M2M networks are data silos. Each project like Helium or Hivemapper builds a custom schema for its hardware, creating proprietary data lakes. This fragmentation prevents composability and forces every new application to rebuild the ingestion pipeline from scratch.
depin-building-physical-infra-on-chain
Blog
The Hidden Cost of Data Silos in Today's M2M Projects
An analysis of how proprietary data formats and closed APIs in Machine-to-Machine (M2M) projects are preventing composability, stranding billions in potential value, and why publishing to a public data availability layer is the necessary evolution for DePIN.
introduction
THE DATA SILO TAX
The M2M Lie: We Built Networks, Not an Economy
Machine-to-machine networks are failing to scale because their isolated data models create unsustainable operational overhead.
The cost is operational bloat. Teams spend 80% of cycles on data plumbing—validating, storing, indexing—instead of building logic. This is the hidden tax of today's M2M architecture, mirroring the early web's API integration hell before standardization.
Evidence: Compare DePIN data to DeFi. A Uniswap pool's state is a public, standardized primitive. A Helium hotspot's coverage data is an opaque, application-specific blob. The former spawned an ecosystem; the latter remains a captive asset.
key-trends
THE HIDDEN COST
The Three Symptoms of the Silo Sickness
Isolated data pipelines are the silent killer of M2M project efficiency, creating massive operational drag.
01
The Liquidity Fragmentation Tax
Every siloed liquidity pool or oracle feed imposes a direct tax on capital efficiency and execution quality. Projects like Uniswap and Chainlink operate in walled gardens, forcing protocols to over-collateralize across multiple venues.
- ~30% higher capital lockup required for equivalent coverage.
- Slippage increases by 5-15% due to fragmented order books.
- Creates arbitrage opportunities for MEV bots, extracting value from end-users.
30%+
Capital Inefficiency
5-15%
Slippage Tax
02
The Integration Quagmire
Building and maintaining custom adapters for each data source or blockchain is a perpetual engineering tax. This is the core problem LayerZero and Axelar aim to solve, but their generalized messaging still requires bespoke integration work.
- 6-12 month development cycles for new chain support.
- $500K+ annual maintenance cost for adapter logic and security audits.
- Creates brittle, non-composable systems that cannot leverage network effects.
6-12mo
Dev Cycle
$500K+
Annual Cost
03
The Security Debt Spiral
Each new data silo introduces a unique attack surface and audit burden. The $2B+ in cross-chain bridge hacks exemplifies this systemic risk. Projects like Wormhole and Nomad show that securing bespoke pathways is a losing battle.
- Attack surface grows linearly with each integrated chain or oracle.
- Security audits become fragmented and incomplete, missing cross-silo vulnerabilities.
- Creates a single point of failure model; one compromised adapter can drain the entire system.
$2B+
Bridge Hacks
Linear Risk
Attack Surface
deep-dive
THE DATA
The Anatomy of Stranded Value: From API to Asset
Machine-to-machine economies fail because data silos prevent value from being recognized, priced, and traded as a native asset.
Stranded value originates in API design. Today's M2M protocols treat data as a static payload, not a dynamic asset. This creates data silos where information is trapped within single applications like Chainlink oracles or Pyth price feeds, unable to be composably leveraged across the stack.
The cost is programmatic illiquidity. A DEX aggregator's routing logic or a lending protocol's risk model holds immense value, but this computational capital is non-transferable. Unlike a tokenized asset on Uniswap, this intelligence cannot be borrowed against or used as collateral in Aave.
The solution is asset abstraction. Projects like Hyperliquid and dYdX v4 demonstrate that stateful logic—order books, matching engines—can be the primary asset. The next evolution abstracts this further, turning any API's output into a tradable, yield-bearing instrument on-chain.
Evidence: Arbitrum processes over 1 million transactions daily, yet less than 1% involve direct value transfer between autonomous agents. The rest is manual user interaction, proving the M2M economy remains nascent due to this fundamental abstraction failure.
M2M DATA INFRASTRUCTURE
The Silo Tax: A Comparative Cost Analysis
Quantifying the hidden operational and strategic costs of isolated data architectures versus unified solutions like Chainscore.
| Cost Dimension | Siloed RPCs (Alchemy, Infura) | Rollup-as-a-Service (Conduit, Caldera) | Unified Data Layer (Chainscore) |
|---|---|---|---|
Data Latency (P95) | 300-500ms | 150-300ms | < 100ms |
Cross-Chain Query Complexity | Manual Multi-API Calls | Limited to Own Stack | Single GraphQL Endpoint |
Developer Hours for Basic Analytics | 40+ hours | 20-30 hours | < 5 hours |
Real-Time Alerting for Anomalies | |||
Cost of Failed Tx Analysis | $5k+ (Manual Review) | $1-2k (Limited Logs) | $0 (Indexed & Queryable) |
Protocol Revenue Leakage Detection | Months (If Ever) | Weeks | Real-Time |
Support for Intent-Based Flows (UniswapX, Across) |
case-study
THE HIDDEN COST OF DATA SILOS
Case Studies in Silos vs. Speculation on Solutions
Isolated data fragments user experience, inflates costs, and creates systemic risk. Here's how the market is reacting.
