Monero (XMR) excels at providing strong, default, and mandatory privacy for all transactions because it is a purpose-built Layer 1. Its core protocol uses ring signatures, stealth addresses, and Ring Confidential Transactions (RingCT) to obfuscate sender, receiver, and amount on-chain. This results in a robust, battle-tested privacy set with a market cap consistently over $2.5B, demonstrating long-term security and community trust. Its privacy is not an add-on; it's the chain's fundamental property.
LABS
Comparisons
Monero (Native Privacy L1) vs. Arbitrum + Privacy Rollup
A technical comparison between a dedicated privacy-first blockchain and a modular approach adding privacy to a high-throughput optimistic rollup. Analyzes anonymity sets, programmability, regulatory risk, and infrastructure trade-offs for engineering leaders.
Chainscore © 2026
introduction
THE ANALYSIS
Introduction: The Privacy Paradigm Split
A foundational comparison between a dedicated privacy-first blockchain and a modular approach using a general-purpose L2 with specialized privacy infrastructure.
Arbitrum + a Privacy Rollup takes a modular approach by separating execution (Arbitrum Nitro) from privacy (e.g., Aztec, Penumbra). This leverages Arbitrum's high throughput (~40,000 TPS theoretical) and low fees while enabling developers to integrate privacy only where needed. The trade-off is that privacy becomes opt-in and application-specific, relying on the security and continued development of both the L2 stack and the chosen privacy protocol's cryptographic circuits (e.g., zk-SNARKs).
The key trade-off: If your priority is unbreakable, uniform privacy as a non-negotiable core feature and you are building a privacy-native application like a decentralized exchange or wallet, choose Monero. If you prioritize developer flexibility, Ethereum ecosystem composability (ERC-20 tokens, DeFi protocols), and the ability to selectively enable privacy for specific functions within a high-performance environment, choose the Arbitrum + Privacy Rollup stack.
tldr-summary
Monero vs. Arbitrum + Privacy Rollup
TL;DR: Core Differentiators
Key strengths and trade-offs at a glance. Monero offers native, mandatory privacy, while Arbitrum provides optional privacy with superior scalability and composability.
01
Monero: Unbreakable Privacy Core
Mandatory, native privacy via Ring Signatures, Confidential Transactions (RingCT), and stealth addresses. Every transaction is private by default, providing strong fungibility and resistance to chain analysis. This matters for high-value, censorship-resistant transfers where privacy is non-negotiable.
100%
Private TXs
02
Monero: Sovereign Security
Independent Proof-of-Work (RandomX) secures a dedicated L1, decoupled from Ethereum's consensus. This eliminates reliance on another chain's security or liveness. This matters for applications requiring maximum survivability and resistance to regulatory pressure on a single chain.
~2.5 GW
Network Hashrate
03
Arbitrum + Privacy: Scalability & Composability
Leverages Ethereum's security while offering ~40k TPS and sub-$0.01 fees via optimistic rollups. Privacy becomes an optional feature (e.g., using Aztec, zk.money) that can interact with public DeFi protocols like Uniswap and Aave. This matters for privacy-enhanced DeFi, gaming, and social apps needing low-cost, high-throughput smart contracts.
$18B+
TVL
< $0.01
Avg. Fee
04
Arbitrum + Privacy: Developer Ecosystem
Full EVM/Solidity compatibility allows developers to use familiar tools (Hardhat, Foundry) and deploy existing dApps with privacy modules. Access to a vast ecosystem of oracles (Chainlink), indexers (The Graph), and wallets. This matters for teams prioritizing rapid development, integration, and user accessibility over building on a niche VM.
500+
DApps
NATIVE PRIVACY L1 VS. L2 PRIVACY STACK
Feature Matrix: Monero vs. Arbitrum + Privacy Rollup
Direct comparison of privacy, performance, and ecosystem metrics for two distinct architectural approaches.
