Railgun excels at providing privacy for existing smart contract assets by leveraging zero-knowledge proofs within the base layer. It functions as a privacy layer on top of Ethereum, Polygon, and BNB Chain, allowing users to shield and transact with native assets like ETH, USDC, and NFTs without leaving their home chain. This approach preserves the security and composability of the underlying L1/L2. For example, Railgun's TVL often exceeds $30M across supported chains, demonstrating adoption for private DeFi interactions directly on major networks.
LABS
Comparisons
Railgun vs Incognito: Smart Contract Privacy vs Sidechain Privacy
A technical comparison of two leading privacy architectures: Railgun's smart contract-based shielded pools for Ethereum DeFi versus Incognito's dedicated privacy sidechain and cross-chain ecosystem.
Chainscore © 2026
introduction
THE ANALYSIS
Introduction: Two Philosophies of On-Chain Privacy
Railgun and Incognito represent two fundamentally different architectural approaches to solving the blockchain privacy problem.
Incognito takes a different approach by implementing privacy at the chain level through a dedicated, interoperable sidechain. It acts as a privacy hub where assets from chains like Bitcoin and Ethereum are wrapped (e.g., pBTC, pETH) and transacted within a shielded environment using its own consensus mechanism. This results in a trade-off: higher theoretical throughput and lower fees within its own ecosystem, but it introduces bridge risk and fragmentation from the original asset's native chain, relying on its own validator set for security.
The key trade-off: If your priority is maximizing the security and composability of assets on Ethereum or other major L1s, choose Railgun. Its non-custodial, smart-contract-based system keeps value within the established security perimeter. If you prioritize lower transaction costs and higher throughput for private transactions across multiple asset types, and can accept the trust assumptions of a bridging system, choose Incognito.
tldr-summary
Railgun vs Incognito
TL;DR: Core Differentiators at a Glance
A high-level comparison of two leading privacy solutions, highlighting their architectural approaches and ideal use cases.
01
Railgun: Smart Contract Privacy
Architecture: Zero-knowledge proofs on the base layer (Ethereum, BSC, Polygon). Key Advantage: Uses existing L1 security and composability. This matters for DeFi power users who need private interactions with protocols like Uniswap, Aave, or Curve without moving assets.
02
Railgun: Key Strength
Universal Composability: Private balances can interact with any public smart contract. Specific Fact: Enables private governance voting, lending, and trading. This is critical for institutional DeFi where transaction history must be obscured but access to the broadest liquidity is required.
03
Railgun: Trade-off
L1 Constrained: Privacy transactions inherit the base chain's speed and cost. On Ethereum, this means higher fees and slower finality than a dedicated sidechain. Choose this if ultimate L1 security is worth the gas cost premium for your use case.
04
Incognito: Sidechain Privacy
Architecture: A separate, privacy-focused blockchain connected via bridges. Key Advantage: Independent consensus (Proof-of-Stake) enables high throughput and low fees. This matters for high-frequency private transactions or applications needing predictable, low-cost privacy.
05
Incognito: Key Strength
Dedicated Privacy Chain: Full-stack privacy for assets (pETH, pBTC) and dApps. Specific Fact: Native privacy DEX and lending. Ideal for building entire privacy-first applications that require complete data isolation not possible on transparent L1s.
06
Incognito: Trade-off
Bridge & Liquidity Risk: Assets must be custodied to the sidechain, introducing bridge security assumptions and fragmenting liquidity from major DeFi ecosystems. Choose this if application-specific privacy and performance outweigh the need for direct L1 composability.
HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON
Railgun vs Incognito: Smart Contract Privacy vs Sidechain Privacy
Direct comparison of privacy architecture, performance, and ecosystem integration.
| Metric | Railgun (Smart Contract Privacy) | Incognito (Sidechain Privacy) |
|---|---|---|
Core Privacy Architecture | zk-SNARKs on host chain (Ethereum, BSC, etc.) | Privacy-focused sidechain with sharding |
Requires Bridge for Assets | ||
Avg. Transaction Cost (Ethereum) | $5 - $15 | $0.01 - $0.10 |
Time to Finality (Ethereum) | ~15 minutes | < 40 seconds |
Supports Smart Contract Privacy | ||
Native Token Required for Fees | ETH, BNB, etc. (host chain gas) | PRV |
Total Value Locked (TVL) | $30M+ | $10M+ |
pros-cons-a
ARCHITECTURE COMPARISON
Railgun vs Incognito: Smart Contract Privacy vs Sidechain Privacy
Key strengths and trade-offs for two distinct approaches to on-chain privacy.
