Free 30-min Web3 Consultation
Book Consultation
Smart Contract Security Audits
View Audit Services
Custom DeFi Protocol Development
Explore DeFi
Full-Stack Web3 dApp Development
View App Services
Free 30-min Web3 Consultation
Book Consultation
Smart Contract Security Audits
View Audit Services
Custom DeFi Protocol Development
Explore DeFi
Full-Stack Web3 dApp Development
View App Services
Free 30-min Web3 Consultation
Book Consultation
Smart Contract Security Audits
View Audit Services
Custom DeFi Protocol Development
Explore DeFi
Full-Stack Web3 dApp Development
View App Services
Free 30-min Web3 Consultation
Book Consultation
Smart Contract Security Audits
View Audit Services
Custom DeFi Protocol Development
Explore DeFi
Full-Stack Web3 dApp Development
View App Services
LABS
Comparisons

Viem vs Ethers.js: The Definitive Technical Comparison for 2024

An unbiased, data-driven analysis of the two leading TypeScript libraries for Ethereum interaction. We compare Viem and Ethers.js on type safety, bundle size, developer experience, and support for modern standards like ERC-4337 Account Abstraction to help CTOs and technical leads make the right architectural choice.
Chainscore © 2026
introduction
THE ANALYSIS

Introduction: The Battle for Ethereum Developer Mindshare

A data-driven comparison of Viem and Ethers.js, the two dominant libraries for Ethereum interaction.

Viem excels at modern, type-safe, and lightweight development. Built from the ground up for TypeScript and ESM, it offers superior bundle size (often 30-40% smaller than Ethers.js) and a modular, composable architecture. This results in faster application load times and a more intuitive developer experience for teams using frameworks like Next.js or Vite. Its first-class support for Account Abstraction (ERC-4337) and multi-chain operations via its public and custom client system makes it the pragmatic choice for new, performance-conscious projects.

Ethers.js takes a different approach by prioritizing a comprehensive, battle-tested API with extensive documentation and a massive installed base. This results in unparalleled ecosystem stability and community support, but at the cost of a larger bundle and a legacy codebase that can feel monolithic. Its v6 update modernized the API, yet its widespread adoption—powering giants like Uniswap and MetaMask—means finding solutions to obscure problems is often easier, making it a safer bet for large, established codebases or teams requiring maximum third-party tool compatibility.

The key trade-off: If your priority is modern tooling, bundle size, and type safety for a new application, choose Viem. If you prioritize ecosystem stability, extensive documentation, and need to maintain a large existing codebase, choose Ethers.js. The decision often boils down to greenfield vs. brownfield development.

tldr-summary
VIEM VS ETHERS.JS

TL;DR: Key Differentiators at a Glance

A data-driven breakdown of the two dominant Ethereum SDKs, highlighting their architectural philosophies and optimal use cases.

01

Viem's Modern Architecture

TypeScript-first & tree-shakable: Built from the ground up for modern bundlers, resulting in significantly smaller bundle sizes (often 40-50% smaller than Ethers). This is critical for frontend dApps where performance impacts user retention.

02

Ethers.js's Maturity & Ecosystem

Battle-tested stability: With over 2.5 million weekly npm downloads and 6+ years of production use, it's the de facto standard. Its extensive documentation and massive community (e.g., 1.5k+ GitHub issues resolved) make it a safe choice for complex, long-term projects.

03

Viem's Developer Experience

Abstraction over configuration: Offers superior RPC abstraction with built-in support for WalletConnect, ENS, and multi-chain clients. Writing a cross-chain query is often a single function call, reducing boilerplate for applications like multi-chain dashboards or bridges.

04

Ethers.js's Granular Control

Explicit, low-level access: Provides fine-grained control over every aspect of an interaction (gas, nonce, data formatting). This is essential for protocol developers building novel primitives, advanced wallet software, or needing to debug complex transaction failures.

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON

Viem vs Ethers.js: Feature Comparison

Direct comparison of key technical metrics and developer features for Ethereum library selection.

