GMX excels at capital efficiency and deep liquidity for blue-chip assets by utilizing a unified, multi-asset liquidity pool (GLP) on Arbitrum and Avalanche. This model allows traders to take large positions with minimal slippage, as evidenced by its consistent $400M+ in Total Value Locked (TVL). The protocol's fee structure, which distributes 70% of trading fees to GLP stakers, has created a powerful flywheel for liquidity providers.
GMX vs Gains Network: Perpetuals on L2 & Multi-Chain
Introduction: The Battle of Perpetual Swap Architectures
A technical breakdown of the two dominant models for decentralized perpetual swaps: GMX's peer-to-pool liquidity and Gains Network's isolated synthetic vaults.
Gains Network takes a different approach by deploying isolated synthetic vaults (gDAI) on Polygon and Arbitrum, allowing for permissionless listing of any asset with a price feed. This results in superior asset diversity—offering 100+ trading pairs including forex and commodities—but introduces the trade-off of fragmented liquidity and higher volatility for exotic pairs. Its use of Chainlink oracles and a dynamic DAI-backed minting mechanism for gDAI isolates risk per asset.
The key trade-off: If your priority is high-volume, low-slippage trading on major crypto assets with a proven liquidity model, choose GMX. If you prioritize maximum asset diversity and exotic pair exposure for a global trading audience, and can manage fragmented liquidity pools, choose Gains Network.
TL;DR: Core Differentiators at a Glance
Key strengths and trade-offs for two leading decentralized perpetuals protocols.
GMX: Superior Capital Efficiency
Multi-asset Liquidity Pool (GLP): Liquidity providers earn fees from all trades in a single, diversified basket. This matters for LPs seeking passive, multi-asset exposure. Zero Price Impact Trading: Trades are executed against the GLP pool, not an order book, enabling large positions without slippage. This is critical for whales and institutions.
GMX: Battle-Tested on Arbitrum & Avalanche
Deepest Liquidity on L2: GMX v1 pioneered perpetuals on Arbitrum, achieving $2.5B+ in cumulative volume. This matters for traders prioritizing execution stability and minimal funding rate volatility. Established Track Record: Over two years of mainnet operation with no major security incidents, providing confidence for large capital deployment.
Gains Network: Unmatched Asset Universe
Synthetic Asset Design (gDAI vault): Trades synthetic forex, commodities, and equities (like Tesla, Gold) with real-world price feeds (Chainlink). This matters for traders seeking exposure beyond crypto. Higher Leverage: Offers up to 150x on major forex pairs vs. GMX's typical 30-50x, catering to aggressive strategies.
Gains Network: Multi-Chain Native & Gas Efficiency
Polygon PoS & Arbitrum Deployment: Native on Polygon for ultra-low fees (<$0.01), with expansion to Arbitrum. This matters for retail traders and high-frequency strategies sensitive to gas costs. Single-Stake Earning (Dai Vault): Liquidity is pooled in a single, stablecoin (DAI) vault, simplifying yield and risk calculations for LPs.
Choose GMX If...
You are a liquidity provider wanting diversified yield via GLP, a large-capital trader needing zero-slippage execution on crypto, or a protocol architect prioritizing the most proven, high-TV L2 perpetuals infrastructure.
Choose Gains Network If...
You are a trader seeking synthetic stock/forex markets, a retail user on Polygon minimizing fees, or a developer building an app that requires exotic asset exposure beyond native crypto.
GMX vs Gains Network: Perpetuals on L2 & Multi-Chain
Direct comparison of key technical and economic metrics for leading decentralized perpetuals exchanges.
| Metric / Feature | GMX | Gains Network |
|---|---|---|
Core Trading Model | Multi-Asset Liquidity Pool (GLP) | Isolated Synthetic Pairs (DAI vault) |
Native Chain Deployment | Arbitrum, Avalanche | Polygon, Arbitrum |
Max Leverage (Crypto) | 50x | 150x |
Trading Fee (Maker/Taker) | 0.0% / 0.1% | 0.08% / 0.08% |
Oracle Solution | Chainlink + Fast Price Feeds | Chainlink + Pyth Network |
Supports Forex/Commodities | ||
Protocol Token Utility | Staking (esGMX), Fee Sharing | Staking (gDAI), Treasury Backing |
GMX vs Gains Network: Perpetuals on L2 & Multi-Chain
Direct comparison of key token utility, fee distribution, and staking models.
| Metric | GMX (GMX Token) | Gains Network (GNS Token) |
|---|---|---|
Primary Token Utility | Protocol fee revenue share & governance | Backing for synthetic positions & fee revenue share |
Fee Distribution to Stakers | 30% of trading fees (ETH) & 30% of trading fees (AVAX) | All trading fees (DAI) after treasury allocation |
Staking APY (30-day avg.) | 8-12% | 15-25% |
Multi-Chain Liquidity Model | Separate pools (Arbitrum, Avalanche) | Unified treasury (Polygon, Arbitrum, Optimism) |
Liquidity Provider Role | GLP token holders (passive liquidity) | DAI vault stakers (active risk underwriting) |
Treasury Control | GMX stakers govern treasury use | Team-controlled treasury for market making |
GMX vs Gains Network: Perpetuals on L2 & Multi-Chain
A data-driven breakdown of the leading decentralized perpetuals protocols. Compare liquidity models, fee structures, and chain strategies to find the right fit for your trading or integration needs.
