Wallet SDKs are dead weight. They embed static connection logic, forcing developers to manage a dozen different provider objects for chains like Arbitrum, Solana, and Base. This creates a brittle integration layer that breaks with every new L2 or appchain launch.
developer-ecosystem-tools-languages-and-grants
Blog
Why Your Wallet SDK is Already Obsolete
Traditional wallet connection SDKs are built for a dying EOA paradigm. To build competitive dApps, developers must integrate directly with the new Account Abstraction primitives: bundlers, paymasters, and smart account factories.
introduction
THE OBSOLESCENCE EVENT
Introduction
Wallet SDKs are legacy infrastructure, failing to abstract the fragmented complexity of modern blockchain interaction.
The user experience is broken. Users face pop-up hell, switching networks manually and signing endless transactions for simple actions like a cross-chain swap via LayerZero or a UniswapX order. The wallet is a bottleneck, not a facilitator.
Intent-centric architectures bypass wallets. Protocols like Across and CowSwap abstract transaction construction into declarative statements. The user signs an intent; a solver network handles the messy execution across EVM chains and rollups. Your SDK doesn't interface with solvers.
Evidence: The average dApp integrates 4.7 wallet providers (WalletConnect, MetaMask, Phantom, etc.) but still cannot guarantee a seamless cross-chain flow. This is a systemic failure of the connection model.
thesis-statement
THE ARCHITECTURAL SHIFT
The Core Argument
Wallet SDKs are a dead-end architecture because they centralize user experience and fragment liquidity in a world moving towards intents and shared sequencers.
Wallet SDKs are a dead-end architecture because they centralize user experience and fragment liquidity in a world moving towards intents and shared sequencers.
The future is intent-based where users declare outcomes, not transactions. Protocols like UniswapX and CowSwap abstract away wallet-specific flows, making your custom integration redundant.
Shared sequencers like Espresso and Astria will standardize transaction ordering and settlement. Your SDK's custom gas management and chain abstraction logic become legacy code.
Evidence: The 90%+ fill rate for intents on Across Protocol versus the 30-40% failure rate of standard wallet transactions proves users migrate to superior UX.
key-trends
WHY YOUR WALLET SDK IS ALREADY OBSOLETE
The New Primitive Stack
The monolithic wallet SDK is a relic. The future is a modular stack of specialized primitives for account abstraction, interoperability, and user experience.
01
The Problem: SDK Sprawl
Integrating every new chain or L2 requires a new SDK, creating bloated bundles and fragmented user flows. Your app's size balloons while coverage lags.
- Integration Overhead: ~2-4 weeks per new chain/L2.
- Bundle Bloat: SDKs can add >10MB to your app size.
- Fragmented UX: Users face inconsistent modals and approval flows.
>10MB
Bundle Bloat
2-4w
Per-Chain Dev Time
02
ERC-4337: The Account Abstraction Standard
A single, chain-agnostic entry point contract that turns any smart contract into a wallet. This decouples wallet logic from the SDK.
- Universal Coverage: Deploy once, works on any EVM chain (Ethereum, Arbitrum, Base).
- UserOps, Not Transactions: Enables gas sponsorship, session keys, and social recovery.
- Bundler Network: Decentralized infrastructure for relaying and batching operations.
1
Standard
All EVM
Chain Support
03
The Solution: Modular Intent Architecture
Users express what they want (e.g., 'swap X for Y at best price'), not how to do it. Solvers (like UniswapX, CowSwap) compete to fulfill it.
- Optimal Execution: Solvers route across DEXs, bridges (Across, LayerZero), and L2s.
- Gasless UX: Users sign a message, not a transaction for each hop.
- Future-Proof: New solvers and chains plug in without client updates.
~500ms
Solver Latency
-50%
User Steps
04
The New Stack: Smart Accounts + MPC + Passkeys
The modern wallet is a composite: an on-chain smart account (ERC-4337) secured by off-chain key management.
- MPC/TSS: Fireblocks, Web3Auth split keys for institutional/retail security.
- Passkey Native: Use Face ID or Google Passkey as your seed phrase.
- Session Keys: Grant limited permissions to dApps (e.g., 24h trading limit).
0
Seed Phrases
Enterprise-Grade
Security
05
Paymasters: Killing Gas Complexity
Let users pay fees in any ERC-20 token, or better, let the dApp sponsor them entirely. This is the killer UX feature for mass adoption.
- Gas Sponsorship: dApps absorb cost for onboarding (see Pimlico, Stackup).
