Rollup-as-a-Service (RaaS) providers like AltLayer, Caldera, and Conduit excel at reducing deployment time and operational overhead. They offer managed infrastructure for popular stacks (OP Stack, Arbitrum Orbit, Polygon CDK), handling node operations, sequencing, and bridging. For example, projects can launch a production-ready chain in days, not months, with predictable costs and access to shared security layers like EigenLayer AVS. This model is ideal for rapid iteration and teams that want to focus on application logic, not blockchain infrastructure.
LABS
Comparisons
Rollup-as-a-Service (RaaS) vs App-Specific Rollups
A technical comparison for CTOs and protocol architects evaluating the trade-offs between outsourcing rollup deployment via RaaS providers and building a sovereign, custom rollup stack from scratch.
Chainscore © 2026
introduction
THE ANALYSIS
Introduction: The Rollup Deployment Dilemma
Choosing between a managed RaaS platform and building an app-specific rollup from scratch is a foundational architectural decision with major implications for cost, control, and time-to-market.
App-Specific Rollups take a different approach by offering maximal sovereignty and customization. Building directly with frameworks like the OP Stack or Arbitrum Nitro allows teams to control every component: the sequencer, data availability layer (Ethereum, Celestia, Avail), and upgrade keys. This results in a trade-off: significantly higher initial engineering cost and ongoing DevOps burden for the benefit of complete protocol design freedom and the potential for superior fee capture and MEV strategies, as seen in protocols like dYdX and Aevo.
The key trade-off: If your priority is speed, cost-efficiency, and reduced operational risk, choose a RaaS provider. If you prioritize absolute control, deep technical customization, and are building a protocol where the chain itself is a core competitive moat, choose the app-specific rollup path. Your choice dictates whether you are primarily a dApp developer or a blockchain operator.
tldr-summary
RaaS vs App-Specific Rollups
TL;DR: Key Differentiators at a Glance
A rapid comparison of managed service versus sovereign stack trade-offs for launching a rollup.
02
RaaS: Cost Predictability
OpEx over CapEx: Fixed monthly fees (e.g., $1.5K-$5K) vs. unpredictable engineering overhead. This matters for teams with < 5 engineers who cannot afford a dedicated infra team. Trade-off: less control over sequencer revenue.
03
App-Specific Rollup: Maximal Extractable Value (MEV)
Full sequencer control: Capture and redistribute 100% of MEV (e.g., via Flashbots SUAVE). This matters for high-volume DEXs or lending protocols where MEV can be a primary revenue stream or user rebate mechanism.
HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON
Rollup-as-a-Service vs App-Specific Rollup: Feature Comparison
Direct comparison of key operational and business metrics for blockchain scaling solutions.
| Metric | Rollup-as-a-Service (RaaS) | App-Specific Rollup |
|---|---|---|
Time to Launch (Production) | 1-4 weeks | 3-9 months |
Upfront Development Cost | $10K - $50K | $500K - $2M+ |
Team Size Required | 1-3 Engineers | 5-10+ Engineers |
Native Token Required | ||
Sequencer Control | ||
Prover Flexibility (ZK/OP) | ||
Protocol Revenue Share | 10-20% | 100% |
EVM Compatibility |
pros-cons-a
PROS AND CONS
Rollup-as-a-Service (RaaS) vs App-Specific Rollups
Key strengths and trade-offs for CTOs evaluating infrastructure strategies. Data based on platforms like AltLayer, Caldera, Conduit, and custom stacks like OP Stack, Arbitrum Orbit, and Polygon CDK.
04
App-Specific: Cost Efficiency at Scale
Specific advantage: Eliminate RaaS provider margins; operational costs approach raw L1 data fees + hardware. At >100 TPS, this can save >$50K/month versus managed services. This matters for high-throughput applications like gaming or social networks where marginal cost per transaction is critical.
05
RaaS: Vendor Lock-in Risk
Specific disadvantage: Migrating off a provider like Conduit requires re-engineering data availability, bridging, and node software. This matters for long-term infrastructure bets where strategic flexibility is valued over initial convenience.
06
App-Specific: Engineering Burden
Specific disadvantage: Requires in-house expertise in fraud/validity proofs, cross-chain messaging, and MEV management. Teams typically need 3-5 senior blockchain engineers for 6+ months. This matters for startups or web2 companies where recruiting this talent is a major bottleneck.
pros-cons-b
ROLLUP-AS-A-SERVICE VS. SELF-MANAGED
App-Specific Rollups: Pros and Cons
Key strengths and trade-offs at a glance for teams choosing between managed infrastructure and full sovereignty.