01
The Oracle Problem: A $10B+ Systemic Risk
Every major DeFi hack traces back to oracle manipulation or stale data. Silos between price feeds and execution create predictable attack vectors.
- Single-point failures like Chainlink dominate, creating centralization risk.
- Latency arbitrage exploits the ~500ms update lag for MEV extraction.
- Cross-chain fragmentation forces protocols to trust multiple, unaligned oracles.
$10B+
TVL at Risk
~500ms
Attack Window
02
UniswapX: Solving Silos with Intents
UniswapX bypasses fragmented liquidity pools by outsourcing routing via a Dutch auction. This is a direct attack on the DEX/AMM data silo.
- Aggregates all liquidity (including private) into a single intent.
- Shifts risk from user to filler, eliminating failed transactions.
- Proves that the solution to silos is abstraction, not another aggregator.
100%
Fill Rate
-90%
Slippage
03
LayerZero & CCIP: The Interoperability Bet
These messaging layers treat every chain as a data silo to be connected. Their success hinges on becoming the universal state sync layer.
- Creates a new meta-silo: the messaging network itself.
- Enables cross-chain intent execution, the foundation for Across Protocol and others.
- Risk shifts from bridge hacks to validator set security, a trade-off the market is accepting.
$20B+
Value Secured
50+
Chains Connected
04
Modular Rollups: The Architectural Antidote
Celestia, EigenDA, and Avail are betting that data availability is the root silo. By decoupling execution from consensus and data, they force interoperability.
- Shared DA creates a canonical data layer, breaking chain-specific silos.
- Enables light clients to verify state across rollups, reducing oracle dependence.
- Proves the end-state is a network of specialized layers, not monolithic chains.
100x
Cheaper DA
-99%
Node Burden
05
The MEV Supply Chain: Silos as a Service
Flashbots' SUAVE and CowSwap's solver network monetize data silos by creating a marketplace for block space and order flow.
- Centralizes information to extract maximum value, creating a powerful new silo.
- Reveals the truth: data fragmentation is a feature, not a bug, for extractors.
- The 'solution' often just reshuffles who controls the silo and profits from it.
$1B+
Annual Extractable
~80%
OF Captured
06
The Endgame: Universal State Proofs
Projects like Herodotus and Lagrange are building storage proofs to let any chain read another's state trust-minimally. This is the nuclear option for silos.
- Renders oracles obsolete for historical data, attacking the biggest silo.
- Enables native cross-chain composability without new trust assumptions.
- Signals the final shift: from bridging assets to synchronizing global state.
Trustless
Verification
~1-5s
Proof Time
counter-argument
THE ARCHITECTURAL TRAP
The Steelman Defense: "But We Need Moats!"
Building proprietary data silos for competitive advantage creates systemic fragility and long-term technical debt.
Data silos are a fragile moat. They create a single point of failure and lock-in, making your system brittle to new entrants with better composability. This is a defensive, not offensive, strategy.
Composability is the real network effect. Protocols like Uniswap and Aave dominate because their open data and logic are building blocks. Your private data is a liability, not an asset, in a world of EigenLayer AVSs and shared sequencers.
The cost is cumulative fragmentation. Each project building its own oracle or bridging stack (e.g., a custom Stargate fork) multiplies security overhead and user friction. The industry-wide integration cost becomes a deadweight loss.
Evidence: The Celestia modular thesis valuation is predicated on this exact fragmentation cost. Its success proves the market prices the inefficiency of monolithic, siloed data layers.
future-outlook
THE HIDDEN COST
The Path Forward: Data Availability as Public Utility
Proprietary data layers create systemic risk and economic drag, making a shared DA layer a non-negotiable infrastructure primitive.
Proprietary data layers fragment security. Each rollup or M2M project that runs its own Celestia or EigenDA node set creates a new, isolated trust assumption. This balkanization reintroduces the validator centralization risks that modular architectures were designed to solve.
Data silos are a liquidity tax. Cross-chain applications using LayerZero or Axelar must now bridge not just assets but state proofs across multiple, incompatible DA layers. This adds latency, cost, and complexity that directly erodes user experience and capital efficiency.
