Free 30-min Web3 Consultation
Book Consultation
Smart Contract Security Audits
View Audit Services
Custom DeFi Protocol Development
Explore DeFi
Full-Stack Web3 dApp Development
View App Services
Free 30-min Web3 Consultation
Book Consultation
Smart Contract Security Audits
View Audit Services
Custom DeFi Protocol Development
Explore DeFi
Full-Stack Web3 dApp Development
View App Services
Free 30-min Web3 Consultation
Book Consultation
Smart Contract Security Audits
View Audit Services
Custom DeFi Protocol Development
Explore DeFi
Full-Stack Web3 dApp Development
View App Services
Free 30-min Web3 Consultation
Book Consultation
Smart Contract Security Audits
View Audit Services
Custom DeFi Protocol Development
Explore DeFi
Full-Stack Web3 dApp Development
View App Services
LABS
Comparisons

Chainstack vs QuickNode: Dedicated Node Pricing

A technical and financial analysis comparing the dedicated node offerings from Chainstack and QuickNode. This guide breaks down hardware specs, pricing tiers, and total cost of ownership to help infrastructure teams make a data-driven decision.
Chainscore © 2026
introduction
THE ANALYSIS

Introduction: The Dedicated Node Decision

Choosing between Chainstack and QuickNode for dedicated nodes requires a clear-eyed analysis of their distinct pricing philosophies and performance guarantees.

Chainstack excels at predictable, consumption-based pricing for high-throughput applications. Its dedicated node plans offer a flat monthly fee for unlimited requests, which is ideal for protocols with variable or unpredictable traffic patterns, such as NFT marketplaces or high-frequency DeFi arbitrage bots. For example, their Premium Ethereum node guarantees 99.9% SLA and processes over 1,000 requests per second, providing cost certainty regardless of API call volume.

QuickNode takes a different approach by offering tiered, usage-based pricing with a strong focus on premium performance and global distribution. This results in a trade-off: you pay for what you use, which can be more economical for stable, lower-volume applications, but costs can scale with traffic spikes. Their Elite plan provides access to over 18 blockchain networks and features like dedicated RPC endpoints and WebSocket support, optimized for applications like cross-chain bridges or multi-chain analytics dashboards that require broad, reliable connectivity.

The key trade-off: If your priority is budget predictability and unlimited requests for a single, high-performance chain, choose Chainstack. If you prioritize pay-as-you-go flexibility and a globally distributed, multi-chain infrastructure, choose QuickNode.

tldr-summary
Dedicated Node Pricing Showdown

TL;DR: Key Differentiators at a Glance

A direct comparison of pricing models and value propositions for dedicated nodes.

01

Chainstack: Predictable, All-Inclusive Pricing

Flat-rate, usage-based tiers: Pay a fixed monthly fee per node with clear resource caps (e.g., requests/day, archive data). No surprise bandwidth overages. This matters for budget-conscious teams who need predictable OpEx and want to avoid variable cloud provider bills.

02

Chainstack: Multi-Cloud & Geo-Redundancy

Infrastructure agnostic: Deploy nodes across AWS, Google Cloud, and Azure from a single dashboard. Enables global low-latency deployments and avoids vendor lock-in. This is critical for enterprise applications requiring high availability and specific compliance (e.g., data sovereignty).

03

QuickNode: Granular, Pay-As-You-Go Add-Ons

Modular pricing: Base dedicated node + à la carte features (e.g., Turbo Geth, Trace & Debug, Archive Data). Optimizes cost for specialized needs. This matters for high-performance dApps (like DeFi arbitrage bots) that require specific optimizations but not a full enterprise bundle.

04

QuickNode: Premium Support & SLAs

Guanteed response times & dedicated engineers: Higher-tier plans include SLA-backed support (e.g., <15 min response for critical issues). This is non-negotiable for institutional clients and protocols where node downtime directly translates to financial loss or user attrition.

CHAINSTACK VS QUICKNODE

Head-to-Head: Dedicated Node Specifications & Pricing

Direct comparison of dedicated node tiers, performance, and cost for enterprise blockchain infrastructure.

Metric / FeatureChainstack DedicatedQuickNode Dedicated

Entry-Level Monthly Cost

$399

$299

Included Daily Requests

10M

Unlimited

Max Request Rate (RPS)

1,500

2,000

Guaranteed Uptime SLA

99.9%

99.9%

Multi-Cloud Deployment

Archive Node Support

Global Edge Caching

Free Shared Tier Available

TOTAL COST OF OWNERSHIP ANALYSIS

Chainstack vs QuickNode: Dedicated Node Pricing

Direct comparison of pricing, performance, and features for dedicated node services.

Metric / FeatureChainstackQuickNode

Dedicated Node Starting Price (Monthly)

$399

$299

Included Daily Request Limit

Unlimited

Unlimited

Archive Data Availability

Tracing/Debug APIs

Multi-Region Deployment

SLA Guarantee

99.9%

99.5%

Free Shared Node Tier

pros-cons-a
PROS AND CONS ANALYSIS

Chainstack vs QuickNode: Dedicated Node Pricing

A data-driven comparison of dedicated node pricing models, highlighting key differentiators for budget-conscious CTOs and architects.

01

Chainstack: Transparent, Predictable Pricing

Fixed monthly cost per chain: No surprise usage-based fees. This matters for enterprise budgeting where forecasting OpEx is critical. For example, a dedicated Ethereum node is a flat $399/month, regardless of request volume.

02

Chainstack: Cost-Effective Multi-Chain Deployments

Bundled discounts for multiple nodes: Running nodes for Ethereum, Polygon, and Arbitrum together is more economical than sourcing separately. This matters for protocols operating across multiple L2s who need reliable, co-located infrastructure.

