All That Node excels at providing transparent, predictable pricing for early-stage projects. Its core strength is a simplified, flat-rate model that eliminates variable data transfer costs, a critical factor for startups with volatile usage. For example, its Startup plan offers 300,000 daily requests and access to 30+ chains for a fixed $299/month, providing clear budget control without surprise overage fees.
LABS
Comparisons
All That Node vs QuickNode: Budget Plans for Startups
A technical and commercial analysis comparing All That Node and QuickNode for early-stage projects. This guide examines entry-level pricing, developer grants, scalability, and core features to help CTOs and founders make a data-driven infrastructure choice.
Chainscore © 2026
introduction
THE ANALYSIS
Introduction: The Startup Infrastructure Dilemma
Choosing between All That Node and QuickNode hinges on a fundamental trade-off between cost predictability and ecosystem breadth.
QuickNode takes a different approach by prioritizing extensive network coverage and deep tooling integration. This results in a more complex, usage-based pricing structure but grants access to a vast ecosystem of over 30 blockchains, including Arbitrum, Optimism, and Base, plus advanced features like Flashbots protection and GraphQL support. Its strength is being a one-stop shop for scaling across multiple protocols.
The key trade-off: If your priority is strict budget control and cost predictability during the volatile early growth phase, choose All That Node. If you prioritize immediate access to a vast multi-chain ecosystem and advanced developer tools, even with a more variable cost structure, choose QuickNode.
tldr-summary
All That Node vs QuickNode
TL;DR: Key Differentiators at a Glance
A direct comparison of budget-friendly node service plans for early-stage startups and developers.
01
All That Node: Best for Lean Startups
Radically transparent pricing: No hidden fees, with a clear $99/month flat rate for core access. This matters for bootstrapped teams who need predictable infrastructure costs.
Developer-first tooling: Includes built-in RPC analytics and WebSocket support on all plans. This matters for teams building real-time dApps or needing to debug API calls without third-party tools.
02
All That Node: Potential Trade-offs
Smaller network coverage: Supports 30+ chains vs. QuickNode's 30+. This matters if your project requires a niche or emerging L2 not yet in their catalog.
Younger ecosystem: Fewer pre-built integrations and plugins compared to established players. This matters if you rely heavily on off-the-shelf data indexing or alerting tools.
03
QuickNode: Best for Scaling Teams
Enterprise-grade reliability: 99.9% SLA and global edge network with 14+ locations. This matters for production applications requiring maximum uptime and low-latency global access.
Extensive chain support & add-ons: Access to 30+ chains and premium add-ons like QuickAlerts and Enhanced APIs. This matters for protocols deploying on multiple ecosystems or needing advanced monitoring.
04
QuickNode: Potential Trade-offs
Complex, usage-based pricing: Costs can scale unpredictably with request volume and add-ons. This matters for startups with variable traffic or tight burn rate controls.
Higher entry cost: Core plans start at a higher price point for comparable throughput. This matters for pre-seed/seed stage companies where every dollar in runway counts.
HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON
All That Node vs QuickNode: Budget Plans for Startups
Direct comparison of pricing, features, and limits for startup-focused plans.
| Metric | All That Node | QuickNode |
|---|---|---|
Starting Price (Monthly) | $49 | $49 |
Requests per Month | 1.5M | 10M |
Daily Request Limit | 50K | 333K |
Archival Data Access | ||
Dedicated Endpoint | ||
Supported Chains | 50+ | 30+ |
Free Trial Credits | $100 | $50 |
CHOOSE YOUR PRIORITY
When to Choose Which: A Scenario-Based Guide
QuickNode for Bootstrapped Startups
Verdict: The premium choice for teams with runway who need immediate, global reliability. Strengths: QuickNode's Free Tier (25M compute units/month) is generous for initial development and testing. Its global edge network (over 25 chains, 16+ locations) provides low-latency access from day one, crucial for user-facing applications. The enterprise-grade SLA (99.9%) and 24/7 support mitigate operational risk for your core infrastructure. Budget Fit: Ideal if your $500K budget allocates for proven, "set-and-forget" infrastructure, allowing your team to focus on product, not node ops. The pay-as-you-go model scales predictably with user growth.
All That Node for Bootstrapped Startups
Verdict: A compelling, cost-optimized alternative for teams willing to trade some convenience for significant savings. Strengths: Dramatically lower costs are the primary draw, with pricing often 50-70% below competitors for equivalent throughput. The simple, flat-rate pricing (e.g., $299/month for 12M requests) eliminates surprise bills, perfect for strict budgeting. Trade-off: You may manage more chains and configurations manually compared to QuickNode's unified dashboard. Support is robust but may not match the 24/7 enterprise response time. Choose this for maximum runway extension.
pros-cons-a
PROS AND CONS
All That Node vs QuickNode: Budget Plans for Startups
Key strengths and trade-offs for early-stage teams with $500K+ budgets evaluating RPC infrastructure.
01
All That Node: Cost-Effective Scaling
Transparent, usage-based pricing: Pay only for the requests you make, with no monthly commit. This matters for startups with unpredictable traffic or those building in testnet phases, as it prevents budget waste on idle capacity. Supports multi-chain bundling (Ethereum, Polygon, Solana) under a single plan.
