Cartel Formation
Programmable staking pools with integrated block building (e.g., EigenLayer AVSs, Flashbots SUAVE) create natural monopolies. The largest pools can dominate block space and extract maximum value, centralizing network power and economic rewards.
- Vertical Integration: Control over stake, execution, and ordering.
- Extractable Value: >90% of MEV could flow to a few entities.
- Barrier to Entry: Smaller operators cannot compete on capital efficiency.
>90%
MEV Capture
Oligopoly
Market Structure
03
Regulatory Capture of Yield
As programmable staking becomes a core business for institutions (e.g., Coinbase, Figment), it invites direct regulatory scrutiny. Compliance requirements (KYC/AML on staking yields, geographic restrictions) will be baked into smart contract logic, creating permissioned, fragmented liquidity pools.
- KYC'd Validators: Staking may require identity verification.
- Geofenced Yield: Protocols may block users by jurisdiction.
- CeDeFi Dominance: TradFi giants will outcompete permissionless actors.
TradFi
Primary Beneficiary
Fragmented
Liquidity
04
Liquidity Fragmentation & Systemic Instability
Yield-seeking capital will rapidly migrate between EigenLayer restaking, Solana LSTs, and Cosmos liquid staking, chasing basis points. This creates volatile, hot money TVL that can destabilize underlying consensus during market stress, similar to bank runs.
- Cross-Chain Contagion: A depeg on one chain triggers withdrawals on others.
- Validator Churn: Rapid stake movement harms network stability.
- Reflexive Downturns: Falling yields trigger exits, which further depress yields.
Seconds
Withdrawal Speed
High Churn
Network Impact
future-outlook
THE BUSINESS MODEL SHIFT
Future Outlook: The End of Passive Tokens
Native yield generation will become a programmable core business model, replacing static token distribution.
Programmable staking is the new business model. Native yield transforms tokens from passive assets into active revenue engines. Protocols like EigenLayer and Babylon demonstrate this by enabling restaking and Bitcoin staking, creating new yield sources from existing capital.
Yield becomes a composable financial primitive. Future protocols will programmatically direct staking yield to specific functions—funding liquidity pools on Uniswap, subsidizing gas on Ethereum L2s, or backing insurance on Nexus Mutual. This creates a self-sustaining economic flywheel.
Passive token holders become active stakeholders. The era of 'set and forget' staking ends. Token governance will require directing treasury yield, forcing a shift from passive speculation to active capital allocation, similar to a corporate CFO's role.
Evidence: EigenLayer has secured over $15B in TVL by enabling restaked ETH to secure Actively Validated Services (AVS), proving demand for yield-bearing security as a service.
takeaways
THE NEW YIELD STACK
Executive Summary
Passive staking is a commodity. The next frontier is programmable staking, where yield becomes a composable, tradable asset class.
01
The Problem: Staking is a $100B+ Illiquid Asset
Staked assets are trapped, creating massive capital inefficiency. This locks up ~$100B+ in TVL that could be used for DeFi or collateral. Protocols lose out on fee revenue from secondary markets built on their stake.
$100B+
Locked TVL
0%
Rehypothecation
02
The Solution: Liquid Staking Tokens as Programmable Yield
LSTs like Lido's stETH and Rocket Pool's rETH transform static stake into a yield-bearing primitive. This enables:\n- Composability: Use LSTs as collateral in Aave or Maker.\n- Tradability: Isolate and trade future yield via Pendle or EigenLayer.\n- Automation: Auto-compound via Yearn or Convex strategies.
30%+
DeFi TVL Share
5-7%
Base Yield
03
The Catalyst: Restaking & Yield Fragmentation
EigenLayer's restaking model fragments security and yield, creating new markets. Operators can sell slashing insurance, while users can direct yield to secure AVSs. This turns a monolithic reward into a tradable risk/yield bundle.
$15B+
Restaked TVL
50+
AVSs
04
The Business Model: Protocol-Controlled Yield Vaults
Forward-thinking protocols like Ethena and Kelp DAO are building their own LST/restaking vaults. This captures fee revenue from the entire yield stack and creates a native yield-backed stable asset, turning treasury management into a core product.
10-20%
Fee Capture
Native Asset
New Primitive
05
The Endgame: Yield as a Service (YaaS)
The final state is a marketplace where any dApp can plug into a yield backend. Think AWS for staking yield. Protocols like Symbiotic and Babylon are abstracting cryptoeconomic security, allowing apps to rent yield and security without running validators.
Plug-and-Play
Integration
Multi-Chain
Coverage
06
The Risk: Systemic Slashing Contagion
Programmable staking creates deep interconnections. A major slashing event on a restaking platform like EigenLayer could trigger cascading liquidations across DeFi, similar to the UST collapse. Over-collateralization and risk markets become critical.
High
Correlation Risk
Novel
Attack Vectors
ENQUIRY
Get In Touch
today.
Our experts will offer a free quote and a 30min call to discuss your project.
NDA Protected
Confidentiality24h Response
Time to ValueDirectly to Engineering Team
No Sales Fluff10+
Protocols Shipped
$20M+
TVL Overall