Free 30-min Web3 Consultation
Book Consultation
Smart Contract Security Audits
View Audit Services
Custom DeFi Protocol Development
Explore DeFi
Full-Stack Web3 dApp Development
View App Services
Free 30-min Web3 Consultation
Book Consultation
Smart Contract Security Audits
View Audit Services
Custom DeFi Protocol Development
Explore DeFi
Full-Stack Web3 dApp Development
View App Services
Free 30-min Web3 Consultation
Book Consultation
Smart Contract Security Audits
View Audit Services
Custom DeFi Protocol Development
Explore DeFi
Full-Stack Web3 dApp Development
View App Services
Free 30-min Web3 Consultation
Book Consultation
Smart Contract Security Audits
View Audit Services
Custom DeFi Protocol Development
Explore DeFi
Full-Stack Web3 dApp Development
View App Services
crypto-regulation-global-landscape-and-trends
Blog

Why the Battle Between Public and Private Digital Money Is a False Dichotomy

A technical analysis of the emerging hybrid monetary stack, where sovereign CBDCs, regulated stablecoins like USDC, and bank-issued tokenized deposits interoperate to form a more efficient, programmable financial system.

introduction
THE FALSE CHOICE

Introduction

The future of money is not a binary choice between public blockchains and private central bank rails, but a hybrid system of interoperable, programmable value layers.

Public vs. Private is Obsolete: The debate frames money as a singular asset, ignoring its function as programmable data. Tokenized deposits from JPMorgan and CBDC pilots on private Ethereum forks prove institutions are already building hybrid models.

Interoperability Defines the Winner: The dominant monetary layer will be the one that connects all others. Protocols like LayerZero and Circle's CCTP are the plumbing for cross-chain and cross-ledger value transfer, making the underlying ledger a secondary concern.

Evidence: The $1.5T market cap of stablecoins, which are private money issued on public blockchains, is the definitive proof-of-concept for this hybrid future.

thesis-statement
THE FALSE DICHOTOMY

The Core Argument: A Three-Layer Monetary Stack

The future monetary system is not a binary choice between public and private money, but a composable stack of three distinct layers.

The debate is a false dichotomy. Framing the future as CBDCs versus Bitcoin ignores the reality of a composable monetary stack. This stack separates the roles of asset issuance, settlement, and execution, allowing public and private systems to coexist.

Layer 1 is sovereign asset issuance. This is the trust anchor layer where states issue CBDCs and corporations issue tokenized deposits. Protocols like Circle's USDC and future FedNow integrations operate here, providing the base-layer digital claims.

Layer 2 is neutral settlement infrastructure. This is the public rail layer where these assets settle. Blockchains like Ethereum, Solana, and Bitcoin (via layers like RGB) provide censorship-resistant finality, separating trust in the asset from trust in the network.

Layer 3 is private execution and compliance. This is the application logic layer where regulated entities like JPMorgan's Onyx and fintech apps enforce KYC/AML. Smart contract wallets and privacy tools like Aztec enable private transactions atop public settlement.

Evidence: The $30B+ in tokenized treasuries on public chains proves this model works. Entities like BlackRock issue a private asset (BUIDL) on a public Ethereum L2 (Base), settling on a neutral L1.

FALSE DICHOTOMY

Digital Money Feature Matrix: A Technical Comparison

A technical breakdown of key features across public, private, and hybrid digital money systems, demonstrating overlapping capabilities.

Feature / MetricPublic (e.g., Bitcoin, Ethereum)Private (e.g., CBDC, JP Morgan Coin)Hybrid / Permissioned (e.g., Quorum, Hyperledger Fabric)

Settlement Finality

Probabilistic (10-60 min for Bitcoin)

Instant & Deterministic

Instant & Deterministic

Transaction Throughput (TPS)

~7 (Bitcoin), ~15 (Ethereum L1)

1,000

500 - 10,000+

Transaction Cost

$1 - $50+ (variable gas)

< $0.01 (fixed)

< $0.01 (fixed)

Programmability (Smart Contracts)

Privacy Model

Pseudonymous (on-chain transparency)

Fully Opaque (central ledger)

Selective/Zero-Knowledge Proofs

Consensus Mechanism

Proof-of-Work / Proof-of-Stake

Permissioned BFT (e.g., PBFT)

Permissioned BFT or PoA

Cross-Border Interoperability

Native (via bridges like LayerZero, Wormhole)

Requires Bilateral Agreements

Via Interoperability Protocols (e.g., Weaver)

Regulatory Compliance (AML/KYC) Enforcement

deep-dive
THE ARCHITECTURE

Why the Battle Between Public and Private Digital Money Is a False Dichotomy

The future of digital money is a composable stack, not a zero-sum war between CBDCs and crypto.

