Oracles are a UX abstraction. They exist because smart contracts cannot natively verify off-chain data. This creates a trust dependency on Chainlink or Pyth, adding latency, cost, and a centralization vector for every dApp.
account-abstraction-fixing-crypto-ux
Blog
Why ZK-Proofs in AA Will Make Oracles Obsolete for Certain Data
A technical analysis of how integrating zero-knowledge proofs into Account Abstraction wallets enables direct, trust-minimized verification of private data, rendering traditional oracle models redundant for credentials, KYC, and off-chain state.
introduction
THE DATA LAYER
The Oracle Problem is a UX Problem in Disguise
Zero-knowledge proofs in Account Abstraction will eliminate the need for external oracles for on-chain state verification, collapsing the data supply chain.
ZK-Proofs are the native alternative. A ZK-SNARK can prove the state of another chain or API directly. An AA wallet can verify this proof, enabling actions like cross-chain swaps or social logins without an oracle's data feed.
The shift is from data delivery to proof verification. Instead of trusting an oracle's reported price, a wallet verifies a ZK proof of a Uniswap pool's state. This moves the security model from social consensus to cryptographic truth.
Evidence: Projects like Succinct and Herodotus are building ZK coprocessors. These allow smart contracts to verify historical Ethereum state, a function currently monopolized by oracle networks, proving the technical path exists.
key-trends
THE END OF TRUSTED THIRD-PARTIES
The Convergence: Three Forces Making This Inevitable
Account Abstraction enables smart accounts to verify their own state, collapsing the oracle's role for on-chain data.
01
The Problem: The Oracle Trilemma
Oracles are forced to trade off between decentralization, cost, and latency. A secure, decentralized oracle like Chainlink introduces ~2-10 second latency and $0.50+ per data point costs, creating a bottleneck for high-frequency AA operations.
~2-10s
Oracle Latency
$0.50+
Per Call Cost
02
The Solution: State Proofs via ZK
A smart account can generate a ZK-proof that it holds sufficient funds or a specific NFT in its state. This proof is verified on-chain in ~100ms for a fraction of a cent, making external price feeds irrelevant for balance checks. Projects like Rhinestone and ZeroDev are pioneering this.
~100ms
Proof Verify Time
<$0.01
Verification Cost
03
The Catalyst: Generalized Provers
Infrastructure like RISC Zero, Succinct, and Axiom provide general-purpose ZK coprocessors. An AA wallet can query any historical or cross-chain state, prove the computation, and submit the result—turning Ethereum itself into its own oracle.
Any State
Data Source
Trustless
Security Model
thesis-statement
THE VERIFICATION SHIFT
The Core Argument: From Fetching Data to Proving Properties
Account Abstraction enables a paradigm shift where smart contracts verify properties of data, not the data itself, rendering oracles obsolete for deterministic state.
Oracles fetch, ZKPs verify. Today's oracles like Chainlink or Pyth are data couriers, introducing trust assumptions and latency. With AA, a user's smart account submits a zero-knowledge proof that a specific on-chain condition was met, eliminating the need for a third-party to fetch and deliver that data.
The property, not the payload. The system's security model shifts from trusting an oracle's data feed to trusting a cryptographic proof. For example, proving a user holds a Soulbound Token in another chain's state root is sufficient; the contract never needs the raw token data from an oracle like LayerZero.
Deterministic state is the target. This model breaks for non-deterministic data like price feeds. However, for provable on-chain state—token balances, DAO votes, NFT ownership—the oracle's role as a messenger is architecturally redundant. Protocols like Starknet's account abstraction roadmap are building this future.
Evidence: Cost and Latency. A ZK proof of a Merkle inclusion can be verified on-chain for ~200k gas. An oracle update with multi-sig consensus costs 10x more and adds minutes of latency. The economic and UX argument for proofs over fetch is definitive for verifiable state.