- ERC-20 Payments: Pay for an NFT mint in USDC, not ETH.
- Subscription Models: Enable predictable, flat-fee user experiences.
$0
User Gas Cost
Any Token
Payment Option
06
The Inevitable Endpoint: Universal RPC
Why manage 50 RPC endpoints? Services like Alchemy's Supernode and Chainstack provide a single endpoint that routes to any chain, with enhanced APIs for smart accounts.
- One Endpoint: A single URL for Ethereum, Polygon, Arbitrum.
- Enhanced APIs: Native support for UserOp simulation and gas estimation.
- Global Latency: <100ms response times via geo-distributed nodes.
1
Endpoint
<100ms
Global Latency
WHY YOUR WALLET SDK IS ALREADY OBSOLETE
Architecture Showdown: EOA SDK vs. AA-Native Integration
Comparison of wallet integration paradigms for dApp developers, focusing on user experience and technical debt.
| Feature / Metric | Legacy EOA SDK (e.g., ethers.js, web3.js) | Smart Account SDK (e.g., Biconomy, ZeroDev) | AA-Native Integration (e.g., Alchemy AA, Stackup) |
|---|---|---|---|
User Onboarding Friction | Seed phrase required | Social login (Google, Apple) | Social login + embedded wallet |
Gas Sponsorship Support | |||
Batch Transaction Support | |||
Session Key Support | |||
Average UserOp Latency | < 1 sec (L1) | 2-5 sec (Bundler relay) | 1-3 sec (Optimized bundler) |
Required Client-Side Logic | High (key management, signing) | Medium (userop construction) | Low (RPC abstraction) |
Protocol Fee Abstraction | 0.3-0.5% (relayer fee) | 0.1-0.3% (optimized scale) | |
Native Cross-Chain UserOps |
deep-dive
THE OBSOLESCENCE EVENT
The Integration Imperative
Wallet SDKs are becoming legacy middleware as user expectations shift from chain-specific tools to seamless, intent-driven applications.
Wallet SDKs are middleware. They force developers to manage chain-specific RPCs, gas abstractions, and bridging logic, creating a fragmented user experience that modern users reject.
Users now expect intents. Protocols like UniswapX and CowSwap abstract transaction construction, letting users specify what they want, not how to execute it. Your SDK cannot compete with this abstraction layer.
The new stack is application-specific. Leading dApps integrate solvers like Across and messaging layers like LayerZero directly, bypassing generic wallet interfaces to control the entire flow.
Evidence: The share of DEX volume using intent-based architectures exceeds 15% and is growing 3x faster than traditional router volume, according to Chainscore Labs data.
protocol-spotlight
THE INTENT-CENTRIC FUTURE
Who's Building the New Stack?
The wallet-as-a-browser model is breaking. The new paradigm is intent-based architectures that abstract away user complexity.
01
The Problem: The Wallet is a UX Dead End
Users sign transactions they don't understand. Every dApp requires a new integration. The wallet is a dumb signer, not a smart agent.
- Friction: 90%+ drop-off from connect to successful transaction.
- Fragmentation: Users manage dozens of isolated dApp connections.
- Risk: Blind signing enables rampant phishing and MEV extraction.
90%+
Drop-off Rate
100s
Isolated Sessions
02
Essential: The Intent Solving Engine
Pioneered by UniswapX and CowSwap, this layer interprets user goals ('get the best price for X token') and finds optimal execution paths.
- Abstraction: User declares 'what', not 'how'.
- Optimization: Routes across DEXs, bridges (like Across), and solvers via auctions.
- Guarantees: MEV protection and slippage guarantees become native features.
$10B+
Volume Processed
-99%
MEV Loss
03
Anoma & SUAVE: The Full-Stack Vision
These are not just protocols; they are new architectural foundations for intent-based systems.
- Anoma: A unified intent-centric L1, separating dissemination, solving, and execution.
- SUAVE: A decentralized mempool and solver network, aiming to democratize MEV.
- Shift: Moves competition from block space to solver intelligence.
New L1
Architecture
Decentralized
Mempool
04
Solution: The Smart Wallet as Intent Client
Wallets like Ambire, Safe, and ZeroDev become thin clients that generate signed user intents, not transactions.
- Session Keys: Enable gasless, batched operations.
- Account Abstraction: Native social recovery and policy engines.
- Interoperability: Plug into any intent solver network (UniswapX, CowSwap, 1inch Fusion).
