On-chain data is the new oil but most infrastructure treats it like crude. Current indexers like The Graph and Covalent provide structured historical data, which is necessary but insufficient for real-time decision-making.
The Future of On-Chain Data: From Indexers to Autonomous Insights
We trace the evolution of on-chain data from passive indexing to active, AI-driven agents that don't just report state—they act on it. This is the endgame for blockchain data infrastructure.
Introduction
On-chain data infrastructure is evolving from passive indexing to active, autonomous intelligence generation.
The next evolution is autonomous insights. Protocols like Airstack and Goldsky are pioneering this shift, moving beyond querying to generating predictive signals and actionable intelligence directly from raw chain data.
This creates a new architectural layer. The stack now separates data retrieval (indexers) from data intelligence (insight engines). This separation enables specialized, real-time analytics that indexers were never designed to provide.
Evidence: The Graph processes ~1B queries monthly, yet DeFi protocols still build custom bots for MEV and liquidation signals, proving the gap between data availability and actionable insight.
The Core Thesis: Data as an Action Layer
On-chain data is evolving from a passive historical record into a real-time, composable signal that directly triggers and optimizes financial actions.
Data is now executable. The current model of indexers like The Graph or Covalent providing static queries is obsolete. The next layer transforms raw data into validated, real-time intent signals that smart contracts consume directly, bypassing the query-response loop.
Autonomous agents require this. Protocols like UniswapX, CowSwap, and Across demonstrate the demand for intent-based execution. Their solvers need a live feed of MEV opportunities, liquidity shifts, and cross-chain states to compete. A dedicated data action layer becomes their competitive moat.
The insight is the transaction. The separation between data analysis and execution disappears. A system detecting a liquidation opportunity on Aave or a profitable arbitrage path between Uniswap and Curve will not just report it—it will bundle the insight with a signed, gas-optimized transaction.
Evidence: The $200M+ in MEV extracted monthly proves the latent value in real-time data synthesis. Protocols like Flashbots are building the execution rails; the missing piece is the standardized, decentralized data oracle that feeds them.
The Current Stack is a Bottleneck
Today's data infrastructure is a patchwork of slow, manual tools that fail to deliver real-time, actionable intelligence.
Indexers are query engines, not brains. They fetch raw data but lack the logic to interpret it, forcing developers to build custom analytics on top of services like The Graph or SubQuery.
Real-time data is a pipe dream. The standard stack introduces latency at every layer, from RPC nodes to indexing, making protocols like Uniswap or Aave reactive instead of proactive.
Manual dashboards create operational debt. Teams rely on fragmented tools like Dune Analytics and Flipside, which require constant maintenance and fail to surface anomalies autonomously.
Evidence: A simple arbitrage opportunity on a DEX like Curve often expires before a traditional indexer can surface the relevant liquidity pool data.
Three Trends Driving the Autonomous Shift
The indexer-to-query model is breaking. The next stack delivers insights, not just data.
The Problem: Indexer Fragmentation
Developers waste weeks stitching together The Graph, Covalent, and custom RPCs. Each chain and rollup is a new data silo, creating a ~40% engineering overhead for multi-chain apps. The result is brittle, slow, and expensive data pipelines.
- Fragmented State: No single query across L2s, app-chains, and alt-L1s.
- Cost Sprawl: Paying for redundant indexing across multiple services.
- Latency Penalty: Sequential queries create >2s delays for aggregated insights.
The Solution: Intent-Centric Data Nets
Move from pull-based queries to push-based insights. Protocols like UniswapX and CowSwap pioneered this for trades; the same logic applies to data. A user's intent (e.g., "alert me when wallet X receives >$1M") is fulfilled by a decentralized network of solvers competing on cost and speed.
- Declarative Logic: Define the what, not the how. The network finds the optimal data path.
- Solver Competition: Drives cost below $0.01 per complex insight.
- Real-Time Streams: Continuous data flows replace batch polling, enabling <500ms autonomous reactions.
