Panther Protocol excels at cross-chain privacy because it uses zk-SNARKs to mint privacy-enhanced assets (zAssets) from deposits on multiple chains like Ethereum and Polygon. For example, its modular design allows protocols to integrate privacy as a service, enabling private liquidity across a fragmented ecosystem. This approach prioritizes interoperability and composability with existing DeFi giants such as Aave and Uniswap, but introduces a reliance on its native token, ZKP, for shielding and governance.
LABS
Comparisons
Panther vs Penumbra: The Private AMM Technical Showdown
A data-driven comparison for CTOs and architects evaluating privacy-focused automated market makers. We analyze Panther Protocol's multi-asset shielded pool model on Ethereum against Penumbra's cross-chain shielded swap DEX, focusing on architectural trade-offs, performance, and ideal use cases.
Chainscore © 2026
introduction
THE ANALYSIS
Introduction: The Privacy-Preserving Liquidity Dilemma
A technical breakdown of Panther Protocol and Penumbra, two leading architectures for private DeFi, highlighting their core trade-offs for CTOs.
Penumbra takes a different approach by building a sovereign, application-specific Cosmos zone. This results in a fully shielded ecosystem where every action—from trading on its constant function market maker (CFMM) to staking—is private by default. Its architecture eliminates MEV and front-running for users, a critical advantage for institutional liquidity. The trade-off is a more isolated environment; while it leverages IBC for cross-chain transfers, its deep liquidity and advanced features like limit orders are contained within its own chain.
The key trade-off: If your priority is integrating privacy into a multi-chain strategy and leveraging existing TVL, choose Panther. If you prioritize maximum privacy guarantees, MEV resistance, and a unified shielded experience for a dedicated user base, choose Penumbra. The former extends privacy as a layer, the latter rebuilds the stack from first principles.
tldr-summary
Private AMMs: Panther vs Penumbra
TL;DR: Core Differentiators at a Glance
Key architectural and economic trade-offs for privacy-focused decentralized exchanges.
01
Panther's Strength: Cross-Chain Privacy Vaults
Multi-chain privacy pools: Uses zk-SNARKs to create shielded assets (zAssets) that can be bridged across Ethereum, Polygon, and other EVM chains via Axelar. This matters for DeFi portfolios seeking privacy across multiple ecosystems without being locked to one chain.
02
Panther's Trade-off: Relayer & Fee Model
Requires off-chain relayers for zero-knowproof generation, introducing a small trusted setup and potential fee market. This matters for protocol architects who prioritize pure cryptographic guarantees over operational simplicity.
03
Penumbra's Strength: Full-Stack Privacy DEX
Integrated shielded swap & stake: AMM, lending, and staking are natively private within the Cosmos-based chain using thresholded DKG and FMD. This matters for traders and validators who need privacy for all actions, not just token transfers.
04
Penumbra's Trade-off: Isolated Cosmos Ecosystem
Native to IBC: Privacy is optimized for the Cosmos ecosystem, requiring IBC transfers for cross-chain assets. This matters for teams building on Ethereum or Solana who need direct, native privacy integration with those L1s.
PRIVATE AMM COMPARISON
Head-to-Head Feature Matrix
Direct comparison of key metrics and features for private AMM protocols.
| Metric | Panther Protocol | Penumbra |
|---|---|---|
Privacy Model | Multi-Asset Shielded Pool (zk-SNARKs) | Full-Stack Privacy (zk-SNARKs) |
AMM Integration | External DEX Aggregation | Native Private AMM |
Supported Assets | Cross-chain (EVM & Cosmos via Axelar) | Cosmos IBC-native |
Transaction Cost | ~$5-15 (Ethereum L1 gas) | < $0.01 (estimated) |
Consensus / Settlement | Ethereum (Settlement Layer) | Cosmos (App-Specific Chain) |
Cross-Chain Privacy | ||
Private LP Positions | ||
Mainnet Status | Live (Phase 1) | Testnet |
PANTHER VS PENUMBRA
Performance & Cost Benchmarks
Direct comparison of key privacy-focused AMM metrics and features.
| Metric | Panther | Penumbra |
|---|---|---|
Privacy Model | Shielded Pools (zk-SNARKs) | Full-Stack Privacy (zk-SNARKs) |
Consensus / Execution Layer | Ethereum L1 | Cosmos IBC (App-Specific Chain) |
Avg. Swap Cost (Est.) | $10 - $50 | < $0.01 |
Cross-Chain Privacy | ||
Native AMM Integration | ||
Mainnet Status | Live (Ethereum) | Testnet |
TVL (Privacy Pools) | $1M+ | N/A (Testnet) |
pros-cons-a
Private AMMs: Panther vs Penumbra
Panther Protocol: Pros and Cons
Key architectural and economic trade-offs for privacy-focused automated market makers.
01
Panther Protocol: Cross-Chain Privacy
Multi-chain privacy pools: Panther deploys zkSNARK-based shielded pools across Ethereum, Polygon, and other EVM chains. This matters for protocols needing privacy for existing assets without migrating to a new chain. However, it introduces bridge risk and higher gas costs for cross-chain operations.
02
Panther Protocol: Compliance Integration
Selective disclosure framework: Users can generate zero-knowledge proofs for AML/CFT compliance (zKYC) to regulated entities. This matters for institutions and protocols operating in regulated jurisdictions. The trade-off is added complexity and potential centralization points in the attestation process.