02
All That Node: Developer-First Tooling
Integrated analytics dashboard provides real-time metrics on request volume, error rates, and latency. This matters for engineering teams needing to debug performance bottlenecks or justify infrastructure spend. Includes WebSocket support and archival data access in base tiers, which competitors often charge extra for.
03
QuickNode: Enterprise-Grade Reliability
Proven 99.9%+ SLA with global low-latency edge network. This matters for production applications where downtime directly impacts revenue, such as DeFi protocols like Aave or NFT marketplaces. Offers dedicated node instances for maximum performance isolation, critical for high-frequency trading bots.
04
QuickNode: Extensive Chain & Ecosystem Support
Support for 30+ chains including emerging L2s like Arbitrum, Optimism, and Base. This matters for startups building cross-chain applications or hedging against ecosystem risk. Provides pre-built add-ons for enhanced APIs (NFT, Token, Debug) and security tools, reducing development time.
05
All That Node: Potential Support Lag
Smaller team scale compared to incumbents can mean slower enterprise-level support response times. This matters for startups requiring immediate, 24/7 engineering support during critical mainnet launches or security incidents. Community-driven documentation may lack depth for niche chains.
06
QuickNode: Higher Cost of Entry
Tiered monthly plans start at a higher fixed cost, even for low usage. This matters for bootstrapped startups where capital efficiency is paramount; you may pay for unused capacity. Advanced features like trace calls or archive data often require upgrading to premium plans, increasing TCO.
pros-cons-b
All That Node vs QuickNode
QuickNode: Pros and Cons for Startups
Key strengths and trade-offs for startups evaluating budget-friendly RPC providers.
01
QuickNode: Enterprise-Grade Reliability
Specific advantage: 99.9% SLA with 24/7/365 monitoring across 30+ chains. This matters for startups building mission-critical DeFi protocols (e.g., lending/borrowing apps) where downtime directly impacts user funds and protocol revenue.
02
QuickNode: Extensive Chain & Tooling Ecosystem
Specific advantage: Supports 30+ chains including Arbitrum, Optimism, and Base, with integrated tools like GraphQL, NFT APIs, and enhanced transaction tracing. This matters for startups needing a single provider for a multi-chain strategy or requiring advanced data indexing beyond basic RPC calls.
03
QuickNode: Higher Cost for Predictable Scale
Specific advantage: Entry-level plan starts at $49/month for 5M requests. This matters for bootstrapped startups or those with low, unpredictable traffic where cost-per-request models (like All That Node's) can be significantly cheaper during early development and testing phases.
04
QuickNode: Potential Over-Provisioning for MVPs
Specific advantage: Tiered plans require capacity estimation upfront. This matters for a startup launching an MVP with unknown user demand, where a pay-as-you-go model can prevent paying for unused capacity and allow budgets to scale precisely with growth.
05
All That Node: Transparent, Usage-Based Pricing
Specific advantage: Pay-per-request model starting at $0.80 per 100K requests on Ethereum Mainnet. This matters for startups with fluctuating traffic (e.g., a new NFT mint) who want to avoid bill shock and only pay for what they use, keeping initial infrastructure costs under $10/month.
06
All That Node: Limited Advanced Features
Specific advantage: Focuses on core JSON-RPC with fewer value-added services like archival data or specialized APIs. This matters for startups that later need advanced tooling (e.g., historical event logs for analytics) and may face a more complex migration to a provider like QuickNode or Alchemy.
verdict
THE ANALYSIS
Final Verdict and Decision Framework
A data-driven breakdown to help CTOs choose the optimal node infrastructure based on their startup's specific growth stage and technical priorities.
All That Node excels at providing predictable, transparent costs and a generous free tier for early-stage validation. Its Pay-As-You-Go model, with a flat rate of $0.10 per 100K compute units, offers clear budget control without hidden fees. For example, a startup building an NFT minting dApp on Polygon can accurately forecast monthly costs based on transaction volume, avoiding the surprise bills common with tiered plans. This model is particularly advantageous for projects with variable or unpredictable traffic patterns.
QuickNode takes a different approach with its feature-rich, tiered subscription plans. This strategy results in a higher entry cost but bundles advanced capabilities like dedicated endpoints, higher rate limits (e.g., 330K requests/day on the Growth plan), and premium add-ons for analytics and debugging. The trade-off is less granular cost control for high-volume users, but you gain enterprise-grade reliability, 99.9% SLA guarantees, and deep integrations with tools like The Graph and Covalent out of the box.
The key trade-off: If your priority is minimizing initial burn rate and maintaining ultimate cost predictability during the MVP and early-growth phases, choose All That Node. Its transparent pricing and robust free tier are ideal for bootstrapped teams. If you prioritize immediate access to enterprise features, dedicated infrastructure, and superior support to scale a product with proven traction, choose QuickNode. Its plans are designed for startups ready to invest in reliability and advanced tooling to support scaling users and TVL.
ENQUIRY
Get In Touch
today.
Our experts will offer a free quote and a 30min call to discuss your project.
NDA Protected
Confidentiality24h Response
Time to ValueDirectly to Engineering Team
No Sales Fluff10+
Protocols Shipped
$20M+
TVL Overall