02
RaaS: Cost & Complexity
Predictable OpEx over CapEx: Avoids the upfront engineering cost of building a custom fraud/validity proof system, a sequencer, and a data availability (DA) bridge. This matters for bootstrapped projects where developer hours are the primary constraint. You trade fees for focus.
04
App-Specific: Performance & Customization
Tailored execution environment: Design a VM optimized for your logic (e.g., SVM for DeFi, Move for gaming). Achieve sub-second block times and minimal fees by stripping out unnecessary opcodes. This matters for consumer apps and games requiring a seamless, low-latency user experience that general-purpose chains can't provide.
CHOOSE YOUR PRIORITY
Decision Framework: When to Choose Which
Rollup-as-a-Service (RaaS) for Speed & Cost
Verdict: The clear winner for rapid deployment and predictable, low operational overhead. Strengths: Providers like Conduit, Caldera, and AltLayer abstract away node operations, slashing time-to-market from months to weeks. They offer shared sequencer networks (e.g., Espresso, Astria) for near-instant cross-rollup composability and MEV protection. Cost is primarily a predictable SaaS fee, avoiding the capital expenditure and DevOps burden of running your own sequencer and prover infrastructure.
App-Specific Rollups for Speed & Cost
Verdict: Higher initial setup cost for potentially superior long-term economics. Strengths: Once operational, a dedicated rollup (e.g., using Arbitrum Orbit, OP Stack, or zkStack) provides maximal control over fee markets and transaction ordering. You can implement custom gas tokenomics and capture 100% of sequencer fees/MEV. For ultra-high-throughput applications where every millisecond of latency matters, a dedicated chain eliminates noisy neighbors.
RAAS VS APP-SPECIFIC ROLLUPS
Technical Deep Dive: Stack Dependencies and Lock-in
Choosing between a managed service and a custom-built rollup involves critical trade-offs in flexibility, control, and long-term technical debt. This section breaks down the key architectural dependencies and vendor lock-in risks.
App-specific rollups offer significantly more flexibility. You have full control over the execution client (OP Stack, Arbitrum Nitro), data availability layer (Ethereum, Celestia, Avail), and prover (Risc Zero, SP1). RaaS platforms like Conduit, Caldera, or AltLayer provide curated, pre-configured stacks for speed, limiting deep customization of the core sequencer or settlement logic in exchange for operational simplicity.
verdict
THE ANALYSIS
Final Verdict and Strategic Recommendation
Choosing between RaaS and building an app-specific rollup is a strategic decision between speed-to-market and ultimate sovereignty.
Rollup-as-a-Service (RaaS) excels at developer velocity and operational simplicity because it abstracts away the complexities of node operation, sequencing, and proving. For example, platforms like Conduit, Caldera, and AltLayer can deploy a production-ready rollup in under an hour, leveraging battle-tested stacks like OP Stack or Arbitrum Orbit with proven security and shared sequencer networks. This model is ideal for projects needing to launch quickly, validate product-market fit, or for whom core development resources are focused on application logic, not infrastructure.
App-Specific Rollups take a different approach by offering maximal sovereignty and performance customization. This results in a trade-off of significantly higher initial overhead for the potential of superior economics and user experience. By controlling the entire stack—from the sequencer and data availability layer (e.g., Celestia, EigenDA, Avail) to the execution environment—teams can optimize for their exact needs, achieving lower fees (sub-cent transactions), higher throughput (1,000+ TPS), and capturing MEV. This path is taken by major protocols like dYdX (v4) and Aevo.
The key trade-off: If your priority is speed, cost-efficiency for MVPs, and leveraging established ecosystems, choose a RaaS provider. If you prioritize long-term sovereignty, bespoke performance, and are prepared for the operational burden of a dedicated engineering team, choose an app-specific rollup. For many, a hybrid strategy is optimal: start with a managed RaaS solution to bootstrap, then migrate to a sovereign chain using the same underlying stack as your needs and resources mature.
ENQUIRY
Get In Touch
today.
Our experts will offer a free quote and a 30min call to discuss your project.
NDA Protected
Confidentiality24h Response
Time to ValueDirectly to Engineering Team
No Sales Fluff10+
Protocols Shipped
$20M+
TVL Overall