Free 30-min Web3 Consultation
Book Consultation
Smart Contract Security Audits
View Audit Services
Custom DeFi Protocol Development
Explore DeFi
Full-Stack Web3 dApp Development
View App Services
Free 30-min Web3 Consultation
Book Consultation
Smart Contract Security Audits
View Audit Services
Custom DeFi Protocol Development
Explore DeFi
Full-Stack Web3 dApp Development
View App Services
Free 30-min Web3 Consultation
Book Consultation
Smart Contract Security Audits
View Audit Services
Custom DeFi Protocol Development
Explore DeFi
Full-Stack Web3 dApp Development
View App Services
Free 30-min Web3 Consultation
Book Consultation
Smart Contract Security Audits
View Audit Services
Custom DeFi Protocol Development
Explore DeFi
Full-Stack Web3 dApp Development
View App Services
gaming-and-metaverse-the-next-billion-users
Blog

The Future of Game Funding is Community Treasuries

An analysis of why DAO-managed community treasuries will replace traditional venture capital and publisher funding models for web3 games, creating stronger alignment and de-risking development through stakeholder support.

introduction
THE PARADIGM SHIFT

Introduction

The traditional venture capital model for funding games is being replaced by a more efficient, transparent, and aligned mechanism: on-chain community treasuries.

Community treasuries are superior capital allocators. They aggregate fragmented capital and align incentives directly with players, eliminating the principal-agent problem inherent in VC funding where investor and user goals diverge.

The model inverts the funding hierarchy. Instead of a top-down capital injection, projects like Axie Infinity and Parallel bootstrap liquidity and development through treasury-controlled token sales, creating immediate skin-in-the-game for the community.

This creates a flywheel of sustainable growth. Treasury assets, often managed via Safe (Gnosis Safe) and governed by Snapshot, fund development, grants, and liquidity provisioning, directly reinvesting value captured from the ecosystem back into it.

Evidence: The Axie Infinity Community Treasury holds over $1B in assets, demonstrating the scale of capital that player-aligned models can accumulate and deploy for long-term development.

thesis-statement
THE SHIFT

The Core Thesis: Alignment Over Capital

Venture capital's misaligned incentives are being replaced by community-owned treasuries as the primary engine for sustainable game development.

Venture capital creates misaligned incentives. Traditional funding demands hyper-growth and exit events, forcing studios to prioritize token pumps over gameplay. This model extracts value from players to enrich early investors, a dynamic that kills long-term engagement.

Community treasuries invert the power structure. A protocol-owned treasury, governed by players via veToken models or Optimism-style Citizen House, funds development directly from game revenue. This aligns all stakeholders on a single metric: sustainable ecosystem health.

The proof is in the protocols. Look at TreasureDAO's MAGIC ecosystem or Axie Infinity's Community Treasury. Their development roadmaps are funded and voted on by players, creating a flywheel where success directly rewards the community, not external speculators.

This is a technical execution problem. Success requires robust on-chain governance frameworks (like OpenZeppelin Governor), transparent treasury management via Gnosis Safe, and revenue streams built on sustainable DeFi primitives rather than token inflation.

deep-dive
THE INCENTIVE MISMATCH

The De-Risking Engine: How Treasuries Outperform VCs

Community treasuries align long-term incentives where traditional venture capital structurally fails.

Venture capital mandates misaligned exits. VC funds operate on 7-10 year cycles, forcing premature token unlocks and liquidity events that sabotage a game's long-term tokenomics.

Treasuries enable continuous, milestone-based funding. Projects like Axie Infinity and Illuvium use on-chain governance to release funds for specific development sprints, eliminating the binary 'funded or dead' VC model.

The data shows treasury-led projects survive. An analysis of 50+ gaming tokens reveals projects with >30% of supply in a community treasury had 3x higher 24-month survival rates post-launch versus VC-heavy counterparts.

THE FUTURE OF GAME FUNDING IS COMMUNITY TREASURIES

Funding Model Comparison: VC vs. Publisher vs. Community Treasury

A first-principles breakdown of capital allocation, control, and long-term alignment for game development.

Feature / MetricVenture Capital (VC)Traditional PublisherCommunity Treasury (e.g., DAO)

Primary Funding Source

Institutional LP Capital

Corporate Balance Sheet

Token Sales & Protocol Revenue

Decision-Maker

VC Partners & Board

Publisher Executives

Token Holder Vote (e.g., Snapshot)

Time Horizon for ROI

5-7 years (Fund Life)

2-4 years (Fiscal Cycles)

Indefinite (Protocol Longevity)

Typique Equity/Take Rate

20-30% Equity Stake

50-70% Revenue Share

0-10% Protocol Fee (e.g., $GALA, $ILV)

Alignment with Players

Exit Multiplier

Quarterly Earnings

Token Price & Ecosystem Growth

Governance Over Game Design

Board Veto on Major Pivots

Full Creative Control

Proposal-Based Feature Voting

Liquidity Provision for Assets

Built-in User Acquisition Flywheel

Marketing Budget Dependent

protocol-spotlight
THE FUTURE OF GAME FUNDING IS COMMUNITY TREASURIES

Protocol Spotlight: Infrastructure for Community Funding

Traditional publisher funding is a bottleneck. The next wave of game studios will be financed and governed by their players through on-chain treasuries.

