Free 30-min Web3 Consultation
Book Now
Smart Contract Security Audits
Learn More
Custom DeFi Protocol Development
Explore
Full-Stack Web3 dApp Development
View Services
Free 30-min Web3 Consultation
Book Now
Smart Contract Security Audits
Learn More
Custom DeFi Protocol Development
Explore
Full-Stack Web3 dApp Development
View Services
Free 30-min Web3 Consultation
Book Now
Smart Contract Security Audits
Learn More
Custom DeFi Protocol Development
Explore
Full-Stack Web3 dApp Development
View Services
Free 30-min Web3 Consultation
Book Now
Smart Contract Security Audits
Learn More
Custom DeFi Protocol Development
Explore
Full-Stack Web3 dApp Development
View Services
bitcoins-evolution-defi-ordinals-and-l2s
Blog

Bitcoin Fee Markets Without New Users

Bitcoin's fee revenue is no longer tied to simple P2P payments. This analysis breaks down how inscription protocols like Ordinals and Runes, alongside emerging L2s like Stacks and Merlin, are creating a new, self-sustaining fee economy independent of mainstream adoption.

introduction
THE SUPPLY-SIDE SHIFT

Introduction: The Fee Market's Quiet Revolution

Bitcoin's fee market is being fundamentally restructured by protocol-level changes, not user growth.

Fee markets are supply-constrained. The primary driver for Bitcoin's rising fee revenue is not new users, but a structural reduction in block space supply from protocols like Ordinals and Runes. These protocols create permanent data inscriptions that compete for the same limited block space as financial transactions.

Ordinals changed the unit of demand. The market no longer bids purely on transaction priority. It now bids on block space as digital real estate for storing images, text, and tokens. This shifts fee pressure from transient network congestion to permanent, inelastic demand for data storage.

Runes amplified the mechanism. Following the Ordinals blueprint, the Runes protocol created a more efficient fungible token standard, triggering massive issuance events that consume entire blocks. This demonstrates that protocol-level innovation, not organic adoption, now dictates fee market cycles.

Evidence: Post-April 2024 halving, Bitcoin's hash price (revenue per exahash) recovered to pre-halving levels within weeks, sustained not by payment volume but by Runes-driven fee spikes exceeding 1,000 sats/vByte. Miners now rely on these new inscription protocols for economic security.

market-context
THE PARADOX

The Data: A Post-Halving Fee Boom Without a User Boom

Bitcoin's fee revenue surged post-halving despite stagnant user growth, revealing a supply shock driven by new protocols, not organic adoption.

Post-halving fee surge is supply-driven. The 50% block reward cut forced a fee market repricing, but daily active addresses and transaction counts remain flat. This decouples revenue from user growth.

Ordinals and Runes are the new fee sink. These protocols create inscription-based demand that competes with payments, crowding out regular users and creating a two-tiered market for block space.

Fee pressure is structural, not cyclical. Unlike past cycles driven by exchange inflows, today's protocol-driven demand from Ordinals/BRC-20 is a permanent new baseline. Miners now rely on it.

Evidence: Post-halving, Bitcoin's average transaction fee spiked over 1,000% while daily active addresses hovered near 600k, a level unchanged since late 2023. Fee revenue from non-payment use cases now exceeds 30%.

BITCOIN FEE MARKET ANALYSIS

Fee Revenue Drivers: Protocol vs. Payment (2023-2024)

Compares the primary drivers of on-chain fee revenue in the Bitcoin ecosystem, highlighting the divergence between protocol-level activity (e.g., Ordinals/BRC-20) and traditional payment transactions.