03

QuickNode: Granular, Pay-As-You-Go Tiers

Scalable plans based on requests/second: From Growth (25M reqs/month) to Enterprise (custom). This matters for applications with variable or spiky traffic (e.g., NFT mints, token launches) who can scale cost with demand.

04

QuickNode: Premium Support & Add-Ons

Higher-tier plans include dedicated Slack support and advanced analytics. This matters for teams requiring white-glove service and deep insights into node performance and RPC usage patterns.

05

Chainstack Con: Limited Burst Capacity

Fixed resources on dedicated plans: High-traffic bursts may require a plan upgrade. This is a trade-off for teams that prefer high, unpredictable volume (e.g., major DeFi protocols during market volatility) over cost predictability.

06

QuickNode Con: Complex Cost Forecasting

Usage-based billing can lead to variable invoices. Exceeding included requests incurs overage fees. This matters for startups with tight burn rates who need absolute cost certainty each month.

pros-cons-b
Chainstack vs QuickNode

QuickNode: Pros and Cons for Dedicated Nodes

Key strengths and trade-offs for CTOs evaluating dedicated node providers at scale.

01

Chainstack: Cost-Effective Scaling

Predictable, flat-rate pricing: No surprise bandwidth overages. Dedicated nodes start at a clear monthly rate, making budget forecasting straightforward for high-throughput protocols like Aave or Uniswap V3. This matters for teams with predictable, high-volume workloads who need to control infrastructure costs.

02

Chainstack: Multi-Cloud Resilience

Infrastructure agnostic deployment: Nodes can be deployed across AWS, Google Cloud, and Azure from a single dashboard. This provides built-in redundancy and avoids vendor lock-in. Critical for enterprise applications requiring 99.9%+ SLA and disaster recovery plans.

03

QuickNode: Unmatched Chain Coverage

Largest supported network portfolio: Access to 30+ chains including Solana, Sui, Aptos, and Cosmos appchains. This matters for protocols like Jupiter Exchange or cross-chain bridges (e.g., Wormhole) that need a single provider for heterogeneous environments.

04

QuickNode: Premium Performance & Support

Guanteed sub-second latency and 24/7 dedicated support: SLA-backed performance with direct engineer access. This is critical for trading desks, NFT marketplaces like OpenSea, and real-time DeFi applications where milliseconds and immediate issue resolution impact revenue.

05

Chainstack: Potential Feature Lag

Slower rollout of new chain support: While core chains (Ethereum, Polygon, Arbitrum) are robust, newer L1/L2 networks may be added after market leaders. This is a trade-off for teams building on emerging ecosystems like Monad or Berachain who need day-one access.

06

QuickNode: Complex Cost Structure

Usage-based add-ons for advanced features: Core dedicated node pricing can escalate with add-ons for enhanced APIs, archival data, or higher request quotas. This requires careful monitoring for applications with spiky or unpredictable traffic patterns.

CHOOSE YOUR PRIORITY

Decision Framework: When to Choose Which Provider

Chainstack for DeFi

Verdict: The premium choice for established protocols with heavy, predictable loads. Strengths: Chainstack's dedicated nodes offer guaranteed resources and consistent sub-1s latency, critical for arbitrage bots and high-frequency DEX aggregators like 1inch. Their global geo-redundancy ensures uptime during regional outages. The enterprise-grade SLA (99.9%+) and direct support provide the reliability needed for protocols managing significant TVL on Ethereum or Arbitrum. Consider: Higher entry cost; overkill for prototyping.

QuickNode for DeFi

Verdict: Superior for rapid scaling and multi-chain experimentation. Strengths: QuickNode's elastic scaling and pay-as-you-go model are ideal for DeFi projects with variable traffic, like a new yield aggregator. Their unified API across 25+ chains (Ethereum, Solana, Polygon) simplifies building cross-chain strategies. Advanced features like the Mempool Streamer and GraphQL are built-in, accelerating development for lending protocols like Aave forks. Consider: Performance can vary slightly on shared plans during extreme network congestion.

verdict
THE ANALYSIS

Final Verdict and Recommendation

Choosing between Chainstack and QuickNode for dedicated nodes hinges on your specific priorities for cost predictability, performance, and ecosystem breadth.

Chainstack excels at providing transparent, predictable pricing for high-throughput applications. Its dedicated node plans offer fixed monthly rates with unlimited requests and predictable bandwidth caps, which is ideal for protocols like Aave or Uniswap V3 that require consistent, high-volume data access. For example, their Ethereum mainnet dedicated node starts at $399/month with 1.2 TB of daily data transfer, a clear cost model that simplifies budgeting for CTOs.

QuickNode takes a different approach by prioritizing ecosystem breadth and advanced features over pure cost simplicity. Its dedicated plans, while often carrying a higher base price, include access to a wider array of chains (e.g., Solana, Polygon, Base) and premium add-ons like enhanced APIs, real-time alerts, and dedicated support tiers. This results in a trade-off: you pay more for a comprehensive, managed infrastructure suite rather than a bare-metal node.

The key trade-off: If your priority is cost control and predictable billing for a core set of EVM chains, choose Chainstack. Its straightforward pricing and solid performance for chains like Ethereum and Polygon make it a reliable workhorse. If you prioritize ecosystem coverage, advanced developer tooling, and support for emerging L1/L2 networks, choose QuickNode. Its platform is better suited for teams building multi-chain applications who value a full-featured, managed service over the lowest possible price point.

ENQUIRY

Get In Touch
today.

Our experts will offer a free quote and a 30min call to discuss your project.

NDA Protected
24h Response
Directly to Engineering Team
10+
Protocols Shipped
$20M+
TVL Overall
NDA Protected Directly to Engineering Team