01
Railgun: Smart Contract Integration
Native Layer-1/Layer-2 Privacy: Uses zero-knowledge proofs (zk-SNARKs) via smart contracts on Ethereum, Polygon, BSC, and Arbitrum. This matters for DeFi composability, allowing private interactions with protocols like Uniswap, Aave, and Curve without bridging assets to a separate chain.
5+
Supported Chains
02
Railgun: Security & Custody
Non-Custodial & Auditable: Users retain control of private keys. The system's Relay infrastructure is permissionless and the cryptography has been audited by top firms. This matters for institutional and high-value users who cannot accept custodial risk or trust assumptions.
03
Incognito: Sidechain Throughput
High-Speed Private Chain: Operates as a standalone Proof-of-Stake blockchain with ~1000 TPS, bundling transactions for finality to Ethereum. This matters for high-frequency private transactions where base layer fees and confirmation times are a bottleneck.
~1000
TPS
04
Incognito: Asset & Chain Support
Broad Cross-Chain Privacy: Supports privacy for native BTC, ETH, BNB, and ERC-20/TRC-20/BEP-20 tokens via its pDEX. This matters for users seeking privacy across multiple ecosystems from a single wallet interface without relying on wrapped assets.
pros-cons-b
PROS AND CONS
Railgun vs Incognito: Smart Contract Privacy vs Sidechain Privacy
Key architectural strengths and trade-offs at a glance. Railgun uses zero-knowledge proofs on existing chains, while Incognito is a dedicated privacy sidechain.
01
Railgun: Smart Contract Composability
Direct integration with DeFi: Uses zk-SNARKs to create private notes on Ethereum, Polygon, and BSC. This allows for private interactions with existing protocols like Uniswap, Aave, and Curve without migrating assets to a new chain. Ideal for users who need privacy within the established DeFi ecosystem.
02
Railgun: Stronger Security Assumptions
Leverages base layer security: Privacy is enforced via audited smart contracts on Ethereum L1 and other major EVM chains. Security inherits from the underlying chain's consensus (e.g., Ethereum's ~$90B+ staked ETH). Lower trust assumption than a separate validator set. Critical for institutional-grade asset protection.
03
Railgun: Higher Cost & Latency
On-chain proof verification fees: Every private transfer or swap requires a zk-SNARK proof to be verified on-chain, incurring L1 gas costs. While Relayer networks can pay fees, costs scale with base layer congestion. Slower finality (Ethereum block time) compared to a sidechain. A trade-off for native composability.
04
Incognito: Native Privacy & Speed
Optimized for private transactions: A dedicated L1 sidechain using a modified UTXO model and zk-SNARKs. Achieves ~100 TPS with ~2-second block times, significantly faster than privacy actions on Ethereum mainnet. Built for high-throughput, low-fee private transfers as its primary function.
05
Incognito: Cross-Chain Privacy Bridge
Wrapped asset model: Users deposit BTC, ETH, BNB, etc., to mint private p-assets (pBTC, pETH) on the Incognito chain. This provides privacy for non-native assets across chains via a decentralized bridge. A key differentiator for users wanting to privatize holdings from multiple ecosystems.
06
Incognito: Ecosystem Fragmentation
Limited DeFi composability: Assets and activity are siloed on the Incognito chain. While it has a DEX (pDEX) and lending, it lacks the depth and liquidity of Ethereum's DeFi. Requires users to move funds out of the main DeFi ecosystem, creating a trade-off between privacy and utility.