Revenue Driver / MetricProtocol-Driven Activity (Ordinals/BRC-20)Traditional Payment ActivityHybrid Model (Lightning Network)

Primary Use Case

Asset Inscription & Digital Artifacts

P2P Value Transfer & Settlement

Micropayments & Instant Settlements

Avg. Transaction Size (KB)

400 KB

< 250 KB

Off-chain (On-chain: 1-2 KB for channel ops)

Fee per Block Contribution (2024 Peak)

70% of total fees

< 30% of total fees

Negligible direct on-chain fee contribution

Revenue Perf. vs. Block Space

High (Data-heavy, inelastic demand)

Low (Fee-sensitive, elastic demand)

N/A (Relies on base layer for security)

User Growth Dependency

False (Driven by existing holder speculation)

True (Requires new adoption for volume)

True (Requires network effect for liquidity)

Fee Pressure Catalyst

NFT Minting Frenzies & Token Launches

Bull Market On-Ramping & Exchange Flows

Channel Open/Close Cycles during volatility

Avg. Fee per Tx (2023-24 Range)

$10 - $150

$1 - $15

$0.01 - $0.10 (routing fees)

Block Space Efficiency (Value/KB)

Low (Aesthetic/collectible data)

High (Monetary value transfer)

Very High (Batched value transfer)

deep-dive
THE FEE ENGINE

The New Fee Stack: Ordinals, L2s, and the Coming DeFi Wave

Bitcoin's fee market is being structurally transformed by new demand sources, not just user growth.

Ordinals and Runes are permanent fee sinks. They create inelastic demand for block space by competing with financial transactions, decoupling fees from simple P2P payments.

L2s like Stacks and Merlin create recurring fee pressure. Their security models require periodic Bitcoin settlement, generating a predictable, compounding base layer demand.

This new fee stack enables Bitcoin DeFi. Protocols like Sovryn and ALEX require reliable, high-throughput settlement, turning Bitcoin into a viable base layer for complex state.

Evidence: Post-Ordinals, Bitcoin's average fee per block increased 10x, with Runes accounting for over 70% of transactions at launch, demonstrating protocol-driven demand.

risk-analysis
WHEN DEMAND IS ZERO-SUM

The Bear Case: Risks of a Protocol-Driven Fee Market

Protocols like Ordinals and Runes create fee demand, but a market reliant solely on internal speculation risks collapse without new users and real utility.

01

The Inelastic Supply Trap

Bitcoin's block space is perfectly inelastic; demand is the only variable. Protocol-driven demand is fickle and can evaporate, leaving miners with ~1-2 BTC/block in subsidies. A fee market that fails to attract external users is just a Ponzi game for block space.

  • Key Risk: Miners face revenue cliffs when speculative manias end.
  • Key Risk: No sustainable value capture if fees aren't tied to economic throughput.
~1-2 BTC
Subsidy/Block
0%
Elasticity
02

Cannibalization of Core Utility

High fees from meme-driven protocols like Runes price out Lightning Network channels and Bitcoin-native DeFi settlements. This creates a tragedy of the commons where short-term speculation damages long-term utility layers.

  • Key Risk: Stifles development of scalable L2s and payment networks.
  • Key Risk: Reinforces Bitcoin as a settlement layer for JPEGs, not a monetary network.
>1000 sats/vB
Rune Mint Fees
1 sat/vB
LN Target
03

The Miner Extractable Value (MEV) On-Ramp

Complex transactions from protocols like BRC-20s and auction systems create predictable arbitrage opportunities. This invites MEV bots, leading to centralized block building, front-running, and a less fair fee auction for regular users.

  • Key Risk: Centralizes mining power around entities with advanced MEV capabilities.
  • Key Risk: Degrades user experience with unpredictable finality and failed transactions.
>20%
Potential MEV
O(1)
Block Builders
04

Fee Market Volatility as a UX Killer

Spikes from protocol launches create fee volatility of 100x+ within hours. This makes Bitcoin unusable for predictable payments or contracts, eroding its core value proposition as reliable base-layer money.

  • Key Risk: Drives users to stable-fee alternatives like Liquid Network or other chains.
  • Key Risk: Creates uncertainty that deters institutional adoption and automated systems.
100x
Fee Spikes
<24h
Cycle Time
05

The 'Blockspace is Scarce' Fallacy

The narrative that all block space demand is good is flawed. Demand from wash trading and spam inscriptions consumes capacity without creating lasting economic value. True scarcity should be allocated to transactions with positive externalities.

