Manta Network excels at high-throughput, application-specific privacy by leveraging its modular Manta Pacific L2 ecosystem. It uses Celestia for data availability and Polygon's zkEVM for settlement, achieving low fees (often <$0.01) and high scalability for dApps like zkHoldem. This design prioritizes developer experience and composability within its own ecosystem, making it a strong choice for projects building new privacy-first applications from the ground up.
LABS
Comparisons
Manta Network's cross-chain privacy vs Zecrey's zk-rollup bridge
A technical comparison for CTOs and architects evaluating modular L2 shielded pools versus dedicated ZK-rollup bridges for private cross-chain asset transfers.
Chainscore © 2026
introduction
THE ANALYSIS
Introduction: The Battle for Cross-Chain Privacy
A technical breakdown of Manta Network's modular approach versus Zecrey's zk-rollup bridge for private cross-chain asset transfers.
Zecrey takes a different approach by focusing on a zk-rollup bridge that connects existing major chains like Ethereum and BNB Chain. Its strength lies in enabling private transfers of native assets (e.g., ETH, BNB) between these established ecosystems using zero-knowledge proofs, with a reported TPS of up to 5,000. This results in a trade-off: superior interoperability for existing assets but less focus on generalized smart contract privacy within a single L2 environment.
The key trade-off: If your priority is building a new, scalable dApp with built-in privacy logic and you value low-cost, high-speed execution, choose Manta Network. If you prioritize enabling private, cross-chain transfers of native assets between major chains like Ethereum and BSC for your users, choose Zecrey.
tldr-summary
Manta Network vs. Zecrey Protocol
TL;DR: Core Differentiators
A data-driven breakdown of two leading privacy infrastructure approaches. Manta focuses on cross-chain privacy for assets and applications, while Zecrey specializes in private cross-chain bridging via zk-rollups.
01
Manta's Strength: Universal Cross-Chain Privacy
Application-layer privacy for any asset: Manta Pacific's modular L2 uses Celestia for data availability and Polygon CDK for settlement, enabling private transactions for assets bridged from Ethereum, Arbitrum, and more via its zkSBT standard. This matters for protocols needing privacy-preserving DeFi (e.g., private swaps, lending) without being locked to a single chain.
$800M+
Peak TVL on Manta Pacific
02
Manta's Trade-off: Centralized Sequencing & Proving
Reliance on a single sequencer and prover: While offering low fees, the current architecture has centralization points for transaction ordering and proof generation. This matters for teams with strict decentralization requirements, as it introduces a potential liveness and censorship risk compared to decentralized rollup stacks like Arbitrum Nitro.
04
Zecrey's Trade-off: Application Ecosystem Limitation
Focus on asset privacy over smart contract privacy: The architecture is optimized for private transfers and swaps within its rollup, not for deploying arbitrary private dApps. This matters for developers looking to build complex private applications (e.g., a private AMM or options protocol), where Manta's EVM-compatible environment provides more flexibility.
HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON
Manta Network vs Zecrey: Cross-Chain Privacy Comparison
Direct comparison of cross-chain privacy solutions focusing on architecture, cost, and interoperability.
| Metric | Manta Network | Zecrey |
|---|---|---|
Core Architecture | ZK-rollup with Celestia DA | ZK-rollup with zkBridge |
Privacy Standard | zk-SNARKs (Universal Circuits) | zk-SNARKs (Account-based) |
Avg. Private Tx Cost | $0.10 - $0.30 | < $0.05 |
Supported Chains | Ethereum, Arbitrum, Base, BNB Chain | Ethereum, BNB Chain, Polygon |
Native Asset Support | ETH, USDC, USDT, MANTA | ETH, BNB, USDT, ZEC |
Developer SDK | ||
EVM Compatibility |
pros-cons-a
PROS AND CONS
Manta Network vs. Zecrey: Cross-Chain Privacy Showdown
A technical breakdown of two leading privacy architectures: Manta's universal privacy layer versus Zecrey's zk-rollup bridge. Key metrics and trade-offs for CTOs.
01
Manta Network: Universal Privacy Layer
Pro: Native Multi-Chain Privacy: Manta Pacific is an L2 on Ethereum, while Manta Atlantic is a ZK L1 on Polkadot. This dual-stack approach provides a universal privacy layer for assets from any chain via its NPO (Network of Privacy Origins). This matters for protocols needing to anonymize assets across a fragmented multi-chain ecosystem without being locked to a single bridge.
$800M+
Peak TVL (Manta Pacific)
EVM & WASM
Supported VMs
02
Manta Network: Developer Experience
Con: Higher Protocol Complexity: Building with Manta's zkSBTs and zkSharding requires deeper cryptographic integration compared to standard EVM development. While SDKs exist, the learning curve for implementing custom private logic is steeper. This matters for teams with tight deadlines or limited ZK expertise, as development and audit cycles will be longer and more costly.
03
Zecrey: ZK-Rollup Bridge Focus
Pro: Optimized for Asset Transfers: Zecrey's architecture is a zk-rollup bridge specifically designed for private, low-cost cross-chain asset transfers. It uses zk-SNARKs to prove ownership off-chain before settling on-chain, achieving sub-cent fees. This matters for applications where the primary use case is moving value privately between major chains like Ethereum and BNB Chain with maximal cost efficiency.
