RaaS is a commoditization engine. Platforms like Conduit, Caldera, and Gelato abstract the complex engineering of launching an L2 or L3, offering a standardized deployment stack. This reduces the technical barrier to entry from a multi-year R&D project to a configuration file, flooding the market with indistinguishable rollups.
developer-ecosystem-tools-languages-and-grants
Blog
Why RaaS Platforms Are Commoditizing Scalability
Rollup-as-a-Service providers like Caldera have turned chain deployment into a commodity. This analysis argues the competitive moat has shifted from launch to superior sequencer economics and cross-chain user experience.
introduction
THE COMMODITY TRAP
Introduction
Rollup-as-a-Service (RaaS) platforms are systematically eliminating technical moats, turning blockchain scalability into a low-margin utility.
The value shifts from infra to distribution. When any team can spin up a chain in hours, the competitive edge is no longer the chain itself. Success hinges on user acquisition and liquidity, mirroring the evolution from proprietary cloud servers to AWS, where the platform wins, not the individual VM.
Evidence: The proliferation is measurable. Over 50 production rollups now run on the OP Stack or Arbitrum Orbit, with deployment times measured in minutes. This standardization via shared tech stacks creates a market where the only differentiator is the branding and tokenomics wrapped around identical core software.
thesis-statement
THE COMMODITY TRAP
Thesis Statement
Rollup-as-a-Service (RaaS) platforms are transforming blockchain scalability from a core competitive advantage into a low-margin, standardized commodity.
RaaS abstracts core complexity. Platforms like Conduit, Caldera, and Gelato provide standardized deployment templates, shared sequencer networks, and managed node infrastructure, reducing the technical and operational barrier for launching an L2 or L3 from months to hours.
This creates a fungible market. The differentiation between rollups shifts from raw technical performance to application-specific design and ecosystem incentives, mirroring how cloud providers like AWS commoditized server hardware.
The evidence is deployment velocity. The proliferation of hundreds of app-specific rollups built on OP Stack, Arbitrum Orbit, and Polygon CDK demonstrates that the core scaling technology is no longer a moat; the moat is now distribution and liquidity.
The end-state is utility pricing. As RaaS competition intensifies, the cost to deploy and maintain a rollup trends toward the marginal cost of compute and data availability, pressuring all layer 2 platforms to compete on price and bundled services.
key-trends
COMMODITIZATION OF SCALABILITY
Key Trends: The Post-RaaS Landscape
Rollup-as-a-Service (RaaS) platforms have made launching an L2 trivial; the new battle is for sustainable, differentiated value beyond the base layer.
01
The Problem: The RaaS Feature War is Over
Every major RaaS provider (AltLayer, Caldera, Conduit, Gelato) now offers a near-identical suite: one-click deployment, multi-VM support (EVM, SVM, Move), and shared sequencers. The core scaling tech is now a commodity.
- Result: Launch costs have plummeted to ~$50k from millions.
- Consequence: Protocol teams now ask 'what's next?' after deployment.
~$50k
Launch Cost
1-Click
Deployment
02
The Solution: The Interop Stack is the New Moat
Winning platforms are bundling native interoperability, making the rollup a seamless part of a unified ecosystem, not an isolated silo. This is the post-RaaS value capture.
- Native Bridges: Integrated liquidity layers like Hyperlane and LayerZero.
- Unified UX: Shared security models and cross-rollup states via EigenLayer and AltLayer's restaked rollups.
<2s
Message Time
Unified
Security
03
The Pivot: From Infrastructure to App-Specific Economics
The real differentiator is no longer the chain, but the economic and execution layer built on top. RaaS is just the foundation for custom fee markets, MEV capture, and intent-based flows.
- App-Chain Thesis: See dYdX, Aevo.
- Key Lever: Custom sequencers that capture and redistribute value to the app, not the infrastructure provider.
100%
Fee Capture
App-Owned
Sequencer
04
The Commodity: Shared Sequencers as a Utility
Decoupling execution from sequencing creates a neutral, liquid market for block space. Platforms like Astria and Espresso are turning the sequencer into a decentralized public good.
- Benefit: Atomic cross-rollup composability and MEV resistance.
- Outcome: RaaS platforms become clients of shared sequencer networks, further eroding their proprietary edge.
Decentralized
Sequencing
Atomic
Composability
05
The Endgame: Vertical Integration with L1s
Major L1s are internalizing the RaaS stack to capture the full value chain. Polygon CDK, Arbitrum Orbit, and OP Stack offer branded, opinionated frameworks with built-in ecosystem benefits.
- Advantage: Native token utility, guaranteed interoperability within the family.
- Risk: Vendor lock-in and fragmentation between L1 ecosystems.