The Enabler: Verifiable Compute Oracles
Raw data is useless. Value is in the computation—risk scores, MEV opportunities, liquidity forecasts. EigenLayer AVSs and zkOracles like Hyperoracle allow any complex logic to be executed trustlessly off-chain and verified on-chain. This creates a market for proprietary analytics as a verifiable service.
- Trustless Aggregation: Combine data from Coinbase, Binance, and Uniswap with cryptographic guarantees.
- Monetizable Models: Data scientists can sell access to verified ML models without leaking IP.
- Settlement Layer: On-chain verification turns insights into direct actions via Gelato or Chainlink Automation.
The Data Stack Evolution: A Comparative Analysis
A feature and performance comparison of the three dominant architectural paradigms for accessing and analyzing on-chain data.
| Core Metric / Capability | Traditional Indexers (The Graph) | Managed Query Services (Goldsky, SubQuery) | Autonomous AI Agents (RSS3, Fetch.ai) |
|---|---|---|---|
Data Latency (Block to API) | ~2-5 minutes | < 30 seconds | < 10 seconds |
Query Cost per 1M Requests | $200-500 | $50-150 | Dynamic (Agent Gas + Fee) |
Schema Flexibility | |||
Real-Time Streams | |||
On-Chain Execution Trigger | |||
Primary Use Case | Historical dApp Data | Real-Time Analytics & Feeds | Autonomous Trading & Governance |
Example Entity | Uniswap, Aave | Dune Analytics, Nansen | Arkham, AIOZ Network |
Architecting the Autonomous Data Layer
On-chain data infrastructure is evolving from passive indexing to autonomous, intent-driven intelligence.
Indexers are becoming obsolete. The current model of centralized indexers like The Graph is a query bottleneck. The future is decentralized query networks where data is processed at the edge by specialized nodes, eliminating single points of failure and censorship.
Data becomes an active asset. Instead of static queries, data layers will execute intent-based computations. A user's request for 'best yield' triggers an autonomous agent to analyze protocols like Aave and Compound, execute the optimal strategy, and settle on-chain.
The stack inverts. We move from applications querying data to data driving applications. Protocols like Goldsky and Substreams enable real-time data streams, allowing dApps to react to on-chain events like Uniswap swaps or NFT transfers within milliseconds.
Evidence: The Graph's query volume grew 300% year-over-year, but its centralized HTTP gateway remains the dominant access point, exposing the systemic risk the next generation must solve.
Protocols Building the Primitives
The next generation of data infrastructure moves beyond simple indexing to deliver autonomous, verifiable, and real-time intelligence.
The Graph: The Query Standard is a Bottleneck
The Graph's subgraph model is slow, centralized, and expensive for real-time applications. The future is streaming-first indexing.
- ~500ms latency for real-time state changes vs. multi-block finality delays.
- Cost reduction via Firehose architecture, decoupling data ingestion from serving.
- Fragmentation solved by Substreams, enabling composable data pipelines for protocols like Uniswap and Aave.
Pyth Network: From Oracles to Programmable Data Feeds
Oracles are moving beyond price feeds to become programmable data layers for any off-chain computation.
- Pull vs. Push: Enables on-demand data fetching, slashing gas costs for dApps like Perpetual DEXs.
- Cross-chain native: Data attestations are natively verifiable on Solana, EVM L2s, and Sui.
- >$2B in value secured by the network, demonstrating institutional-grade reliability.
Space and Time: The Verifiable Data Warehouse
Trustless analytics require cryptographic proof of SQL query execution. This bridges the gap between decentralized apps and enterprise BI.
- Proof of SQL: Uses zkSNARKs to prove query results are correct and untampered.
- Hybrid architecture: Connects on-chain data with off-chain enterprise datasets.
- Serves as a verifiable backend for DeFi risk engines and on-chain gaming leaderboards.
RSS3: The Decentralized Information Layer
Social and semantic data are trapped in centralized APIs. RSS3 indexes the Open Web for user-centric applications.
- Universal Schemas: Structures fragmented data from Lens, Farcaster, and cross-chain activity.
