Moralis excels at developer velocity and onboarding by providing a fully integrated, opinionated suite. It bundles a managed node, a unified API, authentication, and native support for cross-chain indexing and notifications into a single SDK. This results in faster time-to-market for applications like NFT marketplaces or social dApps, as developers can avoid stitching together disparate services from providers like The Graph or POKT Network.
LABS
Comparisons
Moralis vs Alchemy: All-in-One Web3 Backend
A data-driven comparison for CTOs and technical leads evaluating Moralis's integrated platform against Alchemy's high-performance infrastructure for Web3 backend needs.
Chainscore © 2026
introduction
THE ANALYSIS
Introduction: The Web3 Backend Dilemma
Choosing between Moralis and Alchemy means deciding on a foundational philosophy for your Web3 stack.
Alchemy takes a different approach by focusing on core infrastructure reliability and deep, granular data access. Its Supernode architecture offers industry-leading uptime (99.9%+) and raw performance, processing over 100 billion requests monthly. This results in a trade-off: you gain unparalleled reliability and the ability to build complex, custom data pipelines via its Enhanced APIs, but you must assemble additional services for features like authentication or notifications.
The key trade-off: If your priority is rapid prototyping and a batteries-included experience for a multi-chain application, choose Moralis. If you prioritize infrastructure resilience, maximal data control, and building at scale on primary chains like Ethereum or Polygon, choose Alchemy.
tldr-summary
Moralis vs Alchemy: All-in-One Web3 Backend
TL;DR: Core Differentiators
Key strengths and trade-offs at a glance. Choose based on your team's primary need: developer velocity or infrastructure depth.
01
Moralis: Superior Developer Velocity
All-in-one SDK and pre-built APIs: Unified SDK for authentication, NFTs, and token balances. This matters for mobile-first apps and hackathon projects where speed to MVP is critical.
02
Moralis: Integrated Cross-Chain Support
Native multi-chain abstraction: Single API calls work across Ethereum, Polygon, BNB Chain, and others. This matters for consumer dApps that need to onboard users from any chain without managing separate RPC configurations.
03
Alchemy: Unmatched Node Infrastructure
Industry-leading reliability and data depth: 99.9% uptime SLA, enhanced APIs (Transfers, Token, NFT), and WebSockets. This matters for high-volume DeFi protocols and NFT marketplaces where transaction finality and real-time data are non-negotiable.
04
Alchemy: Enterprise-Grade Tooling & Debugging
Advanced developer tools: Composer, Debug, Mempool Visualizer, and superior documentation. This matters for protocol teams and enterprise builds that require deep introspection, transaction simulation, and complex data queries.
HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON
Moralis vs Alchemy: Feature Comparison
Direct comparison of key metrics and features for Web3 backend platforms.
| Metric / Feature | Moralis | Alchemy |
|---|---|---|
Primary Focus | All-in-One SDK for dApp Development | Core Blockchain Infrastructure & APIs |
Free Tier API Calls/Month | 1.25M | 300M (Compute Units) |
Supported Chains | EVM, Solana, Aptos | EVM, Solana, Flow, Starknet, Cosmos |
Native NFT API | ||
Native Token Balances API | ||
Web3 Authentication (Auth) | ||
Enhanced APIs (e.g., Transfers) | ||
Enterprise SLA Guarantee |
pros-cons-a
PROS AND CONS
Moralis vs Alchemy: All-in-One Web3 Backend
A data-driven comparison of two leading Web3 backend platforms. Use this to decide which infrastructure better fits your protocol's technical and business requirements.
01
Moralis Pro: Rapid Full-Stack Development
Specific advantage: Integrated SDKs for authentication, real-time sync, and cross-chain indexing. This matters for teams building consumer dApps (e.g., NFT marketplaces, social apps) who need to ship a complete product without managing separate services like The Graph or Firebase. The unified API surface reduces initial devops complexity.
1-API
Cross-Chain Access
02
Moralis Con: Limited Node Control & Customization
Specific trade-off: Abstraction layer limits direct RPC configuration, advanced tracing (e.g., debug_traceTransaction), and access to specialized node clients (e.g., Erigon, Nethermind). This matters for protocols requiring deep chain inspection, such as DeFi lending platforms needing precise gas estimations or MEV research firms analyzing transaction bundles.
Standard
RPC Tier
03
Alchemy Pro: Enterprise-Grade Node Infrastructure
Specific advantage: Industry-leading node reliability (99.9%+ SLA), advanced APIs (Transfers, NFTs), and enhanced WebSockets. This matters for high-value, high-traffic applications like major exchanges (Coinbase), DeFi protocols (Aave, 0x), or NFT projects (OpenSea) where uptime, data accuracy, and sub-second latency are non-negotiable.