Shared DA is a public utility. A canonical data availability layer, like a universal mempool, provides a single source of truth for state transitions. This enables ZK-proof aggregation and fraud proof verification across ecosystems, turning competing rollups into interoperable components of a single supercomputer.
Evidence: The economic model proves the point. Dedicated DA chains monetize scarcity, while a public-good DA layer like Ethereum's danksharding or a decentralized Avail network monetizes throughput, aligning incentives with ecosystem-wide scaling and composability.
takeaways
THE DATA INTEROPERABILITY TRAP
TL;DR for Protocol Architects
M2M projects are failing to scale because they treat data as a proprietary asset, not a composable resource.
01
The Oracle Problem, Reincarnated
Every M2M silo recreates its own data pipeline, leading to systemic fragility. The result is not just latency, but a fundamental lack of state consistency across the stack.
- Fragmented Truth: Each silo's view of the world diverges, creating arbitrage and MEV opportunities.
- Redundant Costs: Teams spend ~6-12 months building and securing custom data feeds that already exist elsewhere.
- Security Dilution: $2B+ in oracle-related exploits since 2020 shows the cost of getting this wrong.
~6-12mo
Dev Time Wasted
$2B+
Exploit Cost
02
The Solution: A Universal Data Layer
Treat data like a public good. A shared, verifiable data availability and computation layer for M2M, akin to what Ethereum is for assets.
- Shared Security: Leverage a single, battle-tested cryptographic commitment (like a Validity Proof or Data Availability Sampling) for all projects.
- Native Composability: Protocols like Aave, Uniswap, and Lido can build atop a single, consistent state, enabling new cross-protocol primitives.
- Cost Collapse: Amortizes data publishing and proving costs across the entire network, targeting -90% vs. isolated rollup models.
1
Source of Truth
-90%
Data Cost Target
03
Architectural Mandate: Prove, Don't Trust
Move beyond committee-based oracles. The next standard is verifiable computation over raw data, enabling M2M systems to inherit security from cryptography, not legal agreements.
- Validity Proofs: Use zk-SNARKs or zk-STARKs to generate cryptographic guarantees for any off-chain computation (price feeds, RNG, AI inference).
- Universal Verifier: A single on-chain verifier, like those used by zkSync or Starknet, can validate proofs from countless data providers.
- Eliminate Trusted Parties: Removes the $50M+ bond economic attack vector inherent in systems like Chainlink.
0
Trust Assumptions
$50M+
Attack Cost Avoided
04
Case Study: The Intents Ecosystem
Projects like UniswapX, CowSwap, and Across reveal the future. They don't just swap tokens; they orchestrate cross-domain state changes based on verified conditions.
- Conditional Logic: Execution depends on provable events (e.g., "fill this order if BTC > $100K on these 3 sources").
- Fragmented Infrastructure: Today, each solver network runs its own opaque data stack, a major centralization and reliability risk.
- The Opportunity: A universal data layer turns intents into deterministic state transitions, unlocking 10x more complex DeFi primitives.
10x
Primitive Complexity
3+
Data Sources Needed
05
The Liquidity Fragmentation Tax
Siloed data forces siloed liquidity. If an asset's state can't be proven on another chain, its liquidity is trapped. This is the hidden tax stifling Omnichain and LayerZero-style applications.
- Capital Inefficiency: $100B+ in cross-chain TVL is locked in wrapper assets and bridge pools due to state uncertainty.
- Slow Finality: Bridging takes ~10-20 minutes because systems wait for optimistic windows, not instant cryptographic proofs.
- The Fix: Native asset transfers become trivial when the destination chain can cryptographically verify the source chain's burn proof in ~500ms.
$100B+
Trapped TVL
~500ms
Proven Finality
06
Your Build vs. Buy Calculus is Wrong
Building your own data pipeline is not a competitive advantage; it's a liability. The winning strategy is to outsource verifiable computation and focus on application logic.
- Focus on Core IP: Let specialized networks like EigenLayer AVSs, Brevis, or HyperOracle handle data provisioning and proving.
- Faster Time-to-Market: Launch in weeks, not years, by composing with existing verified data streams.
- Future-Proofing: Your protocol automatically upgrades with advances in ZK proving and data availability (e.g., Ethereum's EIP-4844, Celestia).
Weeks
Time-to-Market
0
Data DevOps
ENQUIRY
Get In Touch
today.
Our experts will offer a free quote and a 30min call to discuss your project.
NDA Protected
Confidentiality24h Response
Time to ValueDirectly to Engineering Team
No Sales Fluff10+
Protocols Shipped
$20M+
TVL Overall