QuickNode excels at providing high-performance, dedicated infrastructure for demanding production applications because of its focus on low-latency, single-tenant nodes and deep chain-specific optimizations. For example, its Solana RPC endpoints are engineered for sub-100ms response times, and the platform consistently reports 99.9%+ SLA-backed uptime. This makes it a top choice for protocols like Uniswap and Aave that require maximum reliability and speed for user transactions and oracle data.
LABS
Comparisons
QuickNode vs Ankr: Node Infrastructure
A technical comparison of QuickNode and Ankr, two leading node infrastructure providers. This analysis covers performance, cost, supported networks, and developer tooling to help technical leaders make an informed decision.
Chainscore © 2026
introduction
THE ANALYSIS
Introduction
A data-driven comparison of QuickNode and Ankr, two leading node infrastructure providers, to guide CTOs in selecting the optimal platform for their blockchain application.
Ankr takes a different approach by building a distributed, multi-cloud network powered by a global community of node operators. This strategy results in a significant trade-off: while it enables rapid, cost-effective scaling across 40+ chains and offers a compelling free tier, it may introduce higher latency variability compared to a dedicated setup. Ankr's strength lies in its developer-friendly access model and tools like its Ankr Scan multi-chain explorer, which simplifies initial development and prototyping.
The key trade-off: If your priority is enterprise-grade reliability, predictable low latency, and deep chain support for high-TVL DeFi or NFT projects, choose QuickNode. If you prioritize rapid multi-chain deployment, cost efficiency for scaling, and a rich suite of developer tools for building and testing, choose Ankr.
tldr-summary
QuickNode vs Ankr
TL;DR: Key Differentiators
A data-driven breakdown of core strengths and trade-offs for enterprise node infrastructure decisions.
01
QuickNode: Enterprise-Grade Reliability
Superior SLA & Uptime: Offers a 99.9% SLA with multi-cloud redundancy (AWS, Google Cloud, Azure). This matters for high-frequency trading protocols and mission-critical DeFi applications where downtime equals direct financial loss.
99.9%
SLA
02
QuickNode: Advanced Developer Tooling
Deep protocol integrations: Native support for The Graph, IPFS, and custom RPC methods. This matters for protocol teams building complex dApps that require indexed data, decentralized storage, and low-level chain interactions beyond standard JSON-RPC.
03
Ankr: Cost-Effective Scalability
Aggregated Load Balancer: Dynamically routes requests across a decentralized node network, optimizing for cost and latency. This matters for scaling startups and applications with spiky traffic (e.g., NFT mints) who need to manage infrastructure costs predictably.
~20%
Avg. Cost Savings
04
Ankr: Web3-Native & Decentralized Focus
Distributed Node Infrastructure: Leverages a globally distributed network of independent node operators. This matters for projects prioritizing censorship resistance and geographic decentralization, aligning with core Web3 principles over traditional cloud reliance.
05
QuickNode for: Regulated Enterprises & High-Volume DeFi
Choose QuickNode if your priority is audit-ready compliance, predictable enterprise support, and bulletproof reliability for handling billions in TVL. Ideal for institutions, large DEXs like Uniswap, and stablecoin issuers.
06
Ankr for: Growth-Stage Protocols & Multi-Chain Aggregators
Choose Ankr for cost-optimized scaling, easy multi-chain access (40+ chains), and a decentralized infrastructure ethos. Ideal for cross-chain bridges like LayerZero, emerging GameFi projects, and wallets needing broad chain support.
HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON
Feature Comparison: QuickNode vs Ankr
Direct comparison of key metrics and features for enterprise node infrastructure.
| Metric / Feature | QuickNode | Ankr |
|---|---|---|
Global Node Locations | 25+ regions | 40+ regions |
Supported Chains | 30+ (Ethereum, Solana, Polygon, etc.) | 40+ (Ethereum, Aptos, Sui, etc.) |
Dedicated Node SLA | 99.9% | 99.9% |
Archive Data Access | ||
Free Tier | ||
Enterprise Support (24/7) | ||
Avg. Historical Data Latency | < 2 sec | < 5 sec |
WebSocket Support |
HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON
QuickNode vs Ankr: Node Infrastructure Benchmarks
Direct comparison of key metrics and features for enterprise node infrastructure providers.
| Metric | QuickNode | Ankr |
|---|---|---|
Global Edge Nodes | 16+ | 45+ |
Supported Chains | 30+ | 40+ |
Avg. Block Propagation Time | < 100 ms | < 200 ms |
Historical Data Retention | Archive (Full) | Archive (Full) |
Enterprise SLA Uptime | 99.9% | 99.9% |
Dedicated Node Setup Time | < 24 hours | < 1 hour |
Enhanced APIs (e.g., NFT, Token) | ||
Free Tier Available |
CHOOSE YOUR PRIORITY
When to Choose QuickNode vs Ankr
QuickNode for Enterprise
Verdict: The premium choice for mission-critical, high-throughput applications. Strengths: Unmatched reliability with 99.99% SLA, dedicated node instances, and enterprise-grade support with 24/7 phone access. Offers the deepest chain support (40+ networks) and advanced features like real-time alerts, GraphQL endpoints, and dedicated RPC URLs. Compliance-ready with SOC2 Type II certification. Best For: Large-scale DeFi protocols (e.g., Aave, Uniswap), institutional trading desks, and applications requiring absolute uptime and custom configurations.
