Centralized sequencer extraction is unsustainable. Today's dominant rollups like Arbitrum and Optimism operate as single-operator sequencers, creating a single point of failure and capturing all transaction ordering value. This model contradicts the decentralized ethos of Ethereum L2s and creates a massive, centralized rent.
Why P2P Bundling Networks Are Inevitable
Account abstraction's killer app isn't gas sponsorship—it's a decentralized execution layer. Centralized bundlers are a temporary, dangerous bottleneck. This analysis argues that peer-to-peer bundling networks are the necessary, trust-minimized infrastructure for the next billion users.
Introduction
P2P bundling networks are the necessary evolution of MEV infrastructure, shifting value capture from centralized sequencers to a competitive, permissionless market.
P2P bundling unbundles the sequencer. Networks like SUAVE and Flashbots transform block building into a competitive auction. Builders compete to create the most valuable block from a shared mempool, driving efficiency and returning value to users through better execution, similar to how UniswapX abstracts liquidity sourcing.
The economic incentive is undeniable. The MEV supply chain currently leaks billions in value to a few entities. A permissionless network of builders and searchers, connected via a shared mempool, creates a more efficient market. This is the same force that drove the rise of DEX aggregators like 1inch.
Evidence: The Searcher-Builder-Proposer separation is already here. Ethereum's post-merge PBS landscape and Flashbots' dominance prove the model works at L1. Rollups are merely the next logical layer for this architectural pattern to manifest, preventing the re-centralization of the stack.
The Centralization Trap: Three Unavoidable Trends
The mempool is a failed state. As MEV and latency wars intensify, the current 'public good' model of block building is collapsing into centralized cartels.
The Latency Arms Race
In a world where block times are ~12 seconds, the first 500ms determine profitability. This creates an insurmountable advantage for centralized, co-located operators like Flashbots and Jito, who can afford the infrastructure.\n- Result: Geographic centralization around a few data centers\n- Metric: ~80% of Ethereum blocks built by 3-5 entities
The MEV Cartel Problem
Searchers and builders form exclusive, off-chain relationships to capture value, creating a closed-loop economy. This vertical integration (e.g., a searcher's own builder/relay) kills permissionless participation.\n- Result: MEV supply chain becomes a private bazaar\n- Example: Flashbots SUAVE is an attempt to re-decentralize this cartelized flow
The Economic Inefficiency of Public Mempools
Broadcasting a raw transaction is like yelling your trade in a crowded room. It's frontrun-able, wasteful, and costly. P2P networks like BloXroute or intent-based systems like UniswapX prove there's a better way: direct, private order flow routing.\n- Result: Users pay for failed arbitrage gas and slippage\n- Trend: Rise of private RPCs and order flow auctions
The Inevitable Logic of P2P Bundling
P2P bundling networks are the necessary architectural evolution to solve MEV extraction and liquidity fragmentation across blockchains.
Centralized sequencers are rent extractors. They capture value by controlling transaction ordering, a flaw inherent to the current rollup-centric scaling model. P2P bundling networks like SUAVE and Astria decentralize this function, returning value to users and builders.
Cross-chain intents require coordination. Isolated blockchains and rollups create a fragmented liquidity landscape. Solving this requires a neutral, shared sequencing layer that can execute complex workflows across domains like Ethereum, Solana, and Arbitrum.
The market is already moving. Protocols like UniswapX and CowSwap abstract execution through intents and solvers. P2P bundling is the generalized infrastructure layer that turns these application-specific solutions into a public good.
Evidence: Flashbots' SUAVE testnet processes over 200,000 intents daily, demonstrating demand for credibly neutral, cross-domain block building separate from execution.
Bundler Landscape: Centralized vs. P2P Future State
Comparison of current centralized bundler models against the emergent P2P network paradigm, highlighting the fundamental trade-offs in security, cost, and decentralization.
| Core Feature / Metric | Centralized Bundler (e.g., Alchemy, Blocknative) | P2P Bundler Network (e.g., SUAVE, Shutterized Bundlers) | Hybrid / Staked Pool (e.g., EigenLayer AVS, AltLayer) |
|---|---|---|---|
Censorship Resistance | |||
MEV Extraction Surface | 100% to operator | < 5% to searcher (via commit-reveal) | Varies by pool rules |
User Op Inclusion Latency Guarantee | < 1 sec | ~2-5 sec (consensus round) | < 2 sec |
Infrastructure Cost per 1M Ops | $200-500 | $50-150 (distributed) | $150-300 |
Required Stake per Node | 0 ETH | 32+ ETH (validator bond) | 1-10 ETH (AVS stake) |
Trust Assumption | Single operator honesty | 1-of-N honest majority | Committee honesty |
Primary Failure Mode | Central point of failure | Liveness fault (slashing) | Correlated slashing event |
Protocol Examples | Ethereum P2P (current), Stackup | SUAVE, Anoma, Shutter Network | EigenLayer, AltLayer, Brevis coProcessors |
The Lazy Counter-Argument: "But It Works Fine Now"
Current centralized bundling is a temporary, subsidized convenience that masks fundamental economic and security flaws.
Centralized sequencers are subsidizing failure. Today's low fees are a user acquisition cost, not a sustainable equilibrium. The economic model of a centralized sequencer relies on future MEV extraction and token appreciation to offset current losses, creating a ticking time bomb for user costs.
The "works fine" illusion ignores systemic risk. A single point of failure like a centralized sequencer is a constant security liability. The industry learned this with Mt. Gox and CEX custodians; it will relearn it with sequencer downtime or censorship, which protocols like Arbitrum and Optimism have already experienced.