| Metric | Monero (Native L1) | Arbitrum + Privacy Rollup (e.g., Aztec) |
|---|---|---|
Privacy Model | Mandatory, protocol-level (RingCT, Bulletproofs) | Optional, application-level (ZK-SNARKs, ZK-Rollup) |
Throughput (TPS) | ~20-40 | ~200-500 (Arbitrum) + Rollup overhead |
Avg. Transaction Cost | $0.10 - $0.50 | $0.10 - $0.80 (L2 fee + ZK proof cost) |
Time to Finality | ~30 minutes (20-block unlock) | ~1-5 minutes (Arbitrum) + Rollup challenge period |
Smart Contract Privacy | ||
EVM Compatibility | ||
Total Value Locked (TVL) | $2.5B+ (Network Valuation) | $18B+ (Arbitrum) + Rollup-specific TVL |
pros-cons-a
NATIVE PRIVACY L1 VS. L2 HYBRID
Monero (XMR) vs. Arbitrum + Privacy Rollup
Comparing a purpose-built private chain against an EVM-compatible L2 augmented with privacy tech. Key trade-offs in privacy guarantees, developer ecosystem, and scalability.
01
Monero: Unmatched Privacy Guarantees
Built-in privacy by default: Every transaction uses Ring Signatures, Stealth Addresses, and Confidential Transactions (RingCT). This provides strong, mandatory fungibility and obfuscation of sender, receiver, and amount. This matters for applications requiring the highest privacy assurance, like uncensorable value transfer.
02
Monero: Proven Security & Decentralization
Battle-tested L1 with 2,000+ daily active nodes. Its Proof-of-Work consensus (RandomX) is ASIC-resistant, promoting mining decentralization. With a $2.5B+ market cap and nearly a decade of operation, it offers a high-security, sovereign base layer for privacy. This matters for long-term asset storage where chain sovereignty is critical.
03
Arbitrum + Privacy: EVM Composability
Leverage the entire Ethereum ecosystem. Use standard tooling (Hardhat, Foundry), wallets (MetaMask), and assets (WETH, USDC) while adding privacy via Aztec, zk.money, or Railgun. This matters for teams building DeFi dApps that need privacy features but can't sacrifice liquidity or developer familiarity.
04
Arbitrum + Privacy: Scalability & Lower Costs
~4,500 TPS and sub-$0.10 transaction fees on Arbitrum Nova, versus Monero's ~20 TPS. Privacy rollups batch proofs, making private transactions significantly cheaper than on L1. This matters for high-frequency private interactions (e.g., private gaming, micro-payments) where cost and speed are paramount.
05
Monero: Limited Smart Contract Capability
No EVM/Solidity support. Smart contracts are limited to simple, non-Turing-complete scripts. This severely restricts complex DeFi, NFTs, or dApp development. Building requires learning Monero's unique stack, with a much smaller developer pool than Ethereum's.
06
Arbitrum + Privacy: Trust & Setup Complexity
Privacy depends on additional trust assumptions. Rollups like Aztec require trusting a prover network and watching for data availability issues. It's a modular, complex stack (L1 Ethereum + L2 Arbitrum + Privacy App/rollup) versus Monero's unified design. This matters for purists who want minimal trust outside the base protocol.
pros-cons-b
ARCHITECTURE TRADE-OFFS
Arbitrum + Privacy Layer: Pros and Cons
Comparing a purpose-built private L1 (Monero) against a modular approach (Arbitrum + privacy rollup) for confidential transactions and smart contracts.
01
Monero: Unmatched Privacy Guarantees
Native privacy by design: Uses ring signatures, confidential transactions (RingCT), and stealth addresses by default on the base layer. This provides strong, protocol-level anonymity sets without relying on external validity proofs. This matters for use cases requiring unlinkable, untraceable payments and maximal resistance to chain analysis.
~$2.5B
Market Cap (Privacy L1 Leader)
02
Monero: Limited Smart Contract Capability
Trade-off for purity: The focus on base-layer privacy comes at the cost of a non-Turing-complete scripting language. Complex DeFi, NFTs, or dApps are not natively supported. This matters if your use case extends beyond private payments into programmable finance or confidential DAOs.
03
Arbitrum + Privacy Rollup: EVM Composability
Leverage existing ecosystem: Build with Solidity/Vyper and integrate seamlessly with protocols like Uniswap, Aave, and Lido via Arbitrum's L2. A privacy rollup (e.g., Aztec, Obscuro) adds confidential state. This matters for teams needing private DeFi, confidential governance, or private NFTs without abandoning Ethereum tooling.
