Immutable X excels at providing a purpose-built, zero-gas environment for NFTs by leveraging StarkEx's zk-rollup technology. This results in instant trade confirmation and true gas-free minting and trading for users, a critical feature for mainstream gaming adoption. Its dedicated infrastructure supports a throughput of over 9,000 transactions per second (TPS) and has secured major partnerships like Illuvium and Gods Unchained, demonstrating its tailored fit for high-volume, NFT-centric economies.
LABS
Comparisons
Immutable X vs Arbitrum Nova for Gaming NFTs
A technical analysis comparing the dedicated NFT scaling solution Immutable X (ZK-Rollup) with the general-purpose, cost-optimized Arbitrum Nova (Optimistic Rollup) for deploying and operating gaming asset marketplaces.
Chainscore © 2026
introduction
THE ANALYSIS
Introduction: The Gaming NFT Infrastructure Dilemma
Choosing between Immutable X and Arbitrum Nova requires understanding a fundamental trade-off between native specialization and ecosystem composability.
Arbitrum Nova takes a different approach by being a general-purpose Optimium (AnyTrust) chain optimized for low-cost social and gaming applications. It achieves ultra-low fees—often a fraction of a cent—by posting data to a Data Availability Committee (DAC) instead of Ethereum mainnet. This results in a trade-off: while fees are exceptionally low and it benefits from deep Ethereum Virtual Machine (EVM) compatibility and the vast Arbitrum Nitro tooling ecosystem, its security model for data availability is less decentralized than a pure rollup like Immutable X.
The key trade-off: If your priority is maximizing NFT performance and user experience with gas-free interactions and a proven gaming-specific SDK, choose Immutable X. If you prioritize minimal cost for mixed transactions (NFTs + tokens) and require maximum EVM composability with DeFi protocols like Uniswap or GMX, choose Arbitrum Nova.
tldr-summary
Immutable X vs. Arbitrum Nova
TL;DR: Core Differentiators
Key strengths and trade-offs for gaming NFT infrastructure at a glance.
01
Immutable X: Zero Gas Fees for Users
Specific advantage: Minting and trading NFTs incurs no gas fees for end-users. This matters for mass-market gaming where microtransactions and onboarding friction are critical. The protocol subsidizes costs, enabling free minting for games like Illuvium and Gods Unchained.
$0
User Gas Fees
03
Arbitrum Nova: Ultra-Low, Predictable Costs
Specific advantage: Transaction fees are a fraction of a cent, paid in ETH, with high predictability due to the AnyTrust DAC. This matters for high-frequency, low-value in-game actions where cost stability is more important than absolute zero fees. Used by games like The Beacon and Pirate Nation.
<$0.01
Avg. Tx Cost
HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON
Immutable X vs Arbitrum Nova: Gaming NFT Matrix
Direct comparison of core infrastructure for gaming NFT projects.
| Metric / Feature | Immutable X | Arbitrum Nova |
|---|---|---|
Transaction Fee for NFT Mint | $0.00 (sponsored) | $0.001 - $0.01 |
Settlement Layer | StarkEx Validium (Ethereum L2) | AnyTrust (Ethereum L3) |
Native NFT Standard | Immutable X (ERC-721) | Arbitrum Nova (ERC-721) |
Data Availability | Off-chain (Data Availability Committee) | Off-chain (DAC) with fallback to L1 |
Time to Finality | ~15 min (Ethereum checkpoint) | ~400 ms (L2 finality) |
Primary Use Case Focus | Web3 Gaming & Marketplaces | Gaming & Social Apps (High volume) |
Developer SDK | Immutable SDK (TypeScript/Unity) | Arbitrum Nitro (EVM-compatible) |
pros-cons-a
PROS AND CONS
Immutable X vs Arbitrum Nova: Gaming NFT Showdown
Key strengths and trade-offs for gaming NFT infrastructure at a glance. Data-driven analysis for CTOs and protocol architects.
01
Immutable X Pro: Zero Gas Fees for Users
Specific advantage: Minting and trading NFTs incurs zero gas fees for end-users, subsidized by the protocol. This matters for mass-market gaming where microtransactions and frictionless onboarding are critical for player retention.
$0
User Gas Fees
03
Arbitrum Nova Pro: Lower Protocol-Level Costs
Specific advantage: Data Availability (DA) handled by Ethereum + Data Availability Committee (DAC), reducing L1 posting costs by ~90% vs standard rollups. This matters for high-volume, low-value in-game asset transactions where aggregate protocol costs directly impact studio margins.
