Account Abstraction is a network primitive. On monolithic chains, AA is a feature constrained by the base layer's execution environment. The modular paradigm unbundles execution, settlement, and data availability, allowing AA logic to be embedded directly into specialized execution layers like Arbitrum Orbit or Optimism Superchain.
Why the Modular Stack Redefines What AA Can Be
Monolithic architectures force trade-offs. The modular separation of execution, settlement, and data availability allows Account Abstraction to be implemented with unprecedented efficiency, security, and flexibility.
Introduction
The modular stack transforms Account Abstraction from a wallet feature into a core network primitive.
Intent-centric architectures become viable. Modularity separates transaction execution from user intent. This enables systems like UniswapX and Across to operate as intent solvers, where user-signed intents are fulfilled across domains without manual bridging, a process native AA wallets like Safe{Wallet} now orchestrate.
The user is the sovereign. With data availability layers like Celestia and EigenDA, users control their transaction history and state. This shifts power from monolithic L1s to the application layer, enabling portable smart accounts that move seamlessly between rollups via bridges like LayerZero.
Executive Summary: The Modular AA Advantage
Monolithic account abstraction forces a one-size-fits-all trade-off. The modular stack decomposes the problem, letting protocols specialize and win.
The Bundler Bottleneck
Monolithic bundlers like ERC-4337's EntryPoint are a single point of failure and performance constraint. They handle everything from simulation to inclusion, creating a centralized relay market vulnerable to censorship and MEV.
- Decouples Execution: Separates user operation simulation from block building.
- Enables Competition: Specialized bundlers (e.g., Pimlico, Stackup, Alchemy) compete on speed and reliability.
- Reduces Latency: Parallel processing cuts user operation confirmation to ~500ms.
Paymaster as a Strategic Primitive
Stuck gas fees are a UX dead end. A modular paymaster layer transforms gas sponsorship into a programmable business logic layer, decoupled from the core protocol.
- Unlocks New Models: Enables session keys for gaming, subscription services, and ERC-20 gas payments.
- Improves Capital Efficiency: Sponsors can implement just-in-time funding via account factories like Safe{Core} AA Kit.
- Creates Markets: Entities like Biconomy and ZeroDev monetize gas abstraction, driving adoption.
Signature Abstraction & Key Management
Hardware-bound EOA keys are a security liability. Modular AA separates signature validation logic from the core VM, enabling native support for passkeys, multi-party computation (MPC), and social recovery.
- Eliminates Seed Phrases: Users sign with WebAuthn (passkeys) or zkLogin schemes.
- Enables Granular Security: Define policies per session or asset via Safe{Wallet} modules.
- Future-Proofs Crypto: Integrates emerging standards like ERC-7212 (zk verification precompile) seamlessly.
The Interoperability Mandate
An AA wallet locked to one chain is a dead end. A modular account's state and logic must be portable across EVM L2s, non-EVM L1s, and even LayerZero-connected appchains.
- Unified Identity: A Safe{Core} Account can have a consistent address and permissions on Arbitrum, Optimism, and zkSync.
- Cross-Chain UserOps: Bundlers coordinate with CCIP or Axelar to execute actions across domains atomically.
- Solves Liquidity Fragmentation: Users interact with pooled liquidity on UniswapX or CowSwap natively from any chain.
Data Availability as a Cost Center
Storing full account state and transaction calldata on-chain is prohibitively expensive at scale. Modular AA leverages alternative DA layers to slash costs by >90%.
- Leverages Rollups: Stores non-critical state on Celestia or EigenDA.
- Enables Mass Adoption: Reduces the cost of a social recovery operation from $10+ on Ethereum L1 to <$0.01.
- Future-Proofs Scaling: Prepares for EIP-4844 blobs and validiums, where DA is a commodity.
The Aggregation Layer (Intent-Based)
Expecting users to manually sign transactions for every dApp is absurd. The endgame is intent-based systems where users declare goals ("swap X for Y at best rate") and a solver network, like UniswapX or CowSwap, fulfills them.
- Abstracts Complexity: User signs a high-level intent, not low-level calldata.
- Optimizes Execution: Solvers compete to provide best price via MEV capture, refunding users.
- Native to Modular AA: An AA wallet's signature abstraction and paymaster are perfect intent vehicles. Across Protocol already demonstrates this model.
The Core Argument: Modularity is a Prerequisite for Native AA
Monolithic blockchains structurally limit account abstraction, while a modular stack enables its native, permissionless evolution.
Monolithic designs enforce consensus-level constraints. The EVM's single-threaded execution and global state model make native fee sponsorship or batch transaction validation impossible without hard forks. This forces AA into smart contract layers like ERC-4337, creating fragmented user experiences and security overhead.
