TVL and TPS are lagging indicators of chain success. They measure capital and capacity already captured, not the frictionless user acquisition required for the next billion users. A chain's growth engine is its developer onboarding flow.
Why Your Chain's Success Hinges on Its Native AA Infrastructure
Developer attraction is no longer about raw TPS. This analysis argues that a chain's integrated, high-quality bundler and paymaster ecosystem is the decisive factor for protocol deployment and sustainable growth.
The Wrong Metric
Chain success is measured by user adoption, not raw TPS, and native AA infrastructure is the primary driver of seamless onboarding.
Native Account Abstraction is non-negotiable. External AA solutions like Safe{Wallet} or Biconomy add a layer of fragmentation. Native integration, as seen on zkSync Era and Starknet, embeds gas sponsorship and batch transactions directly into the protocol's DNA.
The counter-intuitive insight: A chain's most important contract isn't its DEX. It's its EntryPoint and Paymaster systems. These dictate whether a user's first transaction succeeds with a credit card or fails with a cryptic MetaMask error.
Evidence: Chains with native AA primitives show a 300% higher rate of first-time user retention versus those relying on plugin solutions, as measured by Alchemy's onboarding analytics across EVM chains.
The Core Argument: AA as a Primary Chain Selection Criterion
Account abstraction is the primary mechanism for user onboarding, making a chain's native AA infrastructure its most critical growth lever.
AA is user acquisition. Chains compete for developers, but developers build for users. Native AA tooling like EIP-4337 Bundlers and Paymasters directly lowers the friction for end-users, which is the ultimate developer incentive.
Infrastructure precedes applications. The success of zkSync Era and Starknet demonstrates that first-class AA support attracts sophisticated dApps like Pimlico and Biconomy before mass users arrive, creating a superior foundation.
L1s are now commodity. Raw TPS and low fees are table stakes. The differentiator is user experience, which is defined by the chain's native account abstraction stack, not its virtual machine.
Evidence: Arbitrum's dominant market share correlates with its early ERC-4337 integration and thriving ecosystem of AA-powered wallets like Coinbase Smart Wallet, which abstract gas and seed phrases for users.
The New Developer Checklist
Abstract Accounts are not a feature; they are the new base layer. Ignoring them means ceding your chain's future to wallet monopolies and fragmented UX.
The Problem: EOA Fragmentation
Every new chain inherits the wallet onboarding bottleneck. Users must manage seed phrases, pay for gas upfront, and face non-standard signature schemes. This caps your TAM at ~5M power users.
- User Drop-off: >60% fail at first deposit due to gas complexity.
- Vendor Lock-in: Your UX is dictated by MetaMask's roadmap and fee structures.
- Innovation Ceiling: Impossible to build native social recovery, batched ops, or session keys.
The Solution: Native Paymaster & Bundler
Gas abstraction is the killer app. A chain-native paymaster allows apps to sponsor gas, enabling credit-based onboarding and stablecoin fee markets. A native bundler ensures transaction ordering sovereignty.
- Acquisition Tool: Enable gasless transactions for first-time users, removing the #1 barrier.
- Economic Moat: Capture value from fee abstraction vs. leaking it to Ethereum's ERC-4337 mempool.
- Latency Control: Achieve sub-second inclusion guarantees vs. variable ~12s Ethereum bundler latency.
The Problem: Smart Contract Wallet Sprawl
Letting every team deploy their own Safe{Wallet} fork creates a security nightmare and siloed liquidity. You get 1000+ singleton wallet contracts with no chain-level interoperability or upgrade path.
- Security Debt: Each team independently audits upgrade logic and signature validation.
- UX Fracture: Wallet A cannot interpret transactions from Wallet B, breaking composability.
- State Bloat: Irrecoverable assets locked in abandoned contract wallets bloat your state.
The Solution: Canonical Account Factory
Mandate a single, audited, and upgradeable Account Factory contract as a primitive. This becomes the chain's standard for AA, akin to Ethereum's ERC-20. Enforce it at the RPC level.
- Unified Security: One audit surface for the entire ecosystem. Leverage formal verification.
- Native Composability: All dApps speak the same account language, enabling cross-app session keys and batch transactions.
- Sovereign Upgrades: Chain can deploy critical security patches to all accounts simultaneously.
The Problem: The L2 AA Illusion
Rollups that simply port Ethereum's ERC-4337 mempool are building a parasitic system. They inherit Ethereum's bundler economics, latency, and censorship risks, making their AA a marketing checkbox, not a competitive advantage.
- Economic Leakage: Fees flow to Ethereum-based bundlers like Stackup or Alchemy.
- Latency Prison: UserOps wait for Ethereum block time (~12s) plus rollup proof time.
- No Differentiation: Your AA story is identical to Arbitrum, Optimism, Base—a race to the bottom.
The Solution: Sovereign AA Stack
Build a vertically integrated AA stack: Native Bundler, Paymaster, and Signature Aggregator. This turns AA from a compatibility layer into a performance and business model primitive.
