Dedicated RPC Endpoints from providers like Alchemy, Infura, or Chainstack excel at providing high-performance, reliable access. They offer guaranteed uptime (often 99.9%+ SLA), higher request throughput, and priority access to the mempool. For example, dedicated endpoints can handle 1,000+ requests per second with sub-100ms latency, crucial for trading bots and high-frequency dApps. They also provide advanced features like WebSocket support, archive data, and enhanced APIs.
LABS
Comparisons
Dedicated RPC Endpoints vs Public RPC Endpoints
A technical analysis comparing private, dedicated RPC endpoints with guaranteed resources against shared public endpoints. We evaluate performance, reliability, rate limits, security, and cost for CTOs and engineering leads.
Chainscore © 2026
introduction
THE ANALYSIS
Introduction: The RPC Infrastructure Decision
Choosing between dedicated and public RPC endpoints is a foundational decision that impacts your application's performance, reliability, and cost.
Public RPC Endpoints take a different approach by offering free, shared access directly from node providers or community pools. This results in a significant trade-off: zero direct cost but highly variable performance. Public endpoints often suffer from rate limiting, congestion during peak demand (leading to 5-10 second response times), and lower reliability. They are suitable for prototyping, read-only operations, or applications with minimal traffic, but lack the support and consistency of a paid service.
The key trade-off: If your priority is performance, reliability, and advanced tooling for a production application with significant user traffic or TVL, choose a Dedicated Endpoint. If you prioritize zero-cost development, testing, or extremely low-volume applications, a Public Endpoint may suffice initially, with a clear migration path as your needs grow.
tldr-summary
Dedicated RPC vs Public RPC
TL;DR: Key Differentiators at a Glance
Critical performance, reliability, and cost trade-offs for high-stakes applications.
01
Dedicated RPC: Performance & Reliability
Guaranteed Uptime & Low Latency: SLA-backed uptime (99.9%+) and sub-100ms global response times. This matters for high-frequency trading bots on Uniswap or NFT minting platforms where seconds equal millions.
99.9%+
Uptime SLA
< 100ms
Avg. Latency
02
Dedicated RPC: Security & Control
Private Endpoint & Rate Limits: Isolated infrastructure prevents traffic from other apps. Customizable rate limits protect against abuse. This matters for wallet providers (MetaMask) and custodial services requiring audit trails and DDoS protection.
03
Public RPC: Cost & Simplicity
Zero Direct Cost & Easy Setup: Free to use, often with a single-line configuration change. This matters for prototyping, hackathon projects, or read-only dashboards where cost is the primary constraint.
04
Public RPC: Shared Load & Instability
Unpredictable Performance & Blacklisting Risk: Shared nodes can be rate-limited, down during congestion (e.g., NFT drops), or blacklist your IP. This matters for mainnet production dApps where failed transactions directly impact user trust and revenue.
1000+
Concurrent Users
DEDICATED RPC VS PUBLIC RPC
Head-to-Head Feature Comparison
Direct comparison of performance, reliability, and cost metrics for blockchain API endpoints.
| Metric | Dedicated RPC Endpoint | Public RPC Endpoint |
|---|---|---|
Guaranteed Uptime SLA | 99.9%+ | |
Request Rate Limits | Unlimited / Custom | ~10-30 requests/sec |
Avg. Response Time | < 100 ms | 200-2000 ms |
Dedicated Infrastructure | ||
Priority Transaction Routing | ||
Historical Data Access | Full Archive | Limited (100 blocks) |
Cost Model | $200-$2000/month | Free (with rate limits) |
WebSocket Support | Often Unstable |
pros-cons-a
A Technical Comparison
Dedicated RPC Endpoints: Pros and Cons
Key strengths and trade-offs for high-stakes applications. Performance, reliability, and cost are the primary differentiators.
01
Dedicated Endpoint: Performance & Reliability
Guaranteed throughput and uptime: Dedicated nodes (e.g., from Alchemy, QuickNode) offer 99.9%+ SLA, <100ms latency, and no rate-limiting. This is critical for high-frequency trading bots, NFT minting platforms, and real-time dashboards where public RPC congestion can cause failed transactions and lost revenue.
99.9%+
Uptime SLA
<100ms
Typical Latency
02
Dedicated Endpoint: Security & Control
Private, authenticated access: Dedicated endpoints use API keys, enabling request filtering, usage analytics, and IP whitelisting. This prevents Sybil attacks, spam, and unauthorized access that plague public RPCs. Essential for protocol treasuries, institutional wallets, and any service handling sensitive user data.
03
Public Endpoint: Zero-Cost Entry
No upfront financial commitment: Services like Infura's public tier or chain-specific public RPCs (e.g., https://eth.llamarpc.com) are free. This is ideal for prototyping, hobby projects, and low-traffic dApps where budget is the primary constraint and occasional downtime is acceptable.