- AI-ready datasets: Provides structured, real-time feeds for training autonomous agents.
- Decentralized network of Indexers and Gateways ensures censorship-resistant access.
Goldsky: Real-Time Data as a Streaming Service
Batch-based indexing fails for high-frequency trading and live experiences. The solution is subsecond streaming.
- Event-driven pipelines: Process blocks as they are proposed, not finalized.
- Seamless integration with Kafka and WebSocket for traditional dev workflows.
- Critical infrastructure for NFT marketplaces and Perpetual DEXs requiring instant updates.
Hyperbolic: The On-Chain Data Lab
Data analysis is stuck in dashboards. The future is on-chain, verifiable data models that act as public goods.
- On-chain deployment: Data models (e.g., a DEX liquidity heatmap) are deployed as smart contracts.
- Forkable & composable: Anyone can build upon or verify a published model.
- Democratizes quant-grade analytics, moving beyond closed-door hedge fund strategies.
The Centralization Paradox
The push for decentralized compute creates a new, more opaque layer of data centralization.
Decentralized compute centralizes data. Rollups like Arbitrum and Optimism process transactions off-chain, but their sequencers control the canonical data feed. This creates a single point of failure for data availability and ordering that The Graph's decentralized indexers cannot bypass.
Autonomous agents demand new data primitives. Intent-based systems like UniswapX and CowSwap require real-time, verifiable state proofs, not historical queries. This shifts power from general-purpose indexers to specialized verifiable data layers like EigenDA or Celestia.
The bottleneck is state attestation. The Ethereum consensus layer attests to block headers, not internal state. Without a native light client protocol for rollups, users and agents must trust centralized RPC endpoints from Alchemy or Infura for the freshest data.
Critical Risks and Failure Modes
The shift from passive indexers to active insight engines introduces new systemic vulnerabilities.
The Oracle Problem Reincarnated
Autonomous agents making decisions based on on-chain data create a new oracle surface. The risk isn't just price feeds, but the integrity of any data stream (e.g., NFT floor prices, governance states, protocol metrics).
- Single Point of Failure: A compromised data source can trigger cascading, automated liquidations or trades.
- Latency Arbitrage: MEV bots will front-run agents reacting to newly indexed data, creating a negative feedback loop.
- Data Freshness: The ~12s Ethereum block time is an eternity for high-frequency agents, forcing reliance on mempool data with its own risks.
Centralization of Interpretive Power
The entities that define and maintain the schemas for "insights" (like The Graph's subgraphs or Goldsky's streams) become critical chokepoints. This isn't just about uptime; it's about the power to frame reality.
- Schema Governance: Who decides what constitutes a "whale wallet" or a "protocol attack"? Biased definitions create biased markets.
- Protocol Capture: Major data providers like Covalent or Flipside could be incentivized to prioritize insights for their investors' portfolios.
- Black Box Models: AI-driven insights from platforms like Space and Time or RSS3 are opaque, making audit and dispute impossible.
Economic Model Collapse
Current indexer economics (query fees, staking) break when data consumers are autonomous agents with volatile, programmatic demand.
- Query Spam Attacks: An agent can trigger millions of micro-queries to probe for state changes, DoSing the indexer network.
- Unpredictable Costs: Agent-driven demand spikes will make query pricing and indexer ROI forecasts impossible, destabilizing networks like The Graph.
- Data Subsidy Wars: Protocols will subsidize data access for agents using their dApps, distorting the neutral data market and creating walled gardens.
The Verifiable Compute Bottleneck
Generating insights requires computation (e.g., calculating TVL, identifying trends). Proving this computation was correct without re-executing it is the new scaling challenge.
- ZK-Proving Overhead: Using Risc Zero or SP1 to prove an insight's derivation can be 100-1000x more expensive than generating it, negating any efficiency gain.
- Data Availability Dilemma: To verify a summary statistic, you need the raw data. This recreates the full node problem, undermining the value of the insight layer.
