Securrency vs. ADDX: Institutional Tokenization Hubs

Core strength: Chain-agnostic Interoperability Fabric that connects public chains (Ethereum, Polygon) and private ledgers. This matters for asset issuers who need to distribute tokens across multiple ecosystems without vendor lock-in.

Core strength: Proven track record tokenizing high-value assets like private equity, real estate, and hedge funds (e.g., $1.5B+ in listings). This matters for asset managers seeking a production-ready platform with a live investor base and settlement history.

You are a large bank or global custodian building a proprietary tokenization stack. Your priority is flexible compliance technology and multi-chain deployment over immediate distribution. You plan to issue across both private consortiums and public blockchains.

You are an asset issuer or fund manager seeking the fastest path to a liquid secondary market in Asia. Your priority is regulatory wrapper and investor access over underlying tech customization. You want a fully managed platform from issuance to secondary trading.

Specific advantage: Backed by DTCC, the $2.4 quadrillion post-trade infrastructure giant. Its CATS (Compliance Aware Tokenization) framework is built for existing SEC, FINRA, and MiFID II rulebooks. This matters for institutions requiring regulatory-first design and seamless integration with legacy settlement systems like DTC.

Specific advantage: Architecture agnostic, supporting token issuance across Ethereum, Polygon, and other EVM chains via its proprietary Regulated DeFi (R-DeFi) connectors. This matters for portfolios that need cross-chain compliance enforcement and cannot be locked into a single blockchain ecosystem.

Specific advantage: Licensed by the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) with a specific focus on private markets and funds. Has facilitated over $1.7 billion in tokenized offerings. This matters for institutions targeting Asian high-net-worth investors and seeking a turnkey, regulated exchange for alternative assets.

Specific advantage: Operates a direct-to-investor platform with fractionalized offerings (minimums as low as $10,000). Features an integrated KYC/AML onboarding and wallet. This matters for asset managers prioritizing end-investor acquisition and liquidity over pure infrastructure licensing.

Potential trade-offs:

• Enterprise-heavy integration: Can mean longer deployment cycles and higher initial cost.
• Less retail-facing: Primarily an B2B infrastructure layer, not a direct distribution channel.
• Complexity: The CATS framework's depth may be overkill for simpler, single-jurisdiction offerings.

Potential trade-offs:

• Platform dependency: Issuers are tied to ADDX's specific exchange and custody stack.
• Geographic focus: Strength in Asia can be a limitation for global, multi-regulatory deployments.
• Blockchain flexibility: Historically more curated in its supported chains vs. a chain-agnostic protocol.

Compliance-as-a-Service: Built-in KYC/AML, tax compliance, and investor accreditation checks via the CAT-20/721 token standard. This matters for institutions requiring automated, on-chain compliance for securities across multiple jurisdictions like the US, EU, and Singapore.

Cross-Chain Compliance: The RegDeFi framework enables compliant asset transfers between blockchains (e.g., Ethereum, Polygon, Avalanche). This matters for multi-chain fund structures and avoiding vendor lock-in, allowing assets to move while retaining legal guardrails.

Heavy Integration Overhead: Adopting the full stack (CAT standards, RegDeFi, Securrency APIs) requires significant technical and legal onboarding. This is a trade-off for smaller funds or single-jurisdiction issuers who may prefer a more turnkey solution.

Secondary Liquidity Dependency: While excellent for issuance and compliance, secondary trading relies on integrating with licensed exchanges like ADDX or ADDX's own ATS. This matters for issuers who need a fully integrated primary-to-secondary pipeline out of the box.

End-to-End Platform: Operates its own Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS)-licensed exchange for both issuance and secondary trading of tokenized securities. This matters for asset managers seeking immediate liquidity and a single vendor for the entire asset lifecycle.

Institutional-Grade Deal Flow: Has a track record of listing blue-chip private equity, hedge funds, and real estate (e.g., Hamilton Lane, Partners Group). This matters for investors seeking vetted, high-quality alternative assets with lower minimums (~$10K).

Vendor Lock-In Risk: Assets are primarily issued and traded on the ADDX proprietary platform, limiting portability to other venues. This is a trade-off for issuers who prioritize sovereignty and future interoperability over an integrated suite.

MAS-Centric Regulation: While expanding, its core regulatory framework is built around Singapore's MAS licensing. This matters for institutions whose primary investor base is in regions like the US or EU, where local licensing nuances add complexity.