Free 30-min Web3 Consultation
Book Consultation
Smart Contract Security Audits
View Audit Services
Custom DeFi Protocol Development
Explore DeFi
Full-Stack Web3 dApp Development
View App Services
Free 30-min Web3 Consultation
Book Consultation
Smart Contract Security Audits
View Audit Services
Custom DeFi Protocol Development
Explore DeFi
Full-Stack Web3 dApp Development
View App Services
Free 30-min Web3 Consultation
Book Consultation
Smart Contract Security Audits
View Audit Services
Custom DeFi Protocol Development
Explore DeFi
Full-Stack Web3 dApp Development
View App Services
Free 30-min Web3 Consultation
Book Consultation
Smart Contract Security Audits
View Audit Services
Custom DeFi Protocol Development
Explore DeFi
Full-Stack Web3 dApp Development
View App Services
account-abstraction-fixing-crypto-ux
Blog

The Coming Consolidation of Account Abstraction Infrastructure Providers

A first-principles analysis predicting the inevitable vertical integration of the fragmented AA stack. We examine the economic, technical, and security drivers forcing consolidation around platforms that bundle RPC, bundler, and paymaster services.

introduction
THE CONSOLIDATION

Introduction: The Modular Mirage

The fragmented landscape of account abstraction infrastructure is a temporary phase that will consolidate around a few dominant providers.

The modular stack is unsustainable. Every new AA provider fragments liquidity, security, and developer mindshare, creating a worse user experience than Web2. The current landscape of Particle Network, Biconomy, ZeroDev, and Safe is a transitional phase.

Consolidation is a technical inevitability. The winning providers will be those that abstract complexity, not expose it. This mirrors the evolution of AWS and Cloudflare, which consolidated fragmented web hosting and CDN markets by offering a complete, reliable service.

The market will converge on bundled solutions. Users and developers will not tolerate managing separate paymasters, bundlers, and signature aggregators. The infrastructure that wins will offer a unified API, similar to how Alchemy and Infura dominate RPC access.

Evidence: The rapid adoption of ERC-4337 and Safe{Core} Account Kit demonstrates the market's demand for standards, which are the precursor to consolidation. The 90%+ market share of a few RPC providers proves this pattern.

thesis-statement
THE CONSOLIDATION

Core Thesis: The Inevitable Bundling

The current fragmented AA stack will consolidate into vertically integrated providers that bundle wallets, paymasters, and bundlers.

The current AA stack is unsustainable. Separate providers for wallets (Safe), paymasters (Pimlico, Biconomy), and bundlers (Etherspot) create a poor user experience and fragmented liquidity. This fragmentation mirrors the early DeFi 'money legos' phase before protocols like Uniswap V3 aggregated liquidity and functions.

Super-apps will absorb the stack. The winning model is a vertically integrated AA provider like Stackup or Rhinestone. They combine the user interface, gas sponsorship, transaction bundling, and key management into a single service, optimizing for reliability and cost-efficiency across chains.

Bundlers become a commodity. As with AWS vs. on-prem servers, the value shifts to the application layer. The bundler market will commoditize, with infrastructure giants like Alchemy and QuickNode offering it as a low-margin utility, while integrated players capture user relationships and premium fees.

Evidence: The intent-based parallel. The evolution of UniswapX and Across Protocol shows the end-state: a unified system that abstracts complexity. Users express a desired outcome (an intent), and the system's bundled infrastructure finds the optimal path, hiding the mechanics of solvers, relays, and bridges.

market-context
THE LANDSCAPE

Current Market: A Fragmented Experiment

The AA infrastructure market is a chaotic collection of competing, overlapping services with no clear winners.

Wallet-as-a-Service proliferation creates user lock-in. Every provider like Privy, Dynamic, Web3Auth offers a proprietary SDK. This fragments user identity and forces developers to choose a single stack, limiting interoperability and portability.

Paymaster services are commoditized. Providers like Alchemy, Biconomy, Pimlico compete on subsidizing gas fees. The real moat is bundling and sponsorship logic, not just paying for transactions. This is a race to the bottom on margins.

Bundler implementations lack differentiation. Most use the EIP-4337 reference code. The competitive edge shifts to MEV capture and cross-chain operation, areas where Stackup, Candide are experimenting. Pure bundling is a utility.

Evidence: Over 15 major AA infrastructure providers exist, yet no single solution dominates across WaaS, Paymaster, and Bundler. This forces developers to assemble a fragile, multi-vendor Rube Goldberg machine.

ACCOUNT ABSTRACTION INFRASTRUCTURE

The Consolidation Scorecard: Who's Building What

A feature and market position comparison of leading AA infrastructure providers, highlighting key differentiators for protocol architects.

