Validium excels at achieving high throughput and low transaction costs by keeping all data off-chain. For example, StarkEx-based solutions like Immutable X and dYdX leverage Validium to achieve over 9,000 TPS for NFT minting and perpetual swaps, with fees often a fraction of a cent. This is achieved by posting only cryptographic validity proofs (ZK-STARKs) to the L1, while data availability is managed by a committee of trusted operators.
LABS
Comparisons
Validium Privacy vs Volition Privacy
A technical analysis comparing Validium and Volition privacy architectures for ZK-rollups, focusing on the critical trade-off between data availability, security, and scalability for CTOs and protocol architects.
Chainscore © 2026
introduction
THE ANALYSIS
Introduction: The Core Data Availability Dilemma
The choice between Validium and Volition privacy models hinges on a fundamental trade-off between cost-efficiency and security guarantees.
Volition takes a different approach by giving users granular, per-transaction control over data placement. A user can choose to post data to the L1 for Ethereum-level security or to a Data Availability Committee (DAC) for lower cost. This hybrid model, pioneered by StarkWare and implemented by protocols like zkSync, results in a critical trade-off: it provides a flexible security spectrum but introduces complexity for both users and developers in managing these choices.
The key trade-off: If your priority is maximum scalability and minimal cost for applications like high-frequency gaming or order-book DEXs, choose Validium. If you prioritize user sovereignty and customizable security, especially for high-value DeFi operations where some transactions may require L1-grade guarantees, choose Volition.
tldr-summary
VALIDIUM VS VOLITION
TL;DR: Key Differentiators at a Glance
A data-availability-first comparison of privacy scaling architectures. The core trade-off is between cost/performance and flexible security.
01
Validium: Superior Performance & Cost
Off-chain data availability: Transaction data is stored by a Data Availability Committee (DAC) or using a network like Celestia. This enables ~9,000 TPS and ~$0.01 fees, as no data is posted to L1. Ideal for high-frequency DeFi (e.g., dYdX v3) and gaming applications where cost is paramount.
~9,000 TPS
Throughput
~$0.01
Avg. Fee
02
Validium: Key Security Trade-off
Potential for data withholding: If the DAC acts maliciously or goes offline, users cannot reconstruct state and funds can be frozen. This introduces a trust assumption. Projects like Immutable X mitigate this with a robust, decentralized DAC. Choose this only if the application's threat model accepts this trade-off for scalability.
03
Volition: User-Controlled Security
Per-transaction data choice: Users or dApps select on-chain (zkRollup) or off-chain (Validium) data availability for each asset/transaction. StarkEx-powered apps (e.g., Sorare, rhino.fi) offer this. This provides flexible sovereignty, allowing stablecoins to use the secure L1 while game assets use the cheaper off-chain mode.
04
Volition: The Flexibility Cost
Higher complexity and variable cost: While offering optimal security, the hybrid model requires more complex client logic and wallet support. Fees are variable based on the chosen data mode. This architecture is best for applications like NFT marketplaces or institutional finance where users demand granular control over their asset security.
Variable
Fee Model
HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON
Validium vs Volition: Privacy Comparison
Direct comparison of key privacy and security trade-offs for data availability solutions.
| Metric / Feature | Validium | Volition |
|---|---|---|
Data Availability Layer | Off-Chain (DAC/Committee) | User-Selectable (On-Chain or Off-Chain) |
Censorship Resistance | ||
Withdrawal Security Guarantee | Committee-Based | Ethereum Consensus |
Typical Transaction Cost | $0.05 - $0.20 | $0.10 - $1.50 |
Data Privacy | ||
Requires Trusted Committee | ||
Primary Use Case | High-Throughput Private Apps | Flexible Security for Assets |
pros-cons-a
ARCHITECTURE COMPARISON
Validium vs Volition: Privacy Trade-offs
Validium and Volition are StarkEx-based scaling solutions offering different data availability (DA) and privacy models. The core trade-off is between cost, scalability, and security.
01
Validium: Superior Scalability & Cost
Off-chain data availability: Transaction data is stored by a Data Availability Committee (DAC), not on-chain. This enables ~9,000 TPS on dYdX and reduces gas fees by ~95% vs L1. Ideal for high-frequency, low-value transactions in DeFi (e.g., perpetuals, spot trading).
~9,000 TPS
Peak Throughput
~95%
Gas Savings
02
Validium: Trusted Data Committee Risk
Security dependency: Relies on a DAC (e.g., StarkWare's 8-member committee) to keep data available. If the committee censors or fails, funds can be frozen—a trust assumption not present with on-chain DA. This is a critical consideration for protocols managing large, non-custodial TVL.
03
Volition: Flexible Data Security
Per-transaction DA choice: Users/apps choose for each asset whether data goes on-chain (zkRollup mode for security) or off-chain (Validium mode for cost). This hybrid model is perfect for applications like Immutable X's NFTs, where high-value assets use rollup security while trading uses Validium speed.
