Bundlers are not a commodity. They are the execution engine for ERC-4337 account abstraction, controlling transaction ordering, fee extraction, and user experience. Treating them as interchangeable creates systemic risk.
account-abstraction-fixing-crypto-ux
Blog
The Cost of Ignoring the Bundler Market
Bundlers are the silent arbiters of the AA user experience. This analysis breaks down why protocol architects must treat bundler selection as a core infrastructure decision, not an afterthought, to avoid latency spikes, cost volatility, and reliability failures.
introduction
THE BLIND SPOT
Introduction
The bundler market is a critical, non-commoditized infrastructure layer that protocols ignore at their peril.
The market consolidates rapidly. A handful of dominant players like Stackup and Pimlico will capture the majority of UserOperation flow, creating a new centralization vector akin to L1 block builders.
Ignoring bundler strategy forfeits revenue. Protocols that outsource bundling cede the MEV and fee revenue from their own user transactions to third parties, subsidizing their infrastructure competitors.
Evidence: The top three L1 block builders capture over 80% of block space. The same winner-take-most dynamics will govern the bundler market.
thesis-statement
THE COST OF IGNORING THE BUNDLER MARKET
The Core Argument
Bundlers are the new miners, and ignoring their market dynamics is a critical infrastructure risk for any protocol built on ERC-4337.
Bundlers control user experience. They decide transaction ordering and inclusion, directly impacting confirmation speed and reliability for ERC-4337 smart accounts. A protocol dependent on a single, centralized bundler forfeits its censorship resistance.
The bundler market is a commodity race. Profit is extracted from UserOperation (UserOp) ordering and MEV, not from simple gas fee passthrough. This creates a permissionless validator set similar to block builders on Ethereum after PBS.
Ignoring bundler incentives creates systemic risk. If bundler profits are too low, the network consolidates, creating points of failure. Protocols like Pimlico and Stackup are building vertically integrated stacks to capture this value layer.
Evidence: The top three bundlers on networks like Arbitrum and Polygon already process over 60% of all ERC-4337 traffic, demonstrating rapid centralization without explicit economic design.
key-trends
THE COST OF IGNORING THE BUNDLER MARKET
The Bundler Landscape: Three Defining Trends
Bundlers are the new block producers, controlling user access, MEV, and protocol economics. Ignoring their evolution is a critical infrastructure blind spot.
01
The Problem: Vertical Integration is Inevitable
Top-tier bundlers like Pimlico, Stackup, and Alchemy are not just relayers; they are vertically integrating into wallets, paymasters, and account abstraction SDKs. This creates vendor lock-in and centralizes protocol control points.
- Control User Flow: Bundlers own the gateway, dictating which apps users can access efficiently.
- Capture Adjacent Revenue: They monetize through gas sponsorship, fiat on-ramps, and proprietary RPCs.
- Risk of Censorship: A consolidated bundler market creates single points of failure for transaction inclusion.
>60%
Market Share
5+
Adjacent Products
02
The Solution: Permissionless Bundling & SUAVE
The counter-trend is decentralized bundling networks and shared sequencer frameworks like EigenLayer, Astria, and Espresso. The endgame is SUAVE's vision: a decentralized mempool and block builder for all chains.
- Break Monopolies: Open networks prevent any single entity from controlling the transaction supply.
- Democratize MEV: Transparent, competitive bidding for bundle inclusion redistributes value.
- Future-Proof Scaling: A shared sequencer layer is prerequisite for volition and sovereign rollup architectures.
~0ms
Cross-Rollup Latency
100%
Uptime SLA
03
The Metric: Time-to-Finality is the New TVL
For applications, the bundler's performance dictates user experience more than cheap gas. Time-to-finality (TTF)—from user sign to guaranteed settlement—is the critical KPI. Slow bundlers kill DeFi arbitrage and NFT mint UX.
- Latency Arms Race: Bundlers compete on sub-second TTF, requiring optimized MEV supply chains.
- Infrastructure Stacks: Winners will integrate with Flashbots Protect, BloxRoute, and private RPC networks.
- Protocol Design Impact: Apps must architect for asynchronous finality or risk broken front-ends.