Metric / FeatureViemEthers.js

Bundle Size (gzipped)

~30 KB

~80 KB

TypeScript Native

Tree-Shaking Support

Account Abstraction (ERC-4337) Support

Wallet Client (Injected, WalletConnect)

RPC Transport Abstraction

Maintenance Model

Modular, versioned

Monolithic, versioned

pros-cons-a
PROS AND CONS

Viem vs Ethers.js: Key Differentiators

A data-driven comparison of the two dominant Ethereum SDKs, highlighting their architectural trade-offs and ideal use cases.

01

Viem: Type-Safe & Modern

Built for TypeScript-first development with automatic type inference for ABIs and RPC methods. This eliminates a major source of runtime errors and significantly boosts developer velocity for teams building on EVM chains like Arbitrum, Base, or Polygon. The API is modular, promoting tree-shaking and smaller bundle sizes.

02

Viem: Performance & Bundle Size

~30-50% smaller bundle size than Ethers.js v5 due to its modular architecture. Offers first-class support for EIP-1193 providers (like MetaMask) and optimized utilities for common operations (e.g., encoding, hashing). This is critical for dApps where frontend performance and load time directly impact user retention.

03

Ethers.js: Maturity & Ecosystem

Battle-tested since 2016 with massive adoption (millions of weekly npm downloads). Its comprehensive, monolithic API covers virtually every Ethereum use case, from simple transfers to complex contract interactions. The extensive documentation and vast community support make it a safe, low-risk choice for enterprise-grade applications.

04

Ethers.js: Familiarity & Tooling

Ubiquitous in tutorials, documentation, and existing codebases. Integrates seamlessly with a vast array of legacy tooling and frameworks like Hardhat and Truffle. The BigNumber abstraction, while heavier, is familiar to developers migrating from Web3.js. This reduces onboarding friction for teams with established Ethereum experience.

05

Viem: Steeper Learning Curve

Requires modern JS/TS tooling and a mindset shift. Its modular, functional approach differs from Ethers.js's class-based OOP style. Developers accustomed to Ethers v5 may face initial friction adapting to concepts like Wallet Clients, Public Clients, and the viem/actions pattern. Less verbose online help for niche issues.

06

Ethers.js: Legacy Code & Bloat

Larger bundle footprint can impact dApp performance. The v6 rewrite improved modularity but maintains backward-compatibility considerations. Some abstractions (like BigNumber) are heavier than native bigint. For teams building lightweight frontends or browser extensions, this overhead can be a significant drawback.

pros-cons-b
VIEM VS ETHERS.JS

Ethers.js: Pros and Cons

A data-driven comparison of the two dominant Ethereum SDKs, highlighting key architectural differences and trade-offs for production applications.

01

Ethers.js: Maturity & Ecosystem

Established Standard: Over 1.5M weekly npm downloads and 6+ years of production use. This matters for enterprise teams requiring a battle-tested library with extensive documentation, Stack Overflow support, and a vast plugin ecosystem (e.g., Hardhat, The Graph).

1.5M+
Weekly Downloads
6+ years
Production History
02

Ethers.js: Developer Experience

Unified API: A single, comprehensive ethers object provides wallets, providers, and contracts. This matters for rapid prototyping and developers who prefer an all-in-one, object-oriented approach with built-in abstractions for complex operations.

03

Viem: Performance & Bundle Size

Modular & Tree-shakable: ~30 KB vs Ethers.js's ~150 KB minified bundle. This matters for frontend dApps where performance is critical. Viem's functional, composable architecture allows bundlers to exclude unused code, directly improving load times.

~30 KB
Bundle Size
04

Viem: Type Safety & Modern Tooling

First-class TypeScript: End-to-end type safety for ABIs, RPC calls, and contract interactions using @viem/types. This matters for large teams building complex protocols (e.g., Uniswap, Aave forks) where type errors in production are costly. Native integration with Wagmi is a key advantage.

05

Ethers.js: Complexity & Bloat

Monolithic Legacy: The v5 to v6 migration introduced breaking changes and left some APIs bloated. This matters for new projects that don't need legacy features, as the larger API surface can be overwhelming and lead to suboptimal bundle sizes.

