Batch transactions solve gas friction. A single user signature can authorize multiple on-chain actions, paying gas once for operations across protocols like Uniswap, Aave, and Compound.
account-abstraction-fixing-crypto-ux
Blog
Why Batch Transactions Are the Killer App for Account Abstraction
ERC-4337's User Operations enable atomic multi-step actions. This is not a marginal improvement—it's a fundamental shift from transaction-based to intent-based interaction, fixing crypto's most broken UX pattern.
introduction
THE GASLESS FRONTIER
Introduction
Batch transactions are the first practical, high-utility application of Account Abstraction, solving the core UX problem of gas fees.
This is not a simple multi-call. Native batching via ERC-4337 Bundlers enables atomic, failure-conditional execution that existing EOA wallets cannot guarantee, moving logic from the user to the protocol.
The killer feature is sponsorship. Projects like Safe{Wallet} and Biconomy use Paymasters to abstract gas, letting dApps absorb costs for users, which directly drives adoption and on-chain activity volume.
Evidence: Safe's sponsored transaction module processes over 300K user operations monthly, demonstrating real demand for this abstracted, batched UX.
thesis-statement
THE KILLER APP
Thesis Statement
Batch transactions are the first mass-market application for Account Abstraction, solving the UX and economic inefficiencies of single-operation wallets.
Batch transactions solve UX fragmentation. Users currently sign dozens of separate transactions for simple DeFi interactions. AA-powered wallets like Biconomy and Safe{Wallet} bundle approvals, swaps, and deposits into a single signature, making complex actions feel like one click.
The killer feature is economic bundling. A single EIP-4337 UserOperation aggregates multiple on-chain actions, amortizing gas costs and enabling sponsored transactions. This creates a viable business model for dApps to subsidize user onboarding, a model pioneered by Pimlico and Stackup.
This is not just gas savings. Batching enables atomic, failure-conditional transactions. A user's swap, bridge via Across, and deposit either all succeed or all revert, eliminating the stranded asset problem that plagues manual multi-step DeFi.
Evidence: Safe{Wallet} processes over 30M batched transactions monthly. Protocols like UniswapX use batching and intent-based routing to guarantee optimal trade execution, a functionality impossible with EOAs.
key-trends
WHY BATCHING IS THE KILLER APP
The State of the Batch: Key Trends
Account abstraction's real value isn't just smart wallets—it's the ability to atomically execute complex, multi-step operations as a single transaction.
01
The Problem: Gas Roulette
Users pay for failed transactions and must approve every single interaction, creating a terrible UX and wasting capital.\n- Failed tx fees are a multi-million dollar annual tax on DeFi.\n- Approval fatigue kills conversion for complex DeFi strategies.
-100%
Wasted Gas
~$50M+
Annual Drain
02
The Solution: Atomic Bundling
Batching turns a sequence of dependent actions into one all-or-nothing transaction. This is the core primitive for intent-based systems like UniswapX and CowSwap.\n- Guaranteed execution: Either the entire swap, bridge, and stake operation succeeds, or it reverts.\n- Single signature: User signs one intent, the bundler handles the messy multi-chain execution.
1-Click
Complex DeFi
100%
Execution Certainty
03
The Infrastructure: ERC-4337 & Bundlers
Account abstraction standardizes the bundler role, creating a competitive market for transaction processing. This is the backend for Stackup, Alchemy, and Biconomy.\n- Paymaster integration: Fees can be paid in any token or sponsored by dApps.\n- MEV resistance: Bundlers can implement privacy pools or use services like Flashbots Protect.
~500ms
Bundle Latency
10x+
Efficiency Gain
04
The Killer Use Case: Cross-Chain Intents
Batch transactions enable seamless cross-chain actions without bridging assets first. This is the vision behind Across, LayerZero, and Chainlink CCIP.\n- Unified liquidity: Swap on Ethereum, bridge to Arbitrum, and provide liquidity—all in one signature.\n- No intermediate tokens: Eliminates the security and UX nightmare of canonical bridges.
-3 Steps
User Journey
$10B+
TVL Enabler
05
The Economic Shift: Sponsored Transactions
Batching enables new business models where dApps or wallets pay gas to acquire users, abstracting cost entirely.\n- Onboarding funnel: Games can sponsor a user's first 100 transactions.\n- Session keys: Sign once for a time-bound series of actions, crucial for gaming and social apps.
0 Gas
For End User
>70%
Conversion Lift
06
The Next Frontier: Programmable Privacy
Batch transactions can hide the linkage between user actions by mixing them with others or using ZK proofs. This integrates with Aztec, Tornado Cash, and Railgun.\n- Privacy pools: Deposit, swap, and withdraw with no on-chain correlation.\n- Regulatory compliance: Selective disclosure of proofs for sanctioned entities, without breaking privacy for all.