Modularity separates concerns to unlock primitives. A dedicated data availability layer like Celestia or EigenDA decouples state from execution. This allows rollups to implement native account protocols with custom validity conditions, moving AA from the application layer into the chain's core protocol.
Execution environments become AA innovation hubs. With a shared settlement and DA layer, a rollup can specialize as an AA-optimized chain. It can bake session keys or social recovery directly into its state transition function, offering performance and cost advantages monolithic L1s cannot match.
Evidence: Starknet's native account abstraction demonstrates this. Its sequencer validates signatures and pays fees natively, a feat impossible on Ethereum's base layer. This reduces gas costs for AA operations by over 30% compared to ERC-4337's bundled approach.
AA Implementation: Monolithic vs. Modular Trade-Offs
Compares the core design philosophies for Account Abstraction infrastructure, defining the new capabilities unlocked by a modular approach.
| Architectural Feature | Monolithic Smart Account | Modular Smart Account (ERC-4337) | Hybrid Bundler Network |
|---|---|---|---|
Core Execution Logic | Hardcoded in contract | User-defined via | User-defined via |
Signature Scheme Flexibility | Single, fixed scheme (e.g., ECDSA) | Any scheme (e.g., BLS, MPC, social) | Any scheme (e.g., BLS, MPC, social) |
Gas Sponsorship (Paymaster) Integration | Custom, non-standard | Standardized ERC-4337 Paymaster | Standardized ERC-4337 Paymaster |
Upgrade Path for Logic | Requires full contract migration | Hot-swappable via EntryPoint | Hot-swappable via EntryPoint |
Bundler Market Competition | None (self-operated) | Open (e.g., Stackup, Alchemy, Pimlico) | Semi-permissioned (e.g., native chain sequencers) |
Time to Finality (L2 Example) | < 2 sec (single chain) | 12 sec (dependent on bundler mempool) | < 2 sec (native bundling) |
Cross-Chain UserOp Relaying | |||
Protocol Examples | Argent, Gnosis Safe | ZeroDev, Biconomy, Etherspot | zkSync Era, Starknet, Polygon zkEVM |
Deep Dive: How Modular Layers Supercharge AA
Modular blockchains transform account abstraction from a smart contract trick into a systemic capability by decoupling execution, settlement, and data availability.
Monolithic chains bottleneck AA innovation by forcing all logic into a single, constrained execution environment. Modular stacks like Celestia or EigenDA separate data availability, allowing AA wallets to post only state diffs, not full transactions, slashing costs.
Specialized execution layers redefine user experience. A rollup like Arbitrum Nova can run a custom AA precompiled contract, enabling native gas sponsorship that Ethereum L1 cannot. This creates a competitive market for AA features.
Settlement layer specialization enables atomic composability. A user's intent, routed through an AA wallet on a rollup, can atomically settle a trade on dYdX and bridge funds via Across in one state transition. Modularity makes cross-chain AA a native primitive.
Evidence: Starknet's account abstraction, built on a modular ZK-rollup stack, processes over 50% of its transactions from AA wallets, a rate impossible on monolithic L1s due to gas and complexity overhead.
Builder's Playbook: Who's Implementing This Now?
The modular stack decouples execution, settlement, and data availability, allowing Account Abstraction to evolve beyond a single-chain feature.
Eclipse: The Sovereign SVM Rollup
Uses a modular stack (SVM execution, Ethereum settlement, Celestia DA) to make AA a foundational primitive. This enables custom fee markets and native programmability for account logic at the chain level.\n- Key Benefit: Developers can build AA-powered dApps without L1 gas token dependencies.\n- Key Benefit: Enables parallel execution of user operations, scaling beyond Ethereum's constraints.
Fuel: The Parallel Execution Engine
Implements AA natively in its UTXO-based VM, treating accounts as programmable predicates. Its modular design separates execution from settlement.\n- Key Benefit: State minimization allows for fraud proofs that only verify the specific account state change, not the entire chain.\n- Key Benefit: Native batch processing of user operations reduces on-chain footprint, cutting costs for paymasters and bundlers.
Avail & Polygon CDK: Data-Agnostic AA
Projects building with Avail for data availability or Polygon CDK can deploy AA-enabled rollups where security and scalability are independent.\n- Key Benefit: Rollup sequencers can implement trust-minimized bundling by posting proofs and data to a dedicated DA layer.\n- Key Benefit: Enables cross-chain AA sessions where a user's intent, validated on one chain, can be settled on another via shared DA.
The Starknet Stack: Prover-Level Abstraction
Starknet's native account abstraction and its Madara sequencer framework demonstrate how a modular prover (STARKs) changes the game.\n- Key Benefit: Single proof can verify a batch of heterogeneous user operations (transfers, swaps, games), amortizing cost.\n- Key Benefit: The Kakarot zkEVM shows how AA logic can be implemented as a smart contract within a proving system, making it portable across L2s.
