Overcollateralization is exclusionary. Protocols like MakerDAO and Aave require assets worth 150%+ of a loan, a model designed for capital-rich users holding volatile crypto, not for users whose primary assets are non-financial.
global-crypto-adoption-emerging-markets
Blog
Why We Must Rethink Collateral for the Global South
The dogma of T-bills and corporate bonds as prime collateral is a developed-world luxury. For true global adoption, crypto must embrace the assets the Global South actually holds: land, commodities, and future income streams.
introduction
THE COLLATERAL MISMATCH
Introduction
Traditional DeFi collateral models are structurally incompatible with the economic realities of the Global South.
Real-world assets (RWAs) are the wrong abstraction. Tokenizing land titles or invoices via Centrifuge assumes pre-existing, formalized property rights—a condition absent for billions. The solution is not to force local assets onto global ledgers.
The required primitive is proof-of-productivity. Collateral must derive from verifiable economic output, not static asset ownership. Systems like Ethereum's attestations or Hyperlane's interchain messaging must anchor to local activity, not just global capital.
Evidence: In Nigeria, 90% of land is informally owned, rendering RWA-based DeFi irrelevant. Successful models like Kenya's M-Pesa scaled by monetizing mobile minutes—a flow, not a stock.
key-trends
WHY TRADITIONAL DEFI FAILS 4B PEOPLE
The Collateral Reality Gap
Current DeFi's over-collateralization model is a luxury good, excluding billions who lack capital but not creditworthiness.
01
The Problem: The 150% Over-Collateralization Trap
DeFi protocols like MakerDAO and Aave require users to lock more value than they borrow, creating a massive capital efficiency barrier. This is a non-starter for the asset-light majority.
- Exclusionary: Locks out users with high income but low savings.
- Inefficient: Ties up $50B+ in TVL that could be productive elsewhere.
- Regressive: Benefits those who already have capital, widening wealth gaps.
150%+
Collateral Ratio
0%
Access for Unbanked
02
The Solution: On-Chain Credit Scoring & Identity
Leveraging verifiable credentials and transaction history to underwrite loans without over-collateralization. Projects like Getline and Spectral Finance are pioneering this.
- Risk-Based Pricing: Loans priced on reputation scores, not just collateral value.
- Portable Identity: Build credit across chains via Ethereum Attestation Service or Verax.
- Real-World Utility: Enables microloans, invoice financing, and salary advances.
10-100x
More Borrowers
<100%
Collateral Ratio
03
The Problem: Illiquid, Unrecognized Collateral
The Global South holds wealth in non-financial assets—land, crops, future harvests—that are invisible to blockchain oracles. Chainlink can't price a rice paddy.
- Oracle Gap: No reliable data feeds for local, physical assets.
- Legal Enforceability: On-chain liens on off-chain assets are legally murky.
- Liquidity Silos: Tokenized real-world assets (RWAs) remain niche and fragmented.
$XXT
Unlocked Value
0
On-Chain Oracles
04
The Solution: Localized Oracles & Legal Wrappers
Building hyper-local validation networks and legally enforceable smart contracts for real-world collateral. This is the RWA 2.0 playbook.
- Community Oracles: Trusted local validators (e.g., cooperatives, NGOs) attest to asset existence and value.
- Hybrid Legal Smart Contracts: Integrate with local land registries and use RWA-focused protocols like Centrifuge.
- Fractionalization: Turn a single tractor or warehouse into fungible debt positions for lenders.
Local
Validation
Legal
Enforceability
05
The Problem: Volatility Wrecks Borrowing Power
Crypto-native collateral (ETH, BTC) is too volatile for stable long-term loans. A 20% price drop triggers liquidations, making it useless for financing a business or education.
- Pro-Cyclical Risk: Market downturns force mass liquidations, exacerbating crashes.
- Unpredictable Costs: Borrowers cannot reliably plan debt repayment schedules.
- Forced Dollarization: Users must seek stablecoins, which are often inaccessible or untrusted locally.
20%
Drop = Liquidation
High
Planning Risk
06
The Solution: Stable Local Currency Pairs & Hedging
Creating debt markets in local fiat-pegged stablecoins or volatility-insulated vaults. This requires deep liquidity pools for pairs like BRL/USDC or NGN/USDC.
- Localized Stablecoins: Projects like Funtopia or Paxos issuing regulated local currency tokens.
- Volatility Vaults: Use option strategies (via Lyra, Premia) to hedge collateral value automatically.
- Cross-Currency AMMs: Protocols like Uniswap v4 with hooks can optimize for low-volatility, high-volume local pairs.
