Gasless onboarding is a trap. Protocols like Pimlico and Biconomy abstract gas fees to attract users, but this shifts the critical infrastructure of fee payment from the user's wallet to a centralized relayer network. The user never learns the core mechanic of blockchain interaction.
account-abstraction-fixing-crypto-ux
Blog
Why Gas Sponsorship is a Trojan Horse for Mass Adoption
Gas sponsorship lures users with free transactions, but the underlying Account Abstraction infrastructure—session keys, batched operations, and intent-based architectures—creates a seamless, sticky UX that fundamentally changes user behavior and locks in engagement.
introduction
THE USER EXPERIENCE TRAP
Introduction: The Bait and Switch
Gas sponsorship promises a frictionless Web3 entry point but creates systemic dependencies that threaten protocol sovereignty and user ownership.
This creates protocol-level vendor lock-in. A user acquired via a gas sponsorship campaign is not a protocol's user; they are the sponsor's user. The sponsor controls the transaction flow, creating a new centralization vector more powerful than a frontend.
The real cost is sovereignty. Projects like Base's Onchain Summer demonstrated that sponsorship drives volume, but the subsequent drop-off proves these are mercenary users, not retained capital. The protocol trades long-term user agency for short-term metrics.
Evidence: After Visa's gas sponsorship pilot on Solana, 99% of sponsored wallets showed zero subsequent activity. The model subsidizes empty clicks, not sustainable adoption.
key-trends
WHY GAS SPONSORSHIP IS A TROJAN HORSE
The Three-Pronged Onslaught
Gas sponsorship isn't a user perk; it's a strategic wedge that dismantles the three biggest barriers to mainstream blockchain adoption.
01
The Problem: The Onboarding Tax
Requiring users to acquire native tokens for gas is a $10B+ adoption tax. It's a UX dead-end that funnels users to centralized exchanges first, defeating decentralization.
- Eliminates pre-funding friction for new users.
- Shifts cost burden to apps and protocols, aligning incentives.
- Enables true cross-chain onboarding without native token arbitrage.
~100%
Friction Removed
$10B+
Barrier
02
The Solution: Intent-Based Abstraction
Gas sponsorship is the gateway drug to full intent-centric architecture, as pioneered by UniswapX and CowSwap. Users declare what they want, not how to do it.
- Enables MEV protection by letting solvers compete for bundled execution.
- Unlocks cross-chain atomicity via systems like Across and LayerZero.
- Turns gas from a tax into a business expense for dApps.
0
User Steps
~500ms
Solver Latency
03
The Endgame: Protocol-Owned Liquidity
Sponsoring transactions lets protocols directly own the user relationship and flow. This creates a sustainable moat beyond temporary token incentives.
- Generates first-party transaction data for optimization and monetization.
- Creates sticky user bases by removing all ancillary friction.
- Transforms gas into a customer acquisition cost (CAC) with measurable ROI.
10x
LTV Increase
-90%
Churn
GAS SPONSORSHIP AS A TROJAN HORSE
The AA Infrastructure Stack: Who's Building the Trap?
Comparison of leading Account Abstraction (AA) infrastructure providers, focusing on their gas sponsorship models and the strategic control they enable.
| Core Feature / Metric | Pimlico (ERC-4337 Bundler) | Stackup (ERC-4337 Bundler) | Biconomy (Hybrid) | Candide (Wallet SDK) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Gas Sponsorship Model | Paymaster-as-a-Service (PaaS) | Generalized Paymaster | Meta-Transactions + Hybrid Paymaster | Modular Paymaster SDK |
User Onboarding Friction | Zero (Sponsor Pays) | Zero (Sponsor Pays) | Zero (Sponsor Pays) | Variable (Developer Choice) |
Sponsorship Subsidy Source | Protocol Treasury / dApp | Protocol Treasury / dApp | Biconomy Treasury (Initial) | dApp / End-User |
Wallet Lock-in Risk | High (Custom Smart Wallets) | High (Custom Smart Wallets) | Very High (Biconomy SDK) | Low (ERC-4337 Standard) |
Avg. Relayer Latency | < 500 ms | < 300 ms | < 2 sec | N/A (Client-side) |
Bundler Market Share (Est.) |
| ~ 25% | ~ 15% | N/A |
Can Censor UserOps | ||||
Primary Revenue Model | Bundler Fees + Premium PaaS | Bundler Fees | Transaction Fees + Enterprise SaaS | SDK Licensing |
deep-dive
THE VECTORS
Anatomy of the Trap: From Free TX to Locked-In Users
Gas sponsorship is a user acquisition strategy that creates powerful vendor lock-in through technical and economic dependencies.
Free transactions are a loss leader for protocols seeking to bootstrap liquidity and user activity. This initial subsidy creates a behavioral dependency where users associate the application with zero-friction access, making competing chains feel expensive and slow.