$18B+
Arbitrum TVL (DeFi Liquidity)
04
Arbitrum + Privacy Rollup: Trust & Complexity
Added trust assumptions: Privacy depends on the rollup's validity proofs and honest operators. Users must trust the rollup's cryptography (e.g., zk-SNARKs) and its upgrade mechanisms. This matters for threat models where minimizing trusted components is critical, as it introduces more attack surfaces than a monolithic L1.
CHOOSE YOUR PRIORITY
Decision Framework: Use Case Scenarios
Monero (Native Privacy L1) for DeFi
Verdict: Not viable. Monero's privacy-first design fundamentally conflicts with DeFi's composability and transparency requirements. Key Limitations:
- No Smart Contracts: Monero does not support Turing-complete smart contracts, preventing the deployment of AMMs, lending pools, or yield aggregators.
- Opaque State: Shielded transactions and confidential assets make on-chain data analysis, oracle price feeds, and risk assessment impossible.
- Ecosystem Gap: No established bridges (like Axelar, Wormhole) or privacy-preserving DeFi standards (like Aztec's zk.money).
Arbitrum + Privacy Rollup for DeFi
Verdict: The pragmatic choice for integrating privacy into existing DeFi ecosystems. Key Strengths:
- Full EVM Compatibility: Deploy standard Solidity/Vyper contracts from Uniswap, Aave, or Compound, then layer privacy via specialized rollups.
- Selective Transparency: Use privacy rollups like Aztec or zkBob to shield specific transactions (e.g., OTC trades, salary payments) while maintaining public liquidity pools.
- Proven Infrastructure: Leverage Arbitrum's ~40k TPS, sub-$0.10 fees, and established bridges. Privacy becomes a modular feature, not a chain-wide constraint.
MONERO VS. ARBITRUM + PRIVACY ROLLUP
Technical Deep Dive: Anonymity Sets and Cryptographic Trust
Comparing the foundational privacy guarantees of a native private blockchain against a modular approach using zero-knowledge proofs on an L2. This analysis focuses on the size of anonymity sets, the cryptographic trust model, and the resulting security assumptions for users.
Monero provides a consistently larger and more robust anonymity set by default. Every standard Monero transaction (RingCT) mixes your transaction with at least 15 others from the entire blockchain history, creating a dynamic, global anonymity pool. A privacy rollup's set is limited to users of that specific application or rollup instance within a given time window, which can be much smaller and more susceptible to statistical analysis, especially during low-activity periods.
verdict
THE ANALYSIS
Final Verdict and Strategic Recommendation
Choosing between a dedicated privacy chain and a modular privacy solution hinges on your application's core requirements for security, flexibility, and ecosystem integration.
Monero excels at providing a default, bulletproof privacy guarantee for all transactions because its privacy is a native, protocol-level feature. This results in a robust, battle-tested network with a strong security-first ethos, as evidenced by its sustained ~$2.5B market cap and resistance to chain analysis over nearly a decade. Its privacy model—using ring signatures, stealth addresses, and confidential transactions—is mandatory and uniform, eliminating user error and ensuring fungibility.
Arbitrum + Privacy Rollup takes a different approach by decoupling execution from privacy, leveraging Arbitrum's high-throughput, low-cost L2 environment (sub-$0.10 average transaction fees, ~40k TPS capacity) and integrating a specialized privacy layer like Aztec or Penumbra. This results in a powerful trade-off: you gain access to the vast Ethereum DeFi ecosystem and EVM tooling but must trust the cryptographic assumptions and operational security of the specific privacy rollup you choose, which may be a newer, less audited codebase.
The key trade-off: If your priority is maximum, non-negotiable privacy and asset fungibility for a standalone application (e.g., a private store of value or shielded payments), choose Monero. If you prioritize developer flexibility, EVM compatibility, and the ability to interact with public DeFi protocols while opting into privacy features, the Arbitrum + Privacy Rollup stack is the strategic choice. For CTOs, the decision maps directly to whether privacy is the product's core axiom or a feature within a broader Web3 application.
ENQUIRY
Get In Touch
today.
Our experts will offer a free quote and a 30min call to discuss your project.
NDA Protected
Confidentiality24h Response
Time to ValueDirectly to Engineering Team
No Sales Fluff10+
Protocols Shipped
$20M+
TVL Overall