Free 30-min Web3 Consultation
Book Consultation
Smart Contract Security Audits
View Audit Services
Custom DeFi Protocol Development
Explore DeFi
Full-Stack Web3 dApp Development
View App Services
Free 30-min Web3 Consultation
Book Consultation
Smart Contract Security Audits
View Audit Services
Custom DeFi Protocol Development
Explore DeFi
Full-Stack Web3 dApp Development
View App Services
Free 30-min Web3 Consultation
Book Consultation
Smart Contract Security Audits
View Audit Services
Custom DeFi Protocol Development
Explore DeFi
Full-Stack Web3 dApp Development
View App Services
Free 30-min Web3 Consultation
Book Consultation
Smart Contract Security Audits
View Audit Services
Custom DeFi Protocol Development
Explore DeFi
Full-Stack Web3 dApp Development
View App Services
LABS
Comparisons

Secret Network vs Oasis Network: TEE-Based Privacy vs Confidential ParaTimes

A technical analysis comparing two leading TEE-based privacy platforms. We evaluate Secret Network's monolithic private smart contract chain against Oasis Network's modular architecture with confidential ParaTimes, focusing on architecture, performance, security, and ideal use cases for CTOs and protocol architects.
Chainscore © 2026
introduction
THE ANALYSIS

Introduction: The TEE Privacy Landscape

A technical breakdown of two leading architectures for programmable privacy on blockchain: Secret Network's integrated TEE layer versus Oasis Network's modular Confidential ParaTimes.

Secret Network excels at providing a unified, privacy-first execution environment by building its entire Layer 1 around Trusted Execution Environments (TEEs). This deep integration ensures that privacy is the default state for smart contracts (called "secret contracts"), with data encrypted during computation. For example, its mainnet has processed over 50 million private transactions, demonstrating proven, on-chain private computation at scale with fees typically under $0.01.

Oasis Network takes a different approach by separating consensus and execution into the Consensus Layer and ParaTime Layers. This modular architecture allows developers to choose a specialized Confidential ParaTime (like Cipher) for TEE-based privacy or a different ParaTime for other needs (e.g., EVM-compatibility with the Sapphire ParaTime). This results in a trade-off: greater flexibility and potential for higher throughput (Sapphire can handle ~1,000 TPS) but a more complex deployment model where privacy is an opt-in, para-time-specific feature rather than a network-wide guarantee.

The key trade-off: If your priority is a sovereign, dedicated chain where privacy is the non-negotiable, foundational property for all applications—such as private DeFi or confidential NFTs—choose Secret Network. If you prioritize architectural flexibility, the ability to leverage both private and public computation in a single ecosystem, or require specific EVM compatibility from day one, choose Oasis Network and its Confidential ParaTimes.

tldr-summary
Secret Network vs Oasis Network

TL;DR: Core Differentiators

Key strengths and trade-offs at a glance. Secret focuses on a unified, programmable privacy layer, while Oasis offers modular confidentiality via its ParaTime architecture.

01

Secret Network: Programmable Privacy

Unified Confidential Smart Contracts: All contracts (Secret Contracts) run inside Trusted Execution Environments (TEEs) by default, encrypting inputs, outputs, and state. This matters for building DeFi applications like private AMMs (e.g., SiennaSwap) or NFTs with hidden metadata, where privacy is a non-negotiable, core feature.

~0.5 sec
Block Time
02

Secret Network: Strong Privacy Guarantee

End-to-End Encryption: Data is encrypted before entering the TEE and only decrypted inside the secure enclave. This provides a robust model against network-level surveillance, crucial for enterprise data co-processing and sensitive supply chain applications where data sovereignty is paramount.

03

Oasis Network: Modular Confidentiality

Flexible ParaTime Architecture: Privacy is opt-in and compartmentalized. Developers can choose a confidential ParaTime (like Cipher) for privacy-sensitive logic or a standard EVM-compatible ParaTime for public execution. This matters for hybrid applications that need both public and private components, reducing overhead and gas costs for non-sensitive operations.

1000+
TPS (Sapphire ParaTime)
04

Oasis Network: EVM Compatibility & Scale

Confidential EVM (Sapphire ParaTime): Offers full EVM bytecode compatibility inside TEEs, allowing developers to port Solidity dApps with minimal changes and add privacy features. This matters for Ethereum-native teams seeking a privacy upgrade path and for applications requiring high throughput for confidential transactions.

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON

Secret Network vs Oasis Network: Feature Comparison

Direct comparison of TEE-based privacy and confidential compute platforms.

Metric / FeatureSecret NetworkOasis Network

Core Privacy Model

Default Encrypted State (TEEs)

Configurable Confidential ParaTimes

Consensus & Execution Layer

Cosmos SDK, Single Chain

Separate Consensus & ParaTime Layers

Smart Contract Language

Rust (Secret Contracts)

Multiple (e.g., Rust, Solidity)

Cross-Chain Privacy (IBC)

EVM Compatibility (Privacy)

Average Block Time

~6 seconds

~6 seconds (Consensus)

Developer Activity (30-day GitHub commits)

~150

~90

pros-cons-a
Secret Network vs Oasis Network

Secret Network: Pros and Cons

A data-driven comparison of two leading privacy-focused Layer 1 blockchains, highlighting their architectural trade-offs and ideal use cases.

02

Secret Network: Cons

TEE reliance and centralization risk: The network's security is tied to hardware manufacturers (Intel SGX). A widespread TEE vulnerability could compromise privacy, creating a single point of failure.