DATA PROVENANCE
Oracle vs. ZK-AA: A Trust and Data Model Comparison
Compares the trust assumptions, data sourcing, and verification mechanisms for off-chain data between traditional oracles and ZK-powered Account Abstraction (ZK-AA) systems.
| Feature / Metric | Traditional Oracle (e.g., Chainlink, Pyth) | ZK-AA with On-Chain Proofs | ZK-AA with Off-Chain Attestations |
|---|---|---|---|
Trust Model | Committee / Federated (n-of-m signers) | Cryptographic (ZK Validity Proof) | Hybrid (ZK Proof + Attester Reputation) |
Data Freshness Latency | 3-10 seconds | < 1 second (for on-chain state) | 1-5 seconds |
Verification Gas Cost | $0.10 - $1.00 per update | $0.50 - $5.00 per proof | $0.01 - $0.10 per attestation |
Data Source Integrity | Relies on oracle node honesty | Cryptographically verifiable from source chain | Depends on attestation issuer's ZK proof |
Supports Private Inputs | |||
Native Cross-Chain State Proofs | |||
Maximum Data Throughput | ~1000 data points/sec | Limited by proof gen (~10-100 ops/sec) | ~10,000 data points/sec |
Primary Use Case | General-purpose price feeds, randomness | Cross-chain asset transfers, state bridging | Private DeFi, identity, compliance proofs |
case-study
ZK-PROOF NATIVE VERIFICATION
Use Cases Where Oracles Are Already Redundant
Account Abstraction powered by ZK-Proofs enables direct, trust-minimized verification of on-chain state, rendering external data feeds obsolete for specific high-value functions.
01
The Gasless Transaction Fallacy
Current 'gasless' models via ERC-4337 rely on paymasters funded by oracles to manage volatile gas prices. ZK-Proofs of a user's on-chain asset portfolio allow the wallet itself to cryptographically guarantee payment, eliminating oracle dependency and associated MEV risks.
- Eliminates paymaster oracle front-running
- Enables true non-custodial gas sponsorship
- Cuts latency from ~12s oracle updates to single-block finality
-100%
Oracle Reliance
<2s
Settlement Latency
02
Cross-Chain State Proofs (vs. LayerZero, Wormhole)
Bridging and messaging protocols like LayerZero rely on external oracle networks for light client state verification. Native ZK light clients inside AA wallets can generate succinct proofs of source chain state, making third-party attestations redundant for simple asset transfers.
- Replaces off-chain oracle committees with on-chain verification
- Secures ~$30B+ in bridged value currently oracle-dependent
- Aligns with Ethereum's EigenDA and Polygon zkEVM's native bridge roadmap
10x
Trust Assumption Reduction
$0.01
Marginal Proof Cost
03
Automated DeFi Limit Orders
Protocols like Gelato use oracle price feeds to trigger limit orders, creating execution lag and slippage. A ZK-powered AA wallet can cryptographically commit to a signed intent containing a price proof, allowing it to be filled permissionlessly by any solver (see UniswapX) without live price data.
- Solves the oracle latency problem for high-frequency trading
- Enables ~500ms execution from signal to settlement
- Removes the ~10-30 bps cost of oracle gas and fees
-30 bps
Slippage/Cost
500ms
Execution Speed
04
Under-Collateralized Lending Proofs
Credit protocols like Spectral rely on oracle-fed credit scores. A ZK-AA wallet can generate a private proof of its aggregated, cross-protocol collateral position (e.g., from Aave, Compound) without revealing individual positions, enabling under-collateralized loans based on verifiable on-chain history.
- Creates a private, provable 'capital efficiency score'
- Unlocks $100B+ in currently idle collateral
- Bypasses the privacy and centralization risks of oracle-scraped data
50%
Lower Collateral Req
ZK-Proof
Data Privacy
deep-dive
THE ORACLE REPLACEMENT
Mechanics: How an AA Wallet Becomes a Verifiable Data Portal
Account Abstraction wallets, when paired with ZK-proofs, can directly source and attest to off-chain data, eliminating the need for traditional oracle networks for specific use cases.