Core Metric / CapabilityERC-4337 Bundlers (e.g., Stackup, Alchemy)Smart Wallet SDKs (e.g., ZeroDev, Biconomy)Intent-Centric Networks (e.g., Anoma, Essential)

Primary Abstraction Layer

Transaction Execution (UserOp Mempool)

Developer Experience (SDK/APIs)

User Intent Declaration

Key Architectural Dependency

Ethereum L1 (EntryPoint)

Bundler RPC & Paymaster

Solver Network & MEV Auctions

Gas Sponsorship Model

Paymaster integrations (ERC-20)

Built-in Paymaster-as-a-Service

Intent-based, solver-subsidized

Cross-Chain Native Support

Limited (via CCIP/third-party)

Time-to-Finality (Est.)

< 15 sec

< 12 sec

Variable (Solver Competition)

Dominant Revenue Stream

Priority Fees (MEV)

Subscription & Gas Markup

Solver Fees & Intent Spread

Protocol-Level Integration

Low (RPC endpoint)

High (Embedded SDK)

Total (New Application Layer)

Competitive Moat

Relayer Scale & Efficiency

Developer Tooling & Adoption

Solver Liquidity & Intent DSL

deep-dive
THE CONSOLIDATION

The Flywheel of Full-Stack Dominance

Account abstraction infrastructure will consolidate into a few full-stack providers that control the user relationship and capture the majority of value.

The wallet is the new browser. The smart account provider (e.g., Safe, Biconomy, ZeroDev) becomes the primary user interface, controlling session keys, gas sponsorship, and transaction bundling. This grants them unprecedented data access on user behavior and transaction flow.

Data ownership enables vertical integration. Providers with user flow data will vertically integrate intent-based infrastructure like UniswapX, Across, and Socket. They will offer native cross-chain swaps and gasless transactions as a unified service, disintermediating standalone relayers and bridges.

The flywheel is self-reinforcing. A better integrated UX attracts more users, which generates more proprietary data, which funds R&D for deeper integration. This creates a winner-take-most market similar to AWS in cloud computing or iOS in mobile.

Evidence: Safe's acquisition of Candide Wallet and launch of Safe{Core} stack is a textbook move for vertical integration. It transforms a multi-sig standard into a full-stack smart account platform.

counter-argument
THE NETWORK EFFECT FALLACY

Counterpoint: Won't Interoperability Save Modularity?

Interoperability standards create a commodity layer, which accelerates consolidation by making providers interchangeable.

Interoperability commoditizes the stack. Standards like ERC-4337 and RIP-7560 define a common interface for Account Abstraction (AA). This allows wallets and dApps to swap underlying providers (like Biconomy, Candide, Stackup) without code changes, destroying vendor lock-in.

Commoditization triggers a price war. When features are equalized by spec, competition shifts to execution price and reliability. Large-scale bundlers with proprietary MEV capture and gas optimization (e.g., Alchemy's Rundler) will undercut smaller players on cost.

The endpoint precedent is clear. The RPC market consolidated after providers standardized on the JSON-RPC interface. A few giants (Alchemy, Infura, QuickNode) now dominate by competing on global latency and uptime, not protocol features. The AA bundler market follows the same trajectory.

Evidence: Ethereum's P2P mempool is deprecated for 4337 transactions. User operations flow through a few permissioned bundler mempools, creating centralizing chokepoints controlled by the most efficient operators.

risk-analysis
WHY THE WINNER-TAKES-MOST DYNAMIC IS A THREAT

The Bear Case: Risks of Consolidation

The race to dominate the account abstraction stack is creating systemic risks that could undermine the very user experience it promises to improve.

01

The Protocol Capture Problem

Dominant AA bundlers like Pimlico or Stackup become de facto gatekeepers. They control transaction ordering and fee extraction for protocols like Uniswap or Aave, creating a new, centralized rent-seeking layer.

  • Single Point of Censorship: A major provider can blacklist transactions or entire dApps.
  • Fee Market Distortion: Bundlers can prioritize their own MEV or partner transactions.
  • Innovation Stagnation: Protocols become dependent on a few providers' roadmaps.
>60%
Market Share Risk
1-3
Viable Bundlers
02

Smart Account Vendor Lock-In

Users' smart accounts (e.g., Safe, Biconomy, ZeroDev) are tied to specific infrastructure. Migrating between providers is a complex, manual process that defeats the purpose of a seamless web3 experience.