Dual-Mode
DA Choice
04
Volition: Higher Cost for Maximum Security
On-chain data has a cost: Opting for zkRollup mode posts call data to Ethereum L1, incurring higher gas fees than pure Validium. This creates a user-experience complexity where fees vary per action. Best for protocols where users value self-custodial security for select high-value operations.
pros-cons-b
Validium vs. Volition Privacy
Volition: Pros and Cons
Key architectural strengths and trade-offs for data availability at a glance. Choose based on your application's security requirements and cost sensitivity.
01
Validium: Cost Efficiency
Lower transaction fees: By keeping data off-chain (e.g., using a Data Availability Committee or DAC), Validiums avoid L1 gas costs for data storage. This matters for high-throughput DeFi applications like dYdX or ImmutableX, where micro-transactions require sub-cent fees.
02
Validium: Throughput Maximization
Higher theoretical TPS: Removing data from the chain eliminates the L1 data bottleneck. Networks like StarkEx with Validium can achieve 9,000+ TPS. This is critical for mass-market gaming and NFT minting events where speed and volume are paramount.
03
Validium: Security Trade-off
Data availability risk: Users rely on the off-chain data committee's honesty. If the DAC withholds data, funds can be frozen. This is a calculated risk for non-custodial exchanges where operators are incentivized to remain honest, but unsuitable for high-value, long-term storage.
04
Volition: User Sovereignty
Per-transaction data choice: Users or applications can choose Data Availability on-chain (zkRollup mode) or off-chain (Validium mode). This flexibility matters for institutional DeFi where a large transfer can use secure on-chain DA, while smaller trades use the cheaper Validium path.
05
Volition: Enhanced Security for Critical Assets
Mitigates withdrawal risks: By allowing vital assets (e.g., governance tokens, large stablecoin positions) to opt for on-chain DA, Volition eliminates the data withholding risk for those specific transactions. This is essential for protocol treasuries and institutional custody solutions building on zkSync Era.
06
Volition: Implementation Complexity
Higher integration overhead: Developers must manage two data availability states and their associated user experiences. Wallets and explorers need to display different security models. This complexity is a barrier for simple dApps but a worthy trade-off for sophisticated platforms like Aztec Protocol offering privacy choices.
CHOOSE YOUR PRIORITY
Decision Framework: When to Choose Which
Validium for DeFi\nVerdict: High-risk, niche use.\nStrengths: Transaction details (amounts, participants) are kept private on-chain, which can be critical for institutional OTC desks or preventing front-running in large trades. Projects like Aztec Connect demonstrated this for private DeFi access.\nTrade-offs: Data availability (DA) is off-chain, requiring a committee. This introduces sequencer censorship risk and potential fund loss if the committee fails, making it unsuitable for high-value, permissionless pools.\n### Volition for DeFi\nVerdict: The pragmatic standard for most applications.\nStrengths: Users or applications can choose per-transaction whether data is posted to Ethereum (for high-value settlements) or kept off-chain (for cheap, private actions). This flexibility is ideal for hybrid DEXs or lending protocols where some actions (e.g., a whale's liquidation) need maximum security. zkSync Era and StarkNet support this model.\nTrade-offs: Slightly higher complexity for users managing DA choices.
verdict
THE ANALYSIS
Final Verdict and Strategic Recommendation
Choosing between Validium and Volition for privacy boils down to a strategic trade-off between cost-efficiency and data availability guarantees.
Validium excels at high-throughput, low-cost private transactions by moving data off-chain to a Data Availability Committee (DAC). For example, protocols like Immutable X leverage this model to achieve over 9,000 TPS for NFT minting and trading with sub-cent fees, making it ideal for high-volume gaming and DeFi applications. However, this speed comes with a critical trade-off: users must trust the DAC to not withhold data, creating a potential censorship or liveness risk.
Volition takes a hybrid approach by allowing users to choose, per transaction, whether data is posted on-chain (as a zkRollup) or off-chain (as a Validium). This is the model pioneered by zkSync Era and StarkEx. This results in unparalleled flexibility and user sovereignty, but introduces complexity. A user securing a high-value asset can opt for the ironclad security of Ethereum's L1 data availability, while routine swaps can use the cheaper off-chain mode.
The key trade-off is control versus cost and scale. If your priority is maximum security and censorship-resistance for all users, such as for a decentralized exchange handling institutional volumes, choose a Volition-based stack. If you prioritize ultra-low fees and maximum scalability for a mass-market application like a free-to-play game, and can architect around the DAC trust assumption, Validium is the superior choice. For most enterprises, a platform offering Volition provides the strategic optionality to cater to both use cases within a single deployment.
ENQUIRY
Get In Touch
today.
Our experts will offer a free quote and a 30min call to discuss your project.
NDA Protected
Confidentiality24h Response
Time to ValueDirectly to Engineering Team
No Sales Fluff10+
Protocols Shipped
$20M+
TVL Overall