ZK-Proofs enable direct attestation. An AA wallet's smart contract logic can generate a ZK-proof verifying a specific off-chain fact, like a user's Twitter follower count or a private credit score. This proof, submitted on-chain, is the data.
The wallet becomes the oracle. This contrasts with the pull-model of Chainlink/Pyth, where data is fetched from a third-party network. The AA wallet's signed proof is a push of self-verified data, reducing latency and trust assumptions.
This targets permissioned data. The model is optimal for user-specific, non-financial data where the user is the canonical source. It fails for decentralized price feeds, which require aggregation from multiple, adversarial sources.
Evidence: Projects like Sindri and Succinct are building ZK coprocessors that allow smart contracts (including AA wallets) to verify complex off-chain computations, creating the infrastructure for this shift.
protocol-spotlight
THE VERIFIABLE DATA STACK
Builder's Toolkit: Protocols Pioneering ZK-AA for Data
Zero-Knowledge proofs in Account Abstraction enable smart accounts to verify off-chain data on-chain, bypassing the trust assumptions and latency of traditional oracles.
01
The Oracle Problem: Trusted Third-Party Risk
Traditional oracles like Chainlink introduce a trusted intermediary, creating a single point of failure and censorship. Data is only as secure as the oracle's multisig.
- Attack Surface: Oracle manipulation is a top-3 DeFi exploit vector.
- Latency: Data finality adds ~2-10 seconds of delay to transactions.
- Cost: Premium for attested data on high-frequency feeds.
~2-10s
Oracle Latency
Top-3
DeFi Risk
02
ZK-AA Solution: On-Chain Verification of Off-Chain Proofs
Smart accounts (AA wallets) can receive and verify a ZK proof of any off-chain state, like a DEX price or KYC attestation, as a user operation.
- Trustless: Verifies computation, not a signature from a known entity.
- Universal: Any verifiable data source works (APIs, private DBs, other chains).
- Composable: Proof can bundle multiple data points and actions into one atomic transaction.
Trustless
Verification
Atomic
Execution
03
Brevis Network: The ZK Coprocessor for Smart Accounts
Brevis provides a co-processor that lets AA wallets query and prove historical data from any chain (EVM, Cosmos, Solana) in a single user op.
- Use Case: Prove your Uniswap LP history on Arbitrum to claim an airdrop on zkSync.
- Throughput: Can generate proofs for ~1M blocks in <5 minutes.
- Integration: Native SDK for AA wallet developers like Safe{Core} and ZeroDev.
Any Chain
Data Source
<5 min
Proof Time
04
Axiom: Verifiable Compute for On-Chain History
Axiom provides ZK proofs for arbitrary historical Ethereum state, enabling AA wallets to perform complex, gas-efficient calculations on-chain data.
- Use Case: Prove you held an NFT 90 days ago for a gamified lending vault.
- Scale: Processes terabytes of chain history into a single proof.
- Cost: ~90% cheaper than re-executing history in an EVM contract.
90%
Cost Reduce
TB Scale
Data Processed
05
HyperOracle: Programmable ZK Oracle Network
HyperOracle's zkOracle provides provable off-chain data and computation, with a focus on automation and triggering AA wallet actions.
- Architecture: Decentralized prover network vs. a single service.
- Use Case: Trigger a CowSwap order when a provable TWAP condition is met.
- Finality: Provides instant cryptographic finality for data, unlike optimistic solutions.
Instant
Data Finality
Decentralized
Prover Net
06
The Endgame: Autonomous, Data-Driven Smart Accounts
ZK-AA creates wallets that act on verified real-world data without manual signing or oracle latency.
- Autonomous Trading: Execute limit orders based on proven CEX prices.
