Custom Indexing Handlers (e.g., Substreams, The Graph Subgraphs) excel at providing protocol-specific, real-time data with bespoke logic. This is critical for novel DeFi primitives or NFT platforms where standard schemas fail. For example, a protocol like Uniswap V4 with custom hooks requires a handler to interpret complex, on-chain events that generic APIs cannot parse, enabling sub-second latency for arbitrage bots.
LABS
Comparisons
Custom Logic: Indexing Handlers vs Pre-processed API Data
A technical comparison for CTOs and architects on choosing between building custom data transformation logic with indexing handlers versus consuming pre-processed, opinionated data from an API. Focuses on trade-offs in flexibility, time-to-market, cost, and maintenance for NFT marketplace infrastructure.
Chainscore © 2026
introduction
THE ANALYSIS
Introduction: The Core Data Infrastructure Decision
Choosing between custom indexing handlers and pre-processed APIs is a foundational architectural choice that dictates your application's flexibility, cost, and time-to-market.
Pre-processed API Data (e.g., Goldsky, The Graph's Hosted Service, Covalent) takes a different approach by offering standardized, production-ready datasets. This results in a significant trade-off: you sacrifice granular control for immediate developer velocity. Services often aggregate data across chains like Ethereum and Polygon, delivering queryable data in minutes, not weeks, with proven uptime SLAs exceeding 99.9%.
The key trade-off: If your priority is unparalleled control and custom data transformation for a novel use case, choose a custom indexing handler. If you prioritize rapid prototyping, reduced DevOps overhead, and standardized access to common blockchain data, choose a pre-processed API. The decision hinges on whether you need to build a unique data engine or simply fuel an application with reliable fuel.
tldr-summary
Custom Indexing vs. Pre-processed APIs
TL;DR: Key Differentiators at a Glance
Core architectural trade-offs for data access, from ultimate flexibility to immediate time-to-market.
01
Choose Custom Indexing Handlers
Ultimate Flexibility & Control: You define the data model, transformation logic, and storage layer (e.g., PostgreSQL, TimescaleDB). This is critical for complex on-chain logic (e.g., custom AMM fee calculations, NFT rarity scores) that off-the-shelf APIs can't provide.
100%
Data Model Control
02
Choose Custom Indexing Handlers
Cost-Effective at Scale: For high-volume applications (e.g., per-block analytics, real-time dashboards), running your own indexer avoids per-API-call fees. The OpEx becomes predictable (infrastructure costs) versus variable OpEx (API usage).
Variable → Fixed
Cost Model
03
Choose Pre-processed API Data
Weeks to Minutes Deployment: Use services like The Graph's subgraphs, Covalent, or Goldsky to query aggregated data (token balances, NFT transfers) via GraphQL/REST in hours, not months. Essential for MVPs, hackathons, or teams without blockchain infra expertise.
~Hours
Time to Data
04
Choose Pre-processed API Data
Managed Reliability & Uptime: Providers handle node infrastructure, re-orgs, and chain upgrades. You get SLA-backed availability (99.9%+) without managing servers. Critical for production apps where data continuity is non-negotiable.
99.9%+
Typical SLA
CUSTOM LOGIC: INDEXING HANDLERS VS PRE-PROCESSED API DATA
Head-to-Head Feature Comparison
Direct comparison of key metrics and features for on-chain data access strategies.
| Metric / Feature | Custom Indexing Handlers | Pre-processed API Data |
|---|---|---|
Time to First Query | 2-6 weeks | < 1 hour |
Development Complexity | High (Rust/Go required) | Low (GraphQL/REST API) |
Query Latency (P95) | ~50ms | ~200ms |
Custom Event Support | ||
Data Freshness | ~1 block | ~3-5 blocks |
Infrastructure Cost (Monthly) | $5K-$20K+ | $500-$5K |
Protocol Examples | Subsquid, Envio, The Graph Subgraph | Goldsky, The Graph Hosted Service, Covalent |
pros-cons-a
Custom Logic vs. Pre-processed APIs
Indexing Handlers: Pros and Cons
Key strengths and trade-offs at a glance for CTOs choosing between building custom data pipelines or consuming managed APIs.