L1-Native
Stack
Ecosystem
Lock-In
06
The Metric: Developer Hours, Not Deployment Time
The winning post-RaaS platform minimizes ongoing developer overhead for maintenance, upgrades, and monitoring. It's a managed service for the chain's lifecycle.
- Key Offerings: Automated governance tooling, upgrade managers, and real-time analytics dashboards.
- Real Cost: The engineering team required to keep the chain live, which can be 5-10 FTEs without proper tooling.
5-10
FTEs Saved
Managed
Lifecycle
INFRASTRUCTURE STACK
The RaaS Commoditization Matrix
Comparing core technical and economic specs of leading Rollup-as-a-Service providers.
| Feature / Metric | Conduit | Caldera | Gelato | AltLayer |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Base Layer Support | OP Stack, Arbitrum Orbit, ZK Stack | OP Stack, Arbitrum Orbit | OP Stack, Arbitrum Orbit, Polygon CDK | OP Stack, Arbitrum Orbit, Polygon CDK, ZK Stack |
Time to Deploy (Prod) | < 20 minutes | < 1 hour | < 15 minutes | < 1 hour |
Sequencer Model | Managed (Default), Self-Hosted | Managed (Default), Self-Hosted | Decentralized (Gelato Network) | Managed (Default), Decentralized (via AltLayer) |
Native Bridge | ||||
Prover Integration (ZK) | Via ZK Stack | Via Polygon CDK | Native (RaaS+) | |
Avg. Cost per Tx (L2 Gas) | ~0.0001 ETH | ~0.00015 ETH | ~0.0001 ETH | ~0.00012 ETH |
Data Availability Layer | Ethereum, Celestia, EigenDA | Ethereum, Celestia | Ethereum, Celestia, Avail | Ethereum, Celestia, EigenDA, Avail |
One-Click Shared Sequencer |
deep-dive
THE RACE TO ZERO
Deep Dive: The New Battlegrounds
Rollup-as-a-Service (RaaS) platforms are turning raw scalability into a commodity, forcing the real competition to shift to developer experience and ecosystem liquidity.
RaaS commoditizes the L2 stack. Platforms like Conduit, Caldera, and Gelato abstract away the complexity of running a rollup. They provide a standardized deployment pipeline for OP Stack, Arbitrum Orbit, or Polygon CDK chains. The core technical differentiator of throughput is now a baseline expectation, not a moat.
The new battleground is developer UX. The winning RaaS provider will be the one that offers the best integrated tooling suite. This includes seamless bridging via LayerZero or Hyperlane, native account abstraction tooling, and one-click deployment to data availability layers like Celestia or EigenDA. Ease of onboarding is the primary filter.
Liquidity fragmentation is the existential threat. A thousand cheap chains are worthless without users or assets. The critical infrastructure is now intent-based cross-chain systems like UniswapX and Across, which abstract liquidity sourcing. RaaS platforms must integrate these solvers to make their chains usable from day one.
Evidence: AltLayer's restaked rollups and Conduit's managed service for Base demonstrate the model. The metric that matters is no longer TPS; it's time-to-first-transaction for a new chain's developer, now measured in minutes, not months.
protocol-spotlight
WHY RENDERING IS THE NEW BATTLEGROUND
Protocol Spotlight: Building the New Moats
Rollup-as-a-Service (RaaS) platforms like AltLayer, Caldera, and Conduit have turned L2 deployment into a 5-minute task, commoditizing the core scaling tech. The new moats are built on execution quality and user experience.
01
The Problem: The 'Ghost Chain' Dilemma
Launching a rollup is trivial, but bootstrapping liquidity and users is not. ~80% of new L2s have less than $1M TVL after 6 months, becoming expensive, empty blockspace. The real cost isn't deployment; it's the cold start.
- Liquidity Fragmentation: Native assets are stranded, killing DeFi composability.
- Security Theater: A sovereign chain with $50K TVL secured by $20B in ETH is economically absurd.
- Discovery Hell: Users won't find your app-specific chain without a major front-end aggregator.
<$1M
Typical TVL
80%
Struggle Rate
02
The Solution: Shared Sequencers as a Liquidity Moat
Platforms like Astria and Espresso are creating a new primitive: decentralized sequencing networks that enable atomic cross-rollup composability. This turns isolated chains into a unified liquidity mesh.
- Atomic Arbitrage: MEV bots can execute trades across your chain and Ethereum in one bundle, injecting initial volume.
- Unified Liquidity Pools: Protocols like Uniswap can deploy a single vault across hundreds of app-chains via LayerZero or Hyperlane.
- Credible Neutrality: Removes the operator as a single point of censorship, attracting more valuable transactions.
~500ms
Cross-Rollup Latency
0
Bridging Delay
03
The New Moats: Execution & Data Quality
When blockspace is a commodity, the winner is determined by execution performance and data integrity. This is where AltLayer's ephemeral rollups and EigenLayer's restaking come in.