~90%
Lower L1 Costs
05
Immutable X Con: Ecosystem Lock-in
Specific trade-off: Primarily optimized for its own zk-rollup and marketplace. This is a drawback for studios wanting maximum composability with DeFi protocols (Aave, Uniswap) or needing to deploy on multiple L2s with the same contract code.
06
Arbitrum Nova Con: User Gas Fees
Specific trade-off: Users pay transaction fees (significantly lower than Ethereum, but non-zero). This is a drawback for free-to-play or web2-style games where any wallet funding requirement creates a major user acquisition barrier.
$0.01 - $0.10
Typical TX Cost
pros-cons-b
PROS AND CONS
Immutable X vs Arbitrum Nova for Gaming NFTs
Key strengths and trade-offs for high-throughput gaming applications at a glance.
01
Immutable X: Superior Throughput & User Experience
Zero gas fees for users: Minting and trading NFTs incurs no network fees, a critical feature for mass-market games with microtransactions. This matters for player onboarding and retention.
High TPS for gaming scale: Built as a Validium with off-chain data availability via StarkEx, achieving 9,000+ TPS. This enables real-time, high-frequency in-game economies without congestion.
9,000+
Peak TPS
$0
User Gas Fees
03
Arbitrum Nova: Cost-Effective Ethereum Security
Significantly lower fees than L1: Uses AnyTrust technology for data availability via a Data Availability Committee (DAC), reducing costs while maintaining strong security. Transaction fees are typically <$0.01. This matters for developers needing Ethereum-level security on a budget.
Full EVM equivalence: Seamlessly ports Solidity contracts from Ethereum or Arbitrum One. This matters for teams with existing Ethereum tooling looking for a cost-optimized home for social/gaming apps.
<$0.01
Avg. Tx Cost
EVM
Full Equivalence
CHOOSE YOUR PRIORITY
Decision Framework: When to Choose Which
Immutable X for Gaming Studios
Verdict: The superior choice for high-volume, asset-first games. Strengths: Zero gas fees for users on L2, instant trade confirmation, and native NFT-centric tooling (Immutable Passport, Orderbook). The StarkEx validity rollup provides 9,000+ TPS for NFT minting/trading, critical for mass adoption. Its custom RPC endpoints and Marketplace API drastically reduce dev time. Illuvium and Gods Unchained are built here for a reason. Trade-off: You are locked into Immutable's ecosystem and its specific data availability solution. Interoperability with general-purpose DeFi on Ethereum is more circuitous.
Arbitrum Nova for Gaming Studios
Verdict: A strong contender for games needing cheap, general-purpose smart contracts. Strengths: Extremely low fees (sub-cent) via AnyTrust DAC for data availability. As part of the Arbitrum suite, it offers seamless bridging to Arbitrum One's DeFi ecosystem. Better for games with complex in-game economies involving fungible tokens and custom logic beyond simple NFT transfers. The Beacon and Pirate Nation leverage this flexibility. Trade-off: Fees, while low, are not zero for users. Throughput (~2,000 TPS) is lower than Immutable X for pure NFT operations.
verdict
THE ANALYSIS
Final Verdict and Strategic Recommendation
Choosing between Immutable X and Arbitrum Nova hinges on prioritizing native gaming infrastructure versus general-purpose ecosystem scale.
Immutable X excels at providing a purpose-built, frictionless environment for high-throughput gaming because it is a dedicated zk-rollup for NFTs on Ethereum. For example, it offers true gas-free minting and trading for users, with a proven capacity of over 9,000 transactions per second (TPS) in stress tests, and has secured major titles like Illuvium and Guild of Guardians. Its native integration of marketplaces like Immutable Marketplace and GameStop NFT creates a turnkey ecosystem for developers.
Arbitrum Nova takes a different approach by leveraging AnyTrust technology, a hybrid between Optimistic and zk-rollups, prioritizing ultra-low cost for a broader range of applications. This results in a trade-off: while transaction fees are extremely low (often <$0.01), they are not entirely gas-free for users. Its strength is deep integration within the expansive Arbitrum ecosystem (e.g., Treasure DAO, The Beacon), offering superior liquidity bridges and composability with DeFi protocols like Camelot DEX.
The key trade-off: If your priority is a pure-play, high-performance gaming chain with zero gas fees for players and built-in marketplace liquidity, choose Immutable X. If you prioritize maximum ecosystem interoperability, the lowest possible (but non-zero) costs, and a chain that supports gaming as part of a broader dApp suite, choose Arbitrum Nova.
ENQUIRY
Get In Touch
today.
Our experts will offer a free quote and a 30min call to discuss your project.
NDA Protected
Confidentiality24h Response
Time to ValueDirectly to Engineering Team
No Sales Fluff10+
Protocols Shipped
$20M+
TVL Overall