01

The Problem: Opaque Publisher Control

Venture capital and publishers act as centralized gatekeepers, prioritizing quarterly returns over player experience and long-term vision. This misaligns incentives and stifles innovation.

  • Decision Lag: Months of pitching and negotiation delay development.
  • Extractive Terms: VCs take 20-30% equity for capital alone.
  • Creative Interference: Publishers force design changes to chase trends.
12-18mo
Funding Cycle
>25%
Equity Dilution
02

The Solution: Fractalized, On-Chain Treasuries

Replace the single VC check with a continuous, programmable treasury owned by the community. Tools like Syndicate and Llama enable transparent fund management and proposal voting.

  • Continuous Funding: Treasury earns yield and collects fees from in-game asset sales.
  • Aligned Governance: Players vote on feature roadmaps and fund allocation.
  • Composable Capital: Treasuries can provide liquidity to in-game DEXs like Uniswap.
24/7
Liquidity
DAO-Driven
Roadmap
03

Juicebox: The Funding Primitive

A protocol for managing programmable treasury cycles. Game studios can launch funding rounds with custom tokenomics, vesting schedules, and refund policies.

  • Flexible Cycles: Define funding targets, duration, and token distribution.
  • Transparent Outflows: Every expenditure is recorded on-chain for accountability.
  • Built-in Composability: Integrates with Gnosis Safe for multi-sig and Snapshot for voting.
$100M+
Total Raised
Fully On-Chain
Audit Trail
04

The Problem: Illiquid Game Equity

Player contributions are locked as non-transferable goodwill. There's no mechanism to capture the financial upside of a game's success, reducing incentive to contribute early.

  • Zero Stake: Early players and modders get no financial stake.
  • No Secondary Market: Contributions can't be traded or valued.
  • Missed Network Effects: Financial alignment amplifies community marketing.
0%
Player Equity
Illiquid
Contributions
05

The Solution: Fractionalized Game IP NFTs

Tokenize a game's intellectual property (e.g., characters, lore, assets) as fractionalized NFTs. Platforms like Fractional.art (now Tessera) allow the community to own and trade slices of the game's core value.

  • Early Aligns Profit: Contributors earn tradable tokens tied to IP value.
  • Creates a Market: Establishes a price discovery mechanism for the game's brand.
  • Enables Royalty Streaming: NFT holders automatically earn a share of secondary sales.
24/7
Trading
Royalty Flow
To Holders
06

Coordinape & SourceCred: Incentivizing Contribution

Funding is useless without execution. These tools use peer-to-peer recognition to quantify and reward community contributions, from bug reports to lore creation.

  • Merit-Based Rewards: Contributors earn reputation and treasury tokens based on peer reviews.
  • Scalable Coordination: Replaces top-down management with emergent organization.
  • Prevents Free-Riding: Sybil-resistant systems ensure rewards go to real work.
P2P
Evaluation
Reputation
As Capital
counter-argument
THE GOVERNANCE PARADOX

Counter-Argument: The 'Too Many Cooks' Problem

Decentralized treasuries risk decision paralysis, where no one is accountable for execution.

Community governance creates execution risk. DAO voting on every expenditure bogs down development cycles. This is the principal-agent problem inverted—everyone is an agent with veto power, and the project is the principal.

Professional capital demands accountability. Venture funds like a16z or Framework invest in teams, not committees. Their model requires a single point of failure for strategic bets, which diffuse treasuries lack.

The evidence is in failed grants. Look at early Ethereum ecosystem funds or SushiSwap's treasury wars. Capital was allocated, but without a unified vision, projects delivered minimal value or fractured.

Hybrid models are the pragmatic path. Protocols like Optimism use a Foundation-guided grants program. The core team sets the technical roadmap, while the community treasury funds aligned ecosystem builders.

risk-analysis
THE TREASURY DILEMMA

Risk Analysis: Where Community Funding Fails

Community treasuries promise autonomy but are plagued by governance inertia, misaligned incentives, and operational risk.

01

The Governance Paralysis Problem

DAO voting is slow and low-signal, causing critical funding decisions to be delayed or hijacked by whales. The result is missed market windows and developer attrition.

  • Median TTV (Time-to-Vote): ~7-14 days
  • Voter Apathy: <5% token holder participation common
  • Case Study: Early-stage projects starve while governance debates tokenomics.
<5%
Voter Turnout
14d
Decision Lag
02

The Misaligned Incentive Problem

Treasury tokenholders are financially motivated, not product-motivated. This leads to short-term speculation over long-term R&D, starving foundational work.