GMX's Core Strength: Deep, Unified Liquidity
Multi-Chain Liquidity Pool: GMX v2 aggregates liquidity from Arbitrum and Avalanche into a single, unified pool (GLP). This creates a $500M+ TVL base, providing deep liquidity for large trades with minimal slippage. This matters for institutional traders and whales who need to execute sizable positions without moving the market.
GMX's Trade-Off: Liquidity Provider Risk
Counterparty is the Pool: GLP holders (LPs) are the direct counterparty to all trades, earning fees but also bearing the P&L. During volatile markets or sustained trader profitability, LPs can experience drawdowns. This matters for capital allocators who must assess the asymmetric risk/reward of providing liquidity versus simple yield farming.
Gains Network's Core Strength: Isolated, Synthetic Markets
Synthetic Asset Model: gTrade uses Chainlink oracles and a DAI vault to mint synthetic assets, enabling 1,500+ unique trading pairs (including forex and equities) with no direct liquidity requirement for each pair. This matters for traders seeking exotic markets and integrators who want to offer niche assets without fragmented liquidity.
Gains Network's Trade-Off: Oracle Dependency & Complexity
Oracle-Governed Execution: All prices and liquidations are managed by decentralized oracle networks. This introduces latency risks during extreme volatility and requires robust oracle infrastructure (e.g., Chainlink's low-latency oracles on Polygon zkEVM). This matters for protocol architects who must design for oracle failure modes and manage integration complexity across multiple data feeds.
GMX vs Gains Network: Perpetuals on L2 & Multi-Chain
Key strengths and trade-offs at a glance for CTOs evaluating perpetual swap protocols.
GMX: Superior Liquidity & Network Effects
Dominant TVL and volume: $500M+ in staked liquidity (GLP) across Arbitrum and Avalanche, facilitating deep markets and tight spreads. This matters for institutional traders and large positions where slippage is a primary cost.
GMX: Simpler, Battle-Tested Model
Established PvP/Peer-to-Pool hybrid: Liquidity providers (GLP) act as the direct counterparty to traders, a model proven since 2021 on Arbitrum. This matters for teams prioritizing protocol stability and a straightforward fee structure over complex mechanisms.
Gains Network: Unmatched Asset Universe
Extensive multi-chain asset selection: Offers 200+ synthetic trading pairs, including forex (EUR/USD), commodities (Gold), and equities (TSLA), far beyond typical crypto pairs. This matters for traders seeking traditional market exposure or diversified portfolios on-chain.
Gains Network: Capital Efficiency & High Leverage
Synthetic architecture with isolated risk: Uses Chainlink oracles and a single DAI vault, allowing for high leverage (up to 150x on crypto) without fragmented liquidity pools. This matters for retail and advanced traders maximizing potential returns on smaller capital.
GMX Con: Limited Asset Selection
Narrow crypto-centric focus: Primarily supports major crypto assets (BTC, ETH, LINK, etc.). This is a trade-off for teams whose users demand exposure to forex, stocks, or commodities without leaving DeFi.
Gains Network Con: Lower Native Liquidity
Smaller liquidity pool: ~$30M in its DAI vault, which can lead to higher slippage on very large trades compared to GMX. This matters for funds or whales executing seven-figure orders, where execution quality is critical.
Decision Framework: When to Choose Which
GMX for High-Volume Traders
Verdict: The superior choice for large, capital-efficient positions. Strengths: GMX's unique GLP liquidity pool model provides deep liquidity sourced from multiple chains (Arbitrum, Avalanche), resulting in minimal slippage for large trades. Its zero-price-impact swaps within the pool are a key differentiator. The platform is optimized for leveraged spot trading and perpetuals with up to 50x leverage, making it ideal for sophisticated strategies. High TVL (~$500M) ensures system stability. Considerations: Trading fees are higher (opening/closing fees + borrow fees from GLP), which can erode profits on high-frequency strategies. The GLP token's performance is directly tied to trader P&L, adding a unique risk/reward dynamic for liquidity providers.
Final Verdict and Strategic Recommendation
A data-driven breakdown to guide infrastructure decisions between two leading perpetual DEX architectures.
GMX excels at deep liquidity and mainstream adoption because of its first-mover advantage and concentrated liquidity model on Arbitrum and Avalanche. For example, it consistently maintains a Total Value Locked (TVL) exceeding $500M, providing superior capital efficiency and tighter spreads for large traders. Its permissionless listing model for blue-chip assets like ETH, BTC, and LINK has created a robust, battle-tested ecosystem with integrations across major DeFi protocols.
Gains Network takes a different approach by prioritizing asset diversity and gas efficiency on Polygon. Its unique gDAI vault and synthetic asset model allows it to offer perpetuals on traditional equities (like Tesla), forex pairs, and exotic cryptocurrencies with minimal slippage. This results in a trade-off of more centralized price feeds (reliant on Pyth Network oracles) but enables a vastly broader market catalog that GMX cannot match natively.
The key architectural divergence is liquidity sourcing: GMX uses a peer-to-pool model where LPs share collective risk, while Gains uses a peer-to-peer model backed by its treasury, isolating LP risk. This makes GMX better for high-volume, low-spread trading on core crypto assets, whereas Gains is engineered for accessing niche markets with predictable, low fees on Polygon.
Consider GMX if your protocol needs: deep, established liquidity for major crypto assets; integration with the Arbitrum DeFi stack (e.g., Camelot, Radiant); or a proven, high-TVL venue for institutional users. Choose Gains Network when your priority is: multi-asset exposure beyond crypto; ultra-low transaction costs on Polygon; or a self-contained, treasury-backed system for exotic pairs.
Get In Touch
today.
Our experts will offer a free quote and a 30min call to discuss your project.