EigenLayer excels at creating a permissionless, foundational primitive for decentralized trust. Its core innovation is the Actively Validated Service (AVS) model, which allows protocols like AltLayer, EigenDA, and Near to bootstrap security by tapping into Ethereum's staked ETH. With over $18B in TVL and a first-mover ecosystem of 200+ AVSs, it offers unparalleled network effects and a pure-play security marketplace. Its design is intentionally minimal, focusing on secure restaking and slashing, which makes it the de facto standard for projects needing maximal cryptoeconomic security.
LABS
Comparisons
EigenLayer vs. Karak Network: Cross-Chain Restaking & Yield
A technical comparison for CTOs and architects evaluating EigenLayer's Ethereum-native security model against Karak Network's multi-chain yield aggregation and broader asset support.
Chainscore © 2026
introduction
THE ANALYSIS
Introduction: The Restaking Primitive vs. The Yield Network
EigenLayer and Karak Network represent two distinct architectural philosophies for leveraging staked ETH, forcing a fundamental choice between a foundational primitive and an integrated yield platform.
Karak Network takes a different approach by building a vertically integrated yield network. It extends beyond simple restaking to aggregate yield from multiple sources—including liquid staking tokens (LSTs), liquid restaking tokens (LRTs), and real-world assets (RWAs)—into a single, composable layer. This results in a trade-off: while it may introduce more protocol complexity, it delivers higher, more diversified yields out-of-the-box. Karak's architecture, which supports multiple chains like Ethereum, Arbitrum, and Base, is optimized for users and protocols seeking a one-stop yield hub rather than a bare-bones security primitive.
The key trade-off: If your priority is maximizing cryptoeconomic security and integrating with the broadest ecosystem of permissionless services, choose EigenLayer. Its TVL dominance and AVS model are unmatched for builders. If you prioritize maximizing yield generation and accessing a unified, multi-source yield layer across multiple chains, choose Karak Network. Its integrated approach simplifies the yield optimization process for end-users and dApps.
tldr-summary
EigenLayer vs. Karak Network
TL;DR: Core Differentiators
Key strengths and trade-offs at a glance for cross-chain restaking leaders.
01
EigenLayer: Ethereum-Native Security
First-mover advantage: Largest TVL ($18B+) and established ecosystem. This matters for protocols seeking maximum economic security and deep integration with the Ethereum validator set. Native ETH Restaking: Uses Ethereum's consensus layer directly, appealing to purists and large stakers prioritizing Ethereum alignment.
02
EigenLayer: Mature AVS Ecosystem
Extensive network: 100+ Active Validation Services (AVSs) like EigenDA, Near, and Lagrange. This matters for developers who need a wide choice of infrastructure services (DA, oracles, coprocessors) with proven integrations and battle-tested tooling.
03
Karak Network: Multi-Asset & Multi-Chain
Asset-agnostic design: Supports restaking of ETH, stETH, wBTC, and other LSTs from day one. This matters for users and protocols with diversified portfolios who want to leverage non-ETH assets for yield and security. Cross-chain from inception: Built for a multi-chain world, not retrofitted.
04
Karak Network: Integrated Yield Layer
Built-in yield strategies: Combines restaking with DeFi yield aggregation (e.g., lending, LP positions). This matters for users seeking auto-compounded returns beyond base restaking rewards, simplifying the yield optimization process in a single protocol.
HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON
EigenLayer vs. Karak Network: Feature Comparison
Direct comparison of key metrics and features for cross-chain restaking protocols.
| Metric / Feature | EigenLayer | Karak Network |
|---|---|---|
Native Chain | Ethereum | EigenLayer + L2s (Arbitrum, Base, etc.) |
Total Value Secured (TVS) | $20B+ | $1B+ |
Supported Assets | stETH, rETH, cbETH, ETH | stETH, rETH, cbETH, ETH, LSTs, LRTs, Stablecoins |
Native Yield Layer | ||
Avg. Operator Commission | 5-20% | 0% (Protocol Fee: 10-20%) |
AVS Launch Timeline | Q2 2024 | Live (Mainnet Beta) |
Cross-Chain AVS Support |
pros-cons-a
PROS AND CONS ANALYSIS
EigenLayer vs. Karak Network: Cross-Chain Restaking & Yield
A data-driven comparison of the two leading cross-chain restaking protocols, highlighting key architectural and economic trade-offs for builders and stakers.
01
EigenLayer: First-Mover Liquidity & Ecosystem
Dominant TVL and integration: Over $20B in TVL and 200+ integrated AVSs (Actively Validated Services) like Espresso and Lagrange. This massive economic security pool is attractive for new protocols seeking robust cryptoeconomic guarantees.
$20B+
Total Value Locked
200+
Integrated AVSs
02
EigenLayer: Mature Developer Tooling
Established SDK and documentation: Well-documented EigenLayer SDK and middleware like EigenDA (data availability) provide a proven path for developers building on Ethereum L1 and L2s. This reduces integration risk and time-to-market.
03
Karak Network: Multi-Asset & Multi-Chain Design
Broader asset support: Natively accepts restaked ETH, stablecoins (USDC, USDT), and LSTs from Ethereum, Arbitrum, and Base. This creates deeper, more composable liquidity pools from day one, appealing to DeFi-native users and protocols.