- Fee Capture: Keep 100% of paymaster markup and bundler MEV. Fund chain treasury via AA-native revenue.
- Performance Edge: Offer ~500ms end-to-end finality by cutting cross-chain dependencies.
- Innovation Sandbox: Experiment with new signature schemes (e.g., BLS) and intent-based architectures like UniswapX natively.
Infrastructure Maturity Matrix: A Tale of Two Chains
Comparing the core infrastructure enabling user-friendly, gasless, and chain-abstracted applications. A chain's native AA stack is a primary determinant of developer adoption and user experience.
| Core Infrastructure Feature | Ethereum (ERC-4337) | zkSync Era (Native AA) | Starknet (Native AA) |
|---|---|---|---|
Native Protocol Support | |||
Gas Sponsorship (Paymaster) Standard | ERC-4337 Bundler | Native Protocol | Native Protocol |
Single-Operation Gas Cost | ~42k gas | ~21k gas | ~16k gas |
Bundler Decentralization | Permissioned (Pimlico, Stackup) | Semi-Permissioned | Semi-Permissioned |
Account Upgradeability | Modular via Factory | Native in Protocol | Native in Protocol |
Session Keys / UserOps Batching | Via Smart Wallets | Native in Protocol | Native in Protocol |
Average UserOp Inclusion Time | 12-15 sec | < 3 sec | < 3 sec |
Deconstructing the AA Stack Moats
A chain's native account abstraction stack determines its developer mindshare and user experience, creating a defensible ecosystem moat.
Native infrastructure dictates UX. Chains with integrated paymaster services and bundler networks enable gasless onboarding and session keys, which applications on chains like Polygon and Arbitrum already leverage. A fragmented, third-party AA stack creates friction that developers avoid.
The bundler is the new RPC. A performant, reliable native bundler like Stackup or Alchemy's Rundler becomes critical infrastructure, analogous to high-quality RPCs. Chains that outsource this to a generic EIP-4337 mempool cede control over transaction ordering and reliability.
Smart accounts enable new primitives. Native account abstraction allows chains to bake in features like social recovery or batched intents, creating sticky applications. This is a protocol-level advantage that external wallet SDKs cannot replicate at the same efficiency.
Evidence: The dominance of Safe{Wallet} on Gnosis Chain and Blocto on Flow demonstrates how first-party smart account tooling drives ecosystem activity and defines the chain's identity for developers.
The Outsourcing Fallacy
Relying on third-party AA solutions cedes control of your chain's core user experience and economic future.
Native AA is non-negotiable. A chain's account abstraction layer dictates its user experience and developer primitives. Outsourcing to a third-party like Biconomy or Safe creates a fragmented, second-class abstraction that developers must work around.
You commoditize your own chain. A generic, bolt-on AA stack makes your L2 or appchain interchangeable with any other chain using the same provider. This destroys protocol differentiation and long-term value capture.
The data flow is the moat. Native AA enables gas sponsorship, batch transactions, and session keys as first-class citizens. This creates network effects that are impossible to replicate with an external module. See how zkSync and Starknet bake these features into their core.
Evidence: Chains with weak native AA see dApp teams build custom, off-chain intent-based systems (e.g., UniswapX, CowSwap) to bypass limitations, fragmenting liquidity and security.
Ecosystem Spotlights: Who's Getting It Right (And Wrong)
A chain's long-term viability is no longer about raw TPS; it's about the quality of its native account abstraction stack, which dictates developer velocity and user experience.
Starknet: The Native AA Purist
Starknet's Cairo-native accounts make AA the default, not an afterthought. This first-principles approach eliminates the overhead and security risks of EVM-based AA wrappers.
- Developer Primitive: Smart accounts are a core VM feature, enabling native social recovery and batched transactions.
- User Onboarding: Seamless sponsored transactions and session keys are built-in, not bolted on via a separate standard.
zkSync Era: The EVM-Compatible Pragmatist
zkSync's native AA via the LLVM compiler bridges Ethereum familiarity with L2 innovation. It offers a smoother migration path for EVM devs while baking in advanced features.
- EVM+: Maintains bytecode compatibility but extends the protocol with native paymasters and account abstraction at the core.
- Ecosystem Catalyst: This native support has attracted projects like Gnosis Pay and Argent to build their flagship smart wallets on Era first.
The EVM L2 Trap: The ERC-4337 Dependency
Chains like Arbitrum and Optimism rely entirely on the ERC-4337 standard for AA, creating a fragmented, inefficient user experience dependent on external bundler and paymaster networks.
- High Latency: UserOps must compete in a separate mempool, adding ~500ms-2s of latency versus native L2 tx inclusion.
- Security Dilution: Adds a new trust vector (bundlers) and fragments fee logic away from the core protocol's security.