P2P networks solve the principal-agent problem. In a centralized model, the sequencer's profit motive (MEV) directly conflicts with user best execution. A peer-to-peer bundling network like a decentralized version of Flashbots SUAVE aligns incentives, forcing competition among builders to improve, not degrade, transaction outcomes.
Evidence: The mempool is the precedent. Ethereum's public mempool was "fine" until MEV bots extracted billions. The advent of private order flows to Flashbots protectors proved the market demands better execution. P2P bundling is the logical next step, moving from trusted relays to a trust-minimized marketplace for block space.
Protocols Building the Inevitable
The current MEV supply chain is a cartel. P2P bundling networks are the inevitable, decentralized alternative.
Flashbots SUAVE: The Centralizing Cartel Killer
The Problem: ~90% of Ethereum MEV is captured by a few centralized builders and relays, creating systemic risk and rent extraction. The Solution: A decentralized, pluggable block-building network that separates execution, consensus, and privacy. It commoditizes the builder role.
- Universal Preference Environment allows any user to express complex intents.
- Decentralized block building via a peer-to-peer network of competing solvers.
Jito: Solana's Bundling Primitive
The Problem: On Solana, unbundled transactions compete chaotically, leading to failed trades and wasted compute. The Solution: A native, protocol-level bundler that aggregates user transactions into a single, atomic bundle for execution.
- Jito Bundles guarantee atomicity and priority, eliminating front-running.
- MEV redistribution via JitoSOL distributes extracted value back to stakers, not just searchers.
The Intent-Based Future (UniswapX, CowSwap)
The Problem: Users specify low-level transactions (how), exposing them to MEV and poor execution. The Solution: Users declare high-level outcomes (what), and a decentralized network of solvers competes to fulfill them optimally.
- UniswapX outsources swap routing to a permissionless network of fillers.
- CowSwap uses batch auctions and coincidence of wants to eliminate MEV and improve prices.
Economic Inevitability: The 10x Cost Reduction
The Problem: Centralized MEV supply chains add layers of rent extraction (builders, relays, searchers), inflating end-user costs. The Solution: P2P networks collapse this stack, creating a direct market between users and block producers.
- Eliminates intermediaries, passing savings directly to users/validators.
- Competitive solver markets drive efficiency, similar to Across and LayerZero for cross-chain intents.
Modularity Wins: Specialized Execution Layers
The Problem: Monolithic L1s must optimize for everything, creating a one-size-fits-none execution environment. The Solution: Dedicated P2P bundling networks become specialized execution layers for intents, orders, and MEV.
- Separation of concerns: L1 for consensus/settlement, P2P network for optimal execution.
- Enables application-specific chains (Approllups) to outsource complex transaction ordering.
The Privacy Mandate: Encrypted Mempools
The Problem: Public mempools are free-for-all sniping grounds, making DeFi toxic for large traders. The Solution: P2P networks with encrypted transaction flow, enabling fair execution without information leakage.
- Threshold Encryption (e.g., Shutter Network) blinds transactions until block inclusion.
- Solves front-running at the network layer, not just the application layer.
TL;DR for the Time-Poor Architect
The MEV supply chain is consolidating. Here's why decentralized, peer-to-peer bundling networks will win the infrastructure layer.
The Problem: Vertical Integration by Builders
Monolithic builders like Flashbots SUAVE and Jito are becoming the new rent-seeking intermediaries. They control order flow, extract value, and create single points of failure and censorship.
- Centralizes MEV Capture: Builder market share is consolidating.
- Creates Systemic Risk: A bug or attack on a dominant builder threatens chain liveness.
- Reduces Searcher Profit: Value accrues to the integrated entity, not the edge.
The Solution: Decentralized P2P Marketplace
A network where independent searchers and solvers connect directly, facilitated by a decentralized relayer network. Think CowSwap or UniswapX model, but for generalized transaction bundling.
- Unbundles the Stack: Separates discovery, solving, and execution roles.
- Democratizes Access: Any searcher can compete for order flow via open auctions.
- Incentivizes Specialization: Solvers compete on execution quality, not just capital.
The Mechanism: Intents & Conditional Execution
Users submit intent-based transactions (e.g., "swap X for Y at >= price Z"), not rigid calldata. This creates a composable solution space for solvers, enabling complex cross-domain bundles.
- Enables Atomic Arbitrage: Solvers can craft bundles across Ethereum, Solana, and layerzero-connected chains.
- Improves UX: Users get better prices without managing gas or slippage.
- **Foundation for Across and UniswapX-style fills.
The Economic Flywheel: Stake-for-Access
Relayers and solvers stake native tokens or ETH to participate, securing the network and aligning incentives. Slashing punishes malicious behavior (e.g., censorship, frontrunning).
- Skin in the Game: Stake ensures economic commitment to honest operation.
- Fee Distribution: Value flows to stakers and users, not a central treasury.
- **Creates a ~$10B+ TVL opportunity for a new staking primitive.
The Endgame: Credibly Neutral Infrastructure
A P2P network becomes a public good for block space, resistant to capture. It's the logical evolution from centralized builders, just as DEXs evolved from order-book CEXs.
- Censorship-Resistant: No single entity can filter transactions.
- Protocol-Owned Liquidity: Fees can be directed to a DAO or burned.
- The only sustainable model for a multi-chain, multi-VM future.
The Catalyst: Modular Stack Maturity
The tech is now viable: fast shared sequencers (Espresso, Astria), robust DA layers (EigenDA, Celestia), and secure bridges (layerzero, Hyperlane). P2P bundling networks assemble these primitives.
- Solves Data Availability: Bundles can be posted cheaply to a DA layer.
- Leverages Shared Sequencing: For fair, cross-rollup ordering.
- Turns modularity from a risk into a competitive advantage.
Get In Touch
today.
Our experts will offer a free quote and a 30min call to discuss your project.