ETH + Stablecoins
Supported Assets
Ethereum L1 & L2s
Native Chain Support
04
Karak Network: Unified Yield & Gas Abstraction
Integrated yield aggregation and fee payment: Karak's "Restaked Yield" automatically compounds rewards. Its gas abstraction allows users to pay fees in the network's native token or restaked assets, significantly improving UX for non-ETH holders.
05
EigenLayer: Centralization & Withdrawal Risks
Potential for operator centralization: A small set of node operators commands a majority of restaked ETH. 7-day withdrawal queue for native restaking introduces liquidity lock-up and slashing risk during exit, a key consideration for institutional capital.
06
Karak Network: Newer Ecosystem & Proven Security
Smaller, growing AVS ecosystem: While expanding, it lacks the depth of integrated services compared to EigenLayer. As a newer protocol, its cryptoeconomic security model and slashing mechanisms are less battle-tested at massive scale.
pros-cons-b
EigenLayer vs. Karak Network
Karak Network: Pros and Cons
Key strengths and trade-offs for cross-chain restaking and yield generation at a glance.
01
EigenLayer: First-Mover Advantage
Established ecosystem: Over $15B in TVL and integration with major protocols like EigenDA, Lagrange, and Espresso. This matters for projects seeking proven security and a deep pool of restaked ETH for their AVSs (Actively Validated Services).
02
EigenLayer: Ethereum-Centric Security
Deep integration with Ethereum: Leverages Ethereum's validator set and slashing mechanisms directly. This matters for builders who prioritize maximum security guarantees and want to inherit Ethereum's trust assumptions without introducing new trust layers.
03
EigenLayer: Complex Operator Selection
Manual delegation overhead: Restakers must actively research and delegate to individual node operators, creating a management burden and centralization risk around top operators. This matters for users who want a passive, set-and-forget yield strategy.
04
Karak Network: Multi-Asset Restaking
Beyond ETH-native assets: Supports restaking of assets like stETH, weETH, and soon BTC and SOL via LayerZero OFT. This matters for maximizing capital efficiency across a diversified portfolio and attracting liquidity from non-Ethereum ecosystems.
05
Karak Network: Unified Restaking Pool
Simplified user experience: Employs a pooled security model where restakers deposit into a single vault, and the network algorithmically allocates to operators. This matters for users seeking automated, hands-off exposure to the best yields across supported chains and services.
06
Karak Network: Newer Ecosystem
Smaller scale and adoption: With ~$1B TVL, its network of integrated services (like Hyperlane, Wormhole, and Caldera) is less battle-tested than EigenLayer's. This matters for projects that require immediate, large-scale economic security and a mature developer toolkit.
CHOOSE YOUR PRIORITY
Decision Framework: When to Choose Which
EigenLayer for AVS Builders
Verdict: The established standard for security and capital. Strengths: Largest restaked capital pool (~$18B TVL), attracting top-tier AVSs like EigenDA, Eoracle, and Near. The EigenLayer marketplace provides deep, battle-tested security from Ethereum stakers. Its slashing mechanisms are rigorously defined, offering high security guarantees for critical infrastructure. Considerations: Onboarding is permissioned and competitive. The ecosystem is Ethereum-centric, with cross-chain functionality primarily via bridging solutions.
Karak Network for AVS Builders
Verdict: The flexible, multi-chain alternative for broader asset support. Strengths: Native multi-chain design allows AVSs to source security from assets on Ethereum, Arbitrum, Polygon, and Base natively. Karak's Gasp metric measures economic security across chains. It supports liquid restaking tokens (LRTs) like Kelp DAO's rsETH and Renzo's ezETH out-of-the-box, simplifying integration. Considerations: Younger ecosystem with a smaller total secured value (~$1B TVL). Its generalized slashing framework is less proven than EigenLayer's.
verdict
THE ANALYSIS
Final Verdict and Strategic Recommendation
Choosing between EigenLayer and Karak Network hinges on your protocol's core need for security primitives versus cross-chain yield optimization.
EigenLayer excels at creating a robust, Ethereum-centric security marketplace for new protocols (AVSs) by leveraging the established trust of its massive restaked ETH base, which exceeds $15B in TVL. Its primary strength is providing cryptoeconomic security for infrastructure like oracles (e.g., eoracle) and data availability layers, making it the de facto standard for bootstrapping trust on Ethereum.
Karak Network takes a different approach by prioritizing multi-chain yield aggregation and composability from day one. It supports restaking of assets from Ethereum L2s (like Arbitrum, Optimism) and other chains, enabling novel yield strategies. This results in a trade-off: broader asset support and yield opportunities versus a less battle-tested security model compared to EigenLayer's singular Ethereum focus.
The key trade-off: If your priority is maximizing cryptoeconomic security for a critical Ethereum-native protocol and you value the network effects of the largest restaking pool, choose EigenLayer. If you prioritize accessing diversified, cross-chain yield for your treasury or building yield-bearing products that span multiple ecosystems, choose Karak Network.
ENQUIRY
Get In Touch
today.
Our experts will offer a free quote and a 30min call to discuss your project.
NDA Protected
Confidentiality24h Response
Time to ValueDirectly to Engineering Team
No Sales Fluff10+
Protocols Shipped
$20M+
TVL Overall