< $0.01
Avg. Transfer Fee
~5 sec
Withdrawal Time
04
Zecrey: Scope & Ecosystem
Con: Limited Smart Contract Privacy: Zecrey is primarily a privacy bridge, not a full-featured private smart contract platform. Its focus is on asset anonymity, not generalized private computation (e.g., private DeFi, anonymous DAO voting). This matters for protocols that require complex, stateful privacy beyond simple asset transfers, as they would need to build atop a more expressive layer like Manta or Aztec.
pros-cons-b
Manta Network vs Zecrey
Zecrey: Pros and Cons
Key architectural strengths and trade-offs for cross-chain privacy and bridging at a glance.
01
Manta Network: Modular Privacy
Universal Circuits: Leverages Celestia for data availability and Polygon CDK for settlement, enabling privacy for any EVM asset. This matters for protocols wanting to add privacy to existing tokens like USDC or WETH without wrapping.
02
Manta Network: Ecosystem Scale
High TVL & Integration: Over $1B in Total Value Locked (TVL) and deep integrations with major DeFi protocols like Aave and Curve. This matters for projects prioritizing liquidity depth and immediate composability within a large privacy-focused ecosystem.
03
Manta Network: Complexity & Cost
Higher Gas Fees: Privacy transactions on Manta Pacific incur L2 gas fees plus proving costs, which can be significant for frequent, small transfers. This matters for applications requiring high-frequency, low-value private transactions.
04
Zecrey: ZK-Rollup Bridge Efficiency
Low-Cost Asset Migration: Uses zk-rollup technology to batch transfers, offering lower per-transaction fees for moving assets between chains (e.g., Ethereum to Zecrey Legend). This matters for users and dApps regularly bridging assets who are sensitive to transaction costs.
05
Zecrey: Native Account Abstraction
Built-in AA Wallets: Every wallet is a smart contract, enabling gas sponsorship, batch operations, and social recovery natively. This matters for enterprises and applications needing customizable transaction flows and improved user onboarding.
06
Zecrey: Niche Ecosystem
Smaller Developer Footprint: Compared to Manta's $1B+ TVL, Zecrey has a smaller, more nascent ecosystem of integrated dApps. This matters for protocols that require a wide array of existing DeFi lego blocks and a large user base from day one.
CHOOSE YOUR PRIORITY
When to Choose Which: A Decision Framework
Manta Network for DeFi & DApps
Verdict: Superior for native privacy-enabled applications on a modular L2. Strengths: Manta Pacific is a full-stack L2 leveraging Celestia for data availability and Polygon CDK for ZK proofs, offering EVM-native privacy for assets and identities. Its Universal Circuits allow developers to integrate privacy into any Solidity smart contract with minimal changes. This is ideal for private voting, shielded DEX trades, and confidential lending pools. The ecosystem is mature, with significant TVL and integrations like Aave, LayerZero, and Circle's CCTP.
Zecrey for DeFi & DApps
Verdict: Best for cross-chain asset aggregation with account abstraction. Strengths: Zecrey's primary focus is its zk-rollup bridge and account abstraction wallet, enabling seamless, private cross-chain swaps and management. It's less about building a new L2 ecosystem and more about providing a privacy layer for assets scattered across chains like Ethereum, BNB Chain, and Polygon. Its Zecrey Legend wallet abstracts gas and simplifies multi-chain interactions, making it powerful for users managing portfolios across ecosystems, but less suited for deploying complex, privacy-first DeFi protocols from scratch.
verdict
THE ANALYSIS
Final Verdict and Recommendation
A data-driven breakdown to guide infrastructure decisions between two distinct privacy and interoperability architectures.
Manta Network excels at providing cross-chain privacy for established assets because it leverages Celestia for data availability and ZK proofs for privacy, creating a modular L2. For example, its Pacific mainnet has secured over $1.5B in Total Value Locked (TVL), demonstrating strong adoption for private swaps and transfers of assets bridged from Ethereum and other chains via its universal circuits.
Zecrey takes a different approach by building a zk-rollup bridge with native account abstraction and privacy. This results in a more integrated but chain-specific solution; its primary bridge connects to Ethereum, offering sub-$0.01 transaction fees within its rollup but requiring users to adopt its wallet standard for the full privacy experience, which can limit initial composability with external dApps.
The key trade-off: If your priority is maximizing privacy for a diverse, cross-chain asset portfolio and you value integration with ecosystems like Ethereum, Arbitrum, and BNB Chain, choose Manta Network. If you prioritize ultra-low-cost private transactions within a dedicated zk-rollup environment and are building a vertically integrated application from the ground up, choose Zecrey.
ENQUIRY
Get In Touch
today.
Our experts will offer a free quote and a 30min call to discuss your project.
NDA Protected
Confidentiality24h Response
Time to ValueDirectly to Engineering Team
No Sales Fluff10+
Protocols Shipped
$20M+
TVL Overall