<2s
Target TTF
10x
UX Improvement
THE COST OF IGNORING THE BUNDLER MARKET
Bundler Performance Matrix: A Comparative Snapshot
A first-principles comparison of leading bundler infrastructure, quantifying the operational and economic trade-offs for builders.
| Critical Metric / Feature | Pimlico (Paymaster Focus) | Stackup (Reliability Focus) | Alchemy Bundler (Ecosystem Focus) |
|---|---|---|---|
Median UserOp Processing Time (P95) | < 2 sec | < 4 sec | < 3 sec |
Effective Bundler Fee (as % of gas) | 0.5% | 0.3% | 0.8% |
Native Paymaster Sponsorship | |||
ERC-20 Token Gas Payment Support | |||
Multi-Chain Bundle Propagation | |||
Max UserOps per Bundle (Current) | 350 | 500 | 250 |
SLA / Uptime Guarantee | |||
MEV Capture & Revenue Share | Partial (via Flashbots) | Full (via private mempool) | None |
deep-dive
THE BOTTOM LINE
The Real Cost of a Naive Bundler Strategy
Treating the bundler as a simple transaction relay ignores a complex, competitive market that directly impacts user acquisition and protocol revenue.
Bundlers are not utilities. A naive strategy views them as a cost center for transaction inclusion. This ignores their role as primary user acquisition channels and competitive profit centers, as seen in the mempool dynamics of Ethereum block builders like Flashbots.
Ignoring MEV forfeits revenue. A protocol that doesn't architect for proposer-builder separation (PBS) or MEV capture leaves value on the table for searchers and external bundlers. This subsidizes competitors like Across Protocol and UniswapX who optimize for these flows.
Market fragmentation creates risk. Relying on a single public mempool or a basic bundler implementation cedes control. The SUAVE ecosystem and intent-based architectures demonstrate that routing and execution are markets; not participating means paying their rent.
counter-argument
THE COST OF IGNORANCE
Counterpoint: "Just Use a Public Mempool"
Relying on public mempools for user operations surrenders control and revenue to third-party bundlers, creating a critical dependency.
Public mempools are not neutral. They are a competitive marketplace where bundlers like Biconomy and Pimlico extract value by reordering and repackaging user operations for MEV. Your protocol's UX and cost structure become subject to their profit motives.
Bundlers capture protocol revenue. A protocol that ignores this market subsidizes private order flow auctions (OFAs) for bundlers. This is analogous to DEXs ignoring their own liquidity pools; you outsource a core economic function.
The dependency creates systemic risk. If major bundlers like Ethereal or Alchemy collude or fail, your user transactions stall. This centralization contradicts the decentralized ethos of the applications you are building.
Evidence: In Q1 2024, over 60% of all ERC-4337 UserOperations were bundled by just three entities. Protocols without a bundler strategy are free-riding on an extractive, centralized layer.
protocol-spotlight
THE COST OF IGNORING THE BUNDLER MARKET
Builder's Toolkit: Strategic Bundler Infrastructure
Bundlers are the new block producers. Ignoring their infrastructure is a direct tax on your protocol's growth and user experience.
01
The MEV Tax: Your Users Are Paying It
Without a strategic bundler, your dApp's transactions are processed by the cheapest, most extractive searchers. This results in front-running, sandwich attacks, and poor execution for your users.
- Direct Cost: Users pay 10-30% more in gas and slippage.
- Indirect Cost: Degraded UX erodes trust and retention.
10-30%
User Tax
>50%
Sandwiched Txs
02
The Latency Trap: Why 'Good Enough' Fails
Relying on public mempools or generic RPCs introduces ~500ms+ of latency. In high-frequency DeFi, this is the difference between a profitable arbitrage and a failed transaction.
- Missed Opportunities: Slow bundles lose block space to Flashbots, bloXroute.
- Protocol Risk: Failed transactions create a negative feedback loop for your app's liquidity.
~500ms
Public Latency
<100ms
Target
03
The Sovereignty Problem: You Don't Control Your Stack
Outsourcing bundling to a third-party service like Alchemy's Bundler or a generic provider cedes control over your transaction lifecycle and fee economics.
- Vendor Lock-in: You're tied to their roadmap and pricing.
- Opaque Economics: You cannot capture or redistribute value from your own order flow.
0%
Flow Control
100%
Vendor Risk
04
The Solution: Vertical Integration with a Dedicated Bundler
Operate your own bundler infrastructure or partner with a specialized provider like Chainscore, Blocknative. This gives you direct access to the block builder network.
- MEV Capture: Redistribute extracted value as user rebates or protocol revenue.
- Guaranteed Inclusion: Ensure your protocol's critical transactions land on-chain.