Stable
Debt Denomination
Hedged
Collateral Risk
deep-dive
THE FRAMEWORK
The Three Pillars of Viable EM Collateral
Tokenized real-world assets from emerging markets require a new collateral framework built on composability, verifiability, and liquidity.
Composability is non-negotiable. Collateral must be a programmable asset, not a static token. A tokenized Kenyan treasury bill must integrate with DeFi lending protocols like Aave or MakerDAO without requiring custom adapters. This demands standards like ERC-3643 for compliant securities and Chainlink's CCIP for cross-chain attestations.
On-chain verifiability supersedes legal opinion. Investors will not trust off-chain audits. The asset's existence and legal status require cryptographically-verifiable proofs. This means oracle networks like Chainlink must attest to real-world data, and zero-knowledge proofs must validate the integrity of the underlying registry, moving beyond traditional credit rating agencies.
Native yield anchors valuation. The collateral's yield must be autonomously distributable on-chain. A tokenized Brazilian government bond must stream coupon payments via Superfluid or Sablier directly to the holder's wallet. This transforms the asset from a static store of value into a productive financial primitive within DeFi money markets.
Evidence: The failure of Terra's UST demonstrated that algorithmic stability without real-world cashflow is fragile. Successful models, like Maple Finance's private credit pools, show that transparent, yield-bearing assets with clear legal recourse form sustainable collateral.
WHY TRADITIONAL MODELS FAIL
Collateral Archetypes: A Technical Comparison
A first-principles breakdown of collateral mechanisms, evaluating their viability for onboarding the next billion users in the Global South.
| Feature / Metric | Overcollateralized (MakerDAO, Aave) | Undercollateralized (Maple, Goldfinch) | Non-Collateralized (DeFi Credit Scores, Spectral) |
|---|---|---|---|
Capital Efficiency (Loan-to-Value) | 50-80% | 100-150% | ∞ (No upfront collateral) |
Onboarding Friction | Requires pre-existing crypto assets | Requires accredited/DAO approval | Requires on-chain transaction history |
Liquidation Risk | High (Volatility triggers auctions) | Medium (Relies on legal recourse) | None (No collateral to liquidate) |
Interest Rate Model | Algorithmic, supply/demand based | Fixed by pool, set by arrangers | Risk-based, personalized via ML |
Primary Use Case | Leverage for crypto-natives | Institutional capital to DAOs/Corps | Microloans, BNPL for retail users |
Sybil Attack Resistance | High (Costly to acquire collateral) | Medium (KYC/off-chain diligence) | Low (Requires novel identity graphs) |
Settlement Finality | On-chain, instant | Off-chain legal + on-chain execution | On-chain, contingent on score |
Oracle Dependency | Critical (Price feeds for collateral) | Low (Off-chain asset assessment) | High (Data feeds for scoring models) |
protocol-spotlight
DECOLONIZING CAPITAL
Builders on the Frontier
Traditional collateral systems exclude billions. On-chain primitives offer a radical redesign for emerging economies.
01
The Problem: The $5.2 Trillion Collateral Gap
IMF data shows ~70% of SMEs in developing nations lack acceptable collateral, locking them out of formal credit. On-chain, overcollateralization (e.g., MakerDAO's 150%+ ratios) replicates this exclusion.
- Exclusionary: Requires pre-existing, liquid capital.
- Inefficient: Idles billions in locked value that could be productive.
70%
SMEs Excluded
150%+
Typical Crypto LTV
02
The Solution: RWA Tokenization & Future Cash Flows
Projects like Centrifuge and Goldfinch tokenize invoices, farmland, and revenue streams, creating loanable assets from local economic activity.
- Inclusive Collateral: Turns illiquid local assets into global capital.
- Risk Diversification: Provides institutional-grade yield to DeFi pools from real-world activity.
$300M+
RWA TVL
10-15%
APY for Farmers
03
The Solution: Reputation & Social Graphs as Collateral
Protocols like Getline and Spectral use on-chain transaction history and off-chain data (e.g., mobile money records) to underwrite uncollateralized credit lines.
- Trustless Credit Scores: Sybil-resistant identity graphs replace physical assets.
- Progressive Decentralization: Starts with verified oracles, evolves to zk-proofs of reputation.
0%
Initial Collateral
1000+
On-chain Factors
04
The Solution: Cross-Chain Collateral Aggregation
Infrastructure like LayerZero and Axelar enables a farmer's assets on Celo to secure a loan for equipment on Ethereum, solving fragmented liquidity.
- Capital Efficiency: Unlocks stranded value across L2s and alt-L1s.
- Interoperability Standard: Creates a global collateral marketplace beyond single-chain silos.