- Privacy-Preserving KYC: Prove credentials without revealing identity.
- Meta-Transactions: Users pay fees in any token, proven by a DEX price feed.
Autonomous
Actions
Privacy
By Default
counter-argument
THE DATA REALITY
Steelman: Why Oracles Aren't Going Anywhere (And Why That's Okay)
ZK-Proofs will not eliminate oracles; they will redefine their role to focus on high-value, non-deterministic data.
ZK-Proofs verify computation, not reality. They prove a state transition is correct given a set of inputs. The authenticity of those inputs remains a separate problem. Oracles like Chainlink and Pyth solve this by providing a trust-minimized source of truth for external data.
The oracle's role shifts upstream. For deterministic on-chain data (e.g., a Uniswap pool balance), a ZK light client proof is sufficient. For non-deterministic real-world data (e.g., a stock price or weather), a cryptoeconomically secured oracle remains the only viable solution. This creates a specialization of labor between verification layers.
Evidence: Protocols like EigenLayer and Brevis use ZK to prove historical on-chain states, but still rely on oracles for initial data attestation. The total value secured by oracles exceeds $100B, a figure that grows with DeFi, not shrinks with ZK.
takeaways
ZK-AA VS. ORACLES
TL;DR for the Time-Poor CTO
Zero-Knowledge Proofs in Account Abstraction can verify on-chain state without external data feeds, fundamentally changing trust assumptions for key operations.
01
The Oracle Trilemma: Cost, Latency, Centralization
Traditional oracles like Chainlink introduce a critical dependency: you pay for data, wait for attestations, and trust a multisig. This creates systemic risk and overhead for simple state proofs.
- Cost: Oracle queries cost gas + premium fees.
- Latency: Updates occur on block times, not instant verification.
- Centralization: Security often reduces to a ~4/7 multisig, a single point of failure.
~500ms
Oracle Latency
4/7
Multisig Trust
02
ZK State Proofs: The On-Chain Verifier
A ZK-enabled AA wallet (e.g., using RISC Zero, SP1) can generate a proof that it observed a specific on-chain state (e.g., a Uniswap pool reserve, an NFT ownership record). The smart contract verifies the proof, not the data.
- Trustless: Verifies computation, not data source. Cryptography replaces committees.
- Universal: Can prove state from any chain (Ethereum, Solana, Bitcoin) if a light client ZK proof is available.
- Atomic: Enables complex, cross-chain intents (like UniswapX) without bridging assets first.
0
Trust Assumptions
Atomic
Execution
03
Killer App: Self-Proving Account Balances
The most immediate obsolescence event for oracles is collateral verification. Instead of Chainlink feeding a price, a ZK-AA wallet proves its own portfolio value across chains via a single proof.
- Capital Efficiency: Enables undercollateralized lending based on provable total net worth.
- Privacy-Preserving: Can prove balance > X without revealing the exact amount or assets.
- Composable: This proof becomes a verifiable credential for any DeFi protocol (Aave, Compound).
>100%
Capital Eff.
Private
Verification
04
The New Stack: zkVM, AA, & Intent Protocols
This shift requires a new infrastructure layer. zkVMs (RISC Zero) generate proofs, AA wallets (Safe, Biconomy) become prover clients, and intent protocols (Across, Socket) route transactions based on proven state.
- Architecture: User Client (Prover) -> zkVM -> AA Smart Contract (Verifier).
- Ecosystem Impact: Reduces oracle extractable value (OEV) and MEV surface area.
- Limitation: Only works for verifiable on-chain state, not for real-world data (sports scores, weather).
New Stack
Infra Shift
Reduced MEV
Side Benefit
ENQUIRY
Get In Touch
today.
Our experts will offer a free quote and a 30min call to discuss your project.
NDA Protected
Confidentiality24h Response
Time to ValueDirectly to Engineering Team
No Sales Fluff10+
Protocols Shipped
$20M+
TVL Overall