Secret Network excels at providing default data privacy for smart contracts through its Trusted Execution Environment (TEE)-based secret contracts. This architecture encrypts all contract state and inputs, making data visible only to the executing node. For example, its flagship privacy-preserving DeFi application, Shade Protocol (SHD), leverages this to enable private swaps and lending. This model prioritizes user and application-level confidentiality above all, creating a strong foundation for use cases like private voting, confidential auctions, and sensitive data marketplaces.
LABS
Comparisons
Regulatory Compliance: Secret Network vs Oasis Network: Privacy-Focused L1s
A technical comparison of how Secret Network and Oasis Network approach data privacy, regulatory compliance, and confidential computation, analyzing trade-offs for dApp developers and enterprises.
Chainscore © 2026
introduction
THE ANALYSIS
Introduction: The Compliance Imperative for Privacy L1s
A technical comparison of how Secret Network and Oasis Network, two leading privacy-focused Layer 1 blockchains, architect their compliance posture for enterprise adoption.
Oasis Network takes a different approach by separating its consensus layer from a parallelized execution layer (ParaTimes), enabling flexible privacy models. Its key innovation, the Confidential ParaTime, also uses TEEs but is designed with regulatory compliance as a first-class feature through its Parcel SDK for data tokenization and governance. This results in a trade-off: while not enforcing privacy by default for all applications, it provides the tools for developers to build compliant, privacy-enabled solutions for sectors like decentralized identity (e.g., Nexus for KYC) and responsible data economies.
The key trade-off: If your priority is maximizing transactional and state privacy by default for a decentralized application, choose Secret Network. Its enforced encryption model is ideal for pure-DeFi primitives and censorship-resistant tools. If you prioritize building enterprise-grade applications that require granular data governance, auditability, and compliance hooks, choose Oasis Network. Its modular architecture is better suited for regulated industries like healthcare, finance, and digital identity seeking to leverage blockchain without sacrificing regulatory obligations.
tldr-summary
Regulatory Compliance: Secret Network vs Oasis Network
TL;DR: Core Differentiators
Key strengths and trade-offs for privacy-focused L1s in regulated environments.
01
Secret Network: Regulator-Friendly Privacy
Default data privacy with selective disclosure: Uses Trusted Execution Environments (TEEs) to encrypt all smart contract state and inputs. This enables auditable privacy where users can grant view keys to regulators or auditors, a key feature for compliant DeFi (e.g., Shade Protocol) and data marketplaces.
02
Secret Network: Mature Compliance Tooling
Built-in compliance primitives: Features like viewing keys and permissioned data access are protocol-level. This reduces integration complexity for projects needing AML/KYC workflows or reporting, as seen in enterprise pilots with the Secret NFT standard for private media rights.
03
Oasis Network: Flexible Privacy Tiers
Modular architecture for compliance: Separates consensus (Consensus Layer) from execution (ParaTime Layer). Developers can choose confidential ParaTimes (using TEEs) or standard, transparent ones. This allows projects like MetaMirror to mix public and private data flows, tailoring compliance per jurisdiction.
04
Oasis Network: Enterprise & Data Governance Focus
Strong alignment with data sovereignty laws: Backed by the Oasis Foundation with a focus on responsible data economy use cases. Its architecture is designed for scenarios requiring granular data governance (e.g., Nebula Genomics for private genomic analysis), appealing to enterprises navigating GDPR or CCPA.
REGULATORY COMPLIANCE: SECRET NETWORK VS OASIS NETWORK
Head-to-Head: Compliance & Privacy Features
Direct comparison of privacy-preserving technologies, compliance tooling, and key architectural choices for regulated applications.
| Feature / Metric | Secret Network | Oasis Network |
|---|---|---|
Privacy Model | Default Encrypted State (Trusted Execution Enclaves) | Confidential ParaTimes (TEEs) & ZK Options |
Regulatory Compliance Tools | Viewing Keys, Permissioned Decryption | Confidential EVM, Data Tokenization |
Auditability & Selective Disclosure | ||
GDPR & CCPA Data Rights Support | ||
Primary Consensus | Tendermint BFT (Cosmos SDK) | Tendermint BFT (Cosmos SDK) |
Native Token | SCRT | ROSE |
Key Enterprise Partners | Shade Protocol, Altermail | Meta, BMW, Genetica |
pros-cons-a
Regulatory Compliance: Secret Network vs Oasis Network
Secret Network: Pros and Cons
Key strengths and trade-offs for privacy-focused L1s in regulated environments. Decision hinges on privacy model and compliance tooling.
01
Secret Network: Regulatory Advantage
Default data privacy with selective disclosure: All smart contract data is encrypted by default (via Intel SGX). This enables auditable privacy, where users or validators can provide viewing keys to regulators or auditors without exposing data publicly. This is critical for DeFi, healthcare, and enterprise applications requiring GDPR/HIPAA compliance.
SGX TEEs
Privacy Model
02
Secret Network: Development Trade-off
Complexity and centralization risk: Reliance on Trusted Execution Environments (TEEs) introduces hardware dependency and a smaller validator set (~50 active). This can be a regulatory red flag for institutions wary of centralized points of failure. Development requires learning Rust and the Secret Contracts framework, which has a steeper curve than Oasis's EVM-paratime.
