Kiln excels at providing deeply integrated, API-first infrastructure for exchanges and fintechs because of its focus on programmability and security. For example, its platform supports over 40+ networks (including Ethereum, Solana, and Polygon) and offers a non-custodial architecture, which is critical for institutions managing billions in assets. Their enterprise-grade APIs allow for seamless white-labeling, enabling clients like Coinbase and Ledger to offer staking directly within their interfaces.
Kiln vs Everstake: White-Label & Exchange Staking
Introduction: The White-Label Staking Infrastructure Battle
A data-driven comparison of Kiln and Everstake, two leading providers for enterprises building or outsourcing staking services.
Everstake takes a different approach by emphasizing high-touch, validator-centric services and geographic decentralization. This results in a trade-off: while potentially less automated than a pure API platform, it provides robust, hands-on node operations and governance participation. With over $5.5 billion in total value staked and a strong presence in Eastern Europe, Everstake is a preferred partner for protocols like Terra Classic (LUNC) and Cosmos that value community-driven, reliable validation over pure self-service tooling.
The key trade-off: If your priority is rapid integration, full white-label control, and a developer-centric API stack for a multi-chain product, choose Kiln. If you prioritize proven validator reliability, active governance support, and a partner to manage the technical staking operations for a core set of Proof-of-Stake chains, choose Everstake.
TL;DR: Core Differentiators at a Glance
Key strengths and trade-offs for white-label and exchange staking solutions.
Kiln's Enterprise Integration
Deep API & SDK focus: Offers a comprehensive suite for programmatic staking operations, including their Staking API and Dashboard API. This matters for exchanges and fintechs needing to embed staking directly into their user interface and back-office systems with high customization.
Kiln's Non-Custodial Security
Validator key ownership remains with client: Clients retain full control of their validator signing keys, a critical security model for institutions. This matters for regulated entities and large asset managers who cannot delegate key custody, aligning with frameworks like SOC 2.
Everstake's Institutional Scale
Massive, battle-tested infrastructure: Operates one of the largest staking services globally, with over $6B+ in assets staked across 70+ blockchains. This matters for clients prioritizing proven, high-uptime networks and seeking a partner with extensive slashing insurance coverage.
Everstake's Turnkey Solution
Full-service, custodial option: Provides a fully managed service where they handle all validator operations, key management, and maintenance. This matters for exchanges or platforms that want to launch a staking product quickly without building deep in-house DevOps expertise for chains like Solana, Cosmos, or Polkadot.
Feature Matrix: Kiln vs Everstake Head-to-Head
Direct comparison of key metrics and features for institutional staking providers.
| Metric / Feature | Kiln | Everstake |
|---|---|---|
White-Label Staking Platform | ||
Exchange-Grade Infrastructure | ||
Supported Assets (Est.) | 40+ | 70+ |
Slashing Insurance Offered | ||
Non-Custodial Key Management | ||
API-First Integration | ||
Average Commission Fee | 5-10% | 5-7% |
Enterprise SLA Guarantee |
Kiln vs Everstake: White-Label & Exchange Staking
A data-driven comparison for CTOs evaluating enterprise-grade staking infrastructure partners. Key strengths and trade-offs at a glance.
Kiln's Trade-off: Protocol Breadth
Primarily focused on Ethereum, Solana, and select L2s. While deep on core protocols, offers fewer networks than some competitors. This matters for exchanges needing support for a vast array of Proof-of-Stake chains beyond the major players.
Everstake's Trade-off: Integration Depth
Strong on validator operations, but less emphasis on turnkey white-label SaaS solutions compared to API-native providers. Custom integrations may require more bespoke development. This matters for exchanges prioritizing speed-to-market with a branded staking product over raw validator selection.
Kiln vs Everstake: White-Label & Exchange Staking
Key strengths and trade-offs for institutional staking infrastructure at a glance.
Kiln's Strength: Enterprise-Grade Integration
Full API-first infrastructure: Offers a comprehensive suite of APIs for staking, rewards, and wallet management, enabling deep, automated integration into exchange backends. This matters for large exchanges like Binance or Coinbase that require programmatic control over millions of user stakes.
Everstake's Strength: Proven Exchange Partnerships
Direct, hands-on integration experience with major players like Binance, KuCoin, and Trust Wallet. Acts as a staking-as-a-service partner rather than just a tech vendor. This matters for exchanges seeking a turnkey, battle-tested solution with a known entity in the staking space.
Kiln's Trade-off: Complexity & Focus
Primarily an infrastructure provider, not an operator. Requires significant in-house engineering resources to integrate and manage. Less ideal for smaller exchanges or teams that want a fully managed, hands-off staking service with direct partner support.
Everstake's Trade-off: Customization & Control
More of a managed service partnership. While reliable, it may offer less granular API control and customization over the staking user journey and fee mechanics compared to a pure tech stack like Kiln. This matters for exchanges wanting to own the full stack and branding without intermediary dependencies.
Decision Framework: When to Choose Kiln vs Everstake
Kiln for Exchanges
Verdict: The superior choice for high-volume, white-label staking-as-a-service. Strengths: Kiln's core competency is providing a fully managed, API-driven staking infrastructure. Their platform is built for seamless integration into exchange dashboards, offering multi-chain support (Ethereum, Solana, Cosmos) with a unified interface. Key features include real-time reporting, automated fee collection, and robust compliance tooling (KYC/AML integrations). For exchanges like Coinbase or Kraken looking to launch staking quickly without deep protocol expertise, Kiln's turnkey solution reduces time-to-market and operational overhead significantly.
Everstake for Exchanges
Verdict: A strong validator-first option, but less optimized for white-label SaaS. Strengths: Everstake is a premier, non-custodial validator with a stellar security reputation across 50+ networks (Ethereum, Cardano, Polkadot). Their strength lies in institutional-grade node operations and deep protocol governance participation. For an exchange prioritizing maximum validator decentralization and direct protocol influence over a branded user interface, Everstake's delegation services are excellent. However, building a custom front-end and managing the user experience layer becomes the exchange's responsibility.
Final Verdict and Strategic Recommendation
A data-driven conclusion on choosing between Kiln and Everstake for white-label and exchange staking infrastructure.
Kiln excels at providing a deeply integrated, API-first platform for enterprises seeking to embed staking as a core product feature. Their strength lies in a unified dashboard and a single API that manages staking across 40+ networks, including Ethereum, Solana, and Cosmos. This is evidenced by their significant enterprise traction, powering staking for major players like Coinbase, Ledger, and Crypto.com, and securing over $9 billion in assets. Their focus is on enabling clients to own the customer relationship with a seamless, branded experience.
Everstake takes a different approach by leveraging its deep roots as a top-tier validator operator to offer a robust, security-first white-label solution. This results in a trade-off: while their platform may offer less flashy UI customization, it is built on proven, battle-tested infrastructure with a strong emphasis on reliability and slashing protection. Their validator expertise across 70+ blockchains, including a top-10 position on networks like Solana and Polygon, provides a foundation of trust, making them a preferred partner for projects prioritizing maximum network uptime and security over extensive front-end modularity.
The key trade-off: If your priority is brand control, rapid product integration, and a sophisticated user interface for a retail or exchange audience, choose Kiln. Their platform is engineered for scalability and a polished end-user experience. If you prioritize validator-grade security, proven infrastructure resilience, and deep protocol expertise—particularly for institutional clients or as a foundational backend service—choose Everstake. Their model is optimized for trust and operational excellence above all else.
Get In Touch
today.
Our experts will offer a free quote and a 30min call to discuss your project.