Free 30-min Web3 Consultation
Book Consultation
Smart Contract Security Audits
View Audit Services
Custom DeFi Protocol Development
Explore DeFi
Full-Stack Web3 dApp Development
View App Services
Free 30-min Web3 Consultation
Book Consultation
Smart Contract Security Audits
View Audit Services
Custom DeFi Protocol Development
Explore DeFi
Full-Stack Web3 dApp Development
View App Services
Free 30-min Web3 Consultation
Book Consultation
Smart Contract Security Audits
View Audit Services
Custom DeFi Protocol Development
Explore DeFi
Full-Stack Web3 dApp Development
View App Services
Free 30-min Web3 Consultation
Book Consultation
Smart Contract Security Audits
View Audit Services
Custom DeFi Protocol Development
Explore DeFi
Full-Stack Web3 dApp Development
View App Services
LABS
Comparisons

Kiln vs Everstake: White-Label & Exchange Staking

A technical analysis for CTOs and protocol architects comparing Kiln's enterprise-grade API platform with Everstake's established validator network for white-label staking solutions.
Chainscore © 2026
introduction
THE ANALYSIS

Introduction: The White-Label Staking Infrastructure Battle

A data-driven comparison of Kiln and Everstake, two leading providers for enterprises building or outsourcing staking services.

Kiln excels at providing deeply integrated, API-first infrastructure for exchanges and fintechs because of its focus on programmability and security. For example, its platform supports over 40+ networks (including Ethereum, Solana, and Polygon) and offers a non-custodial architecture, which is critical for institutions managing billions in assets. Their enterprise-grade APIs allow for seamless white-labeling, enabling clients like Coinbase and Ledger to offer staking directly within their interfaces.

Everstake takes a different approach by emphasizing high-touch, validator-centric services and geographic decentralization. This results in a trade-off: while potentially less automated than a pure API platform, it provides robust, hands-on node operations and governance participation. With over $5.5 billion in total value staked and a strong presence in Eastern Europe, Everstake is a preferred partner for protocols like Terra Classic (LUNC) and Cosmos that value community-driven, reliable validation over pure self-service tooling.

The key trade-off: If your priority is rapid integration, full white-label control, and a developer-centric API stack for a multi-chain product, choose Kiln. If you prioritize proven validator reliability, active governance support, and a partner to manage the technical staking operations for a core set of Proof-of-Stake chains, choose Everstake.

tldr-summary
Kiln vs Everstake

TL;DR: Core Differentiators at a Glance

Key strengths and trade-offs for white-label and exchange staking solutions.

01

Kiln's Enterprise Integration

Deep API & SDK focus: Offers a comprehensive suite for programmatic staking operations, including their Staking API and Dashboard API. This matters for exchanges and fintechs needing to embed staking directly into their user interface and back-office systems with high customization.

100+
Integrated Protocols
02

Kiln's Non-Custodial Security

Validator key ownership remains with client: Clients retain full control of their validator signing keys, a critical security model for institutions. This matters for regulated entities and large asset managers who cannot delegate key custody, aligning with frameworks like SOC 2.

0
Key Custody
03

Everstake's Institutional Scale

Massive, battle-tested infrastructure: Operates one of the largest staking services globally, with over $6B+ in assets staked across 70+ blockchains. This matters for clients prioritizing proven, high-uptime networks and seeking a partner with extensive slashing insurance coverage.

$6B+
Staked Assets
04

Everstake's Turnkey Solution

Full-service, custodial option: Provides a fully managed service where they handle all validator operations, key management, and maintenance. This matters for exchanges or platforms that want to launch a staking product quickly without building deep in-house DevOps expertise for chains like Solana, Cosmos, or Polkadot.

70+
Supported Blockchains
WHITE-LABEL & EXCHANGE STAKING COMPARISON

Feature Matrix: Kiln vs Everstake Head-to-Head

Direct comparison of key metrics and features for institutional staking providers.

Metric / FeatureKilnEverstake

White-Label Staking Platform

Exchange-Grade Infrastructure

Supported Assets (Est.)

40+

70+

Slashing Insurance Offered

Non-Custodial Key Management

API-First Integration

Average Commission Fee

5-10%

5-7%

Enterprise SLA Guarantee

pros-cons-a
PROS AND CONS

Kiln vs Everstake: White-Label & Exchange Staking

A data-driven comparison for CTOs evaluating enterprise-grade staking infrastructure partners. Key strengths and trade-offs at a glance.

02

Kiln's Trade-off: Protocol Breadth

Primarily focused on Ethereum, Solana, and select L2s. While deep on core protocols, offers fewer networks than some competitors. This matters for exchanges needing support for a vast array of Proof-of-Stake chains beyond the major players.

