Chainstack excels at flexible, multi-cloud infrastructure because it allows deployment on your own cloud accounts (AWS, Google Cloud, Azure) or its global network. This model provides superior data sovereignty, predictable billing based on compute usage, and eliminates vendor lock-in. For example, a protocol requiring compliance with GDPR or specific regional data laws can deploy dedicated nodes in chosen geographies while maintaining full control over the underlying hardware and security configuration.
LABS
Comparisons
Chainstack vs Infura: Flexible Deployment & Multi-Cloud RPC
A technical analysis comparing Chainstack's flexible, multi-cloud deployment model against Infura's established, fully-managed service. This guide is for infrastructure architects and CTOs evaluating RPC providers based on control, compliance, and performance.
Chainscore © 2026
introduction
THE ANALYSIS
Introduction: The Core Architectural Divide
The fundamental choice between Chainstack and Infura hinges on deployment flexibility versus managed simplicity.
Infura takes a different approach by offering a fully managed, consolidated service layer. This results in a trade-off: developers gain exceptional ease of use and rapid onboarding—often with a free tier—but sacrifice granular control over node location, client software, and infrastructure specifics. Infura's strength is its seamless integration with the Ethereum ecosystem, powering major wallets like MetaMask and protocols like Uniswap, providing a robust, battle-tested API with consistent 99.9%+ uptime SLA.
The key trade-off: If your priority is infrastructure control, compliance, and cost predictability for high-throughput applications, choose Chainstack. If you prioritize developer velocity, ecosystem integration, and a hands-off managed service for rapid prototyping or mainstream dApp support, choose Infura.
tldr-summary
TL;DR: Key Differentiators at a Glance
A side-by-side comparison of the core architectural and commercial trade-offs between Chainstack and Infura for enterprise RPC deployment.
01
Chainstack: Multi-Cloud Flexibility
Deploy dedicated nodes across AWS, Google Cloud, and Azure with a single interface. This matters for enterprises with existing cloud commitments or strict data sovereignty requirements (e.g., GDPR). You avoid vendor lock-in and can optimize for regional latency and cost.
02
Infura: Ethereum-First Scale & Ecosystem
Processes over 13 trillion requests annually with deep, battle-tested infrastructure for Ethereum and L2s like Arbitrum and Optimism. This matters for high-volume dApps needing proven reliability (99.9%+ SLA) and seamless integration with the ConsenSys stack (MetaMask, Truffle).
03
Chainstack: Transparent, Predictable Pricing
Pay-as-you-go and fixed-rate plans with clear per-request costs, no hidden throughput limits. This matters for startups and protocols with variable or spiky traffic who need to forecast infrastructure costs accurately and avoid surprise bills.
04
Infura: Enterprise-Grade Security & Support
SOC 2 Type II compliance, dedicated account managers, and 24/7 priority support. This matters for regulated institutions (DeFi, TradFi) and large-scale protocols where security audits, compliance reporting, and immediate escalation paths are non-negotiable.
HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON
Chainstack vs Infura: Feature Matrix
Direct comparison of key deployment, performance, and cost metrics for enterprise RPC providers.
| Metric | Chainstack | Infura |
|---|---|---|
Multi-Cloud Deployment | ||
Avg. Global Latency | < 50 ms | < 100 ms |
Dedicated Node Pricing (Monthly) | $399+ | Custom Quote |
Free Tier Daily Requests | 3,000,000 | 100,000 |
Supported Chains | 30+ | 15+ |
Private Transaction Routing | ||
Bring Your Own Cloud (BYOC) |
HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON
Chainstack vs Infura: Performance & Reliability Benchmarks
Direct comparison of key metrics and features for RPC infrastructure.
| Metric | Chainstack | Infura |
|---|---|---|
Multi-Cloud Deployment | ||
Avg. Global Latency (P95) | < 100 ms | < 150 ms |
Guaranteed Uptime SLA | 99.9% | 99.9% |
Dedicated Node Pricing Tier | $399/month | $500/month |
Free Tier Daily Requests | 3,000,000 | 100,000 |
Supported EVM Chains | 30+ | 15+ |
pros-cons-a
PROS AND CONS ANALYSIS
Chainstack vs Infura: Flexible Deployment & Multi-Cloud RPC
A data-driven comparison of infrastructure control and deployment models for CTOs managing high-value applications.
01
Chainstack Pro: True Multi-Cloud & Hybrid Deployment
Full infrastructure control: Deploy dedicated nodes on AWS, Google Cloud, Azure, or on-premises. This matters for enterprise compliance (GDPR, HIPAA) and cost optimization by leveraging existing cloud credits and commitments.
4+
Cloud Providers
02
Chainstack Pro: Granular Performance & Cost Control
Predictable, usage-based pricing with per-request metering, unlike tiered plans. Offers dedicated node specs (CPU, RAM, storage) and advanced indexing (The Graph, Subsquid). This matters for high-throughput dApps (DeFi, gaming) needing consistent sub-100ms latency and custom data pipelines.
< 100ms
Target Latency
03
Chainstack Con: Higher Operational Overhead
Requires DevOps expertise for node provisioning, monitoring, and maintenance. While managed, you own the infrastructure lifecycle. This is a trade-off for teams without dedicated SREs, where a fully-managed service like Infura reduces time-to-market.
04
Chainstack Con: Ecosystem Tooling Maturity
Younger developer ecosystem compared to Infura. Fewer native integrations with popular frameworks (Hardhat, Foundry) and smaller community support channels. This matters for teams prioritizing developer velocity and extensive documentation.