  • Key Risk: Misallocation of a finite security budget.
  • Key Risk: Undermines the social consensus for future throughput increases (e.g., block size debates).
>60%
Spam Tx Share
0
Net Value
06

Centralization of Protocol Rent-Seekers

A few dominant protocols (e.g., Ordinals, Runes) and their infrastructure providers (indexers, marketplaces) can capture disproportionate fee revenue. This creates centralized points of failure and rent extraction, contradicting Bitcoin's decentralized ethos.

  • Key Risk: Indexer trust assumptions become critical vulnerabilities.
  • Key Risk: Fee market becomes a tool for protocol treasuries, not a neutral auction.
O(10)
Major Indexers
>80%
Fee Share
future-outlook
THE NEW REALITY

Conclusion: Implications for Miners, Builders, and Capital

A saturated Bitcoin fee market redefines the ecosystem's economic incentives and strategic priorities.

Miners face revenue volatility. Block subsidy halvings permanently shift the security budget to transaction fees, creating unpredictable income streams dependent on protocol-driven demand rather than user growth.

Builders must monetize blockspace directly. Projects like Ordinals and Runes demonstrate that creating new, fee-generating asset primitives is the only viable path for protocol-level sustainability without relying on external user acquisition.

Capital allocates to fee capture. Investment shifts from speculative token bets to infrastructure that extracts value from transaction flow, such as sophisticated MEV strategies and specialized mining operations optimized for high-fee environments.

Evidence: The 2024 halving saw fees constitute over 75% of miner revenue for multiple days, a structural shift that Luxor and Foundry now build entire business models around.

takeaways
BITCOIN FEE MARKET DYNAMICS

Key Takeaways for Protocol Architects

The Bitcoin fee market is a closed-loop system; without new capital inflow, protocols must compete for a fixed pool of block space.

01

The Problem: Inelastic Supply, Volatile Demand

Block space is a perfectly inelastic commodity. Demand spikes from Ordinals or Runes can cause fees to increase 100x+ in minutes, pricing out other applications.\n- Fee volatility makes cost prediction impossible for dApps.\n- Winner-take-all auctions create a hostile environment for predictable settlement.

100x+
Fee Spike
~4MB
Fixed Block
02

The Solution: Layer 2s as Fee Arbitrageurs

Protocols like Stacks and Merlin Chain batch thousands of user transactions into a single Bitcoin settlement. This turns a variable cost into a predictable operational expense.\n- Economies of scale reduce per-user cost by 90%+.\n- Fee smoothing insulates users from mainnet volatility.

90%+
Cost Save
1000s
Tx per Batch
03

The Problem: Miner Extractable Value (MEV) on Bitcoin

While less complex than Ethereum, Bitcoin MEV exists via transaction ordering in blocks. Protocols relying on timely inclusion are vulnerable to front-running and time-bandit attacks.\n- No native PBS (Proposer-Builder Separation) exacerbates the issue.\n- Opaque auctions happen off-chain, hidden from users.

Opaque
Auctions
High Risk
For DeFi
04

The Solution: Commit-Reveal Schemes & Soft Finality

Adopt cryptographic techniques like SNARKs or discreet log contracts to hide transaction intent until inclusion. Implement soft finality on your L2, treating Bitcoin settlement as a dispute window rather than instant confirmation.\n- Mitigates front-running by hiding economic intent.\n- Decouples execution from base layer timing.

SNARKs
Privacy
Soft Finality
Paradigm
05

The Problem: Congestion Kills UX

When fees spike, user experience collapses. A $50 NFT mint becomes a $200 transaction. This destroys the utility of any application built directly on L1.\n- Abandoned transactions increase dramatically.\n- Network effects reverse as users flee.

4x
Cost Multiplier
Poor UX
Result
06

The Solution: Intent-Based Abstraction & Payment Rails

Architect like UniswapX or CowSwap. Let users sign intents, not transactions. Use a solver network to optimize for inclusion and cost, abstracting the fee market entirely. Integrate with Lightning Network for microtransactions.\n- Gasless UX for end-users.\n- Solver competition drives fee efficiency.

Gasless
UX
Solvers
Optimize
ENQUIRY

Get In Touch
today.

Our experts will offer a free quote and a 30min call to discuss your project.

NDA Protected
24h Response
Directly to Engineering Team
10+
Protocols Shipped
$20M+
TVL Overall
NDA Protected direct pipeline