Free RPCs centralize failure. Public endpoints from providers like Alchemy and Infura create single points of failure, as seen when the 2022 Infura outage crippled MetaMask. This architecture contradicts the decentralized ethos of the underlying blockchains.
future-of-dexs-amms-orderbooks-and-aggregators
Blog
The Hidden Cost of Free RPCs on User Experience and Decentralization
The reliance on centralized, rate-limited RPCs is the silent bottleneck crippling DEX performance, exposing user data, and undermining the decentralized future. This analysis breaks down the technical and economic trade-offs.
introduction
THE FREE LUNCH
Introduction
Free RPC services create a hidden tax on user experience and network resilience, undermining the decentralization they claim to support.
Performance is a trade-off. The 'free tier' model subsidizes access by throttling requests and providing stale data. This creates latency arbitrage where sophisticated users run private nodes while retail users suffer.
Data sovereignty is an illusion. Relying on a centralized gateway means the provider controls data ordering and access. This creates trust assumptions identical to traditional web2 APIs, negating blockchain's verifiability.
Evidence: Over 70% of Ethereum's RPC traffic routes through three major providers, creating systemic risk that protocols like Pocket Network and decentralized RPC pools are built to solve.
thesis-statement
THE INFRASTRUCTURE TRAP
The Core Argument
Free RPCs create a hidden tax on user experience and decentralization, centralizing control and degrading performance for the entire ecosystem.
Free RPCs centralize control. They create single points of failure and censorship, contradicting blockchain's core value proposition. A wallet using only a single provider like Infura or Alchemy delegates trust, making users vulnerable to service outages and regulatory takedowns.
Performance is a hidden cost. Free tiers enforce strict rate limits and provide no quality-of-service guarantees. During network congestion, user transactions from free endpoints are deprioritized, leading to failed swaps on Uniswap or delayed NFT mints.
The business model is extractive. Providers monetize user data and transaction flow. This creates misaligned incentives where the provider's profit depends on analyzing and potentially front-running user activity, a conflict evident in the MEV supply chain.
Evidence: The 2022 Infura outage took down MetaMask, dYdX, and the Polygon bridge. This single failure demonstrated the systemic risk of relying on centralized RPC gateways for critical infrastructure.
market-context
THE HIDDEN TAX
The Current State of Play
Free RPCs subsidize user acquisition by monetizing data and centralizing infrastructure, creating systemic risk.
Free RPCs are not free. Providers like Infura, Alchemy, and QuickNode monetize user data through analytics and MEV extraction, creating a hidden tax on user privacy and execution. This business model subsidizes developer onboarding but centralizes network access.
Centralized points of failure create systemic risk. The 2022 Infura outage demonstrated that a single provider's downtime can cripple major wallets like MetaMask and protocols across Ethereum. This contradicts the decentralization ethos of the underlying blockchains.
Performance is a trade-off. Free tiers enforce strict rate limits and lack features like transaction bundling or archival data. This degrades the user experience for dApps requiring high throughput or low latency, pushing serious builders to paid plans.
Evidence: Over 70% of Ethereum's RPC traffic routes through Infura and Alchemy. This concentration creates a single vector for censorship, as seen when providers complied with OFAC sanctions on Tornado Cash relays.
key-trends
THE HIDDEN COST OF FREE RPCS
Three Latent Bottlenecks
Free RPCs subsidize development with user data and degraded performance, creating systemic risks for applications and the network.
01
The Performance Tax
Free RPCs operate on shared, overloaded infrastructure, making them the weakest link in your UX. Latency spikes and rate limits are passed directly to your users.
- 95th percentile latency can exceed ~2 seconds during congestion.
- Global inconsistency leads to failed transactions and wallet timeouts.
- Your app's performance is capped by the cheapest provider in the chain.
~2s+
P95 Latency
99.0%
SLA vs. 99.9%+
02
The Centralization Vector
Free tiers consolidate traffic to a handful of mega-providers like Infura and Alchemy, creating systemic SPOFs. This contradicts the decentralized ethos of the underlying protocols.
- >60% of Ethereum traffic routes through 2-3 major providers.
- Censorship risk: Providers can theoretically blacklist addresses or contracts.
- Network health becomes dependent on the business models of private companies.