ZK-Proof
Selective Disclosure
0 Linkage
On-Chain
BATCH TRANSACTIONS AS THE KILLER APP
The UX Tax: Cost of Fragmentation
Comparing the user and developer cost of multi-step operations across different transaction execution models.
| UX Tax Component | Standard EOA | Simple AA (ERC-4337) | Batch AA (ERC-4337 + Bundler) |
|---|---|---|---|
Avg. Gas Cost for 3-Token Swap (ETH->USDC->DAI) | $12-45 | $8-30 | $5-18 |
Avg. User Wait Time for 3-Token Swap | ~90 seconds | ~60 seconds | < 5 seconds |
Failed Transaction Risk (Multi-Step) | High (3 separate txs) | Medium (1 UserOp, 3 calls) | Low (1 atomic batch) |
Gas Abstraction (Pay in any token) | |||
Requires Pre-Approval for Each Token | |||
MEV Exposure per Operation | 3x (per tx) | 1x (bundled) | 1x (bundled + private mempool) |
Developer Integration Complexity | High (multi-tx logic) | Medium (UserOp builder) | Low (single batch call) |
deep-dive
THE KILLER APP
Deep Dive: From Transactions to Intents
Account abstraction's primary value is not single-click UX, but the systemic efficiency unlocked by batching user intents.
Batch processing is the core value. The killer app for account abstraction is not a better wallet, but a system that aggregates and executes thousands of user intents in a single transaction. This moves the computational burden off-chain, creating a new market for intent solvers like UniswapX and CowSwap.
Transactions are prescriptive, intents are declarative. A transaction specifies every step. An intent states a desired outcome. This shift enables solver competition to find optimal execution paths across DEXs, bridges like Across, and aggregators, reducing costs for all users.
The efficiency is mathematical. Batching 1,000 swaps into one settlement transaction amortizes the fixed L1 gas cost. This model, pioneered by ERC-4337 Bundlers, creates a scalable fee market where solvers profit from MEV extraction and users get better prices.
Evidence: UniswapX, which uses this intent-based model, now facilitates over $1B in weekly volume by outsourcing routing complexity to a network of competing solvers, demonstrating the model's product-market fit.
protocol-spotlight
FROM GAS SPONSORSHIP TO INTENT EXECUTION
Protocol Spotlight: Who's Building the Batched Future
Batch transactions are the foundational primitive enabling the next wave of user-centric applications, moving beyond simple fee abstraction to complex, multi-step intent resolution.
01
Biconomy: The Gas Abstraction Pioneer
Biconomy's Paymaster infrastructure abstracts gas fees and enables meta-transactions, making dApps feel like Web2. Their SDKs allow developers to sponsor user fees or accept payment in any token.
- Key Benefit: 90%+ gas cost reduction for end-users via sponsored transactions.
- Key Benefit: ~1M+ user sessions powered daily, demonstrating massive product-market fit.
90%+
Gas Saved
1M+
Daily Sessions
02
Stackup & Alchemy: The Bundler Infrastructure Duopoly
These providers operate the critical bundler infrastructure that aggregates and submits UserOperations to the EntryPoint contract. They are the backbone of ERC-4337.
- Key Benefit: >99.9% uptime and reliability for submitting batched transactions to the mempool.
- Key Benefit: Sub-second latency for bundling, ensuring a seamless user experience comparable to traditional apps.
>99.9%
Uptime
<1s
Bundle Latency
03
The Problem: Isolated Intents & Fragmented Liquidity
Users want outcomes, not transactions. Swapping tokens across chains currently requires manual bridging, exposing them to MEV and high, unpredictable costs.
- Key Pain Point: 10x cost variance between optimal and naive cross-chain routes.
- Key Pain Point: Minutes to hours of settlement latency, locking capital and creating risk.
10x
Cost Variance
Hours
Settlement Latency
04
The Solution: UniswapX & Across: Intent-Based Batching
These protocols use a fill-or-kill intent model. Users sign a desired outcome (e.g., 'Swap X ETH for Y USDC on Arbitrum'), and a network of solvers competes to batch and fulfill it optimally.
- Key Benefit: ~30% better prices via aggregated, cross-chain liquidity from solvers like Across.
- Key Benefit: Zero gas for failed transactions, as users only pay for successful execution.
~30%
Better Pricing
$0
Gas on Fail
05
The Problem: Wallet Bloat & Onboarding Friction
New users must secure seed phrases, fund wallets with native gas tokens, and approve every single transaction. This kills retention before the first interaction.
- Key Pain Point: >70% drop-off during traditional wallet onboarding flows.
- Key Pain Point: Cognitive overhead of managing gas across dozens of L2s and appchains.
>70%
Onboarding Drop-off
Dozens
Gas Tokens
06
The Solution: Smart Wallets (Safe, Zerodev): Session Keys & Batched Actions
Smart contract wallets like Safe, powered by toolkits from Zerodev, enable programmable security. Users can approve a 'session' to batch multiple actions (e.g., swap, bridge, stake) with a single signature.
- Key Benefit: One-click multi-step journeys (e.g., bridge ETH and provide liquidity) executed as a single atomic batch.
- Key Benefit: Time/Value-limited permissions reduce key exposure, making self-custody safer for mass adoption.