02
Custom Indexing Handlers: Data Sovereignty
Own your data pipeline end-to-end: Eliminate dependency on a third-party's schema, uptime, and roadmap. This matters for enterprises requiring audit trails, data residency compliance, or building a proprietary data moat. You control the indexing speed, historical depth, and data retention policies.
100%
Schema Control
03
Custom Indexing Handlers: Development & Maintenance Burden
High initial and ongoing cost: Requires a dedicated team to build, monitor, and maintain the indexing infrastructure (e.g., Subgraph development, RPC node management, database scaling). This is a poor fit for teams lacking blockchain DevOps expertise or those needing to iterate quickly on product features rather than data infrastructure.
04
Custom Indexing Handlers: Time-to-Data Latency
Slower to derive insights: From defining the schema to indexing historical data, the cycle can take weeks. This matters for rapid prototyping or responding to market events (e.g., a new token launch or exploit). Contrast with APIs that offer sub-second query latency on pre-indexed data.
Weeks
Setup Time
06
Pre-processed API Data: Built-in Reliability & Scale
Enterprise-grade SLAs and global CDNs: Leverage the provider's infrastructure for >99.9% uptime, load balancing, and multi-chain support. This matters for consumer-facing applications like wallets or explorers that cannot afford downtime, saving you from managing The Graph's indexer ecosystem or blockchain reorgs.
>99.9%
Uptime SLA
07
Pre-processed API Data: Schema Constraints
Limited to the provider's data model: You cannot compute custom derived fields not already in their API. This is a poor fit for novel protocols or research requiring non-standard aggregations (e.g., cross-contract state correlations or proprietary trading signals). You are bound by their update frequency and aggregation methods.
08
Pre-processed API Data: Vendor Lock-in & Cost Scaling
Recurring costs and migration risk: API pricing scales with usage (e.g., per request or MAU), which can become prohibitive at high scale. Switching vendors requires significant code changes. This matters for high-throughput applications like on-chain dashboards or protocols where data costs directly impact unit economics.
$/Request
Cost Model
pros-cons-b
Custom Indexing Handlers vs. Pre-processed Data Feeds
Pre-processed APIs: Pros and Cons
Key architectural trade-offs for building real-time on-chain applications. Choose based on your team's resources and data complexity needs.
01
Custom Indexing Handlers (The Gold Standard)
Maximum Flexibility & Control: Define your own transformation logic (e.g., calculating a custom DEX price TWAP, tracking NFT rarity scores). This is critical for protocols with unique business logic like lending platforms needing precise health factors or gaming apps tracking complex player states.
Data Sovereignty: You own the entire pipeline from raw logs to your application's database. Eliminates dependency on a third-party's schema updates or API deprecations, a key consideration for long-term, mission-critical applications.
02
Custom Indexing Handlers (The Cost)
High Operational Overhead: Requires dedicated DevOps for managing indexers (The Graph subgraphs, Subsquid squids, or custom services), database scaling, and ensuring sync reliability. Expect 2-3+ engineer-months for initial setup and ongoing maintenance.
Slower Time-to-Market: Building, testing, and deploying a robust indexing solution can take weeks. Not suitable for MVPs or rapid prototyping where speed is the primary constraint.
03
Pre-processed APIs (The Accelerator)
Instant Development Velocity: Access normalized, query-ready data (e.g., token balances, NFT metadata, decoded event logs) in minutes via REST or GraphQL. Services like Chainscore, The Graph's Hosted Service, or Covalent reduce initial development time from months to days, ideal for hackathons or validating product-market fit.
Managed Scalability & Reliability: The provider handles infrastructure scaling, data redundancy, and uptime (often 99.9%+ SLA). Frees your team from DevOps burdens, allowing focus on core application logic.
04
Pre-processed APIs (The Constraints)
Schema & Latency Limitations: You are bound by the provider's data models, update frequency (e.g., 1-block vs. 12-block finality), and supported chains. Can be a blocker for applications needing sub-second latency or highly custom aggregated metrics.