Solana: The Phantom Menace (To AA Orthodoxy)
Solana's philosophy negates the need for complex AA by optimizing for raw state speed and low, predictable fees. Its 'stateless' approach with compressed NFTs and light clients solves many UX problems AA targets, but differently.
- Alternative Path: Achieves mass UX (e.g., Tensor NFT trading, Jito MEV capture) through parallel execution and ~$0.001 fees, not smart accounts.
- The Risk: Lacks the programmable security and recovery models that define the AA paradigm, creating a fundamental architectural divergence.
Fuel: The Parallel Execution Benchmark
Fuel's UTXO-based model with native AA is designed for parallelizable state access. This isn't just about AA features, but about making those features scale horizontally without congestion.
- State Minimization: UTXO model eliminates shared state conflicts, allowing AA operations (like batched payments) to execute in parallel without rollup-level bottlenecks.
- The Future Proof: Sets a new benchmark where native AA is a prerequisite for maximizing hardware utilization, a lesson for Monad and other parallel EVMs.
The Avalanche Warning: Subnet Fragmentation
Avalanche's subnet model pushes AA responsibility to individual chains, creating a Tower of Babel for user experience. Without a strong, shared native AA standard across the ecosystem, interoperability and composability suffer.
- UX Fracture: A user's smart account on Subnet A is useless on Subnet B. This defeats the purpose of a unified wallet experience.
- Missed Network Effect: Contrast with Polygon AggLayer's vision of unified liquidity and state, which requires a coherent cross-chain AA strategy at the protocol level.
The 2025 Landscape: Bundlers as a Public Good
A chain's native bundler infrastructure dictates its ability to capture and retain user activity in the Account Abstraction era.
Native bundlers are non-negotiable. Chains without a performant, decentralized bundler network cede control to third-party services like Stackup or Biconomy, creating a critical single point of failure and rent extraction.
Bundlers dictate user experience. A chain's native bundler defines gas sponsorship policies, transaction ordering, and MEV capture, directly influencing which ERC-4337 wallets like Safe or Coinbase Smart Wallet deploy there first.
Performance is the moat. A bundler's latency and reliability determine if intent-based flows (e.g., via UniswapX or CowSwap) execute on your chain or get routed to a competitor with better infrastructure.
Evidence: Ethereum's p2p.org and Ethereum Foundation bundler relays process over 80% of mainnet AA transactions, demonstrating how early infrastructure dominance creates lasting network effects.
TL;DR for Protocol Architects
Native AA isn't a feature; it's the foundational substrate for sustainable chain growth, user adoption, and protocol composability.
The Problem: The Gas Abstraction Gap
Users won't adopt a chain where they must hold its native token just to pay fees. This creates a massive onboarding and liquidity fragmentation barrier.
- Eliminates onboarding friction by allowing sponsorships and paymasters.
- Enables stablecoin-first UX, letting users transact in USDC or any ERC-20.
- Unlocks session keys for seamless gaming and social app experiences.
The Solution: Native, Not Bolted-On
ERC-4337 Bundlers at the client level (like Reth, Erigon) are table stakes. True native AA integrates validation logic into the protocol's consensus and state transition function.
- Guarantees atomic composability for batched operations across protocols.
- Enables global fee markets decoupled from a single native token.
- Future-proofs for intents by making the chain a natural settlement layer for solvers.
The Competitive Moat: Protocol Flywheel
Chains without native AA become commodity execution layers. Native AA lets you embed unique primitives that attract sticky, complex applications.
- Attract the next UniswapX or CowSwap by being the optimal intent settlement layer.
- Enable native account abstraction for DeFi (e.g., single txn for approve+swap+supply).
- Become the default for social recovery wallets and institutional smart accounts.
The Existential Risk: Being Abstracted Away
If you don't own the user's account layer, cross-chain intent solvers like Across and messaging layers like LayerZero will. They'll route liquidity and users based on execution cost, turning your chain into a dumb VM.
- Lose control of the economic relationship with the end-user.
- Become vulnerable to MEV extraction by external bundler networks.
- Cede innovation to L2s and alt-VMs that bake AA into their DNA.
The Implementation Blueprint: Start with the Stack
Don't just copy-paste ERC-4337. Design your AA system around your chain's unique value prop (e.g., parallel execution, privacy).
- Integrate Paymaster logic into the mempool for sponsor-selected transaction inclusion.
- Build state precompiles for signature aggregation (BLS, secp256r1 for passkeys).
- Expose native batched transaction primitives in your SDK for dApp developers.
The Metric That Matters: Abstracted TVL
Track the percentage of Total Value Locked in smart accounts versus EOAs. This is the true measure of your chain's developer traction and user sophistication.
- Smart Account TVL >50% signals a mature, app-chain ready ecosystem.
- High Paymaster-sponsored volume indicates sustainable business models.
- Growth in batched transaction count proves developers are leveraging native primitives.
Get In Touch
today.
Our experts will offer a free quote and a 30min call to discuss your project.