06

Viem: Learning Curve & Niche Support

Paradigm Shift: Requires adopting a functional, modular mindset versus Ethers.js's OOP style. While it supports L2s (Arbitrum, Optimism), some niche RPC methods or older testnets may have less mature support compared to the ubiquitous Ethers.js provider.

CHOOSE YOUR PRIORITY

When to Choose Viem vs Ethers.js

Viem for Protocol Architects

Verdict: The modern, type-safe foundation for new systems. Choose Viem when building from scratch, especially for multi-chain applications. Strengths:

  • TypeScript-Native: End-to-end type safety from ABIs, reducing runtime errors.
  • Modular & Tree-Shakable: Import only the clients and actions you need (e.g., createPublicClient, createWalletClient), keeping bundle sizes minimal.
  • Multi-Chain First: Built-in support for Ethereum, Polygon, Arbitrum, and others via transport abstraction, simplifying cross-chain logic.
  • Superior Developer Experience (DX): Automatic type inference for contract calls and events.

Ethers.js for Protocol Architects

Verdict: The battle-tested, comprehensive toolkit for maintaining or extending large, existing codebases. Strengths:

  • Mature Ecosystem: Ubiquitous in production; most existing documentation, tutorials, and audit tools are built for Ethers.js.
  • Monolithic & Feature-Complete: A single, comprehensive library covering every edge case, from wallet creation to complex contract interactions.
  • Proven Stability: Years of production use across major protocols like Uniswap, Aave, and Compound.
  • Familiarity: Largest developer mindshare, making team onboarding and hiring easier.
LIBRARY ARCHITECTURE

Technical Deep Dive: Type Safety and Bundle Size

A critical comparison of Viem and Ethers.js for developers prioritizing robust type safety and minimal application footprint. This analysis focuses on the architectural decisions that impact developer experience and production performance.

Viem provides superior, first-class TypeScript integration. It is written in TypeScript and generates types directly from the ABIs you provide, ensuring end-to-end type safety for contract interactions, event filters, and RPC calls. Ethers.js v5 added TypeScript definitions, but Viem's types are more granular and infer types from method names and parameters, catching errors at compile time. For example, readContract in Viem will enforce correct argument types and return a fully typed response.

verdict
THE ANALYSIS

Final Verdict and Decision Framework

A data-driven breakdown to help engineering leaders choose the right Ethereum library for their stack.

Viem excels at modern, type-safe, and lightweight interactions. Built for the post-merge era, its modular architecture and first-class TypeScript support result in a significantly smaller bundle size—often 60-70% smaller than Ethers.js v5—and superior developer experience for complex typed interactions with newer standards like ERC-4337 (Account Abstraction) and ERC-4626 (Vaults). Its performance in high-frequency environments, like indexers or real-time dashboards, is measurably faster due to optimized RPC handling.

Ethers.js takes a different approach by prioritizing a comprehensive, monolithic API with extensive backward compatibility. This results in a more extensive built-in feature set—including utilities for wallets, contract abstractions, and legacy formats—but at the cost of a larger bundle and a more complex migration path from its v5 to v6. Its maturity and vast ecosystem, with over 1.5 million weekly npm downloads, make it the de facto standard for many existing projects and educational resources.

The key trade-off: If your priority is performance, bundle size, and a modern, type-first DX for new applications, choose Viem. It is the clear choice for Next.js/React apps, high-performance backends, and projects leveraging the latest Ethereum upgrades. If you prioritize ecosystem stability, extensive built-in tooling, or are maintaining a large legacy codebase, choose Ethers.js v6. Its widespread adoption and familiar API reduce onboarding friction and integration risk for established teams.

ENQUIRY

Get In Touch
today.

Our experts will offer a free quote and a 30min call to discuss your project.

NDA Protected
24h Response
Directly to Engineering Team
10+
Protocols Shipped
$20M+
TVL Overall
NDA Protected Directly to Engineering Team
Viem vs Ethers.js | TypeScript Library Comparison 2024 | ChainScore Comparisons