- Time-to-Insight Lag: The proving delay means insights are stale by the time their validity is established, a fatal flaw for real-time agents.
The 24-Month Outlook: From Assistants to Autonomy
On-chain data infrastructure will shift from passive query services to active, autonomous agents that execute strategies.
Indexers become execution triggers. Today's indexers like The Graph and SubQuery answer historical queries. The next generation will use real-time data streams to trigger on-chain actions, moving from read-only APIs to write-capable agents.
Autonomous agents replace dashboards. Static analytics dashboards from Dune Analytics or Nansen will be obsolete. AI agents will monitor wallet activity, liquidity pools, and governance proposals, then execute trades or votes based on predefined logic without human intervention.
The data layer is the execution layer. Protocols like Aevo and Hyperliquid demonstrate that low-latency data feeds are the core product. In 24 months, the most valuable data infrastructure won't report prices—it will be the settlement layer for derivative contracts and intent-based swaps.
Evidence: The demand is already visible. The 300% annual growth in real-time data RPC calls to services like QuickNode and Alchemy proves applications require sub-second latency not for display, but for immediate financial action.
TL;DR for Builders and Investors
The data layer is shifting from passive query engines to active intelligence networks. Here's where the alpha is.
The Indexer Trilemma: Performance, Decentralization, Cost
Traditional indexers like The Graph force a trade-off. You can't have all three at scale.\n- Performance: Sub-100ms queries require centralized caches.\n- Decentralization: Truly decentralized networks (e.g., SubQuery) suffer from higher latency and coordination overhead.\n- Cost: Optimizing for the first two makes query pricing unpredictable for builders.
Solution: Intent-Based Data Pipelines
Shift from asking "give me data X" to declaring "I want outcome Y." The network figures out the optimal data fetch and computation path.\n- Parallels to DeFi: Similar to how UniswapX and Across abstract liquidity sources.\n- Key Benefit: Developers specify the what, not the how, enabling automatic optimization across indexers, RPCs, and co-processors like Axiom or Brevis.\n- Result: 90% cheaper complex queries by routing to the most efficient execution layer.
The Rise of Autonomous Insights Agents
The end-state is not APIs, but autonomous agents that monitor, analyze, and act on data. Think ChatGPT for your protocol's treasury.\n- Entity Example: Platforms like Shadow fork on-chain and off-chain data to power trading or risk-management bots.\n- Key Benefit: Moves beyond dashboards to executable strategies (e.g., "auto-rebalance when TVL concentration hits 40%").\n- Monetization: Shifts revenue from per-query fees to SaaS-style subscriptions for intelligence feeds.
The Modular Data Lake: EigenLayer for Data
Restaking logic applied to data validation. Operators can restake to secure specialized data layers (e.g., an options volatility feed).\n- Key Benefit: Unlocks trust-minimized data oracles without bootstrapping a new validator set from scratch.\n- Entity Play: Projects like Hyperliquid use custom chains for high-frequency data; this model secures them.\n- Result: Rapid innovation in data verticals (NFT liquidity, MEV flows) with shared security.
Zero-Knowledge Proofs as the Universal Verifier
ZKPs move from scaling to data integrity. Prove the correctness of any historical state or complex computation off-chain.\n- Key Benefit: Enables light clients to trustlessly verify data from any source, breaking RPC provider lock-in.\n- Entity Example: =nil; Foundation's Proof Market or RISC Zero allow proving SQL queries.\n- Result: Data consumers pay for verification, not trust, reducing reliance on centralized indexers.
Investment Thesis: Vertical Data Networks Win
Horizontal "data for everything" APIs (Alchemy, Infura) will be commoditized. The value accrues to vertical-specific networks.\n- Examples: Dune Analytics for analytics, Arkham for intelligence, Flipside for governance.\n- Key Insight: Owning the data schema and community for DeFi, Gaming, or Social is a defensible moat.\n- Action: Build or invest in networks that own a data vertical and embed financial primitives (staking, fee distribution).
Get In Touch
today.
Our experts will offer a free quote and a 30min call to discuss your project.