99.9%
Uptime SLA
04
Alchemy Con: Higher Cost & Integration Overhead
Specific trade-off: Pay-as-you-go pricing and separate products for core RPC, indexing (Supernode), and monitoring (Notify) can lead to complex billing and integration work. This matters for bootstrapped startups or MVPs where predictable costs and a single vendor for auth + database + nodes (like Moralis offers) can accelerate time-to-market and simplify budgeting.
Usage-Based
Pricing Model
pros-cons-b
Moralis vs Alchemy
Alchemy: Pros and Cons
Key strengths and trade-offs for choosing an all-in-one Web3 backend provider.
01
Alchemy's Key Strength: Enterprise-Grade Reliability
99.9%+ historical uptime SLA and multi-cloud redundancy across AWS, Google Cloud, and bare metal. This matters for high-value DeFi protocols (like Aave, OpenSea) and NFT marketplaces where downtime equals lost revenue.
99.9%+
Uptime SLA
03
Moralis' Key Strength: Rapid Prototyping & Cross-Chain Simplicity
Unified API across 10+ chains (EVM, Solana, Aptos) with identical endpoints. All-in-one SDK bundling auth, notifications, and cloud functions. This matters for startups and hackathon projects needing to launch a multi-chain MVP in days, not weeks.
10+
Chains Supported
05
Alchemy's Trade-Off: Complexity & Cost
Steeper learning curve due to granular, powerful APIs versus a monolithic SDK. Pay-as-you-go pricing can scale quickly with high RPC volume (>100M reqs/month), making it costlier for high-traffic applications versus flat-rate competitors.
06
Moralis' Trade-Off: Performance & Customization Limits
Abstracted infrastructure can limit low-level optimizations for ultra-high TPS needs. Generalized APIs may lack the depth for niche use cases (e.g., specific MEV protection, custom indexers) that Alchemy's raw nodes and specialized endpoints provide.
CHOOSE YOUR PRIORITY
Decision Framework: When to Choose Which
Moralis for Speed & Scale
Verdict: Strong for rapid prototyping and cross-chain data aggregation. Strengths: Unified API across 10+ chains (Ethereum, Solana, BNB Chain) reduces integration time. Real-time WebSocket streams for wallets, NFTs, and token balances are highly performant for dashboards and live feeds. The Moralis Streams API is a key differentiator for event-driven applications. Trade-offs: Less granular control over node configuration compared to Alchemy's dedicated tier.
Alchemy for Speed & Scale
Verdict: Superior for high-throughput, production-grade applications requiring deterministic performance.
Strengths: Industry-leading Alchemy Supernode infrastructure offers 99.9%+ reliability and enhanced APIs (e.g., alchemy_getTransactionReceipts). Best-in-class Webhook system for transaction lifecycle events. Supports advanced features like debug_traceCall for complex DeFi simulations.
Trade-offs: Chain support is deep but narrower, focused on EVM chains (Ethereum, Polygon, Arbitrum, Optimism).
verdict
THE ANALYSIS
Final Verdict and Strategic Recommendation
Choosing between Moralis and Alchemy is a strategic decision between developer velocity and raw infrastructure power.
Moralis excels at developer onboarding and rapid prototyping by providing a unified, opinionated SDK that abstracts away complex blockchain interactions. Its all-in-one approach bundles a node service, authentication, real-time indexing, and native cross-chain support into a single, cohesive platform. For example, its Moralis.Streams API allows developers to set up on-chain event listeners in minutes, significantly accelerating feature development for dApps like NFT marketplaces or DeFi dashboards.
Alchemy takes a different approach by focusing on core infrastructure reliability and deep, specialized tooling. This results in a trade-off: you gain superior node performance, advanced debugging with tools like alchemy_transfer and trace APIs, and direct access to a broader suite of specialized products (Supernode, Enhanced APIs, Notify), but at the cost of a steeper learning curve and the need to integrate multiple services. Alchemy's infrastructure powers over $105 billion in on-chain transactions, a testament to its enterprise-grade reliability.
The key trade-off: If your priority is developer velocity, a unified API surface, and getting a full-featured MVP to market quickly, choose Moralis. Its bundled services and streamlined SDK are ideal for startups and teams building consumer-facing dApps. If you prioritize infrastructure sovereignty, maximum performance, deep chain observability, and are building a complex protocol requiring specialized, best-in-class components, choose Alchemy. Its modular, high-performance architecture is the standard for established projects like OpenSea, 0x, and Aave.
ENQUIRY
Get In Touch
today.
Our experts will offer a free quote and a 30min call to discuss your project.
NDA Protected
Confidentiality24h Response
Time to ValueDirectly to Engineering Team
No Sales Fluff10+
Protocols Shipped
$20M+
TVL Overall