Immunefi excels at creating high-stakes, protocol-first bug bounty programs because of its dominant market share and focus on attracting elite white-hat hackers. For example, it has facilitated over $100 million in bounties paid across protocols like Ethereum, Polygon, and Arbitrum, and its platform hosts programs for major DeFi projects like Aave, Compound, and Lido. Its model is built on scale and a reputation for handling critical vulnerabilities with significant financial rewards.
LABS
Comparisons
Immunefi vs Hacken: Bug Bounty & Security Services
A technical comparison of Immunefi and Hacken, analyzing their bug bounty platforms, security audit methodologies, cost structures, and ideal use cases for Web3 protocols and DeFi projects.
Chainscore © 2026
introduction
THE ANALYSIS
Introduction
A data-driven comparison of Immunefi and Hacken, the two dominant forces in Web3 security services, to guide your bug bounty and audit strategy.
Hacken takes a different approach by offering a comprehensive, full-cycle security suite that integrates audits, monitoring, and bounties. This results in a more managed, end-to-end service but can be less focused purely on the open-market bounty model. Hacken's strength lies in its CER.live security scorecards and its penetration testing services, which appeal to projects seeking a long-term security partner beyond a one-time bug bounty launch.
The key trade-off: If your priority is maximizing white-hat attention and liquidity for a high-value, standalone bug bounty on a major chain, choose Immunefi. If you prioritize a bundled, managed security service with ongoing audits, KYC'd researchers, and a certification badge for trust marketing, choose Hacken.
tldr-summary
Immunefi vs Hacken
TL;DR Summary
Key strengths and trade-offs at a glance for two leading Web3 security platforms.
01
Immunefi's Edge: High-Value Bounties
Dominant market share for top-tier protocols: Hosts bounties for protocols like Chainlink, MakerDAO, and Arbitrum, with over $100M in rewards paid. This matters for blue-chip DeFi and L1/L2s seeking maximum white-hat attention and a proven track record with the largest bounties.
$100M+
Rewards Paid
02
Immunefi's Edge: Specialized Process
Pure-play bug bounty focus with a rigorous, manual triage process by in-house security analysts. This creates a high-signal environment for critical vulnerability submission (e.g., smart contract logic flaws) and is trusted by protocols where a single bug can mean >$1B in risk.
03
Hacken's Edge: Comprehensive Suite
Full-service security provider offering bounties plus code audits, KYC services, and the HackenProof platform. This matters for projects seeking a one-stop-shop from initial audit through ongoing bug bounty, especially newer ecosystems or CeFi/GameFi projects needing broader security posture management.
2000+
Audits Completed
04
Hacken's Edge: Ecosystem & Scalability
Strong presence in Eastern Europe and Asia with scalable processes for handling high volumes of reports. This is optimal for high-throughput projects (e.g., NFT platforms, multi-chain dApps) or those prioritizing regional hacker community engagement and faster initial response times on lower-severity issues.
HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON
Immunefi vs Hacken: Feature Comparison
Direct comparison of key metrics and features for blockchain security and bug bounty services.
| Metric | Immunefi | Hacken |
|---|---|---|
Primary Focus | Bug Bounty Platform | Full-Suite Security Firm |
Total Bounties Paid | $100M+ | $10M+ |
Smart Contract Audits | ||
KYC & Background Checks | ||
Supported Chains | Ethereum, Solana, 50+ | Ethereum, BNB Chain, 20+ |
Response Time SLA | < 24 hours | < 48 hours |
Penetration Testing | ||
Certification Programs |
pros-cons-a
PROS AND CONS
Immunefi vs Hacken: Bug Bounty & Security Services
A data-driven comparison of the leading Web3 security platforms. Choose based on your protocol's stage, budget, and risk profile.
01
Immunefi's Strength: Dominant Market Share
Largest Web3 bug bounty platform: Secures over $200B+ in on-chain assets and has facilitated over $100M+ in payouts. This matters for blue-chip protocols (e.g., Chainlink, Polygon) needing maximum white-hat visibility and a proven, high-stakes track record.
$200B+
Assets Secured
$100M+
Payouts
02
Immunefi's Trade-off: High-Value Focus
Premium, high-cost model: Bounties often start in the six figures for critical bugs. This matters for early-stage startups or projects with sub-$10M TVL, where the cost can be prohibitive compared to the value at risk.