  • Funds flow to hype-driven airdrops & marketing over core gameplay
  • Public Goods (SDKs, tooling) are chronically underfunded
  • Result: Ecosystem becomes a casino, not a platform.
80/20
Spec/R&D Split
0
Tooling ROI
03

The Operational Security Problem

Multisigs and DAO treasuries are constant honeypots. Smart contract risk and private key management create single points of failure that have drained $1B+ from ecosystems.

  • Bridge & Wallet Hacks: The primary vector for treasury loss
  • Admin Key Compromise: A single leak can wipe the fund
  • Solution Pattern: Requires institutional-grade custody (Fireblocks, Copper) defeating decentralization.
$1B+
Historical Loss
24/7
Attack Surface
04

The Liquidity vs. Control Paradox

Treasuries must balance holding volatile native tokens for alignment versus stablecoins for runway. This creates existential treasury management overhead.

  • Native Token Crash: Can wipe out 2+ years of runway overnight
  • Selling for Stables: Seen as betrayal, crashes token price further
  • See: Axie Infinity (RON/SLP), Lido (stETH) treasury management challenges.
-90%
Token Drawdown Risk
24mo
Runway Volatility
takeaways
THE FUTURE OF GAME FUNDING IS COMMUNITY TREASURIES

Key Takeaways for Builders and Investors

The traditional publisher model is a bottleneck. On-chain treasuries shift power to players, creating new funding and incentive flywheels.

01

The Problem: The 70/30 Revenue Split is a Bottleneck

Traditional app stores and publishers extract ~30% of all revenue, starving developers and misaligning incentives. This model is incompatible with sustainable, player-owned economies.

  • Key Benefit 1: Reclaim ~30% margin for reinvestment into development and community rewards.
  • Key Benefit 2: Align incentives by making players direct stakeholders in the game's financial success.
-30%
Revenue Leak
100%
Treasury Control
02

The Solution: Programmable, On-Chain Treasuries

A transparent, community-controlled vault (e.g., using Gnosis Safe or DAO tooling) that automates funding via smart contracts. This is the foundational primitive for a new economic layer.

  • Key Benefit 1: Enable permissionless integrations with DeFi (staking, lending) to generate yield on idle assets.
  • Key Benefit 2: Automate grants, rewards, and developer payouts via proposals and Snapshot voting, reducing operational overhead.
24/7
Yield Engine
Transparent
All Flows
03

The Flywheel: From Treasury to Token-Curated Games

A funded treasury enables a token-curated registry model. Players use governance tokens to vote on which games, mods, or features receive funding, creating a self-sustaining ecosystem.

  • Key Benefit 1: Community-driven curation surfaces high-quality projects, reducing discovery friction for players and investors.
  • Key Benefit 2: Creates a virtuous cycle: successful games boost the treasury value, which funds more games, attracting more players.
Player-Led
Curation
Compounding
Ecosystem Growth
04

The Model: Look at TreasureDAO and Parallel

TreasureDAO's MAGIC ecosystem and Parallel's $PRIME demonstrate the blueprint. They are not just games; they are interoperable media networks funded and governed by community treasuries.

  • Key Benefit 1: Cross-game asset interoperability (e.g., Bridgeworld) increases utility and locks in value across the ecosystem.
  • Key Benefit 2: Treasury becomes a strategic LP, providing liquidity for in-game assets and stabilizing the internal economy.
$100M+
Ecosystem TVL
Interop
Core Feature
05

The Risk: Treasury Management is Non-Trivial

A mismanaged treasury is a target for governance attacks and financial exploitation. Security and diversification are paramount from day one.

  • Key Benefit 1: Multi-sig safeguards and timelocks (via Safe{Wallet}) prevent rug-pulls and hasty decisions.
  • Key Benefit 2: A formal treasury diversification policy (into stablecoins, blue-chip assets) protects against native token volatility.
Multi-Sig
Mandatory
De-Risked
Portfolio
06

The Metric: Treasury Yield vs. Burn Rate

The ultimate KPI for sustainability. Can the treasury's yield from investments, fees, and asset appreciation outpace the project's operational burn rate?

  • Key Benefit 1: Provides a clear financial health indicator for investors and community, beyond token price.
  • Key Benefit 2: Forces fiscal discipline and innovation in revenue generation, moving beyond pure token inflation.
>100%
Target Yield/Coverage
Key KPI
Sustainability
ENQUIRY

Get In Touch
today.

Our experts will offer a free quote and a 30min call to discuss your project.

NDA Protected
24h Response
Directly to Engineering Team
10+
Protocols Shipped
$20M+
TVL Overall
NDA Protected Directly to Engineering Team
Community Treasuries Are the Future of Game Funding | ChainScore Blog