>60%
Traffic Share
2-3
Critical Nodes
03
The Data Monetization Model
'Free' is funded by selling aggregated user data, MEV insights, and usage analytics. Your users' transaction patterns are the product.
- Frontrunning & MEV: Transaction order flow is a high-value data stream.
- Privacy erosion: Wallet addresses and dApp interactions are profiled.
- Creates misaligned incentives between the app, user, and infrastructure.
0
Privacy Guarantee
100%
Incentive Misalignment
THE INFRASTRUCTURE TRADE-OFF
RPC Performance & Censorship Matrix
Comparing the operational and ideological costs of public RPC endpoints versus private, paid infrastructure for EVM chains.
| Metric / Feature | Public RPC (e.g., Infura, Alchemy Free Tier) | Decentralized RPC Pool (e.g., Pocket, Ankr) | Private Dedicated Node |
|---|---|---|---|
Guaranteed Uptime SLA | None |
|
|
Median Response Time (p95) | 300-1200ms | 150-400ms | < 100ms |
Request Rate Limit | 10-50 req/sec | None (Pay-per-request) | None |
Censorship Resistance | |||
MEV Protection / Privacy | |||
Historical Data Depth | 128 Blocks | Full Archive | Full Archive |
Monthly Cost (Est.) | $0 | $50-500 | $500-5000+ |
Supports eth_sendRawTransaction | |||
Geo-Distributed Endpoints |
deep-dive
THE HIDDEN COST
How RPCs Break the DEX Stack
Free RPCs degrade DEX performance and centralize infrastructure, creating systemic risk.
Free RPCs degrade UX. Public endpoints throttle requests and batch transactions, causing failed swaps and front-running on Uniswap and Curve.
Infrastructure centralization creates risk. DEXs like 1inch and PancakeSwap rely on centralized providers, creating a single point of failure for billions in TVL.
The MEV pipeline is compromised. RPC providers like Infura and Alchemy are trusted not to censor or extract value, a flawed security assumption.
Evidence: Over 50% of Ethereum's RPC traffic routes through two providers, a centralization vector the DEX stack ignores.
protocol-spotlight
BEYOND THE FREE TIER
The Decentralized Infrastructure Response
Free RPCs create systemic fragility. The next wave of infrastructure is building for performance, reliability, and sovereignty.
01
The Problem: The Single Point of Failure
Free RPCs centralize traffic, creating systemic risk. A single provider outage can brick wallets and DApps for millions.
- 99.9%+ uptime is a marketing claim, not a guarantee.
- ~500ms latency spikes during congestion are common.
- Creates a censorship vector for blacklisted addresses.
1
Point of Failure
>99%
Traffic Share
02
The Solution: Decentralized RPC Networks (POKT, Lava)
Protocols that incentivize a global network of independent node operators. Failover is built-in.
- Geographic distribution reduces latency and increases redundancy.
- Censorship resistance through node diversity.
- Pay-per-request models align costs with actual usage, not VC subsidies.
10k+
Node Operators
<200ms
P95 Latency
03
The Problem: Data Fidelity & MEV Leakage
Free RPCs often serve stale or manipulated data. Your transaction's path through the mempool is a revenue stream for the provider.
- Front-running and sandwich attacks are facilitated.
- State inconsistencies can cause failed transactions.
- You are the product; your intent is the data.
$1B+
Annual MEV
0
Your Cut
04
The Solution: MEV-Aware & Private RPCs (Flashbots Protect, BloxRoute)
Infrastructure designed to protect user transactions from predatory extraction.
- Direct-to-builder pathways bypass public mempools.
- Bundle simulation ensures optimal execution.
- Privacy via encrypted channels or threshold cryptography.
-90%
MEV Reduction
Secure
Execution
05
The Problem: The Performance Tax
Free tiers are throttled and deprioritized. Your user's experience is sacrificed for the provider's bottom line.
- Rate limiting causes timeouts during peak demand.
- Archival data requests are often blocked or slow.
- No SLA means no recourse for degraded service.
5s+
Timeout Risk
Low
Priority
06
The Solution: Performance-First Gateways (Alchemy Supernode, Chainstack)
Commercial-grade infrastructure with robust SLAs, advanced indexing, and dedicated resources.
- Sub-100ms global latency with edge caching.