04
Public Endpoint: Decentralization & Redundancy
No single point of failure: Developers can implement fallback RPC providers (e.g., switching between Infura, Alchemy public, and community nodes) to improve resilience. This strategy, used by major wallets like MetaMask, mitigates risk if one provider fails. Best for non-critical read operations and user-facing wallet interactions.
pros-cons-b
Dedicated vs. Public RPCs
Public RPC Endpoints: Pros and Cons
Key strengths and trade-offs for infrastructure decisions, based on performance, cost, and reliability metrics.
01
Dedicated RPC: Unmatched Performance & Reliability
Guaranteed Rate Limits & Uptime: Dedicated endpoints offer isolated infrastructure with SLAs often exceeding 99.9% uptime and no shared rate limits. This is critical for high-frequency trading bots, production-grade DeFi frontends, and NFT minting services that cannot afford dropped transactions or throttling during peak loads.
99.9%+
Uptime SLA
0 Throttling
Shared Limits
02
Dedicated RPC: Enhanced Security & Privacy
Private Request Logs & Anti-Frontrunning: Your application's traffic and user wallet interactions are not pooled with unknown third parties. This prevents transaction frontrunning and protects sensitive data. Essential for wallet providers, institutional trading desks, and any app handling non-public user data where privacy is a compliance requirement.
03
Public RPC: Zero-Cost Entry
Immediate, Free Access: Services like Alchemy's Supernode, Infura, and public endpoints from chains like Polygon and BSC provide instant API keys at no cost. This is ideal for prototyping, hackathons, personal projects, and early-stage startups where budget is the primary constraint and ultra-high reliability is not yet required.
$0
Initial Cost
04
Public RPC: Simplicity & Speed to Market
No Infrastructure Management: Eliminates the need to spin up and maintain your own node. With a single API key, you get access to global load balancers and basic archival data. Best for MVPs, simple dApp integrations, and educational tools where developer velocity and operational overhead outweigh the need for custom configurations.
CHOOSE YOUR PRIORITY
When to Choose: Decision Guide by Use Case
Dedicated RPC Endpoints for High-Volume dApps
Verdict: The only viable choice for production applications with significant user traffic. Strengths:
- Guaranteed Performance: Avoid public endpoint rate limits (e.g., 10-30 req/sec) that cause user transaction failures during peak load.
- Consistent Latency: Sub-100ms response times from geographically distributed nodes ensure a smooth UX for trading on Uniswap, Aave, or Compound.
- Enhanced Reliability: 99.9%+ SLA from providers like Alchemy, Infura, or Chainstack eliminates downtime-related TVL bleed.
Public RPC Endpoints for High-Volume dApps
Verdict: Not suitable. Using public endpoints for a mainnet DeFi or NFT minting dApp is a critical operational risk. The unpredictable latency and guaranteed rate-limiting will directly impact user retention and protocol revenue.
DEDICATED VS PUBLIC RPC
Technical Deep Dive: Performance & Reliability Metrics
A quantitative comparison of performance, reliability, and operational characteristics between dedicated and public RPC endpoints for blockchain applications.
Yes, a dedicated RPC endpoint is consistently faster. Dedicated endpoints from providers like Alchemy, QuickNode, and Infura offer prioritized, load-balanced nodes with sub-100ms response times, while public endpoints often suffer from congestion, leading to latencies of 1-5 seconds or more during peak loads. This speed is critical for high-frequency trading bots on Uniswap or real-time NFT minting applications.
verdict
THE ANALYSIS
Final Verdict and Decision Framework
Choosing between dedicated and public RPC endpoints is a strategic decision balancing cost, performance, and reliability.
Dedicated RPC Endpoints excel at providing consistent, high-performance access because they offer exclusive resources and advanced features. For example, services like Alchemy, Infura, and Chainstack provide dedicated endpoints with 99.9%+ SLA uptime, rate limits exceeding 1,000 requests per second, and access to specialized APIs like eth_getLogs for historical data or debug_traceTransaction for debugging. This results in predictable latency, often under 50ms, and eliminates the "noisy neighbor" problem inherent in shared infrastructure.
Public RPC Endpoints take a different approach by offering free, shared access to blockchain nodes. This results in a significant trade-off: zero direct cost but highly variable performance. Public endpoints, such as those from Ankr or public Ethereum Foundation nodes, frequently experience downtime during network congestion, rate limits as low as 10-100 requests per second, and latency spikes over 500ms. They are suitable for prototyping, read-only dashboards, or low-volume personal wallets, but lack the reliability required for production-grade dApps.
The key trade-off: If your priority is production reliability, high throughput, and advanced tooling for a dApp with significant TVL or user base, choose a Dedicated RPC. If your priority is minimizing initial cost for a prototype, a hobby project, or a read-only interface with minimal traffic, a Public RPC is a viable starting point. For teams with a $500K+ infrastructure budget, the performance and risk-mitigation benefits of a dedicated service from a top-tier provider are non-negotiable for mainnet deployment.
ENQUIRY
Get In Touch
today.
Our experts will offer a free quote and a 30min call to discuss your project.
NDA Protected
Confidentiality24h Response
Time to ValueDirectly to Engineering Team
No Sales Fluff10+
Protocols Shipped
$20M+
TVL Overall