04
Hacken's Trade-off: Lower Bounty Visibility
Smaller, more regional hunter community compared to Immunefi's global dominance. This matters for protocols requiring the absolute largest and most competitive pool of security researchers to find edge-case vulnerabilities.
pros-cons-b
Immunefi vs Hacken
Hacken: Pros and Cons
A data-driven breakdown of two leading bug bounty platforms. Use this to decide which aligns with your protocol's security maturity and budget.
01
Immunefi's Strength: Unmatched Payouts & Prestige
Dominant market share for high-value bounties: Hosts programs for protocols like Chainlink, MakerDAO, and The Graph, with over $100M in rewards paid. This attracts the most elite white-hat researchers. Choose Immunefi if your primary goal is maximum security prestige and you have a budget for million-dollar critical bug rewards.
$100M+
Rewards Paid
02
Immunefi's Trade-off: High Barrier to Entry
Focus on top-tier protocols means less hand-holding for newer projects. The platform is optimized for established teams with mature security processes. If you're a startup needing guided onboarding and educational resources, the pure bounty model may feel like being thrown into the deep end.
04
Hacken's Trade-off: Lower Bounty Specialization
While it offers bug bounties, its brand is less singularly focused on this niche compared to Immunefi. The researcher community, while skilled, may be more diffuse across its various service lines. For a project that wants exclusive access to the most dedicated bounty hunters, this can be a limitation.
CHOOSE YOUR PRIORITY
When to Choose Immunefi vs Hacken
Immunefi for DeFi
Verdict: The industry standard for high-value, on-chain smart contract protection. Strengths: Unmatched Total Value Protected (TVL), with over $100B secured. The platform is battle-tested by top-tier protocols like Aave, Compound, and Lido. Its crowdsourced white-hat community is the largest, offering continuous, adversarial testing. The clear severity classification and payout structure (up to $10M+) are designed for critical financial infrastructure. Considerations: The process is formal and can be slower, focused on maximum security over speed.
Hacken for DeFi
Verdict: A strong alternative for protocols seeking a full-service, audit-first approach. Strengths: Provides a comprehensive security suite that often starts with a manual smart contract audit before launching a bug bounty. This is ideal for newer or complex DeFi projects needing foundational code review. Their CER.live security scorecard adds a layer of investor confidence. Considerations: The bug bounty community, while skilled, is generally smaller than Immunefi's, potentially reducing the volume of adversarial scrutiny.
verdict
THE ANALYSIS
Final Verdict and Decision Framework
Choosing between Immunefi and Hacken depends on your protocol's stage, risk profile, and desired security posture.
Immunefi excels at high-stakes, on-chain security for mature DeFi and Web3 protocols because of its dominant market position and massive bounty pools. For example, it has facilitated over $100 million in bug bounties and hosts programs for industry leaders like Chainlink, Polygon, and The Graph. Its platform is optimized for managing critical vulnerabilities with clear, blockchain-native payout structures, attracting elite white-hat researchers focused on smart contract and protocol-layer exploits.
Hacken takes a different approach by offering a comprehensive, audit-first security suite. This results in a trade-off: while its bug bounty platform is robust, its core strength is the integration of services like smart contract audits, KYC verification for teams, and the CER.live exchange security rating. This makes Hacken a one-stop-shop for projects seeking a full-spectrum security partner from pre-launch due diligence to ongoing monitoring, rather than just a post-deployment bounty board.
The key trade-off: If your priority is maximizing white-hat attention and managing a high-value bounty for a live, complex protocol, choose Immunefi. Its network effect and specialization in catastrophic vulnerabilities are unmatched. If you prioritize a bundled security roadmap starting with foundational audits and expanding to community-driven testing, choose Hacken. Its integrated model is ideal for projects building security into their development lifecycle from the ground up.
ENQUIRY
Get In Touch
today.
Our experts will offer a free quote and a 30min call to discuss your project.
NDA Protected
Confidentiality24h Response
Time to ValueDirectly to Engineering Team
No Sales Fluff10+
Protocols Shipped
$20M+
TVL Overall