CHOOSE YOUR PRIORITY
When to Choose Railgun vs Incognito
Railgun for DeFi
Verdict: The native, composable choice for private on-chain activity. Strengths: Uses zero-knowledge proofs (zk-SNARKs) to enable private interactions with existing DeFi protocols like Uniswap, Aave, and Lido directly on Ethereum, Polygon, and BNB Chain. Your assets remain in the mainnet's security environment. The RAILGUN SDK allows developers to integrate privacy into their dApps. Ideal for private trading, lending, and staking without migrating assets. Trade-offs: Requires paying mainnet gas fees for proof generation and verification. Shielded interactions have a higher gas overhead than public ones.
Incognito for DeFi
Verdict: A high-throughput, low-cost sidechain for private asset transfers and swaps. Strengths: Operates as a privacy-focused sidechain using its own consensus (Proof-of-Stake). Offers extremely low fees and fast transactions for sending and swapping shielded assets (pBTC, pETH, pBNB). Good for users prioritizing cost and speed for basic private transfers and cross-chain swaps via its built-in DEX. Trade-offs: Assets are custodied on the Incognito chain, introducing sidechain security assumptions. Limited direct composability with major Ethereum DeFi blue-chips.
RAILGUN VS INCOGNITO: HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON
Cost and Economic Analysis
Direct comparison of privacy architecture, costs, and economic security.
| Metric | Railgun | Incognito |
|---|---|---|
Privacy Architecture | Smart Contract Privacy (ZK-SNARKs) | Sidechain Privacy (Sharding + ZK) |
Avg. Transaction Fee (ETH Mainnet) | $5 - $50 (Gas + Relayer) | $0.001 - $0.01 (Sidechain Gas) |
Native Asset Support | Any ERC-20, ERC-721, ERC-1155 | Wrapped Assets (pETH, pBTC, pDAI) |
Requires New Token | ||
Trusted Setup Required | ||
Economic Security Source | Ethereum Mainnet | Incognito Validator Staking (PoS) |
Developer Integration | SDK for dApps | Custom Sidechain dApp Build |
verdict
THE ANALYSIS
Final Verdict and Decision Framework
A data-driven breakdown to guide CTOs and architects in choosing between smart contract-based and sidechain-based privacy solutions.
Railgun excels at providing privacy for existing DeFi and dApp interactions on major L1/L2 chains like Ethereum, Arbitrum, and Polygon. Its smart contract-based system uses zero-knowledge proofs (zk-SNARKs) to shield transaction details, allowing users to interact with protocols like Uniswap or Aave privately without migrating assets. This results in strong composability and leverages the security of the underlying chain, but incurs the associated gas fees. For example, a private swap on Ethereum mainnet requires paying ETH for the proof verification and contract execution.
Incognito takes a different approach by operating as a dedicated privacy sidechain. Users deposit assets to mint privacy tokens (pETH, pBTC) that move within a faster, lower-fee environment using its own consensus. This strategy results in a trade-off: superior transaction throughput and near-zero fees for private transfers, but it creates a separate liquidity pool and limits direct interaction with external DeFi smart contracts. Its ecosystem is more self-contained.
The key architectural trade-off is between native composability and optimized performance. Railgun's TVL, often in the tens of millions, reflects its use for private DeFi on established chains. Incognito's model, with its own DEX and lending apps, offers a streamlined experience for private peer-to-peer transactions and internal dApp use. Your priority dictates the choice.
Consider Railgun if your priority is enabling private interactions with the broad, existing DeFi ecosystem (e.g., private yield farming on Curve) and you accept the gas cost trade-off for Ethereum-level security. It's the tool for adding privacy to current workflows.
Choose Incognito when your priority is high-volume, low-cost private transfers of assets (especially BTC, ETH) and operations within a dedicated privacy-first environment. It's suitable for applications where cost and speed for private movements are paramount over direct external composability.
ENQUIRY
Get In Touch
today.
Our experts will offer a free quote and a 30min call to discuss your project.
NDA Protected
Confidentiality24h Response
Time to ValueDirectly to Engineering Team
No Sales Fluff10+
Protocols Shipped
$20M+
TVL Overall