03
Penumbra: Full-Stack Privacy
Application-layer obfuscation: Every action (swap, stake, LP) is a private, one-time-use transaction using the zkSwap and zkLend circuits. This matters for users demanding maximal privacy with no linkability between activities. The trade-off is ecosystem isolation on the Cosmos-based Penumbra chain.
04
Penumbra: Capital Efficiency
Multi-asset shielded pool: A single liquidity pool can facilitate swaps between any asset pair, reducing fragmentation and impermanent loss for LPs. This matters for maximizing yield on private capital. The system requires validators to run trusted hardware (SGX) for performance, a potential attack vector.
pros-cons-b
Private AMMs: Panther vs Penumbra
Penumbra: Pros and Cons
Key architectural and market-positioning trade-offs for CTOs evaluating privacy-centric DeFi infrastructure.
01
Penumbra: Native Privacy
Full-stack shielded execution: Every transaction (swap, stake, governance) is private by default using zk-SNARKs. This matters for protocols requiring complete transaction confidentiality without relying on external mixers or bridges.
02
Penumbra: Capital Efficiency
Single-asset staking with liquidity: Users can stake $PEN while simultaneously providing liquidity in shielded pools. This eliminates the opportunity cost common in systems like Cosmos, where staked assets are illiquid.
03
Panther: Multi-Chain Privacy
Cross-chain privacy layer: Deploys zk-commitments as vaults on Ethereum, Polygon, and others via Axelar. This matters for established protocols seeking to add privacy to existing assets without migrating chains.
04
Panther: Compliance Tooling
ZK-compliance proofs: Offers selective disclosure for regulatory reporting (e.g., to Tornado Cash's blackbox model). This is critical for institutions that must balance privacy with auditability requirements.
05
Penumbra: Trade-off (Ecosystem Maturity)
New mainnet: Launched Q4 2023. While technically advanced, it lacks the integrated dApp ecosystem and TVL (>$2B) of established chains. Higher integration cost for early adopters.
06
Panther: Trade-off (Architectural Overhead)
Bridge-dependent privacy: Relies on cross-chain bridges for asset movement, introducing smart contract risk and latency. Contrasts with Penumbra's unified, chain-native shielded state.
CHOOSE YOUR PRIORITY
Decision Framework: When to Choose Which
Panther for DeFi
Verdict: The choice for privacy-first, cross-chain DeFi composability. Strengths: Panther's zkSNARK-based shielded pools are designed for interoperability. You can deposit assets from Ethereum, Polygon, or Arbitrum into a single private pool. Its zkShield architecture allows for private, cross-chain liquidity provisioning and yield farming. For builders, this means integrating a privacy layer that works across your multi-chain deployment without fragmenting TVL. Considerations: The system relies on its native ZKP relayer network, adding a layer of complexity versus a single-chain solution. Protocol fees include a shield fee for privacy services.
Penumbra for DeFi
Verdict: The choice for a fully private, integrated DeFi experience on a dedicated chain. Strengths: Penumbra is not an add-on; it's a sovereign Cosmos SDK chain where every action is private by default. Its compact block design and batch ZK proofs enable high-throughput private swaps, staking, and lending natively. The Penumbra AMM uses a novel Multi-Asset Shielded Pool for completely hidden liquidity positions and trading strategies. Considerations: It's a separate chain, so composability with existing Ethereum or Solana DeFi requires bridging. Its tooling (CosmWasm) is different from the EVM/SVM ecosystems.
verdict
THE ANALYSIS
Final Verdict and Strategic Recommendation
A data-driven breakdown to guide CTOs and architects in selecting the optimal private AMM for their specific protocol needs.
Panther Protocol excels at providing privacy for existing DeFi assets through its zk-SNARK-based shielded pools and cross-chain interoperability. Its core strength is enabling privacy for assets like ETH, USDC, and DAI on networks such as Polygon and NEAR via its multi-asset shielded pool (MASP) and zkShield technology. For example, its architecture is designed to integrate with major DEXs and lending protocols, making it a strategic choice for projects that need to add privacy as a layer to an established, multi-chain ecosystem without rebuilding liquidity from scratch.
Penumbra takes a fundamentally different approach by building a full-stack, application-specific blockchain (appchain) for private DeFi. This results in a more holistic and integrated privacy model where every interaction—trading, staking, governance—is shielded by default using its novel proof system. The trade-off is a narrower, Cosmos-focused scope, but it delivers superior privacy guarantees and eliminates the need for trusted setup, as seen in its implementation of the Penumbralisp smart contract environment and its native shielded pool AMM.
The key trade-off: If your priority is integrating privacy into a broad, existing multi-chain portfolio and you value interoperability with Ethereum Virtual Machine (EVM) ecosystems, choose Panther. If you prioritize maximum privacy and capital efficiency within a dedicated, Cosmos-based chain and are building a new application from the ground up, choose Penumbra. Panther offers a pragmatic path for enhancement, while Penumbra offers a purist's rebuild for the future of private finance.
ENQUIRY
Get In Touch
today.
Our experts will offer a free quote and a 30min call to discuss your project.
NDA Protected
Confidentiality24h Response
Time to ValueDirectly to Engineering Team
No Sales Fluff10+
Protocols Shipped
$20M+
TVL Overall