Vendor Lock-in & Cost at Scale: Pricing models (per API call, monthly tiers) can become expensive at high volume (>10M reqs/month). Migrating away requires re-architecting your data layer, creating strategic dependency risk for high-growth applications.
CHOOSE YOUR PRIORITY
Decision Framework: When to Choose Which
Custom Indexing Handlers for Speed & Control
Verdict: Choose this for real-time, complex applications. Strengths: Sub-second latency for on-chain events, full control over data transformation logic, and the ability to build custom APIs tailored to your dApp's exact schema (e.g., a bespoke leaderboard for a game or a real-time risk engine for DeFi). You own the infrastructure, eliminating third-party API rate limits. Trade-offs: Requires significant DevOps overhead (managing indexer nodes, databases, and ETL pipelines). Initial setup is complex and demands expertise in tools like The Graph (Subgraphs), Subsquid, or Envio. Best For: High-frequency trading dashboards, real-time gaming state, and protocols where data logic is a core competitive moat.
Pre-processed API Data for Speed & Control
Verdict: Choose this for rapid prototyping and when developer velocity trumps micro-optimization. Strengths: Instant access to normalized, queryable data via REST or GraphQL endpoints from providers like Goldsky, Covalent, or Flipside. Zero infrastructure management lets your team focus on frontend and smart contract development. Trade-offs: Latency is higher (seconds), data schemas are generic, and you are subject to the provider's pricing, rate limits, and uptime. Custom logic must be implemented in your application layer, not at the indexing level. Best For: MVPs, hackathons, analytics dashboards, and applications where "good enough" speed (2-5 second updates) is acceptable.
CUSTOM LOGIC
Technical Deep Dive: Implementation & Cost Realities
Choosing between building custom indexing handlers or using pre-processed API data is a critical architectural decision. This section compares the trade-offs in development effort, runtime performance, cost, and flexibility for real-world blockchain applications.
Custom indexers can achieve lower latency for specific, optimized queries. By tailoring the data schema and indexing logic to your exact needs, you bypass the generalized processing overhead of a public subgraph. However, The Graph's hosted service provides consistently fast, sub-second queries for common patterns without any infrastructure management, making it faster to implement and scale for standard use cases like NFT metadata or token balances.
verdict
THE ANALYSIS
Final Verdict and Strategic Recommendation
Choosing between custom indexing handlers and pre-processed API data is a fundamental architectural decision that balances control against speed-to-market.
Custom Indexing Handlers excel at delivering protocol-specific, deterministic data because you control the entire transformation pipeline from raw on-chain data. For example, a DeFi protocol like Aave or Uniswap V3 can build handlers to calculate impermanent loss, fee accruals, or concentrated liquidity positions with 100% accuracy, a necessity for on-chain integrations or complex dashboards. This approach is foundational for projects requiring data sovereignty and is the engine behind tools like The Graph's subgraphs or Subsquid's processor frameworks.
Pre-processed API Data takes a different approach by offering instant, curated access to normalized blockchain data. Services like Covalent, Alchemy's Transfers API, or Moralis abstract away the immense engineering overhead of running indexers. This results in a trade-off: you gain development velocity—often reducing time-to-prototype from months to days—but you must accept their data schema, aggregation logic, and potential latency. For instance, their NFT or token balance APIs provide a unified interface but may not support your novel, non-standard smart contract event.
The key trade-off is between engineering investment and flexibility. If your priority is bespoke logic, absolute data consistency, and long-term cost control at scale, choose a custom indexing solution. If you prioritize rapid iteration, reduced DevOps burden, and standardized access for common use cases like wallet activity feeds or token holdings, a pre-processed API is the superior strategic choice. For most teams, a hybrid approach—using a robust API for foundational data (transactions, logs) and building custom handlers only for your core proprietary metrics—offers the optimal balance of speed and precision.
ENQUIRY
Get In Touch
today.
Our experts will offer a free quote and a 30min call to discuss your project.
NDA Protected
Confidentiality24h Response
Time to ValueDirectly to Engineering Team
No Sales Fluff10+
Protocols Shipped
$20M+
TVL Overall