1-Click
Multi-Step Flow
$40B+
TVL in Safes
counter-argument
THE ARCHITECTURAL SHIFT
Counter-Argument: Is This Just a Wrapper?
Batch transactions are not a simple UI wrapper but a fundamental architectural shift that redefines the blockchain's role.
Batch transactions are infrastructure. A wrapper is a client-side abstraction; batching is a protocol-level primitive that changes the blockchain's role from a transaction processor to a settlement layer for intent-based systems like UniswapX and CowSwap.
The value accrual changes. Wrappers capture fees at the application layer. Batching moves value to the Paymaster and Bundler infrastructure, creating new economic models for sequencers and validators.
It enables impossible operations. A wrapper cannot atomically execute a cross-chain swap via LayerZero and a loan repayment. A batch, powered by ERC-4337 account abstraction, makes this a single, guaranteed state transition.
Evidence: The success of StarkNet's fee market, where 70% of transactions are batched, demonstrates the network-level efficiency gains and reduced state bloat that a simple wrapper cannot achieve.
FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS
FAQ: Batch Transactions & Account Abstraction
Common questions about why batch transactions are the killer app for account abstraction.
A batch transaction is a single on-chain operation that executes multiple user actions atomically. This is a core feature of Account Abstraction (AA), allowing wallets like Safe and Biconomy to combine approvals, swaps, and transfers into one click, saving gas and reducing failed state.
takeaways
WHY BATCHING IS THE KILLER APP
Takeaways for Builders and Investors
Account abstraction's true value isn't just gas sponsorship; it's the ability to compose and execute complex user intents atomically.
01
The Problem: The Gas Auction
Users pay for each transaction individually, creating friction for multi-step DeFi interactions. This fragments liquidity and makes advanced strategies like arbitrage or leveraged looping economically unviable for retail.
- Key Benefit 1: Single approval for an entire session of trades via ERC-4337 session keys.
- Key Benefit 2: Enables UniswapX-style fill-or-kill orders, where a user's intent (e.g., "swap X for Y at a minimum rate") is executed across multiple venues in one atomic batch.
-70%
Gas Waste
1 Tx
Multi-Step Op
02
The Solution: Intent-Based Aggregation
Batch transactions shift the paradigm from transaction execution to intent fulfillment. Protocols like CowSwap and Across already aggregate user orders off-chain; AA batching brings this on-chain for any application.
- Key Benefit 1: Solvers compete to fulfill complex user intents most efficiently, driving down costs.
- Key Benefit 2: Creates a new design space for MEV-capturing and MEV-sharing models that benefit the user, not just validators.
10x
Solver Efficiency
User-Captured
MEV
03
The Infrastructure: Paymasters & Bundlers
The economic engine of batching. Paymasters allow for gas abstraction (sponsorship, pay with ERC-20s), while bundlers are the execution layer that profit from efficient batch construction.
- Key Benefit 1: Paymasters enable novel business models (e.g., app pays gas to acquire users, gas paid in stablecoins).
- Key Benefit 2: Bundlers (like Stackup, Pimlico) become critical infrastructure, competing on latency and inclusion guarantees, similar to Flashbots for MEV.
$0
Upfront Gas
<500ms
Bundle Latency
04
The New Attack Surface: Atomic Complexity
Batching dozens of calls into one operation creates powerful single points of failure. A bug in one contract can doom the entire batch, and malicious bundlers can censor or reorder transactions.
- Key Benefit 1: Drives demand for formal verification and advanced security auditing for smart accounts.
- Key Benefit 2: Creates an opportunity for reputable bundler networks and suave-type decentralized block building to ensure execution integrity.
Critical
Audit Need
Decentralized
Bundler Future
05
The Vertical: Social Recovery & Key Management
Batch approval is useless if you lose your keys. Native account abstraction makes social recovery, multi-sig guardians, and hardware signer rotation a first-class feature, not a bolt-on.
- Key Benefit 1: Mass adoption requires moving beyond seed phrase anxiety. ERC-4337 accounts can have programmable recovery logic.
- Key Benefit 2: Enables enterprise-grade security models (e.g., 2-of-3 signing with a time-locked social recovery fallback) for institutional DeFi.
No Seed Phrase
User Onboarding
Enterprise Ready
Security Models
06
The Investment Thesis: Owning the User Session
The wallet or app that controls the smart account and its transaction flow captures immense value. It's the new browser homepage or app store.
- Key Benefit 1: Wallet-as-a-Service providers (like Privy, Dynamic) that abstract AA complexity will see $10B+ TAM.
- Key Benefit 2: Applications with embedded smart accounts (e.g., a game with batched in-game asset trades) will have superior UX and higher retention, creating defensible moats.
$10B+
Service TAM
Sticky UX
App Moat
ENQUIRY
Get In Touch
today.
Our experts will offer a free quote and a 30min call to discuss your project.
NDA Protected
Confidentiality24h Response
Time to ValueDirectly to Engineering Team
No Sales Fluff10+
Protocols Shipped
$20M+
TVL Overall