  • Fragmented Liquidity: Paymaster gas sponsorship and session keys are not portable.
  • Switching Costs: Moving an account with complex permissions and DeFi positions is high-friction.
  • Data Silos: User transaction history and reputation are trapped within a provider's stack.
~0%
Portability Today
High
User Friction
03

The Systemic Security Corollary

Consolidation creates a systemic attack surface. A critical bug in a dominant ERC-4337 bundler, paymaster, or account factory could compromise millions of smart accounts simultaneously, dwarfing any private key hack.

  • Monoculture Risk: Homogeneous infrastructure amplifies the impact of a single exploit.
  • Upgrade Governance: Who decides when and how to patch millions of live accounts?
  • Insurance Gap: No Lloyds of London for a $1B+ smart account breach.
1 Bug
Mass Compromise
$1B+
Potential TVL at Risk
04

The Innovation Kill Zone

Estrolled players like Coinbase (via Base and Smart Wallet) or Visa can use their distribution to commoditize the AA layer. They subsidize gas and onboarding to capture users, making it impossible for pure-play innovators to compete on economics.

  • Predatory Pricing: Loss-leading bundles from giants with other revenue streams.
  • Ecosystem Capture: Default integration into a dominant L2 or wallet becomes a moat.
  • Feature Parity Trap: Competition shifts from groundbreaking R&D to incremental UX tweaks.
$0 Gas
Subsidy Weapon
Millions
Captive Users
future-outlook
THE CONSOLIDATION

The 24-Month Outlook: The Big Squeeze

The current fragmented account abstraction landscape will consolidate into a few dominant infrastructure providers, driven by network effects and capital efficiency.

The winner-takes-most dynamic will compress the market. Account abstraction's value accrues to the most adopted smart account standard, creating a powerful network effect that marginalizes smaller players. This mirrors the consolidation seen in rollup sequencers and oracle networks like Chainlink.

Bundled services will dominate. Standalone paymaster or bundler services from Pimlico or Biconomy will be outcompeted by vertically-integrated stacks. Protocols like Safe, with its Safe{Core} stack and native bundler, capture the full value chain and user relationship.

Capital becomes the ultimate moat. The most efficient paymaster operations, which require managing gas token liquidity across chains, demand massive scale. Entities with deep treasury reserves or native token integration, like StarkWare's Braavos wallet, will price out competitors.

Evidence: The bundler market is already consolidating; a single provider, likely Alchemy or Stackup given their enterprise relationships and RPC dominance, will process over 60% of ERC-4337 UserOperations within 18 months.

takeaways
ACCOUNT ABSTRACTION INFRASTRUCTURE

TL;DR for Builders and Investors

The current fragmented landscape of AA providers is unsustainable. Here's where the consolidation will happen and who will win.

01

The Bundler Wars Are Over

The market will consolidate around a few dominant bundler-as-a-service providers. The winner won't be the fastest, but the one with the deepest integrations and most reliable economic guarantees.

  • Key Benefit: Seamless integration with major Paymasters and Account Factories.
  • Key Benefit: Sub-second finality for 99.9% of UserOps, backed by MEV-proof ordering.
2-3
Winners
~500ms
Latency
02

Paymaster is the Real Business

The sponsorship and gas abstraction layer is where the defensible revenue and moats are built. This is the core of the intent-based user experience.

  • Key Benefit: ERC-20 gas payment and subscription models create sticky, predictable cash flows.
  • Key Benefit: Session keys and policy engines enable complex, automated transaction flows for dApps.
$10B+
Gas Sponsored
>70%
Margin
03

Smart Account Wallets Will Commoditize

The account factory and modular signer logic (like ERC-4337's entry point) will become a low-margin utility. Innovation shifts to the signature abstraction and recovery layers.

  • Key Benefit: Multi-chain, key-agnostic accounts (EVM, Stark, Solana) become the standard.
  • Key Benefit: Social recovery and policy-based security modules become primary differentiators for end-users.
-90%
Dev Time
5+
Chains
04

The Full-Stack AA Aggregator Emerges

A single API endpoint that abstracts Biconomy, Stackup, Candide, and Safe will dominate. Builders want one integration, not five. This aggregator captures the relationship.

  • Key Benefit: Unified dashboard for managing bundler, paymaster, and account metrics across chains.
  • Key Benefit: Best execution for UserOps, routing to the most cost-effective underlying provider.
1
API
-40%
Gas Cost
ENQUIRY

Get In Touch
today.

Our experts will offer a free quote and a 30min call to discuss your project.

NDA Protected
24h Response
Directly to Engineering Team
10+
Protocols Shipped
$20M+
TVL Overall
NDA Protected Directly to Engineering Team
Account Abstraction Consolidation: The End of Modular Stacks | ChainScore Blog