Ankr for Enterprise
Verdict: A strong, cost-effective alternative for scaling startups and growth-stage projects. Strengths: Competitive global infrastructure with a free tier and transparent, usage-based pricing. Strong multi-chain support (30+ networks) with a unified API. Offers advanced tools like the Ankr Scan explorer suite and seamless integration with services like Liquid Staking. Best For: Rapidly scaling dApps, projects needing to manage costs predictably, and teams that value a unified toolset across multiple chains.
pros-cons-a
PROS AND CONS
QuickNode vs Ankr: Node Infrastructure
A data-driven breakdown of the key strengths and trade-offs between two leading node infrastructure providers.
01
QuickNode: Performance & Reliability
Enterprise-grade uptime: Publicly commits to 99.9%+ SLA with multi-cloud redundancy (AWS, Google Cloud, Azure). This matters for high-frequency trading bots and mission-critical DeFi protocols where downtime equals lost revenue. Supports over 30 chains, including Solana, Polygon, and Base.
99.9%
Uptime SLA
30+
Supported Chains
03
Ankr: Cost & Accessibility
Competitive, transparent pricing: Often lower entry-level costs with a clear pay-as-you-go model. This matters for early-stage startups and projects with variable traffic looking to minimize fixed infrastructure overhead. Offers a generous free tier for development.
05
QuickNode: The Trade-Off
Higher cost for premium tier: Enterprise plans with advanced features (dedicated nodes, enhanced analytics) command a premium price. Can be cost-prohibitive for very small projects or those with extremely high, unpredictable request volumes on a budget.
06
Ankr: The Trade-Off
Performance variability on shared tiers: The lower-cost, shared RPC endpoints can experience higher latency during network congestion compared to dedicated infrastructure. This matters for applications requiring sub-second finality guarantees and consistent high throughput.
pros-cons-b
QuickNode vs Ankr: Node Infrastructure
Ankr: Pros and Cons
Key strengths and trade-offs at a glance for CTOs evaluating RPC and node service providers.
01
Ankr's Key Strength: Multi-Chain Breadth
Extensive protocol support: Ankr provides RPC endpoints for 40+ blockchains, including Ethereum, Polygon, Avalanche, and emerging L2s like Base. This matters for dApp developers building cross-chain applications who want a single API provider.
02
Ankr's Key Strength: Decentralized Node Network
Infrastructure model: Ankr leverages a globally distributed network of node operators, contrasting with centralized data centers. This matters for protocol architects prioritizing censorship resistance and network resilience for their applications.
03
QuickNode's Key Strength: Enterprise-Grade Reliability
Proven uptime and support: QuickNode guarantees 99.9% SLA, offers 24/7 dedicated support, and provides advanced features like dedicated endpoints and GraphQL. This matters for VPs of Engineering running high-volume, mission-critical production workloads.
04
QuickNode's Key Strength: Performance & Advanced Tooling
Optimized performance and analytics: QuickNode offers enhanced APIs (e.g., Debug & Trace), real-time analytics dashboards, and faster sync times. This matters for trading platforms and DeFi protocols requiring low-latency data and deep chain inspection.
05
Ankr's Trade-Off: Support & SLAs
Potential support gap: While offering competitive pricing, Ankr's support structure and formal SLAs may not match the enterprise-tier, white-glove service of competitors. This is a consideration for teams with less in-house DevOps expertise.
06
QuickNode's Trade-Off: Cost & Centralization
Premium pricing model: QuickNode's robust features come at a higher cost. Its infrastructure, while reliable, is more centralized. This matters for bootstrapped projects or those with a strict decentralization mandate.
verdict
THE ANALYSIS
Final Verdict and Decision Framework
A data-driven breakdown to help CTOs and architects choose the optimal node infrastructure provider for their specific needs.
QuickNode excels at providing high-performance, enterprise-grade reliability and deep chain support. Its core strength is a meticulously managed, vertically integrated infrastructure that guarantees consistent performance, evidenced by its 99.9%+ SLA and support for over 30 blockchains including niche L2s and app-chains. For example, its dedicated nodes offer sub-second block times and are the preferred backend for high-frequency DeFi protocols and NFT marketplaces requiring deterministic latency.
Ankr takes a different approach by prioritizing decentralization, cost-efficiency, and developer accessibility through a distributed node network. This strategy results in a compelling trade-off: lower-cost RPC endpoints (often 20-30% cheaper for comparable tiers) and innovative products like the Ankr Protocol, but with potentially more variable performance during peak network congestion compared to a fully centralized provider.
The key architectural trade-off is control versus cost and philosophy. QuickNode offers a premium, controlled environment ideal for applications where predictable uptime and raw performance are non-negotiable. Ankr provides a more decentralized, cost-effective path that aligns with Web3 ethos, suitable for projects with variable traffic or those building decentralized infrastructure themselves.
Consider QuickNode if your priority is enterprise-grade stability for mission-critical dApps, you require the deepest multi-chain support (including advanced APIs for Solana or Sui), and your budget supports a premium for guaranteed performance and dedicated support.
Choose Ankr when you prioritize reducing infrastructure costs, value contributing to a decentralized node network, need scalable solutions for fluctuating traffic, or are building middleware services that leverage distributed node providers.
ENQUIRY
Get In Touch
today.
Our experts will offer a free quote and a 30min call to discuss your project.
NDA Protected
Confidentiality24h Response
Time to ValueDirectly to Engineering Team
No Sales Fluff10+
Protocols Shipped
$20M+
TVL Overall