Celestia excels at providing ultra-low-cost, high-throughput data availability by specializing solely as a data availability (DA) layer. Its modular architecture, using Data Availability Sampling (DAS), allows it to scale blob capacity independently of execution, offering a cost of ~$0.20 per MB as of Q1 2024. This makes it a powerful, pluggable component for chains prioritizing minimal transaction costs and maximum scalability from day one.
LABS
Comparisons
Celestia vs Rollup-native DA (OP Stack): Modular DA Integration vs. Default OP Stack Design
A technical analysis for CTOs and protocol architects building on the OP Stack, comparing the cost, security, and sovereignty trade-offs of integrating a modular DA layer like Celestia versus using the default, Ethereum-aligned data availability.
Chainscore © 2026
introduction
THE ANALYSIS
Introduction: The Core Architectural Decision for OP Stack Chains
Choosing between Celestia's modular DA and the OP Stack's default design is a foundational choice between specialization and integration.
The default OP Stack design takes an integrated approach by leveraging Ethereum for DA and consensus via the BatchInbox contract. This results in stronger inherited security and seamless compatibility with the broader Superchain ecosystem, but at the trade-off of higher, more volatile data costs tied directly to Ethereum L1 gas prices, which can exceed $1.00 per MB during network congestion.
The key trade-off: If your priority is minimizing operational costs and achieving maximum data throughput for a high-volume application, choose Celestia. If you prioritize maximizing security guarantees and ecosystem interoperability within the Optimism Collective, the default OP Stack design is the decisive choice.
tldr-summary
Celestia vs. OP Stack DA
TL;DR: Key Differentiators at a Glance
A direct comparison of modular data availability versus the default, integrated design. Choose based on your rollup's need for sovereignty, cost, and ecosystem alignment.
MODULAR DA VS. INTEGRATED DA
Feature Comparison: Celestia vs. OP Stack Native DA
Direct comparison of Data Availability (DA) solutions for Optimism-based rollups.
| Metric / Feature | Celestia (Modular DA) | OP Stack Native DA (Cannon) |
|---|---|---|
Data Cost per MB (Est.) | $0.50 - $1.50 | $100 - $300 |
DA Throughput (MB/s) |
| ~ 0.2 MB/s (Ethereum-bound) |
Settlement & DA Coupling | ||
Multi-Chain DA Provision | ||
Fraud Proof Data Window | ~ 21 days | ~ 7 days |
Ethereum L1 Gas Dependency | ||
Blobspace Utilization | Dedicated Celestia Blobs | Ethereum EIP-4844 Blobs |
pros-cons-a
MODULAR DA INTEGRATION VS. DEFAULT DESIGN
Celestia vs. Rollup-native DA for OP Stack
Key strengths and trade-offs for CTOs evaluating data availability layers for their OP Stack chain.
01
Celestia: Cost Efficiency
Specific advantage: Sub-cent transaction costs for DA. Celestia's modular design and data availability sampling enable ~$0.003 per MB, significantly undercutting Ethereum L1 blob costs. This matters for high-throughput applications like gaming or social feeds where data posting is the primary expense.
~$0.003/MB
DA Cost (Est.)
02
Celestia: Throughput & Scalability
Specific advantage: Dedicated DA bandwidth. Celestia provides a separate, scalable data layer, decoupling rollup throughput from Ethereum's congestion. It supports blobs up to 8 MB per block, enabling higher TPS for chains like Base or Zora. This matters for mass-market dApps requiring consistent, low-latency finality.
03
Rollup-native DA: Security & Simplicity
Specific advantage: Inherits Ethereum's full security. Using Ethereum blobs (EIP-4844) means DA guarantees are backed by the same validator set securing ~$500B+ in assets. This matters for high-value DeFi protocols (e.g., Aave, Uniswap V4) where the cost of a data withholding attack outweighs marginal fee savings.
$500B+
Securing Assets
04
Rollup-native DA: Ecosystem Cohesion
Specific advantage: Native tooling and liquidity integration. Staying within the Ethereum ecosystem ensures seamless compatibility with indexers (The Graph), bridges (Across), and wallets. This matters for teams prioritizing developer experience and avoiding the operational overhead of managing cross-domain security assumptions.
pros-cons-b
Modular DA Integration vs. Default OP Stack Design
OP Stack Native DA: Pros and Cons of the Default Path
A data-driven comparison of using Celestia for modular data availability versus the default, integrated Ethereum L1 DA layer in the OP Stack.