- Fast Finality via Preconfirmations: Users demand sub-second soft commits, not 12-minute Ethereum finality.
- Verifiable Execution Proofs: RISC Zero and SP1-type zkVMs allow anyone to verify state transitions off-chain, reducing fraud proof windows.
- Restaked Security Services: EigenLayer AVSs provide decentralized sequencers, faster data availability, and watchtowers, creating a trust marketplace.
<1s
Preconfirmations
10-100x
DA Cost Save
04
The Aggregator Endgame: Intents & Solvers
The ultimate moat is controlling the user's entry point. Intent-based architectures (UniswapX, CowSwap, Across) abstract away the chain entirely. The aggregator with the best solver network wins.
- Chain-Agnostic UX: Users sign a goal ('swap X for Y at best rate'). Solvers compete across all L2s and L1s to fulfill it.
- Solver Network Effects: The platform with the most integrated chains and liquidity sources (like 1inch Fusion) offers consistently better rates.
- RaaS as a Backend: Your app-chain becomes just another liquidity endpoint for a global solver network, not a destination.
20-30%
Better Rates
1-Click
UX Complexity
counter-argument
THE NETWORK EFFECT
Counter-Argument: Is This Just More Fragmentation?
RaaS commoditizes the stack, which paradoxically reduces fragmentation by standardizing the base layer and forcing competition on composability.
Commoditization precedes standardization. RaaS platforms like Caldera, Conduit, and Gelato abstract the underlying node client (OP Stack, Arbitrum Nitro, Polygon CDK). This creates a uniform foundation where the execution environment is the commodity, not the differentiator.
Fragmentation shifts upward. The battle moves from L2 creation to L2 connectivity. This is the domain of intent-based solvers (UniswapX, CowSwap) and generalized messaging layers (LayerZero, Hyperlane). Fragmentation in the settlement layer is replaced by competition in the aggregation layer.
Evidence: The OP Stack's Superchain vision explicitly trades chain sovereignty for shared security and native interoperability. This model, adopted by Base, Zora, and others, proves that standardized, commoditized rollups reduce, not increase, systemic fragmentation.
takeaways
THE COMMODITY TRAP
Key Takeaways for Builders & Investors
Rollup-as-a-Service platforms are turning scalability into a cheap, undifferentiated utility, shifting the competitive battleground.
01
The Problem: The $500K+ Custom Chain
Launching a sovereign or app-chain required a dedicated team for node ops, sequencer logic, and bridge security. This was a multi-month, capital-intensive endeavor that only large protocols could afford.
- Capital Barrier: Upfront dev/audit costs often exceeded $500K.
- Time-to-Market: 6-12 month development cycles were standard.
- Operational Risk: Teams became full-time infrastructure managers.
$500K+
Upfront Cost
6-12mo
Time Lost
02
The Solution: RaaS as a Utility (Eclipse, Caldera, Conduit)
Platforms abstract the entire stack into a one-click deployment with a managed service layer. Scalability is now a pay-as-you-go operational expense, not a core engineering challenge.
- Cost Collapse: Launch costs drop to ~$50K with ~2-week timelines.
- Focus Shift: Teams can concentrate on application logic and growth.
- Commoditization: Differentiators become thin; performance and cost converge across providers.
-90%
Cost
2-4w
Time-to-Launch
03
The New Moat: Execution & Liquidity Layers
With the base layer commoditized, sustainable value accrues upstream to specialized execution environments and downstream to unified liquidity layers.
- Execution Focus: Parallel EVMs like Monad, Sei, and SVM-focused providers win on raw performance.
- Liquidity Aggregation: Cross-chain intents via UniswapX, Across, and shared sequencing networks like Espresso become critical.
- Investor Implication: Bet on application-specific execution and interop layers, not generic RaaS.
10k+
TPS Battleground
$10B+
Interop TVL
04
The Sovereign Illusion & Shared Sequencing
RaaS sells 'sovereignty', but true control is limited without a dedicated validator set. The real power—and risk—lies in sequencer centralization. The next wave is shared sequencing networks like Astria, Espresso, and Radius.
- Risk Concentration: Most RaaS chains rely on the provider's centralized sequencer.
- Shared Future: Decentralized sequencer pools offer credible neutrality, MEV resistance, and atomic cross-chain composability.
- Builder Action: Demand shared sequencing options; it's the next non-negotiable for credible decentralization.
1
Single Point of Failure
~500ms
Cross-Chain Latency
ENQUIRY
Get In Touch
today.
Our experts will offer a free quote and a 30min call to discuss your project.
NDA Protected
Confidentiality24h Response
Time to ValueDirectly to Engineering Team
No Sales Fluff10+
Protocols Shipped
$20M+
TVL Overall