03
Oasis Network: Flexibility Advantage
Modular architecture with confidential EVM: The Oasis Sapphire paratime provides a confidential EVM, allowing developers to port Solidity dApps and add privacy with minimal changes. This separation of consensus (Consensus Layer) and execution (Paratime Layer) lets you choose between confidential (Sapphire) or non-confidential (Emerald EVM) execution, offering more deployment flexibility for hybrid compliance strategies.
Sapphire
Confidential EVM
04
Oasis Network: Compliance Trade-off
Opt-in privacy vs. default encryption: Privacy is a feature, not the default. Applications must be explicitly built for the confidential Sapphire paratime. This can lead to data leakage if developers misconfigure settings. For strict regulatory needs requiring data minimization and privacy-by-design, Oasis's model places more burden on the application layer compared to Secret's chain-level default.
pros-cons-b
Regulatory Compliance: Secret Network vs Oasis Network
Oasis Network: Pros and Cons
Key strengths and trade-offs for privacy-focused L1s navigating compliance, at a glance.
01
Secret Network: Programmable Privacy
Default data encryption: All smart contract data is private by default via Trusted Execution Environments (TEEs). This matters for applications requiring confidential on-chain state, like private voting or sealed-bid auctions. Enables compliance by allowing selective data disclosure via viewing keys.
02
Secret Network: Compliance Tooling
Built-in compliance primitives: Native support for viewing keys and permissioned data access allows for auditability without breaking privacy. This matters for DeFi protocols and institutions that must prove solvency or transaction history to regulators, as seen with Shade Protocol and Sienna Network.
03
Oasis Network: Flexible Confidentiality
ParaTime architecture: Separates consensus from execution, allowing developers to choose between confidential (e.g., Cipher ParaTime with TEEs) or non-confidential execution layers. This matters for building hybrid applications where only sensitive components (like KYC data) need privacy, simplifying compliance scope.
04
Oasis Network: Data Tokenization & Control
Focus on data-as-an-asset: The Oasis Privacy Layer (OPL) and projects like Nexus enable users to control and monetize their data. This matters for regulatory frameworks like GDPR, providing a clear model for data sovereignty and consent-based sharing, which is a proactive compliance advantage.
CHOOSE YOUR PRIORITY
Decision Framework: When to Choose Which
Secret Network for DeFi & RWA
Verdict: Superior for confidential transactions and sensitive financial data. Strengths: Private smart contracts (Secret Contracts) with encrypted inputs, outputs, and state. This is critical for Real-World Assets (RWA), private auctions, and institutional DeFi where data like order books or loan collateral must remain confidential. Integrates with IBC for cross-chain privacy. Key Protocols: Shade Protocol (private swaps, lending), Sienna Network.
Oasis Network for DeFi & RWA
Verdict: Better for scalable, confidential computation on large datasets. Strengths: Paratime architecture separates consensus from execution, enabling high-throughput confidential DeFi. Its Confidential EVM (C-EVM) makes it easier for Ethereum developers to build private dApps. Strong focus on Data Tokenization and privacy-preserving AI/ML for RWAs. Key Protocols: YuzuSwap, ValleySwap, and enterprise-focused data marketplaces.
verdict
THE ANALYSIS
Final Verdict and Strategic Recommendation
Choosing between Secret Network and Oasis Network hinges on your application's specific privacy model and compliance requirements.
Secret Network excels at default, programmable data privacy because its consensus layer natively supports encrypted state via Trusted Execution Environments (TEEs). This allows for private smart contracts (secret contracts) where inputs, outputs, and state are encrypted by default, visible only to authorized parties. For example, its ecosystem supports private DeFi (e.g., Shade Protocol), private NFTs, and confidential voting, with a current mainnet TVL demonstrating active adoption in privacy-sensitive dApps.
Oasis Network takes a different approach by separating consensus and execution into the Consensus Layer and ParaTime Layer, enabling flexible privacy. Its key innovation is the Confidential ParaTime, which also uses TEEs, but the architecture allows for both confidential and non-confidential computation environments. This results in a trade-off: while it offers greater flexibility for hybrid applications, achieving default, contract-level privacy requires explicit development within a specific Confidential ParaTime, unlike Secret's blanket encryption model.
The key trade-off: If your priority is strong, by-default data confidentiality for financial or identity applications where privacy is non-negotiable, choose Secret Network. Its integrated model provides a more straightforward path for developers needing guaranteed encryption. If you prioritize architectural flexibility, scalability for enterprise data tokenization (e.g., with the Oasis Privacy Layer), or need to run both public and private computations in parallel, choose Oasis Network. Its paraTime structure is better suited for complex, modular applications where privacy is a selective feature.
ENQUIRY
Get In Touch
today.
Our experts will offer a free quote and a 30min call to discuss your project.
NDA Protected
Confidentiality24h Response
Time to ValueDirectly to Engineering Team
No Sales Fluff10+
Protocols Shipped
$20M+
TVL Overall