04

Everstake's Trade-off: Integration Depth

Strong on validator operations, but less emphasis on turnkey white-label SaaS solutions compared to API-native providers. Custom integrations may require more bespoke development. This matters for exchanges prioritizing speed-to-market with a branded staking product over raw validator selection.

pros-cons-b
PROS AND CONS

Kiln vs Everstake: White-Label & Exchange Staking

Key strengths and trade-offs for institutional staking infrastructure at a glance.

01

Kiln's Strength: Enterprise-Grade Integration

Full API-first infrastructure: Offers a comprehensive suite of APIs for staking, rewards, and wallet management, enabling deep, automated integration into exchange backends. This matters for large exchanges like Binance or Coinbase that require programmatic control over millions of user stakes.

40+
Blockchains
03

Everstake's Strength: Proven Exchange Partnerships

Direct, hands-on integration experience with major players like Binance, KuCoin, and Trust Wallet. Acts as a staking-as-a-service partner rather than just a tech vendor. This matters for exchanges seeking a turnkey, battle-tested solution with a known entity in the staking space.

$4B+
Total Value Staked
05

Kiln's Trade-off: Complexity & Focus

Primarily an infrastructure provider, not an operator. Requires significant in-house engineering resources to integrate and manage. Less ideal for smaller exchanges or teams that want a fully managed, hands-off staking service with direct partner support.

06

Everstake's Trade-off: Customization & Control

More of a managed service partnership. While reliable, it may offer less granular API control and customization over the staking user journey and fee mechanics compared to a pure tech stack like Kiln. This matters for exchanges wanting to own the full stack and branding without intermediary dependencies.

CHOOSE YOUR PRIORITY

Decision Framework: When to Choose Kiln vs Everstake

Kiln for Exchanges

Verdict: The superior choice for high-volume, white-label staking-as-a-service. Strengths: Kiln's core competency is providing a fully managed, API-driven staking infrastructure. Their platform is built for seamless integration into exchange dashboards, offering multi-chain support (Ethereum, Solana, Cosmos) with a unified interface. Key features include real-time reporting, automated fee collection, and robust compliance tooling (KYC/AML integrations). For exchanges like Coinbase or Kraken looking to launch staking quickly without deep protocol expertise, Kiln's turnkey solution reduces time-to-market and operational overhead significantly.

Everstake for Exchanges

Verdict: A strong validator-first option, but less optimized for white-label SaaS. Strengths: Everstake is a premier, non-custodial validator with a stellar security reputation across 50+ networks (Ethereum, Cardano, Polkadot). Their strength lies in institutional-grade node operations and deep protocol governance participation. For an exchange prioritizing maximum validator decentralization and direct protocol influence over a branded user interface, Everstake's delegation services are excellent. However, building a custom front-end and managing the user experience layer becomes the exchange's responsibility.

verdict
THE ANALYSIS

Final Verdict and Strategic Recommendation

A data-driven conclusion on choosing between Kiln and Everstake for white-label and exchange staking infrastructure.

Kiln excels at providing a deeply integrated, API-first platform for enterprises seeking to embed staking as a core product feature. Their strength lies in a unified dashboard and a single API that manages staking across 40+ networks, including Ethereum, Solana, and Cosmos. This is evidenced by their significant enterprise traction, powering staking for major players like Coinbase, Ledger, and Crypto.com, and securing over $9 billion in assets. Their focus is on enabling clients to own the customer relationship with a seamless, branded experience.

Everstake takes a different approach by leveraging its deep roots as a top-tier validator operator to offer a robust, security-first white-label solution. This results in a trade-off: while their platform may offer less flashy UI customization, it is built on proven, battle-tested infrastructure with a strong emphasis on reliability and slashing protection. Their validator expertise across 70+ blockchains, including a top-10 position on networks like Solana and Polygon, provides a foundation of trust, making them a preferred partner for projects prioritizing maximum network uptime and security over extensive front-end modularity.

The key trade-off: If your priority is brand control, rapid product integration, and a sophisticated user interface for a retail or exchange audience, choose Kiln. Their platform is engineered for scalability and a polished end-user experience. If you prioritize validator-grade security, proven infrastructure resilience, and deep protocol expertise—particularly for institutional clients or as a foundational backend service—choose Everstake. Their model is optimized for trust and operational excellence above all else.

ENQUIRY

Get In Touch
today.

Our experts will offer a free quote and a 30min call to discuss your project.

NDA Protected
24h Response
Directly to Engineering Team
10+
Protocols Shipped
$20M+
TVL Overall
NDA Protected Directly to Engineering Team