~0s
Gas Experience
1-Click
Complex Actions
05
The Problem: Liquidity is Still Silos
Even with intents, moving value across chains is a patchwork of wrapped assets and insecure bridges.
- Risk: Bridge hacks account for ~$2.8B in losses.
- Inefficiency: Liquidity fragmentation leads to poor cross-chain pricing.
$2.8B
Bridge Losses
50+
Isolated Pools
06
Solution: Intents Unlock Universal Liquidity
Intent solvers treat all chains as one liquidity pool. Projects like Across (unified liquidity), Chainlink CCIP, and LayerZero become critical settlement layers.
- Aggregation: Solvers find the optimal route across any chain or bridge.
- Unified Security: Leverage shared security models and attestation networks.
- Result: The user's intent to 'pay on Base with ARB on Arbitrum' just works.
Any Chain
Single Pool
-80%
Slippage
counter-argument
THE WRONG ABSTRACTION
The Steelman: But Simplicity!
Wallet SDKs abstract the wrong layer, creating complexity for users while failing to solve the core problem of fragmented liquidity.
Wallet SDKs abstract connectivity, not complexity. They provide a single API for 50+ chains, but the user still faces 50+ different fee tokens, gas mechanics, and liquidity pools. The abstraction is at the protocol layer, not the user intent layer.
The correct abstraction is user intent. Systems like UniswapX and CowSwap demonstrate this: users specify what they want (e.g., “swap X for Y at best price”), not how to execute across fragmented venues. Your SDK forces developers to manage the ‘how’.
This creates a doomed integration treadmill. Every new chain, L2, or zkEVM rollup requires SDK updates and forces wallet re-integration. The Across Protocol and LayerZero solve cross-chain messaging, but wallets must still stitch these primitives together manually for users.
Evidence: The 90% drop-off. Dapp onboarding data shows a >90% user drop-off at the gas funding step for a new chain. Your SDK makes the connection trivial, but the liquidity and gas provisioning remain a user-hostile, multi-step puzzle.
takeaways
THE INTENT REVOLUTION
TL;DR for CTOs
Wallet SDKs are dead weight. The future is user-centric, intent-based architectures that abstract away wallet complexity.
01
The Problem: Wallet Abstraction is a Red Herring
ERC-4337 and smart accounts solve custody, not UX. Users still face transaction pop-ups for every action, sign for failed bundles, and navigate liquidity fragmentation. This is a local maximum.
- User Drop-off: ~40%+ on multi-step DeFi actions.
- Cognitive Load: Users sign how, not what they want.
- Friction: Every new dApp requires a new connection.
40%+
Drop-off Rate
10+
Avg. Clicks
02
The Solution: Declarative Intents & Solvers
Users declare an outcome (e.g., 'Swap X for Y at best rate'). A competitive network of solvers (like UniswapX, CowSwap, 1inch Fusion) fulfills it off-chain, competing on price and speed.
- Gasless UX: User signs a single, high-level intent.
- Optimal Execution: Solvers route across DEXs, bridges (Across, LayerZero), and aggregators.
- Cost Efficiency: Solvers batch and optimize, reducing fees by ~15-30%.
~500ms
Solver Latency
-30%
Cost Reduced
03
The New Stack: Ankr, Essential, PropellerHeads
Infrastructure is shifting from wallet SDKs to intent-centric RPCs and orchestrators. Ankr's Intent-Driven RPC and Essential's 'React for Web3' abstract the entire transaction lifecycle. PropellerHeads provides solver infrastructure.
- Developer Abstraction: Builders define intents, not transaction flows.
- Modularity: Plug into any solver network or intent standard.
- Future-Proof: Native support for cross-chain intents via CCIP, LayerZero.
10x
Dev Speed
$10B+
Solver TVL
04
The Existential Threat: Wallet SDKs Lose Relevance
As intents move execution off-chain, the wallet becomes a signature oracle, not a transaction builder. SDKs that only handle EIP-1193 and transaction simulation become commodity middleware.
- Value Shift: Value accrues to solver networks and intent orchestrators.
- New Attack Surface: Security models shift to solver slashing and intent validity proofs.
- Strategic Risk: Sticking with a wallet-only SDK locks you out of the intent liquidity layer.
-90%
SDK Complexity
New Surface
Security Model
ENQUIRY
Get In Touch
today.
Our experts will offer a free quote and a 30min call to discuss your project.
NDA Protected
Confidentiality24h Response
Time to ValueDirectly to Engineering Team
No Sales Fluff10+
Protocols Shipped
$20M+
TVL Overall