Arbitrum Stylus & The Rust AA Frontier
Arbitrum Stylus allows AA smart accounts to be written in Rust/Go, compiled to WASM, and run at near-native speed.\n- Key Benefit: Complex signature schemes (e.g., BLS, social recovery logic) become economically viable, moving beyond simple ECDSA.\n- Key Benefit: Developers can build high-frequency trading accounts or autonomous agent wallets where computational overhead was previously prohibitive.
Cosmos & The Interchain AA Vision
The Inter-Blockchain Communication (IBC) protocol and chains like Neutron are pioneering AA where the account is the cross-chain primitive.\n- Key Benefit: A single smart account can hold assets and execute across multiple app-chains via IBC, with unified security from a mesh of interchain security providers.\n- Key Benefit: Enables sovereign chain accounts where governance and treasury management are abstracted across an ecosystem.
The Counter-Argument: Isn't This Just More Complexity?
Modularity transforms Account Abstraction from a wallet feature into a core protocol primitive, shifting complexity from developers to the infrastructure layer.
Complexity is abstracted, not added. The modular stack moves AA's core logic—signature validation, gas sponsorship, transaction batching—from the application layer to dedicated chains like Avail or Celestia. This creates a clean separation where developers integrate a standard interface, while specialized networks handle the execution.
AA becomes a system property. In a monolithic chain like Ethereum, AA is a smart contract hack. In a modular stack with a shared sequencer like Espresso or Astria, AA is a native capability. The sequencer sees user intents before finalization, enabling native gas abstraction and atomic cross-rollup bundles.
Compare the developer experience. Building AA features on Ethereum requires wrestling with ERC-4337 bundlers, paymasters, and mempools. On a rollup with native AA support via AltLayer or Caldera, it's a configuration parameter. The complexity shifts from your codebase to your chain's configuration file.
Evidence: The bundler market. The need for competitive ERC-4337 bundler services from Stackup or Alchemy proves the monolithic model's inefficiency. A modular sequencer network internalizes this function, turning a fragmented service market into a protocol-level utility.
TL;DR: Key Takeaways for Builders and Investors
Account Abstraction is no longer just an L2 feature; it's a core design principle unlocked by the modular stack.
The Problem: Monolithic AA is a Bottleneck
Bundling AA logic into the execution layer limits innovation and creates vendor lock-in. It forces a trade-off between security, cost, and functionality.
- Vendor Lock-in: You're stuck with the L2's native AA implementation.
- Inflexible Cost Structure: Paying for expensive L1 calldata for simple user ops.
- Slow Innovation: Upgrades are tied to the L2's hard fork schedule.
The Solution: Intent-Based AA with a Shared Sequencer
Decouple user intent expression from execution. Let users declare what they want, not how to do it, and let a specialized sequencer network (like Espresso, Astria) find the optimal path.
- UniswapX Model: Users sign intents; off-chain solvers compete for best execution.
- Parallelization: A shared sequencer can batch and route intents across rollups.
- Optimal Execution: Solvers can leverage Across, LayerZero, or CEXs for best price.
The Architecture: Sovereign AA Stack
Build AA as a dedicated, sovereign rollup or settlement layer. Use a modular DA layer (Celestia, EigenDA) and a shared sequencer for security and interoperability.
- Sovereign Security: Your AA logic has its own fraud/validity proofs.
- Plug-in Modules: Integrate session keys, social recovery, and fee sponsorship as separate modules.
- Universal Entry Point: A single, chain-agnostic contract becomes the user's identity across all rollups.
The New Business Model: AA-as-a-Service
Monetize the AA infrastructure layer directly. This is the AWS for Smart Accounts, offering gas sponsorship, key management, and compliance tooling.
- Recurring Revenue: Subscription for gas abstraction and security services.
- Data Monetization: Anonymous aggregate intent data is a new asset class.
- Protocol Capture: The AA layer becomes the primary user relationship, not the dApp.
The Security Primitive: Proof-Based Bridging for AA
Move assets and state between chains for AA users using light-client proofs, not locked liquidity. This makes cross-chain AA secure and capital efficient.
- IBC Model: Use light clients to verify state proofs on destination chains.
- No Bridging Risk: Users never rely on a third-party's locked capital.
- Native Composability: Smart accounts can interact with any chain as if it's local.
The Endgame: User-Owned Blockchains
The logical conclusion: each user's smart account is a micro-rollup. Their personal sequencer (phone/cloud) batches transactions, posts proofs to a DA layer, and settles.
- Ultimate Sovereignty: Users control their own execution and sequencing.
- True Portability: Identity and assets are independent of any L1/L2.
- Hyper-Personalization: Custom VM, privacy, and fee rules per account.
Get In Touch
today.
Our experts will offer a free quote and a 30min call to discuss your project.