Public ledgers are the settlement layer. They provide the immutable, neutral rails for finality. Private systems like CBDCs or bank networks will settle on these rails for interoperability and auditability, similar to how Arbitrum settles on Ethereum.

Private systems are the application layer. They handle KYC, compliance, and high-throughput transactions. This mirrors the architecture of Polygon's Supernets or Avalanche's subnets, which offer private execution on public consensus.

The dichotomy is a design choice. The technical debate is about where to place the trust boundary. A CBDC can be a private ledger with public proof-of-reserves via Chainlink or a zk-proof, not a closed silo.

Evidence: JPMorgan's Onyx uses a permissioned Ethereum fork for its JPM Coin, proving institutional demand for blockchain rails while maintaining private control over participant identity and transaction logic.

counter-argument
THE FALSE DICHOTOMY

Counter-Argument: Won't CBDCs Just Crowd Out Private Money?

Public and private digital money will compete and integrate, not displace each other.

CBDCs are infrastructure, not products. A central bank digital currency provides a risk-free, programmable settlement layer. Private stablecoins like USDC and USDT are the application layer, building user-facing products on top of this base. This mirrors how TCP/IP enabled private internet companies.

Competition drives innovation. The existence of a public option forces private issuers to differentiate. They will compete on cross-chain interoperability (via LayerZero, Wormhole), yield, and specialized compliance. This pressure improves the entire ecosystem's efficiency and user choice.

Private money dominates user experience. Central banks lack the incentive to build complex DeFi integrations or consumer wallets. Protocols like Aave and Uniswap will integrate CBDCs as a stable asset, but the UX and composability layer remains a private-sector domain.

Evidence: In China's digital yuan pilot, commercial banks and tech firms (e.g., Alipay) handle distribution and interfaces. The central bank provides the core ledger, but private entities own the customer relationship and innovation.

case-study
BEYOND THE FALSE DICHOTOMY

Case Studies: The Hybrid Stack in Action

Real-world protocols are blending public settlement with private execution, proving the optimal design is a hybrid.

01

The Problem: Private Chains Are Data Silos

Institutions need privacy but face crippling interoperability issues. A private chain cannot natively verify or settle with public liquidity pools like Uniswap or Aave, locking capital and limiting utility.

  • Isolated Liquidity: Assets are trapped, unable to interact with $50B+ DeFi TVL.
  • No Universal Settlement: Each private chain becomes a walled garden, defeating the purpose of a global financial network.
0%
Native Composability
High
Fragmentation Cost
02

The Solution: Aztec's zkRollup for Private DeFi

Aztec uses a public zkRollup on Ethereum for settlement, while keeping all transaction logic and state private. This hybrid model gives users the security of Ethereum with the privacy of a shielded pool.

  • Public Finality: All proofs settle on Ethereum L1, inheriting its $500B+ security.
  • Private Execution: Complex DeFi interactions (swaps, loans) are computed off-chain with zero-knowledge proofs, hiding amounts and parties.
100x
Cheaper than L1
Full
L1 Security
03

The Problem: Public Chains Leak Alpha

Traders and institutions cannot execute large orders on public DEXs without causing front-running and devastating price slippage. MEV bots on public mempools extract billions annually, making sophisticated strategies impossible.

  • Strategy Exposure: Every intent is public, allowing sandwich attacks.
  • Cost Inefficiency: Slippage and fees can erase 10-30% of large trade value.
$1B+
Annual MEV
100%
Tx Transparency
04

The Solution: Espresso's Shared Sequencer for Fair Ordering

Espresso Systems provides a configurable shared sequencer network that rollups can use. It enables private mempools and fair, MEV-resistant transaction ordering before batches are posted to a public L1 like Ethereum.

  • Hybrid Finality: Execution is private and ordered fairly off-chain, settlement is public.
  • Rollup-Agnostic: Serves as neutral infrastructure for chains like Arbitrum or Optimism, preventing ecosystem fragmentation.
~500ms
Time to Finality
MEV-Resistant
Ordering
05

The Problem: CBDCs Risk Financial Surveillance

A purely centralized Central Bank Digital Currency creates a perfect tool for state overreach—programmable money that can be frozen, taxed, or expired at will. This undermines the foundational property of money as a neutral settlement asset.