- Full archival support and real-time event streaming.
- Predictable pricing scales with business needs, not surprise bills.
99.99%
Uptime SLA
<50ms
P99 Latency
counter-argument
THE HIDDEN COST
The 'Free is Fine' Fallacy
Free RPC services degrade user experience and centralize network access, creating systemic risk.
Free RPCs degrade UX. They prioritize cost over performance, leading to high latency, dropped transactions, and inconsistent state reads. This creates a negative feedback loop where developers build on unreliable infrastructure, guaranteeing poor end-user experiences.
Centralization is the business model. Providers like Infura and Alchemy offer free tiers to capture developer mindshare. This creates a single point of failure for thousands of dApps, directly contradicting blockchain's core value proposition of decentralization.
The cost is just hidden. Free services monetize via data indexing, MEV extraction, or enterprise upsells. This creates perverse incentives where the provider's profit aligns with surveilling or reordering user transactions, not optimizing for them.
Evidence: The 2020 Infura outage took down MetaMask and major DeFi protocols, demonstrating the systemic risk of centralized RPC dependence. A decentralized RPC network like POKT Network or a multi-provider strategy is the only viable alternative.
takeaways
THE INFRASTRUCTURE TRAP
TL;DR for Builders and Investors
Free RPCs are a tax on your protocol's reliability and your users' sovereignty, creating systemic risk for marginal cost savings.
01
The Problem: Centralized Choke Points
Free RPCs like Infura and Alchemy control >70% of Ethereum traffic, creating a single point of failure for your dApp.\n- Censorship Risk: Providers can blacklist addresses or contracts, breaking core composability.\n- Data Monopoly: Your user's query patterns and IPs are aggregated into a centralized analytics product.
>70%
Traffic Share
1
Point of Failure
02
The Solution: Multi-RPC & Fallback Architectures
Decouple from any single provider. Use services like Chainstack, BlastAPI, or Pocket Network to programmatically route requests.\n- Automatic Failover: If one RPC is slow or censors, traffic shifts instantly to a backup.\n- Cost Predictability: Pay-for-use models with tiered providers are often cheaper than scaling on a 'free' tier that throttles you.
99.9%
Target Uptime
<100ms
Failover Time
03
The Hidden Cost: Degraded UX & Lost Revenue
Free tiers enforce strict rate limits and low priority queues, directly impacting your bottom line.\n- Latency Spikes: Users face 2-10s+ response times during congestion, leading to failed trades on Uniswap or Aave.\n- Throttled Growth: Your app's scalability is capped by your RPC's free quota, stunting user acquisition.
2-10s+
Response Lag
~15%
TX Fail Rate
04
The Endgame: User-Owned Infrastructure
The final evolution is users running their own light clients or leveraging Ethereum's Portal Network. Protocols like Aztec and zkSync already push for this.\n- Sovereign UX: No intermediary can filter or spy on transactions.\n- Protocol Resilience: Decentralization at the infrastructure layer protects against regulatory capture of RPC providers.
0
Trusted Parties
P2P
Network Model
05
The Metric: Time-To-Finality (TTF) vs. Latency
Builders optimize for latency, but users care about finality. A 'fast' RPC that serves unconfirmed data causes more harm than a slower, reliable one.\n- Frontrunning Fuel: Low-latency, centralized RPCs are the preferred tool for MEV searchers.\n- Real Finality: Use providers that prioritize consensus-layer data over execution-layer speed.
12s
Ethereum TTF
<1s
RPC Latency
06
The Investment Thesis: Infrastructure as a MoAT
The next wave of unicorns won't just be apps, but protocols that decentralize critical infra. Look at Pocket Network's $1.5B+ peak valuation.\n- Sticky Revenue: Reliable RPC service is a recurring, protocol-grade revenue stream.\n- Ecosystem Alignment: Investing in decentralized infra directly strengthens the L1/L2 you're betting on.
$1.5B+
Peak Valuation
Protocol
Revenue Model
ENQUIRY
Get In Touch
today.
Our experts will offer a free quote and a 30min call to discuss your project.
NDA Protected
Confidentiality24h Response
Time to ValueDirectly to Engineering Team
No Sales Fluff10+
Protocols Shipped
$20M+
TVL Overall