MODULAR DA VS. DEFAULT STACK
Celestia vs. OP Stack: Data Availability Cost & Economics
Direct comparison of data availability costs, scalability, and operational overhead for rollup builders.
| Metric / Feature | Celestia (Modular DA) | OP Stack (Default Design) |
|---|---|---|
Avg. Cost per MB of DA | < $0.10 | $100+ (via Ethereum calldata) |
DA Throughput (MB/sec) |
| ~0.3 MB/sec (Ethereum limit) |
DA Cost Scaling | Independent of Ethereum gas | Directly tied to Ethereum L1 gas |
Settlement & DA Coupling | ||
Native DA Integration | External plug-in (e.g., RaaS) | Built-in (via Ethereum) |
Proposer/Sequencer Cost | Reduced by > 99% vs. L1 | High, driven by L1 posting costs |
Time to Data Availability | ~2-5 seconds | ~12 seconds (Ethereum block time) |
CHOOSE YOUR PRIORITY
Decision Framework: When to Choose Which Architecture
Celestia for Cost & Scale
Verdict: The definitive choice for maximizing throughput and minimizing data availability (DA) costs. Strengths: Celestia's modular DA layer is purpose-built for scale, offering blobspace priced purely by bytes, not computation. This creates a predictable, low-cost baseline for high-throughput rollups like dYdX and Manta Pacific. Its data availability sampling (DAS) allows the network to scale securely with more light nodes, decoupling security from validator count. Trade-off: You inherit the operational overhead of integrating a separate DA layer and managing the associated bridging or fraud proof mechanisms.
OP Stack (Default) for Cost & Scale
Verdict: A simpler, integrated solution with moderate scaling, but higher long-term costs at scale. Strengths: The default Canonical Data Availability (DA) on Ethereum L1 provides maximum security and simplicity. For early-stage rollups or those with lower data volumes, this 'batteries-included' approach reduces initial complexity. Projects like Base and Zora benefit from the unified security model. Trade-off: Ethereum blob costs are volatile and scale with mainnet demand, making long-term cost predictability challenging for data-heavy applications like social or high-frequency gaming.
verdict
THE ANALYSIS
Final Verdict and Strategic Recommendation
Choosing between Celestia's modular DA and the OP Stack's default design is a foundational architectural decision with long-term implications for cost, sovereignty, and ecosystem alignment.
Celestia excels at providing a high-throughput, cost-optimized data availability layer for sovereign rollups. By decoupling execution from consensus and data availability, it offers rollups like Arbitrum Orbit and Polygon CDK a dedicated, scalable DA solution. This results in significantly lower data posting costs—often under $0.001 per transaction—and the freedom to choose any execution environment (EVM, SVM, Move). The trade-off is increased initial integration complexity and managing a separate security and data availability provider.
The OP Stack's default design takes a different approach by bundling DA with the Superchain's shared security and interoperability framework. Using Ethereum (or a dedicated Data Availability Committee in Plasma mode) as the DA layer prioritizes immediate ecosystem cohesion, native access to Optimism's governance and tooling, and a streamlined developer experience. This results in a trade-off: potentially higher, more volatile DA costs tied to Ethereum L1 gas prices, but with the benefit of a turnkey, battle-tested path to deployment within a major L2 ecosystem.
The key trade-off is sovereignty versus integration. If your priority is minimizing long-term operational costs, maintaining maximum chain sovereignty, or building a non-EVM chain, Celestia is the superior choice. If you prioritize rapid deployment within the Optimism Superchain, leveraging existing OP Stack tooling like the Superchain Faucet and Chainlist, and aligning with a specific, high-growth L2 ecosystem, the default OP Stack design is the strategic path. Your choice defines your chain's economic model and its foundational alliances.
ENQUIRY
Get In Touch
today.
Our experts will offer a free quote and a 30min call to discuss your project.
NDA Protected
Confidentiality24h Response
Time to ValueDirectly to Engineering Team
No Sales Fluff10+
Protocols Shipped
$20M+
TVL Overall