50+
Chains Connected
$10B+
Message Volume
05
The Problem: Oracle Manipulation & Local Price Feeds
A farmer's tokenized harvest is worthless if the price feed is gamed or unavailable. Current oracles (Chainlink) lack hyper-local, volatile asset coverage.
- Systemic Risk: Single points of failure for novel asset classes.
- Data Gaps: No feeds for region-specific commodities or mobile airtime credit.
<1%
Covered Assets
~3s
Update Latency
06
The Architect's Mandate: Build for Context, Not Abstraction
Success requires localized primitives, not just importing DeFi Lego. This means:
- Purpose-Built Oracles: For agricultural yields, remittance flows.
- Mobile-First UX: ~500ms finality, <$0.01 tx costs (see Celo, SEI).
- Regulatory Primitives: zk-KYC attestations for compliant access.
<$0.01
Target Tx Cost
500ms
Target Finality
counter-argument
THE REAL-WORLD ASSET PARADOX
The Liquidation Fallacy (And How to Solve It)
On-chain collateral models fail in emerging markets because they ignore local economic volatility and liquidity constraints.
Overcollateralization is exclusionary. It demands stable, liquid assets that simply do not exist for most of the global population, locking out billions from DeFi.
Local volatility breaks global models. A 20% price drop in USDC is a crisis; the same swing in a local currency is Tuesday. Protocols like MakerDAO and Aave are not calibrated for this reality.
The solution is composable, non-correlated collateral. Systems must accept baskets of assets—from tokenized invoices via Centrifuge to agricultural receipts—to create stability through diversification.
Evidence: During the 2022 LUNC crash, Terra-based collateral pools evaporated. A diversified RWA vault would have absorbed the shock from uncorrelated, income-generating assets.
takeaways
THE REAL-WORLD ASSET SHIFT
TL;DR for Builders and Investors
Traditional DeFi collateral is a luxury good, excluding billions. The next wave of adoption requires rethinking what can be locked on-chain.
01
The Problem: Off-Chain Wealth is Invisible
$1T+ in informal economy assets across the Global South are locked out of DeFi. The current system demands crypto-native collateral, creating a massive liquidity trap.
- Exclusionary Design: Requires pre-existing capital in a volatile asset class.
- Missed Market: Ignores the primary store of value for emerging economies: land, inventory, receivables.
- Systemic Risk: Concentrates DeFi TVL in a handful of correlated crypto assets like ETH and stETH.
$1T+
Informal Assets
>80%
Excluded Users
02
The Solution: Hyperlocal Oracles & Legal Wrappers
Bridge real-world state to the chain with context-aware infrastructure. This isn't just Chainlink for commodities; it's proving ownership and cash flows from Lagos to Manila.
- Local Validators: Networks like DIA and Pyth must expand to cover micro-economies and non-standard assets.
- Legal Entity Onboarding: Protocols like Centrifuge and Goldfinch provide the template for asset tokenization, but require localization.
- New Collateral Stack: Creates a non-correlated asset base for DeFi, reducing systemic risk.
10-100x
Addressable Market
<1%
Correlation to ETH
03
The Blueprint: MakerDAO's Endgame Plan
Maker is pioneering the playbook by backing DAI with real-world assets (~$2B+ in RWA collateral). Their SubDAO model is a masterclass in scalable, localized collateral engineering.
- SubDAO Specialization: Spark for crypto, Sky for agriculture—each optimizes for a specific asset class.
- Institutional Pipelines: Direct onboarding of regulated asset originators (e.g., Huntingdon Valley Bank).
- Proof of Concept: Demonstrates stable yield and demand for yield-bearing, real-world-backed stablecoins.
$2B+
RWA Collateral
6%+
Stable Yield
04
The Moonshot: Credit Scoring On-Chain
The final frontier is undercollateralized lending. This requires immutable, portable reputation—moving beyond overcollateralization as the only security model.
- Sovereign Identity: Protocols like Gitcoin Passport and Worldcoin can anchor identity, but need integration with local financial behavior.
- Cash Flow as Collateral: Lending against verifiable revenue streams from platforms like PayPal, M-Pesa, or Shopify.
- Paradigm Shift: Unlocks productive capital for entrepreneurs, not just leveraged speculation for capital holders.
0%
Collateral Required
100M+
SMEs Unlocked
ENQUIRY
Get In Touch
today.
Our experts will offer a free quote and a 30min call to discuss your project.
NDA Protected
Confidentiality24h Response
Time to ValueDirectly to Engineering Team
No Sales Fluff10+
Protocols Shipped
$20M+
TVL Overall