Higher computational overhead: Running computations inside secure enclaves is more resource-intensive than plain execution, which can lead to higher gas costs and slightly slower transaction finality compared to non-private chains.

04

Oasis Network: Cons

Privacy is opt-in, not default: Confidentiality is a feature of specific ParaTimes, not the base layer. This can fragment liquidity and developer mindshare, as the ecosystem isn't uniformly private by design.

Younger confidential dApp ecosystem: While growing, the number of mature, high-TVL applications built specifically on its confidential Cipher ParaTime lags behind Secret's more established privacy-first ecosystem.

pros-cons-b
Secret Network vs Oasis Network

Oasis Network: Pros and Cons

Key architectural and use-case differentiators between two leading TEE-based privacy platforms.

01

Oasis: Superior Scalability & Flexibility

Confidential ParaTimes architecture: Decouples consensus from execution, enabling parallel processing. This matters for enterprise applications requiring high throughput (e.g., Nebula Genomics' genomic data marketplace) without congesting the main chain. Supports multiple VM environments like EVM and Rust.

1000+ TPS
Per ParaTime
02

Oasis: Broader Privacy Model

Flexible confidentiality: Developers choose what data is private (full-state, inputs, outputs). This matters for hybrid DeFi where only sensitive computations (e.g., credit scoring in the MetaMirror lending protocol) need protection, allowing public liquidity pools and audits for other components.

03

Secret: Stronger Privacy Guarantees

Default privacy-by-design: All smart contract state and inputs are encrypted by default via trusted execution environments (TEEs). This matters for pure privacy applications like SecretSwap (AMM) or Sienna Network where every transaction's details are concealed from nodes and users.

100%
Encrypted State
04

Secret: Mature DeFi & NFT Ecosystem

Established privacy-first dApps: A more developed ecosystem for confidential finance, including lending (Shade Protocol), synthetic assets (SiennaSwap), and private NFTs. This matters for developers seeking immediate composability with existing privacy-preserving money legos and a dedicated user base.

$50M+
Peak TVL
CHOOSE YOUR PRIORITY

When to Choose: A Decision Framework

Secret Network for DeFi

Verdict: Choose for privacy-first, non-custodial financial products. Strengths: Secret Contracts enable private state and inputs, critical for decentralized dark pools (e.g., SiennaSwap), shielded lending (e.g., Shade Protocol), and MEV-resistant DEXs. Native SNIP-20 token standard provides confidential transfers. Ideal for institutions requiring on-chain compliance without exposing sensitive data. Weaknesses: Lower TVL (~$30M) and fewer integrated oracles compared to public chains. TEE reliance adds a unique trust assumption.

Oasis Network for DeFi

Verdict: Choose for scalable, confidential computation with EVM compatibility. Strengths: Confidential EVM (CEM) ParaTime allows developers to fork and privatize existing Solidity dApps with minimal changes. Higher throughput (up to 1,000 TPS) and lower gas fees than Secret. Strong for private automated market makers and RWA tokenization where computation, not just state, must be confidential. Weaknesses: Privacy is opt-in per ParaTime; the main consensus layer is public. Less mature DeFi ecosystem than public L1s.

PRIVACY COMPARISON

Technical Deep Dive: TEE Implementation & Security

Secret Network and Oasis Network both leverage Trusted Execution Environments (TEEs) for privacy, but their architectural philosophies and security models differ significantly. This section breaks down the key technical distinctions for architects and engineers.

Secret Network uses TEEs more extensively at its core. Its entire mainnet consensus layer and all smart contracts ("secret contracts") run inside TEEs, providing default data privacy for all computations. Oasis Network uses a modular approach, with TEEs primarily confined to its optional, specialized Confidential ParaTimes like Cipher, while its consensus layer (the Sapphire ParaTime) is not TEE-based. This makes Secret's privacy more universal, while Oasis offers flexibility.

verdict
THE ANALYSIS

Final Verdict and Recommendation

Choosing between Secret Network and Oasis Network hinges on your application's specific privacy and architectural requirements.

Secret Network excels at providing default, programmable privacy for smart contracts because its entire mainnet is built on Trusted Execution Environments (TEEs). This creates a uniform, secure enclave for all dApps, enabling private computations on encrypted data. For example, its flagship privacy DeFi protocol, Shade Protocol, leverages this to offer private swaps and lending with over $10M in historical TVL, demonstrating a proven use case for its architecture.

Oasis Network takes a different approach by separating consensus and execution into the Consensus Layer and ParaTimes. This modular design allows for diverse, purpose-built confidential ParaTimes (like the Cipher ParaTime) that can be optimized for specific use cases, such as confidential AI or enterprise data co-processing. This results in a trade-off: greater flexibility and potential specialization at the cost of a more fragmented developer experience compared to Secret's unified environment.

The key trade-off: If your priority is a battle-tested, monolithic chain for privacy-first DeFi and NFTs where every contract is private by default, choose Secret Network. Its integrated TEE model and established ecosystem with tools like Secret.js and the SNIP-20 token standard provide a streamlined path. If you prioritize architectural flexibility, data tokenization (e.g., via the Oasis Privacy Layer), or need to build a custom confidential runtime for a niche vertical like confidential AI, choose Oasis Network. Its parachain-like structure and higher theoretical throughput (up to 1,000 TPS per ParaTime vs. Secret's ~20 TPS mainnet) cater to scalable, specialized applications.

ENQUIRY

Get In Touch
today.

Our experts will offer a free quote and a 30min call to discuss your project.

NDA Protected
24h Response
Directly to Engineering Team
10+
Protocols Shipped
$20M+
TVL Overall
NDA Protected Directly to Engineering Team