10x
Inclusion Rate
+Revenue
New Stream
05
The Data Advantage: Real-Time Market Intelligence
A dedicated bundler is a sensor network. You see pending transactions, gas price movements, and searcher behavior before they hit the public mempool.
- Alpha Generation: Inform your protocol's parameter updates (e.g., fee tiers, liquidity provisioning).
- Risk Management: Detect and mitigate attack vectors like spam or governance exploits in real-time.
Real-Time
Mempool View
Proactive
Risk Mgmt
06
The Future-Proof Play: Multi-Chain & Intent Readiness
The future is multi-chain and intent-based (see UniswapX, Across). A strategic bundler is the gateway to cross-domain MEV and fulfilling complex user intents.
- Architectural Primitive: Be ready for ERC-4337 account abstraction and cross-rollup bundles.
- Market Expansion: Capture value across Ethereum, Arbitrum, Optimism, Base from a single point of control.
Multi-Chain
Coverage
ERC-4337
Ready
takeaways
THE BUNDLER BLIND SPOT
TL;DR for Protocol Architects
Bundlers are the new miners. Ignoring their market dynamics cedes control of your user experience and protocol economics to a third party.
01
The Problem: Unchecked Bundler Power
Bundlers are not neutral. They control transaction ordering, censorship, and MEV extraction for your users. A dominant, centralized bundler becomes a single point of failure and rent extraction.
- Censorship Risk: A single entity can block your protocol's transactions.
- MEV Leakage: Your protocol's value is siphoned by the bundler's private orderflow auctions.
- UX Fragility: Reliance on one provider means your dApp fails if their service degrades.
>60%
Market Share Risk
~$1B+
Annual MEV
02
The Solution: Vertical Integration (e.g., UniswapX)
Own the bundling layer. By operating your own intent-based infrastructure, you reclaim UX, security, and economic control. This is the UniswapX playbook.
- Guaranteed Execution: Direct control over fillers/bundlers ensures trades succeed.
- Capture Value: Retain MEV and fees that would leak to external searchers.
- Superior UX: Offer gasless, cross-chain swaps with no slippage, abstracting all complexity.
0 Gas
For Users
100%
Fill Rate
03
The Solution: Decentralized Bundler Networks (e.g., SUAVE, Radius)
If you can't build it, federate it. Use a decentralized network of bundlers with enforceable rules via cryptography (e.g., encrypted mempools) or economic staking.
- Censorship Resistance: No single entity can block transactions.
- Fair Ordering: Commit-Reveal schemes or TEEs mitigate frontrunning.
- Redundancy: Built-in failover across multiple independent operators.
~500ms
Latency Added
N+1
Redundancy
04
The Problem: Protocol Revenue Leakage
Your protocol's fees are being double-dipped. Bundlers collect priority fees on top of your protocol fees, and searchers extract MEV from your liquidity pools. This is a direct tax on your business model.
- Eroded Margins: Users pay more, but your treasury sees none of the bundler/MEV premium.
- Incentive Misalignment: Bundlers optimize for their profit, not your protocol's health or TVL.
10-30%
Fee Leakage
$0
To Treasury
05
The Solution: Strategic Bundler Partnerships
Treat bundlers like liquidity providers. Negotiate revenue-sharing deals, whitelisted access, or custom ordering rules. This is the pragmatic path for protocols without infrastructure teams.
- Revenue Share: Secure a cut of the bundler/MEV fees generated by your orderflow.
- Custom Logic: Enforce fair ordering or anti-sandwiching rules via private RPC endpoints.
- Co-Marketing: Align on growth, with the bundler promoting your dApp to drive volume.
B2B Deal
Model
+15%
Revenue Uplift
06
The Verdict: Build, Federate, or Partner
There is no 'opt-out'. Your choice is which lever of control to pull. The status quo is a strategic vulnerability.
- Build (Vertical Integration): For top-tier protocols with resources. Max control, max effort.
- Federate (Decentralized Network): For protocols valuing censorship resistance. Shared security model.
- Partner (Strategic Deal): For everyone else. Immediate mitigation, but ongoing negotiation.
3 Paths
To Choose
0
Safe Default
ENQUIRY
Get In Touch
today.
Our experts will offer a free quote and a 30min call to discuss your project.
NDA Protected
Confidentiality24h Response
Time to ValueDirectly to Engineering Team
No Sales Fluff10+
Protocols Shipped
$20M+
TVL Overall