05
Infura Pro: Developer Experience & Speed
Frictionless onboarding with free tier and simple API keys. Deep, native integrations with MetaMask, Truffle, and Hardhat. This matters for prototyping and startups needing to deploy on Ethereum, Polygon, or Optimism in hours, not days.
100M+
Daily Requests
06
Infura Con: Limited Deployment Flexibility
Pure SaaS model with no dedicated node or multi-cloud options. You get a shared, managed endpoint. This is a critical limitation for enterprises with strict data sovereignty requirements or applications needing guaranteed resource isolation.
pros-cons-b
CHAINSTACK VS INFURA
Infura: Pros and Cons
Key strengths and trade-offs for flexible deployment and multi-cloud RPC at a glance.
01
Chainstack: Flexible Deployment
True multi-cloud & on-premise control: Deploy dedicated nodes on AWS, Google Cloud, Azure, or your own infrastructure. This matters for enterprises with strict data sovereignty requirements (e.g., financial institutions) or teams needing predictable, isolated performance for high-frequency trading bots.
02
Chainstack: Transparent Pricing
Pay-as-you-go and fixed-rate plans with clear, per-request pricing. No hidden enterprise fees. This matters for startups and scaling protocols (like a new DeFi app) that need to model infrastructure costs accurately against user growth without surprise bills.
03
Infura: Market Dominance & Ecosystem
Largest market share and deepest integrations: The default RPC for MetaMask, foundational for Consensys tools, and trusted by protocols like Uniswap and Aave. This matters for projects prioritizing maximum compatibility and developer familiarity to reduce integration friction.
04
Infura: Developer Experience
Polished SDKs and seamless wallet integration: Superior documentation and tools like the Infura SDK streamline development. This matters for smaller teams or hackathon projects that need to ship quickly without deep DevOps overhead.
05
Chainstack: Advanced Node Access
Full archive data and trace API support on flexible plans, plus dedicated node endpoints. This matters for data-intensive applications like blockchain analytics platforms (e.g., Dune Analytics alternatives) or indexers that require historical state queries.
06
Infura: Rate Limiting & Centralization Risk
Strict tiered rate limits on core plans can throttle high-volume dApps. As a single-point service, it presents a centralization vector; outages have caused widespread dApp downtime. This matters for mission-critical, high-TPS applications requiring guaranteed uptime and scalability.
CHOOSE YOUR PRIORITY
Decision Framework: When to Choose Which
Chainstack for Enterprise DevOps
Verdict: The definitive choice for teams requiring cloud-agnostic, self-managed infrastructure. Strengths: Chainstack's core value is flexible deployment. You can deploy dedicated nodes on AWS, Google Cloud, Azure, or on-premises, giving you full control over data sovereignty, compliance (e.g., GDPR, SOC2), and network egress costs. Its Multi-Cloud RPC feature provides automatic failover and load balancing across these deployments, ensuring 99.9%+ SLA for mission-critical applications. The platform is built for DevOps workflows with Terraform/Ansible integrations, granular team permissions, and detailed usage analytics.
Infura for Enterprise DevOps
Verdict: A streamlined, managed service best for teams prioritizing speed-to-market over infrastructure control. Strengths: Infura abstracts away all node operations, offering a simple, unified API endpoint. This drastically reduces the DevOps burden and onboarding time. Its global load-balanced network provides high reliability without any configuration. However, you are locked into Infura's cloud infrastructure (AWS), with less control over data location and no ability to run nodes in your own VPC. Ideal for projects that need to scale quickly without a dedicated infra team.
verdict
THE ANALYSIS
Final Verdict and Strategic Recommendation
Choosing between Chainstack and Infura hinges on your strategic priorities for deployment flexibility versus ecosystem maturity and developer velocity.
Chainstack excels at providing flexible, multi-cloud infrastructure control, allowing you to deploy dedicated nodes across AWS, Google Cloud, and Azure with a single API endpoint. This is critical for enterprises with strict data sovereignty requirements or those building multi-region applications. For example, a protocol needing nodes in Frankfurt for GDPR compliance and Singapore for low-latency Asian access can manage it all through Chainstack's unified console, avoiding the complexity of managing separate cloud vendor contracts and configurations.
Infura takes a different approach by offering a highly optimized, managed service built on a massive, shared infrastructure layer. This results in superior developer experience and time-to-market for applications that can operate within a shared, cloud-agnostic environment. Infura's 99.9% SLA-backed uptime and deep integrations with tools like Truffle, Hardhat, and MetaMask mean developers can build and scale dApps like those on Uniswap or Compound without managing node health, benefiting from Infura's battle-tested reliability and vast scale.
The key trade-off: If your priority is infrastructure sovereignty, custom cloud provider selection, and granular control over node deployment (e.g., for a regulated DeFi protocol or a gaming studio with specific regional clusters), choose Chainstack. If you prioritize maximizing developer productivity, leveraging the most established ecosystem with robust tooling, and accessing the broadest multi-chain support (including Ethereum, Polygon, Arbitrum, Optimism) without operational overhead, choose Infura. Your decision ultimately maps to a choice between architectural control and accelerated development velocity.
ENQUIRY
Get In Touch
today.
Our experts will offer a free quote and a 30min call to discuss your project.
NDA Protected
Confidentiality24h Response
Time to ValueDirectly to Engineering Team
No Sales Fluff10+
Protocols Shipped
$20M+
TVL Overall