  • Loss of Fungibility: Each unit can be uniquely tracked and controlled.
  • Single Point of Failure: The central issuer is a censorship and technical bottleneck.
100%
Central Control
0
User Sovereignty
06

The Solution: Hybrid CBDC Architectures (e.g., Project Guardian)

Pioneered by MAS, this model uses a public permissioned blockchain for wholesale settlement between institutions, while allowing private sector innovation on retail-facing layers. The core ledger is transparent to regulators, but user interactions are mediated by licensed banks and fintechs.

  • Regulatory Visibility: Central bank has audit access to the core settlement layer.
  • Private Innovation: Banks build competing user interfaces and loyalty programs on top, preserving some privacy and choice.
24/7
Settlement
Layered
Control
takeaways
FALSE DICHOTOMY DECONSTRUCTED

Key Takeaways for Builders and Investors

The future of digital money is not a zero-sum battle between public and private rails; it's a composable stack of programmable value layers.

01

The Problem: Regulatory Arbitrage as a Feature

Public blockchains are often framed as regulatory escapes, but their real power is creating transparent, auditable rails for regulated private money. The solution is building for compliance, not against it.

  • Key Benefit: Enables institutional-grade settlement for private CBDCs and tokenized deposits.
  • Key Benefit: Provides real-time audit trails and programmable compliance hooks (e.g., travel rule modules).
24/7
Settlement
100%
Auditable
02

The Solution: Programmable Settlement Layers (E.g., Ethereum, Solana)

Public L1s/L2s are not currencies; they are neutral settlement and coordination layers. Their value accrues from securing and finalizing transactions for all forms of digital money.

  • Key Benefit: Monetizes security through fee capture from private stablecoin and RWAsset transactions.
  • Key Benefit: Enables cross-asset composability (e.g., a private money market fund interacting with a public DeFi pool via CCIP or LayerZero).
$100B+
Secured Value
~12s
Finality
03

The Architecture: Hybrid Custody & Intent-Based UX

The user experience dichotomy (self-custody vs. bank custody) is solved by abstracting complexity. Solutions like account abstraction (ERC-4337) and intent-based protocols (UniswapX, CowSwap) let users transact seamlessly across money types.

  • Key Benefit: Users hold asset ownership (private or public) while delegating execution complexity.
  • Key Benefit: Drives volume and liquidity to the most efficient settlement layer, regardless of the money type.
1-Click
UX
-90%
Gas Complexity
04

The Metric: Liquidity Fragmentation is the Real Enemy

The fight isn't public vs. private money; it's unified liquidity vs. siloed pools. Builders win by creating bridges and aggregation layers (e.g., Chainlink CCIP, Across) that treat all digital money as a fungible input.

  • Key Benefit: Maximizes capital efficiency across the entire digital economy.
  • Key Benefit: Creates winner-take-most markets for interoperability infrastructure.
$10B+
Bridged Assets
~5bps
Arb Spreads
05

The Investment Thesis: Vertical Integration of Money Stacks

The largest opportunities are not in creating another stablecoin, but in owning the critical middleware that connects and secures all forms of digital value. Think oracles, cross-chain messaging, and programmable privacy layers.

  • Key Benefit: Captures value from the entire ecosystem's growth, not a single asset's adoption.
  • Key Benefit: Builds regulatory moats through proven security and compliance integrations.
Infra
Business Model
10x
TAM Multiplier
06

The Endgame: National Currency as a Smart Contract Interface

The final convergence: a digital dollar is just a standardized API on a public ledger. Private banks and fintechs become node operators and service providers on a shared, programmable monetary network.

  • Key Benefit: Disintermediates rent-seeking in traditional payment rails (SWIFT, ACH).
  • Key Benefit: Unlocks global, programmable monetary policy and real-time economic levers.
API
Abstraction
-99%
Settlement Cost
ENQUIRY

Get In Touch
today.

Our experts will offer a free quote and a 30min call to discuss your project.

NDA Protected
24h Response
Directly to Engineering Team
10+
Protocols Shipped
$20M+
TVL Overall
NDA Protected Directly to Engineering Team
Public vs Private Digital Money: A False Dichotomy | ChainScore Blog