The lock-in is infrastructural, not just psychological. Users who onboard via a sponsor's wallet or paymaster, like Biconomy or Pimlico, are bound to that stack. Migrating assets and transaction history to a new chain or wallet becomes a multi-step burden.
This creates a moat of user inertia. Protocols like Arbitrum and Polygon used sponsored gas to drive early adoption, embedding their ecosystems as the default. The cost of switching for a user with established DeFi positions and social graphs is prohibitive.
Evidence: After its initial gas sponsorship program, Arbitrum's daily transaction count increased by over 300%, demonstrating how removing fee friction directly catalyzes network effects that are hard to abandon.
counter-argument
THE HIDDEN COSTS
The Bear Case: Subsidies, Centralization, and the Privacy Illusion
Gas sponsorship creates systemic risks by centralizing network control and obscuring true transaction costs.
Gas sponsorship is a subsidy trap. Protocols like Pimlico and Biconomy pay fees to onboard users, but this creates unsustainable customer acquisition costs. When subsidies end, user retention collapses, exposing the lack of organic demand.
Centralization of relay power emerges. A dominant paymaster or bundler network becomes a single point of censorship and failure. This recreates the trusted intermediary problem that account abstraction aims to solve, centralizing around entities like Ethereum's PBS builders.
Privacy is a temporary illusion. Sponsored transactions reveal user intent to the sponsor before execution. While ERC-4337 abstracts the gas payer, it creates a metadata leakage vector where sponsors like Visa or Coinbase gain privileged insight into user behavior patterns.
Evidence: In Q1 2024, over 90% of EIP-4337 UserOperations on mainnet were sponsored, creating a $15M+ subsidy liability for applications. This mirrors the unsustainable DeFi yield-farming model where activity vanishes after incentives stop.
takeaways
WHY GAS SPONSORSHIP IS A TROJAN HORSE
TL;DR for Builders and Investors
Gas sponsorship abstracts away crypto's most hostile UX barrier, unlocking new user acquisition models and protocol revenue streams.
01
The Problem: The Gas Tax Kills Growth
Requiring users to hold a network's native token for fees is a massive adoption bottleneck. It creates a cold-start problem for every new chain or dApp.
- ~70% of DeFi users cite gas complexity as a primary barrier.
- Onboards only speculators, not mainstream consumers.
- Forces protocols into zero-sum competition for the same liquidity-rich users.
70%+
UX Barrier
0
Mainstream Onboarded
02
The Solution: Make Gas Invisible
Sponsorship lets dApps or third-party paymasters (like Biconomy, Gelato, Pimlico) cover gas costs. Users sign messages, not transactions.
- Enables credit-based and subscription business models.
- Turns gas from a cost center into a user acquisition budget.
- Unlocks intent-based architectures (see: UniswapX, CowSwap) where solvers handle execution.
100%
Friction Removed
New Biz Models
Enabled
03
The Trojan Horse: Embedded Abstraction
Sponsorship is the wedge for account abstraction (ERC-4337) and session keys. Once users are in a gasless environment, you can incrementally roll out advanced features.
- Session Keys: Enable one-click trading for ~24 hours without repeated approvals.
- Social Recovery: Seedless wallets become viable, reducing support costs.
- Batch Operations: Bundle actions, reducing effective cost by up to 90%.
ERC-4337
Standard
-90%
Batch Cost
04
The New Business Model: Paymaster as a Service
Paymasters become critical infrastructure, monetizing via markups, subscriptions, or data. This mirrors AWS or Stripe in web2.
- Gas Futures: Hedge and offer predictable pricing to dApps.
- Intent Routing: Paymasters integrate with Across, LayerZero for cross-chain sponsorships.
- Data Monetization: Anonymized transaction flow becomes a valuable product.
New Rev Stream
For Infra
Stripe-like
Model
05
The Risk: Centralization & Censorship Vectors
The entity paying the gas gains significant power. They can censor transactions, create walled gardens, and become systemic single points of failure.
- Requires decentralized paymaster networks and policy frameworks.
- Vitalik's proposal for ERC-4337 includes anti-censorship measures.
- Builders must design for paymaster substitutability.
High
Censorship Risk
Critical
Design Need
06
The Investment Thesis: Own the Abstraction Layer
The value accrual shifts from L1 gas tokens to the abstraction infrastructure that manages the sponsorship economy. This is a multi-billion dollar wedge.
- Invest in paymaster stacks (Biconomy), SDK providers (Pimlico), AA wallets.
- Layer 2s with native AA (like Starknet, zkSync) have a first-mover advantage.
- Watch for gas sponsorship becoming a default feature in major dApps by 2025.
$B+
Market Cap
2025
Inflection Point
ENQUIRY
Get In Touch
today.
Our experts will offer a free quote and a 30min call to discuss your project.
NDA Protected
Confidentiality24h Response
Time to ValueDirectly to Engineering Team
No Sales Fluff10+
Protocols Shipped
$20M+
TVL Overall